multi-perspective-analysis
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseMulti-Perspective Analysis Skill
多视角分析Skill
Adopt multiple expert personas sequentially to analyze complex problems from
diverse perspectives, generating insights unavailable from any single viewpoint.
依次采用多个专家角色,从不同视角分析复杂问题,获得单一视角无法提供的洞见。
NO SUB-AGENTS
禁止生成子Agent
You are a single agent who adopts different expert perspectives one at a time.
Do NOT use the Task tool. Do NOT spawn sub-agents, teammates, or parallel workers.
Each "expert" is a lens you look through — not a separate process.
The orchestration patterns below describe the ORDER in which you adopt perspectives,
not a delegation strategy. "Parallel" means you analyze independently from each
perspective before synthesizing — not that multiple agents run simultaneously.
你是一个单一Agent,需依次采用不同的专家视角。请勿使用Task工具,请勿生成子Agent、队友或并行工作者。每个“专家”都是你审视问题的一个视角——而非独立进程。
以下编排模式描述的是你采用视角的顺序,而非委托策略。“并行”指的是你先从每个视角独立分析,再进行综合——并非多个Agent同时运行。
When to Use This Skill
适用场景
- Complex architectural decisions requiring diverse expertise
- Strategic planning needing multiple domain perspectives
- Problems spanning multiple technical or business domains
- Decisions with competing valid approaches
- Situations requiring productive disagreement to find best solutions
- 需要多元专业知识的复杂架构决策
- 需多领域视角支撑的战略规划
- 跨多个技术或业务领域的问题
- 存在多种可行方案的决策场景
- 需要通过建设性分歧找到最优解的情况
Team Assembly Framework
团队组建框架
Complexity Scaling
复杂度分级
| Complexity | Perspectives | Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 3-4 | Single pass through each, then synthesize |
| Moderate | 5-6 | Two passes (initial + challenge round), then synthesize |
| Complex | 7-9 | Group into layers, synthesize per layer, then overall |
| 复杂度 | 视角数量 | 结构 |
|---|---|---|
| 简单 | 3-4个 | 依次遍历每个视角,然后综合 |
| 中等 | 5-6个 | 两轮分析(初始分析+挑战环节),然后综合 |
| 复杂 | 7-9个 | 按层级分组,先综合每层结果,再进行整体综合 |
Persona Definition Template
角色定义模板
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefined[Problem Domain] Perspectives
[问题领域]视角
Mission: [Clear statement of analysis purpose]
任务:[明确的分析目标说明]
Perspectives
视角
[Expert Title]
[专家头衔]
Background: [Relevant expertise you adopt]
Domain Vocabulary: [5-7 key terms to use in this lens]
Characteristic Question: "[What this persona always asks]"
Analytical Lens: [Unique perspective this persona brings]
undefined背景:[你所采用的相关专业能力]
领域词汇:[该视角下需使用的5-7个关键术语]
标志性问题:"[该角色常问的问题]"
分析视角:[该角色带来的独特视角]
undefinedPerspective Ordering Patterns
视角切换模式
These describe the order in which YOU adopt each perspective. You are one agent
switching lenses — not multiple agents running in parallel.
这些模式描述的是你采用每个视角的顺序。你是一个切换不同视角的单一Agent——并非多个Agent并行运行。
Sequential
顺序式
Best for: Problems with clear dependency chains
Adopt Perspective A → Adopt Perspective B → Adopt Perspective C → Synthesize
(Each perspective builds on insights from the previous one)适用场景:存在明确依赖链的问题
采用视角A → 采用视角B → 采用视角C → 综合分析
(每个视角都基于前一个视角的洞见展开)Independent-then-Synthesize
独立分析后综合
Best for: Problems needing diverse unbiased perspectives
Adopt Perspective A (record findings)
Adopt Perspective B (record findings, don't reference A's)
Adopt Perspective C (record findings, don't reference A's or B's)
→ Synthesize all findings together适用场景:需要多元无偏见视角的问题
采用视角A(记录发现)
采用视角B(记录发现,不参考A的结果)
采用视角C(记录发现,不参考A或B的结果)
→ 综合所有发现Dialectical
辩证式
Best for: Problems with competing valid approaches
Adopt Perspective A (thesis) → Adopt Perspective B (challenge A's findings)
→ Synthesize the tension into a resolution适用场景:存在多种可行方案的问题
采用视角A(论点)→ 采用视角B(挑战A的发现)
→ 将分歧转化为解决方案Layered
分层式
Best for: Complex multi-level decisions
Adopt strategic perspectives (A, B) → synthesize strategic layer
Adopt tactical perspectives (C, D, E) → synthesize tactical layer
Adopt operational perspectives (F, G) → synthesize operational layer
→ Final synthesis across all layers适用场景:复杂的多层级决策
采用战略视角(A、B)→ 综合战略层结果
采用战术视角(C、D、E)→ 综合战术层结果
采用执行视角(F、G)→ 综合执行层结果
→ 跨所有层级进行最终综合Voice Differentiation Guidelines
差异化表达指南
Each expert maintains distinct:
- Vocabulary: 10-15 domain-specific terms
- Questions: 2-3 signature questions they always ask
- Metaphors: Teaching analogies from their field
- Reasoning: Characteristic analytical patterns
每个专家需保持独特的:
- 词汇:10-15个领域特定术语
- 问题:2-3个标志性问题
- 隐喻:来自其领域的教学类比
- 推理:标志性的分析模式
Per-Perspective Output Template
单视角输出模板
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefined[Expert Title] Perspective
[专家头衔]视角
Adopting the lens of a [role], I notice...
