Battlecard Generator
销售对战卡片生成器
Research a competitor from every public angle — website, reviews, ads, social, pricing — and produce a structured sales battlecard. The output is what a rep opens 5 minutes before a competitive deal.
Built for: PMMs building competitive programs without a dedicated competitive intel team. The battlecard should be opinionated, not a neutral feature comparison.
从所有公开维度调研竞品——官网、用户评价、广告、社交媒体、定价,并生成结构化的销售对战卡片。输出内容是销售代表在竞争型客户沟通前5分钟需要查看的资料。
适用人群: 没有专属竞争情报团队的产品营销经理(PMM),用于搭建竞争项目。这份对战卡片需带有明确立场,而非中立的功能对比。
- "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
- "We keep losing deals to [competitor] — help me understand why"
- "What are [competitor]'s weaknesses we can exploit?"
- "Prep the sales team for competitive deals against [competitor]"
- "Research [competitor] and give me competitive positioning"
- "生成一份针对[竞品名称]的对战卡片"
- "我们一直输给[竞品名称]——帮我分析原因"
- "[竞品名称]有哪些我们可以利用的弱点?"
- "帮销售团队准备与[竞品名称]的竞争型客户沟通"
- "调研[竞品名称]并给出竞争定位建议"
- Your product name + URL
- Competitor name + URL — One competitor per battlecard (focused > broad)
- Deal context — Where do you compete? (same ICP, upmarket/downmarket, different use case?)
- Known win/loss signals — Any patterns from deals you've won or lost against them?
- Sales team size — Are reps technical or business-focused? (affects language level)
- Existing positioning — Your one-line positioning vs this competitor (if any)
- 你的产品名称+官网链接
- 竞品名称+官网链接——每份对战卡片仅针对一个竞品(聚焦胜于宽泛)
- 客户场景——你们在哪些场景下竞争?(相同目标客户、高端/低端市场、不同使用场景?)
- 已知胜负信号——与该竞品的对战中,已有的胜负模式有哪些?
- 销售团队规模——销售代表偏技术型还是业务型?(影响话术的专业程度)
- 现有定位——针对该竞品,你们的一句话定位(如有)
Phase 1: Competitor Research
阶段1:竞品调研
1A: Website & Messaging Analysis
1A:官网与话术分析
Fetch: [competitor] homepage, pricing page, about page, product page
Search: "[competitor]" "we help" OR "the only" OR "unlike"
Search: "[competitor]" case study OR customer story
Extract:
- Hero claim — their primary positioning
- Category — what category do they place themselves in?
- Target audience — who do they say they serve?
- Key features emphasized — what do they lead with?
- Social proof — customer logos, metrics, quotes
- Pricing structure — plans, pricing model, enterprise vs self-serve
获取:[竞品]首页、定价页、关于我们页、产品页
搜索:"[竞品]" "我们助力" OR "唯一" OR "不同于"
搜索:"[竞品]" 案例研究 OR 客户故事
提取内容:
- 核心主张——他们的主要定位
- 品类归属——他们将自己归为哪个品类?
- 目标受众——他们宣称服务的群体是谁?
- 重点强调功能——他们主推哪些功能?
- 社交证明——客户logo、数据指标、客户评价
- 定价结构——套餐类型、定价模式、企业版vs自助版
1B: Review Intelligence
1B:评价情报分析
Search: "[competitor]" site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com
Search: "[competitor]" reviews "switched from" OR "moved to"
From reviews, extract:
- Top 5 praised features (their moat — don't compete here directly)
- Top 5 complaints (your attack angles)
- Switching signals — why do customers leave?
- ICP patterns — what roles/company sizes review them?
搜索:"[竞品]" site:g2.com OR site:capterra.com
搜索:"[竞品]" 评价 "从...切换" OR "转用"
从评价中提取:
- Top5好评功能(他们的护城河——不要在此直接竞争)
- Top5投诉点(我们的攻击方向)
- 切换信号——客户为何离开他们?
- 目标客户模式——哪些岗位/公司规模的用户会评价他们?
