ai-slop-detector
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseAI Slop Detector
AI Slop Detector
What This Does
功能介绍
Takes any text and rewrites it to remove common AI writing patterns, making it sound authentically human. Returns only the cleaned final version.
接收任意文本并重新改写,移除常见的AI写作模式,让文本听起来更像真实人类创作。仅返回清理后的最终版本。
When to Use
适用场景
- After generating any AI-assisted content
- Before publishing newsletters, articles, or social posts
- When text feels "too polished" or generic
- As a final quality gate in any writing workflow
- 生成AI辅助内容之后
- 发布通讯稿、文章或社交帖子之前
- 文本感觉“过于规整”或千篇一律时
- 作为写作工作流中的最终质量把关环节
Instructions
使用说明
Execute these steps NOW on the text provided:
- Scan the text for patterns listed below
- Rewrite each flagged section using the suggested fixes
- Output the cleaned text immediately - no preamble, no explanation
The input text is everything that preceded this skill's invocation. Process it now.
立即对提供的文本执行以下步骤:
- 扫描文本,查找下方列出的各类模式
- 改写所有标记的部分,采用建议的修正方式
- 输出清理后的文本——无需开场白,无需解释说明
待处理的文本是在调用本技能之前的所有内容,请立即处理。
When Called by Another Skill
被其他技能调用时
This skill is often invoked at the end of other skills (magic-model-review, bb-coaching-response, newsletter-coach, etc.).
When invoked mid-workflow:
- The text to clean is the draft just generated
- Process it immediately
- Return the cleaned version for the calling skill to present
本技能常被其他技能(magic-model-review、bb-coaching-response、newsletter-coach等)在流程末尾调用。
当在工作流中途被调用时:
- 待清理的文本是刚生成的草稿
- 立即处理该文本
- 返回清理后的版本,供调用的技能展示
LANGUAGE AND TONE PATTERNS TO ELIMINATE
需要消除的语言与语气模式
Promotional/Puffery Phrases
宣传/浮夸用语
Remove these entirely or replace with specific facts:
- "stands as / serves as / is a testament"
- "plays a vital/significant role"
- "continues to captivate"
- "leaves a lasting impact"
- "rich cultural heritage/tapestry"
- "nestled in the heart of"
- "breathtaking," "must-visit," "stunning natural beauty"
- "enduring/lasting legacy"
Fix: Use specific, factual descriptions
- BAD: "The museum stands as a testament to the city's rich cultural heritage"
- GOOD: "The museum houses 3,000 artifacts spanning four centuries of local history"
完全移除或替换为具体事实:
- "stands as / serves as / is a testament"
- "plays a vital/significant role"
- "continues to captivate"
- "leaves a lasting impact"
- "rich cultural heritage/tapestry"
- "nestled in the heart of"
- "breathtaking," "must-visit," "stunning natural beauty"
- "enduring/lasting legacy"
修正方式: 使用具体、真实的描述
- 反面示例:"The museum stands as a testament to the city's rich cultural heritage"
- 正面示例:"该博物馆收藏了3000件文物,涵盖当地四个世纪的历史"
Editorializing Phrases
评论性用语
Remove these - present facts directly:
- "it's important to note/remember/consider"
- "it is worth noting"
- "no discussion would be complete without"
- "this article wouldn't exist without"
Fix: Just state the thing
- BAD: "It's important to note that the company expanded rapidly"
- GOOD: "The company opened 15 new locations between 2020-2023"
移除这类用语——直接陈述事实:
- "it's important to note/remember/consider"
- "it is worth noting"
- "no discussion would be complete without"
- "this article wouldn't exist without"
修正方式: 直接陈述内容
- 反面示例:"It's important to note that the company expanded rapidly"
- 正面示例:"该公司在2020-2023年间开设了15家新门店"
Overused Conjunctions
过渡词滥用
Replace excessive use of:
- "moreover," "furthermore," "in addition," "on the other hand"
Fix: Use varied, natural transitions or combine sentences
- BAD: "Moreover, the company expanded. Furthermore, it hired new staff."
- GOOD: "The company expanded while hiring additional staff and opening three regional offices."
替换过度使用的过渡词:
- "moreover," "furthermore," "in addition," "on the other hand"
修正方式: 使用多样化的自然过渡,或合并句子
- 反面示例:"Moreover, the company expanded. Furthermore, it hired new staff."
- 正面示例:"该公司在扩张的同时,还招聘了新员工,并开设了三家区域办事处"
Section Summaries
段落总结
End paragraphs with forward-looking statements or the most important point.
