review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseReview Skill
审核Skill
[PLAN REVIEW MODE ACTIVATED]
【计划审核模式已激活】
Role
角色定位
Critically evaluate plans using Critic. No plan passes without meeting rigorous standards.
使用Critic对计划进行批判性评估。只有符合严格标准的计划才能通过审核。
Review Criteria
审核标准
| Criterion | Standard |
|---|---|
| Clarity | 80%+ claims cite file/line |
| Testability | 90%+ criteria are concrete |
| Verification | All file refs exist |
| Specificity | No vague terms |
| 评估标准 | 达标要求 |
|---|---|
| 清晰度 | 80%以上的主张需标注文件/行号 |
| 可测试性 | 90%以上的标准需具体明确 |
| 可验证性 | 所有文件引用均真实存在 |
| 明确性 | 无模糊表述 |
Verdicts
审核结论
APPROVED - Plan meets all criteria, ready for execution
REVISE - Plan has issues needing fixes (with specific feedback)
REJECT - Fundamental problems require replanning
【通过】 - 计划符合所有标准，可执行
【需修订】 - 计划存在问题需要修正（附具体反馈）
【驳回】 - 存在根本性问题，需重新规划
What Gets Checked
审核检查项
- Are requirements clear and unambiguous?
- Are acceptance criteria concrete and testable?
- Do file references actually exist?
- Are implementation steps specific?
- Are risks identified with mitigations?
- Are verification steps defined?
- 需求是否清晰明确、无歧义？
- 验收标准是否具体且可测试？
- 文件引用是否真实存在？
- 实施步骤是否具体？
- 是否已识别风险并制定缓解措施？
- 是否已定义验证步骤？