1C: Ad & Content Analysis
1C:广告与内容分析
Search: "[competitor]" advertisement OR sponsored
Search: "[competitor]" vs OR alternative OR compare
Extract:
- Ad messaging — what claims do they pay to promote?
- Comparison pages — have they published "us vs X" pages?
- Content themes — what topics do they create content around?
搜索:"[竞品]" 广告 OR 推广
搜索:"[竞品]" vs OR 替代 OR 对比
提取内容:
- 广告话术——他们付费推广的主张是什么?
- 对比页面——他们是否发布过“我们与X对比”的页面?
- 内容主题——他们围绕哪些主题创作内容?
1D: Social & Community Signals
1D:社交与社区信号分析
Search: "[competitor]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com complaints OR issues
Search: "[competitor]" "looking for alternative" OR "anyone use"
Extract:
- Common frustrations discussed publicly
- Feature requests their users are vocal about
- Sentiment patterns — do users love or tolerate them?
搜索:"[竞品]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com 投诉 OR 问题
搜索:"[竞品]" "寻找替代" OR "有人在用吗"
提取内容:
- 公开讨论的常见痛点
- 用户明确提出的功能需求
- 情绪倾向——用户是喜爱还是勉强接受他们?
1E: Pricing Deep Dive
1E:定价深度分析
Fetch: [competitor] pricing page
Search: "[competitor]" pricing OR cost OR "how much"
Map their pricing:
- Model: Per seat / usage-based / flat rate / hybrid
- Tiers: What's in each tier?
- Free tier: What's included? What's gated?
- Enterprise: Custom pricing? What triggers enterprise sales?
- Hidden costs: Implementation, overages, add-ons?
获取:[竞品]定价页
搜索:"[竞品]" 定价 OR 费用 OR "多少钱"
梳理他们的定价:
- 模式:按席位/按使用量/固定费率/混合模式
- 套餐层级:每个套餐包含什么?
- 免费版:包含哪些内容?哪些功能需要付费解锁?
- 企业版:是否定制定价?触发企业版销售的条件是什么?
- 隐性成本:实施费用、超额费用、附加组件费用?
Phase 2: Competitive Analysis
阶段2:竞争分析
Strengths & Weaknesses Matrix
优劣势对比矩阵
| Dimension | Them | Us | Net |
|---|
| [Feature area 1] | [Rating + context] | [Rating + context] | Win/Lose/Tie |
| [Feature area 2] | ... | ... | ... |
| Pricing | ... | ... | ... |
| Ease of use | ... | ... | ... |
| Support | ... | ... | ... |
| Integrations | ... | ... | ... |
| 维度 | 竞品 | 我方 | 结果 |
|---|
| [功能领域1] | [评分+背景] | [评分+背景] | 胜/负/平 |
| [功能领域2] | ... | ... | ... |
| 定价 | ... | ... | ... |
| 易用性 | ... | ... | ... |
| 支持服务 | ... | ... | ... |
| 集成能力 | ... | ... | ... |
Where We Win (lead with these)
我方优势(优先突出)
- [Strength] — [Evidence from research]
- [Strength] — [Evidence]
- [Strength] — [Evidence]
- [优势点]——[调研得出的证据]
- [优势点]——[证据]
- [优势点]——[证据]
Where We Lose (don't engage here)
我方劣势(避免在此交锋)
- [Weakness] — [Mitigation strategy]
- [Weakness] — [How to reframe]
- [劣势点]——[缓解策略]
- [劣势点]——[如何重新定位]
Where It's Close (differentiate on narrative)
势均力敌领域(通过叙事差异化)
- [Area] — [How to position the tie as a win]
Phase 3: Output — Battlecard
阶段3:输出——销售对战卡片
Battlecard: [Your Product] vs [Competitor]
对战卡片:[我方产品] vs [竞品名称]
Last updated: [DATE] | Confidence: [High/Medium — based on data freshness]
最后更新:[日期] | 可信度:[高/中——基于数据新鲜度]
Quick Reference (The 30-Second Version)
快速参考(30秒版)
They say: "[Their positioning headline]"
We say: "[Our counter-positioning]"
We win when: [Deal profile where we have advantage]
We lose when: [Deal profile where they have advantage]
Best opening move: "[Question or statement to frame the deal]"
他们的定位: "[他们的定位标语]"