Pattern to replace: "In summary," "In conclusion," "Overall" followed by restatement
- REPLACE: "In summary, the research shows climate change affects migration patterns"
- WITH: "These migration shifts may accelerate as temperatures continue rising"
段落结尾使用前瞻性表述或核心要点。
需替换的模式: 以"In summary," "In conclusion," "Overall"开头的总结性表述
- 替换前:"In summary, the research shows climate change affects migration patterns"
- 替换后:"随着气温持续上升,这些移民趋势可能会加速"
STYLE AND FORMATTING PATTERNS
格式与排版模式
Title Case in Headings
标题大小写问题
Use sentence case instead:
- BAD: "Early Life and Educational Background"
- GOOD: "Early life and education"
改用句子大小写:
- 反面示例:"Early Life and Educational Background"
- 正面示例:"Early life and education"
Excessive Boldface
粗体过度使用
Use bold sparingly - only for true emphasis or introducing technical terms for the first time.
谨慎使用粗体——仅用于真正需要强调的内容,或首次引入专业术语时。
Formulaic Lists
公式化列表
Write in flowing paragraphs instead of numbered/bulleted lists:
- BAD: "The benefits include: 1. Cost savings 2. Efficiency gains 3. Better outcomes"
- GOOD: "The program reduces costs by 15%, improves processing speed, and enhances patient satisfaction scores"
使用流畅的段落替代编号/项目符号列表:
- 反面示例:"The benefits include: 1. Cost savings 2. Efficiency gains 3. Better outcomes"
- 正面示例:"该项目可降低15%的成本,提升处理速度,并提高患者满意度评分"
Em-dash Overuse
破折号滥用
Replace with varied punctuation (commas, parentheses, colons, or sentence breaks):
- BAD: "The solution is elegant — simple, effective, and affordable — exactly what we need"
- GOOD: "The solution combines simplicity with effectiveness at an affordable price point"
替换为多样化的标点符号(逗号、括号、冒号或拆分句子):
- 反面示例:"The solution is elegant — simple, effective, and affordable — exactly what we need"
- 正面示例:"该方案兼具简洁性与实用性,且价格合理,完全符合我们的需求"
ANALYTICAL WRITING PATTERNS
分析性写作模式
Superficial Analysis with -ing Phrases
表层分析的-ing短语
Replace analytical -ing phrases with specific outcomes.
Pattern to replace: Vague present participle comments (highlighting, demonstrating, showcasing)
- REPLACE: "The study found a 20% increase, highlighting the importance of early intervention"
- WITH: "The study found a 20% increase in recovery rates when treatment began within 48 hours"
将分析性的-ing短语替换为具体结果。
需替换的模式: 模糊的现在分词表述(highlighting、demonstrating、showcasing)
- 替换前:"The study found a 20% increase, highlighting the importance of early intervention"
- 替换后:"研究发现,若在48小时内开始治疗,康复率可提升20%"
Vague Attributions
模糊归因
Attribute claims to specific sources with dates or numbers.
Pattern to replace: "Industry experts," "many believe," "studies show" without citation
- REPLACE: "Industry experts believe the trend will continue"
- WITH: "Tesla's Q3 report projects 25% growth in the electric vehicle sector"
将观点归因于具体来源,并标注日期或数据。
需替换的模式: 未标注来源的"Industry experts," "many believe," "studies show"
- 替换前:"Industry experts believe the trend will continue"
- 替换后:"特斯拉第三季度报告预测,电动汽车行业将实现25%的增长"
False Ranges
虚假范围表述
Use specific lists instead of artificial "from X to Y" constructions.
Pattern to replace: "from...to..." when not describing actual ranges
- REPLACE: "The menu features dishes from pasta to grilled meats"
- WITH: "The menu includes pasta dishes, grilled meats, and seasonal vegetables"
使用具体列表替代生硬的"from X to Y"结构。
需替换的模式: 并非描述实际范围的"from...to..."结构
- 替换前:"The menu features dishes from pasta to grilled meats"
- 替换后:"菜单包含意大利面、烤肉和应季蔬菜"
DIRECT CONTRAST FORMULATIONS - ELIMINATE ON SIGHT
直接对比表述——立即消除
These patterns scream AI:
- "This isn't about X—it's about Y"
- "It's not X, it's Y"
- "The problem isn't X—it's Y"
- "Rather than X, focus on Y"
- "Instead of X, consider Y"
- Any sentence with "but rather" construction
Fix: Replace with direct positive assertions
- BAD: "Success isn't about working harder but working smarter."
- GOOD: "Success comes from working smarter and more strategically."
Exception: Contrast is acceptable ONLY if spaced out with substantial content between negative and positive (2-3+ sentences of expansion).
