rice

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

RICE Prioritization Scoring

RICE优先级评分法

Score and rank initiatives using Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort to make prioritization decisions more objective.

通过覆盖范围（Reach）、影响力（Impact）、可信度（Confidence）和投入（Effort）四个维度对举措进行评分和排名，让优先级决策更具客观性。

Instructions

操作说明

For each initiative, estimate the four RICE factors, calculate the score, and rank them. Be explicit about assumptions behind each estimate.

针对每个举措，估算RICE的四个因子，计算得分并进行排名。需明确每个估算背后的假设依据。

Output Format

输出格式

Context What are we prioritizing? What's the time horizon for Reach?

Factor Definitions

Reach: [Define for this context, e.g., "users affected per quarter"]
Impact: [Define for this context, e.g., "effect on conversion rate"]
Effort: [Define unit, e.g., "engineer-weeks"]

Scoring Table

Initiative	Reach	Impact	Confidence	Effort	RICE Score
[Name A]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[calculated]
[Name B]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[calculated]
[Name C]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[calculated]

Ranked Results

[Highest score] — RICE: X
[Second] — RICE: X
[Third] — RICE: X

Detailed Breakdown

For each initiative:

背景信息 我们要对什么进行优先级排序？覆盖范围（Reach）的时间范围是什么？

因子定义

覆盖范围（Reach）：[结合本次场景定义，例如“每季度受影响的用户数量”]
影响力（Impact）：[结合本次场景定义，例如“对转化率的影响”]
投入（Effort）：[定义单位，例如“工程师周数”]

评分表格

举措名称	覆盖范围	影响力	可信度	投入	RICE得分
[举措A]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[计算结果]
[举措B]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[计算结果]
[举措C]	[#]	[0.25-3]	[%]	[#]	[计算结果]

排名结果

[得分最高的举措] — RICE得分：X
[第二名] — RICE得分：X
[第三名] — RICE得分：X

详细拆解

针对每个举措：

[Initiative Name]

[举措名称]

Reach: [X] — [Assumption: how did you estimate this?]
Impact: [X] — [Reasoning for impact level]
Confidence: [X%] — [What would increase confidence?]
Effort: [X] — [What's included in this estimate?]
RICE Score: (R × I × C) / E = [score]

Sensitivity Analysis Which scores would change significantly if assumptions are wrong?

Recommendation Based on the scores and analysis:

[What to prioritize and why, including any caveats]

What RICE Doesn't Capture

Strategic alignment
Dependencies
Team capability gaps
Technical risk

覆盖范围（Reach）：[X] — [假设依据：你是如何估算这个数值的？]
影响力（Impact）：[X] — [该影响力等级的理由]
可信度（Confidence）：[X%] — [哪些因素能提升可信度？]
投入（Effort）：[X] — [该估算包含哪些内容？]
RICE得分：(R × I × C) / E = [计算结果]

敏感性分析 如果假设不成立，哪些得分会发生显著变化？

建议基于得分和分析结果：

[优先推进哪些举措及原因，包括需要注意的事项]

RICE评分法的局限性

战略对齐度
依赖关系
团队能力缺口
技术风险

Scoring Guide

评分指南

Impact Scale

Score	Meaning
3	Massive — core value prop
2	High — significant improvement
1	Medium — noticeable improvement
0.5	Low — minor enhancement
0.25	Minimal — nice to have

Confidence Scale

Score	Meaning
100%	High — have data
80%	Medium — reasonable estimate
50%	Low — mostly guessing

$ARGUMENTS

影响力等级

得分	含义
3	极大 — 核心价值主张
2	高 — 显著改进
1	中等 — 可感知的改进
0.5	低 — 小幅优化
0.25	极小 — 锦上添花的功能

可信度等级

得分	含义
100%	高 — 有数据支撑
80%	中等 — 合理估算
50%	低 — 主要靠猜测

$ARGUMENTS