我们的回应: "[我方反定位]"
我方胜势场景: [我方具备优势的客户场景]
我方劣势场景: [竞品具备优势的客户场景]
最佳开场策略: "[用于框定沟通方向的问题或陈述]"
| [Competitor] |
|---|
| Founded | [Year] |
| Funding | [Amount / stage] |
| Headcount | [Estimate] |
| Target market | [Who they serve] |
| Pricing | [Model + range] |
| Category | [How they position] |
| [竞品名称] |
|---|
| 成立时间 | [年份] |
| 融资情况 | [金额/轮次] |
| 员工规模 | [估算值] |
| 目标市场 | [服务群体] |
| 定价 | [模式+范围] |
| 品类定位 | [自我定位] |
Questions to ask early in the deal that frame the evaluation in your favor:
-
"[Question that highlights your strength]"
→ If they say [X], you win because [reason]
→ If they say [Y], pivot to [angle]
-
"[Question that exposes competitor weakness]"
→ Their answer will likely be [X], which reveals [limitation]
-
"[Question about a capability they lack]"
→ They can't do this. When the prospect asks them, it plants doubt.
在沟通初期提出以下问题,将客户的评估方向引导至对我方有利的角度:
-
"[突出我方优势的问题]"
→ 如果客户回答[X],我方胜出,原因:[理由]
→ 如果客户回答[Y],转向[角度]
-
"[暴露竞品弱点的问题]"
→ 他们的回答很可能是[X],这会暴露[局限性]
-
"[关于竞品缺失能力的问题]"
→ 他们无法做到这一点。当客户向他们提出这个问题时,会埋下疑虑的种子。
Drop these casually — they'll come up when the prospect evaluates the competitor:
- "Have you asked [competitor] about [specific limitation]?"
- "When you evaluate [competitor], make sure to test [area where they're weak]."
- "One thing worth checking: [competitor] pricing can get expensive once you [usage trigger]."
不经意间提出这些问题——它们会在客户评估竞品时浮现:
- "你有没有问过[竞品名称]关于[特定局限性]的问题?"
- "评估[竞品名称]时,一定要测试[他们的薄弱领域]。"
- "有一点值得注意:当你[达到某使用阈值]时,[竞品名称]的定价会变得昂贵。"
##异议处理话术
Objection Handling
"我们为什么不直接选择[竞品名称]?"
"Why shouldn't we just go with [Competitor]?"
"[Direct response — acknowledge their strength, pivot to your differentiation]"
"[直接回应——认可他们的优势,转向我方差异化点]"
"[Competitor] has more features / is more established"
"[竞品名称]功能更多/更成熟"
"[Response — focus on what matters for this buyer's use case, not feature count]"
"[回应——聚焦于该客户使用场景的核心需求,而非功能数量]"
"[Competitor] is cheaper"
"[竞品名称]更便宜"
"[Response — reframe on total cost, hidden costs, or value per dollar]"
"[回应——从总拥有成本、隐性成本或单位价值角度重新定位]"
"[Competitor] has [big customer logo]"
"[竞品名称]有[知名客户logo]"
"[Response — your relevant social proof + why logo != fit]"
"[回应——我方相关的社交证明+解释为什么logo不等于适配性]"
"We're already using [Competitor]"
"我们已经在使用[竞品名称]"
"[Response — switching cost vs cost of staying, what's changed]"
"[回应——对比切换成本与维持现状的成本,以及变化点]"
Feature Comparison (Honest Assessment)
功能对比(客观评估)
| Capability | Us | [Competitor] | Verdict |
|---|
| [Feature 1] | [Status + context] | [Status + context] | [Who wins + why] |
| [Feature 2] | ... | ... | ... |
| [Feature 3] | ... | ... | ... |
| Pricing transparency | ... | ... | ... |
| Onboarding speed | ... | ... | ... |
| Support quality | ... | ... | ... |
| 能力 | 我方 | [竞品名称] | 结论 |
|---|
| [功能1] | [状态+背景] | [状态+背景] | [谁胜出+原因] |
| [功能2] | ... | ... | ... |
| [功能3] | ... | ... | ... |
| 定价透明度 | ... | ... | ... |
| 上线速度 | ... | ... | ... |
| 支持质量 | ... | ... | ... |
Their Customers Say (From Reviews)
客户评价(来自用户反馈)
What they love (don't fight these):
客户喜爱的点(不要在此竞争):
- "[Quote from review]" — [Platform, Role]
- "[Quote]" — ...