以下模式明显带有AI写作痕迹:
- "This isn't about X—it's about Y"
- "It's not X, it's Y"
- "The problem isn't X—it's Y"
- "Rather than X, focus on Y"
- "Instead of X, consider Y"
- 任何包含"but rather"的句子
修正方式: 替换为直接的正面陈述
- 反面示例:"Success isn't about working harder but working smarter."
- 正面示例:"成功源于更聪明、更具策略性的工作方式"
例外情况: 只有在负面与正面表述之间间隔大量内容(2-3句以上的展开)时,才允许使用对比。
THROAT-CLEARING OPENERS - ELIMINATE ON SIGHT
开场白套话——立即消除
These opening gambits announce "AI wrote this":
- "Here's the thing:"
- "Let me be clear:"
- "The uncomfortable truth is"
- "Let that sink in."
- Starting sentences with "So" or "Look,"
- "In today's fast-paced world"
- "In the realm of"
Fix: Start with the actual point
- BAD: "Here's the thing: most coaches struggle with content."
- GOOD: "Most coaches struggle with content."
以下开场白明显暴露“AI写作”痕迹:
- "Here's the thing:"
- "Let me be clear:"
- "The uncomfortable truth is"
- "Let that sink in."
- 以"So"或"Look,"开头的句子
- "In today's fast-paced world"
- "In the realm of"
修正方式: 直接切入核心内容
- 反面示例:"Here's the thing: most coaches struggle with content."
- 正面示例:"大多数教练都在内容创作上遇到困难"
EMPHASIS CRUTCHES - ELIMINATE ON SIGHT
强调依赖套话——立即消除
AI loves these dramatic punctuation patterns:
- "That's it. That's the [noun]."
- "And that's okay."
- "Not because X. Because Y." (staccato variant)
- "Ready to level up?"
- "The best part?"
- "And here's the kicker"
- "Enter: [thing]"
Fix: Let the content carry the weight
- BAD: "That's it. That's the strategy."
- GOOD: "The entire strategy fits in one sentence."
AI偏好使用这些夸张的标点模式:
- "That's it. That's the [noun]."
- "And that's okay."
- "Not because X. Because Y."(断句式表述)
- "Ready to level up?"
- "The best part?"
- "And here's the kicker"
- "Enter: [thing]"
修正方式: 让内容本身传递分量
- 反面示例:"That's it. That's the strategy."
- 正面示例:"整个策略可以用一句话概括"
DRAMATIC FRAGMENTATION - USE SPARINGLY
刻意碎片化表述——谨慎使用
AI overuses these for false drama:
- One-sentence paragraphs (when not warranted)
- Punchy one-liners at the end of every section
- "X changed everything."
- Short hook questions in isolation
Fix: Vary paragraph length naturally. Reserve one-liners for genuine impact.
- BAD: "Then I discovered AI agents.\n\nEverything changed."
- GOOD: "Then I discovered AI agents, and the whole model shifted."
AI过度使用此类表述营造虚假的戏剧效果:
- 单句段落(无合理理由时)
- 每个章节结尾的短句点睛
- "X changed everything."
- 孤立的简短设问句
修正方式: 自然变化段落长度。仅在真正需要突出重点时使用短句。
- 反面示例:"Then I discovered AI agents.\n\nEverything changed."
- 正面示例:"后来我发现了AI Agent,整个模式都随之改变"
WORD SUBSTITUTIONS
词汇替换
| AVOID | USE INSTEAD |
|---|---|
| "leverages" | "uses" |
| "encompasses" | "includes" |
| "facilitates" | "enables" or "allows" |
| "utilized" | "used" |
| "commenced" | "began" or "started" |
| "subsequent to" | "after" |
| "prior to" | "before" |
| "in order to" | "to" |
| "serves to" | "helps" or omit entirely |
| "delve" | "explore" or "examine" |
| "navigate" | "work through" or "handle" |
| "unpack" | "explain" or "break down" |
| "tapestry" | "mix" or "combination" |
| "realm" | "area" or "field" |
| "embark" | "start" or "begin" |
| "harness" | "use" or "apply" |
| "illuminate" | "show" or "reveal" |
| "pivotal" | "important" or "key" |
| "robust" | "strong" or "solid" |
| 避免使用 | 建议替换为 |
|---|---|
| "leverages" | "使用" |
| "encompasses" | "包含" |
| "facilitates" | "使能够"或"允许" |
| "utilized" | "使用" |
| "commenced" | "开始"或"启动" |
| "subsequent to" | "在……之后" |
| "prior to" | "在……之前" |
| "in order to" | "为了" |
| "serves to" | "有助于"或直接省略 |
| "delve" | "探索"或"研究" |
| "navigate" | "处理"或"应对" |
| "unpack" | "解释"或"拆解" |
| "tapestry" | "混合体"或"组合" |
| "realm" | "领域"或"范围" |
| "embark" | "启动"或"开始" |
| "harness" | "使用"或"应用" |
| "illuminate" | "展示"或"揭示" |
| "pivotal" | "重要的"或"关键的" |
| "robust" | "强大的"或"稳固的" |
STRUCTURAL PATTERNS
结构模式
Essay-like Organization
议论文式组织结构
Use inverted pyramid structure (important info first) or natural conversational flow.