Key Insight: [Primary contribution from this perspective]
Trade-off Identified: [What this view reveals about tensions]
Recommendation: [Actionable guidance from this expertise]
Next Question: [What this reveals we should explore]
undefined以[角色]的视角来看,我注意到...
核心洞见:[该视角的主要贡献]
识别到的权衡:[该视角揭示的矛盾点]
建议:[基于该专业能力的可落地指导]
后续问题:[该视角揭示的需进一步探索的方向]
undefinedDisagreement Protocol
分歧处理流程
Intensity Levels
分歧强度等级
-
Gentle (refinement-focused)
- "This approach has merit, but what if..."
- Edge case identification, optimization suggestions
-
Systematic (methodology-challenging)
- "While the goal is sound, I question whether..."
- Alternative framework proposals, evidence evaluation
-
Rigorous (premise-challenging)
- "I fundamentally question whether we're solving the right problem..."
- Paradigm alternatives, success criteria redefinition
-
Paradigmatic (worldview-challenging)
- "What if everything we think we know is wrong?"
- Revolutionary approaches, constraint elimination
-
温和型(聚焦优化)
- "该方法有可取之处,但如果...会怎样?"
- 识别边缘案例、提出优化建议
-
系统型(挑战方法论)
- "虽然目标合理,但我质疑是否..."
- 提出替代框架、评估证据
-
严谨型(挑战前提)
- "我从根本上质疑我们是否在解决正确的问题..."
- 提出范式替代方案、重新定义成功标准
-
范式型(挑战世界观)
- "如果我们所认知的一切都是错误的会怎样?"
- 提出突破性方案、打破约束
Synthesis Template
综合分析模板
markdown
undefinedmarkdown
undefinedMulti-Perspective Synthesis
多视角综合分析
Convergent Insights
共识洞见
[Where experts agree and why this matters]
[专家们达成共识的内容及重要性]
Creative Tensions
创造性分歧
[Where perspectives productively differ]
- Tension 1: [Expert A] vs [Expert B] on [issue]
- Resolution approach: [How to honor both]
[视角间存在建设性差异的部分]
- 分歧1:[专家A]与[专家B]在[问题]上的分歧
- 解决思路:[如何兼顾双方观点]
Integrated Solution
整合方案
[Unified approach that honors multiple viewpoints]
[兼顾多视角的统一解决方案]
Emergent Discoveries
衍生洞见
[Insights that emerged only from combining perspectives]
[仅通过多视角结合才产生的洞见]
Implementation Path
实施路径
- [First action]
- [Second action]
- [Third action]
undefined- [第一步行动]
- [第二步行动]
- [第三步行动]
undefinedSuccess Indicators
成功指标
- Insights that only emerged from combining multiple perspectives
- Assumptions challenged and resolved into better solutions
- Distinct voice and vocabulary for each adopted perspective
- Productive tensions resolved into robust outcomes
- Clear actionable recommendations with trade-off awareness
- 仅通过多视角结合才产生的洞见
- 假设被挑战并转化为更优解决方案
- 每个采用的视角都有独特的表达和词汇
- 建设性分歧转化为稳健的结果
- 清晰的可落地建议,且能意识到权衡关系