- "[评价引用]" — [平台,岗位]
- "[评价引用]" — ...
What they hate (exploit these):
客户不满的点(可利用):
- "[Quote from negative review]" — [Platform, Role]
- "[Quote]" — ...
- "[Quote]" — ...
- "[负面评价引用]" — [平台,岗位]
- "[评价引用]" — ...
- "[评价引用]" — ...
| Us | [Competitor] |
|---|
| Entry price | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
| Mid-tier | [$/mo] | [$/mo] |
| Enterprise | [Custom / $X] | [Custom / $X] |
| Free tier | [What's included] | [What's included] |
| Hidden costs | [None / list] | [Implementation, overages, etc.] |
Pricing attack angle: [How to frame pricing comparison favorably]
| 我方 | [竞品名称] |
|---|
| 入门价格 | [$/月] | [$/月] |
| 中端套餐 | [$/月] | [$/月] |
| 企业版 | [定制/$X] | [定制/$X] |
| 免费版 | [包含内容] | [包含内容] |
| 隐性成本 | [无/列表] | [实施费用、超额费用等] |
定价攻击角度: [如何从有利角度呈现定价对比]
Win Themes (What Wins Deals)
胜势主题(促成交易的因素)
Based on competitive patterns:
- [Theme] — "[Proof point or quote]"
- [Theme] — ...
- [Theme] — ...
基于竞争模式:
- [主题] — "[证据或引用]"
- [主题] — ...
- [主题] — ...
Loss Themes (What Loses Deals)
败势主题(导致交易流失的因素)
Be aware — we tend to lose when:
- [Pattern] — Mitigation: [strategy]
- [Pattern] — Mitigation: [strategy]
需要注意——我们通常在以下场景失利:
- [模式] — 缓解策略:[策略]
- [模式] — 缓解策略:[策略]
Quick Responses for Email/Chat
邮件/聊天快速回复话术
When prospect mentions [competitor]:
"[2-sentence response for email or Slack]"
When asked for a comparison:
"[3-sentence elevator pitch vs competitor]"
Save to `clients/<client-name>/product-marketing/battlecards/vs-[competitor-slug]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`.
当客户提及[竞品名称]时:
"[适用于邮件或Slack的2句话回复]"
当被要求对比时:
"[3句话的电梯演讲式对比]"
保存至 `clients/<客户名称>/product-marketing/battlecards/vs-[竞品缩写]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`。
| Component | Cost |
|---|
| Web research | Free |
| Review mining (optional, via review-scraper) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
| Ad analysis (optional, via ad scrapers) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
| All analysis and battlecard generation | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Total | Free — $2 |
| 组件 | 成本 |
|---|
| 网页调研 | 免费 |
| 评价挖掘(可选,通过review-scraper) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
| 广告分析(可选,通过广告爬虫) | ~$0.50-1.00 |
| 所有分析与对战卡片生成 | 免费(基于LLM推理) |
| 总计 | 免费 — $2 |
- web_search — for competitor research
- fetch_webpage — for site analysis
- Optional: for G2/Capterra mining
- Optional: , for ad intelligence
- web_search — 用于竞品调研
- fetch_webpage — 用于官网分析
- 可选: 用于G2/Capterra评价挖掘
- 可选: 、 用于广告情报收集
- "Build a battlecard against [competitor]"
- "Competitive intel on [competitor]"
- "Run the battlecard generator for [competitor]"
- "Help me win deals against [competitor]"
- "生成一份针对[竞品名称]的对战卡片"
- "[竞品名称]的竞争情报"
- "为[竞品名称]运行对战卡片生成器"
- "帮我赢得与[竞品名称]的客户交易"