Pattern to replace: Five-paragraph essay structure with thesis statements and formal conclusions
采用倒金字塔结构(重要信息前置)或自然的对话式流程。
需替换的模式: 包含论点陈述和正式结论的五段式议论文结构
Rule-of-Three Overuse
三段式滥用
Vary list lengths and replace generic adjectives with specific details.
Pattern to replace: Constant groupings of three generic qualities
- REPLACE: "The platform is fast, reliable, and secure"
- WITH: "The platform processes requests in under 200ms with 99.9% uptime and bank-level encryption"
多样化列表长度,并用具体细节替换通用形容词。
需替换的模式: 频繁使用三个通用品质的组合
- 替换前:"The platform is fast, reliable, and secure"
- 替换后:"该平台处理请求的时间不足200毫秒,正常运行时间达99.9%,并采用银行级加密"
Knowledge Disclaimers
知识免责声明
Remove AI hedging phrases entirely - state facts directly.
Patterns to remove: "as of [date]," "based on available information," "while specific details are limited"
完全移除AI的模糊表述——直接陈述事实。
需移除的模式: "as of [date]," "based on available information," "while specific details are limited"
Chatbot Hedging
聊天机器人式模糊表述
Use direct assertions backed by specific data.
Pattern to replace: Excessive qualifiers (appears to, tends to, seems to, might)
- REPLACE: "The data appears to suggest that users tend to prefer the new interface"
- WITH: "Users prefer the new interface by a 3:1 margin in testing"
使用具体数据支撑的直接陈述。
需替换的模式: 过度使用的限定词(appears to、tends to、seems to、might)
- 替换前:"The data appears to suggest that users tend to prefer the new interface"
- 替换后:"在测试中,用户对新界面的偏好比例为3:1"
VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
验证清单
Before returning cleaned text, verify:
- No section ends with a summary statement
- No "challenges and future prospects" formulaic sections
- No excessive em-dashes or repeated punctuation patterns
- No title case in headings
- No promotional language about "rich heritage" or "cultural significance"
- No vague attributions without specific sources
- Varied sentence structures and lengths
- Specific facts and figures rather than general statements
- Natural flow between paragraphs without formulaic transitions
- No direct contrast formulations ("This isn't X—it's Y")
- No throat-clearing openers ("Here's the thing", "Let me be clear")
- No emphasis crutches ("That's it. That's the [noun].")
- Varied paragraph lengths (not all one-sentence or all same length)
返回清理后的文本之前,请验证:
- 没有段落以总结性语句结尾
- 没有“挑战与未来展望”这类公式化章节
- 没有过度使用破折号或重复的标点模式
- 标题未使用标题大小写
- 没有“丰富遗产”或“文化意义”这类宣传用语
- 没有未标注具体来源的模糊归因
- 句子结构和长度多样化
- 使用具体事实和数据而非笼统表述
- 段落间过渡自然,无公式化过渡词
- 没有直接对比表述("This isn't X—it's Y")
- 没有开场白套话("Here's the thing"、"Let me be clear")
- 没有强调依赖套话("That's it. That's the [noun].")
- 段落长度多样化(并非全是单句或统一长度)
Output Format
输出格式
Return only the cleaned text. No preamble, no explanation of changes, no "Here's the cleaned version:" - just the polished content ready to use.
仅返回清理后的文本。无需开场白,无需解释修改内容,无需添加“以下是清理后的版本:”这类表述——直接返回可使用的 polished 内容。
Version History
版本历史
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.0 | 2026-01-17 | Added throat-clearing, emphasis crutches, dramatic fragmentation; expanded word substitutions (+10 words); 13-point checklist |
| 1.1.0 | 2026-01-15 | Directive instructions for immediate execution, positive framing, skill chaining section |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-01 | Initial creation from Write with AI prompt |
| 版本号 | 日期 | 更新内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.0 | 2026-01-17 | 新增开场白类、强调类、刻意碎片化类模式;扩充词汇替换列表(新增10个词汇);新增13项检查清单 |
| 1.1.0 | 2026-01-15 | 新增即时执行的指令说明、积极表述方式、技能联动章节 |
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-01 | 基于Write with AI提示词初始创建 |