review-sql
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseSkill: Review SQL
技能:SQL审查
Purpose
目的
Review SQL and query-related code for language and query conventions only. Cover injection and parameterization, indexing and execution-plan concerns, transactions and isolation, NULL and unique constraints, dialect portability, large-table and paging patterns, and sensitive columns and permissions. Emit a findings list in the standard format for aggregation. Do not define scope or perform full security/architecture review; injection is in scope here as an SQL-specific concern, but broader security is for review-security.
仅针对SQL及查询相关代码的语言与查询规范进行审查。涵盖注入与参数化、索引与执行计划相关问题、事务与隔离级别、NULL值与唯一约束、方言可移植性、大表与分页模式,以及敏感列与权限。按照标准格式输出问题发现列表以进行汇总。请勿定义审查范围或执行全面的安全/架构审查;注入问题作为SQL特有关注点在此范围内,但更广泛的安全审查需参考review-security。
Use Cases
适用场景
- Orchestrated review: Used as the language step when review-code runs for projects that include SQL (.sql files, embedded SQL, or ORM-generated SQL).
- SQL-only review: When the user wants only query correctness, performance, and safety checked.
- Migration or portability: Check dialect-specific constructs and portability across databases.
When to use: When the code under review includes SQL (raw .sql, embedded in code, or ORM-generated). Scope (diff vs paths) is determined by the caller or user.
- 编排式审查:当review-code针对包含SQL的项目(.sql文件、嵌入式SQL或ORM生成的SQL)运行时,作为语言层面的审查步骤使用。
- 仅SQL审查:当用户仅需检查查询的正确性、性能与安全性时使用。
- 迁移或可移植性检查:检查特定方言的语法结构,以及跨数据库的可移植性。
使用时机:当待审查代码包含SQL时(原生.sql文件、嵌入在代码中的SQL或ORM生成的SQL)。审查范围(差异对比 vs 指定路径)由调用者或用户决定。
Behavior
行为规范
Scope of this skill
本技能的审查范围
- Analyze: SQL and query logic in the given scope (files, snippets, or diff). Accept .sql files, embedded SQL in application code, or ORM-generated SQL when visible.
- Do not: Decide scope (diff vs codebase); do not perform full application security or architecture review. Focus on SQL/query dimension.
- 分析内容:指定范围内(文件、代码片段或差异)的SQL与查询逻辑。支持.sql文件、应用代码中的嵌入式SQL,以及可见的ORM生成SQL。
- 禁止操作:不得决定审查范围(差异对比 vs 整个代码库);不得执行全面的应用安全或架构审查。仅聚焦于SQL/查询维度。
Review checklist (SQL dimension only)
审查检查清单(仅SQL维度)
- Injection and parameterization: No string concatenation or interpolation for user input in SQL; use parameterized queries or prepared statements; avoid dynamic SQL from untrusted input.
- Indexing and execution plan: Queries that filter or join on unindexed columns; SELECT * on large tables; missing indexes for WHERE/JOIN/ORDER BY.
- Transactions and isolation: Appropriate transaction boundaries; isolation level and locking; avoid long-running transactions; deadlock risk.
- NULL and unique constraints: Handling of NULL in comparisons and aggregates; unique constraints and duplicate handling; NOT NULL where appropriate.
- Dialect and portability: Database-specific syntax (e.g. LIMIT vs OFFSET/FETCH, date functions) and portability if multi-DB support is required.
- Large tables and paging: Full scans on large tables; paging (keyset vs OFFSET) and scalability.
- Sensitive columns and permissions: Sensitive data in SELECT; least-privilege and role usage in SQL (where visible).
- 注入与参数化:SQL中不得使用字符串拼接或插值处理用户输入;需使用参数化查询或预编译语句;避免来自不可信输入的动态SQL。
- 索引与执行计划:针对未索引列进行过滤或关联的查询;在大表上使用SELECT *;WHERE/JOIN/ORDER BY语句缺失对应索引。
- 事务与隔离级别:事务边界是否合理;隔离级别与锁机制;避免长事务;死锁风险。
- NULL值与唯一约束:比较与聚合操作中对NULL值的处理;唯一约束与重复值处理;在合适的场景使用NOT NULL。
- 方言与可移植性:数据库特定语法(如LIMIT与OFFSET/FETCH的差异、日期函数),以及多数据库支持场景下的可移植性。
- 大表与分页:对大表执行全表扫描;分页方式(键集分页 vs OFFSET)与可扩展性。
- 敏感列与权限:SELECT语句中包含敏感数据;SQL中使用最小权限原则与角色(若可见)。
Tone and references
语气与参考规范
- Professional and technical: Reference specific locations (file:line or query identifier). Emit findings with Location, Category, Severity, Title, Description, Suggestion.
- 专业且技术化:标注具体位置(文件:行号或查询标识符)。输出的问题发现需包含位置、类别、严重程度、标题、描述、建议。
Input & Output
输入与输出
Input
输入
- Code scope: Files or snippets containing SQL (e.g. .sql files, code with embedded SQL, or ORM-generated SQL when available). Provided by the user or scope skill.
- 代码范围:包含SQL的文件或代码片段(例如.sql文件、含嵌入式SQL的代码,或可获取的ORM生成SQL)。由用户或范围指定技能提供。
Output
输出
- Emit zero or more findings in the format defined in Appendix: Output contract.
- Category for this skill is language-sql.
- 输出零个或多个问题发现,格式需符合附录:输出约定中的定义。
- 本技能对应的类别为language-sql。
Restrictions
限制条件
- Do not perform scope selection or full security/architecture review. Stay within SQL and query conventions.
- Do not give conclusions without specific locations or actionable suggestions.
- Do not assume a specific database vendor unless stated; note dialect when relevant.
- 禁止选择审查范围或执行全面的安全/架构审查。仅聚焦于SQL与查询规范。
- 禁止在无具体位置或可操作建议的情况下给出结论。
- 禁止假设特定数据库厂商,除非明确说明;相关方言需标注说明。
Self-Check
自我检查
- Was only the SQL/query dimension reviewed (no scope/architecture beyond query design)?
- Are parameterization, indexing, transactions, NULL/constraints, and portability covered where relevant?
- Is each finding emitted with Location, Category=language-sql, Severity, Title, Description, and optional Suggestion?
- Are issues referenced with file:line or query identifier?
- 是否仅审查了SQL/查询维度(未涉及查询设计之外的范围/架构)?
- 是否涵盖了相关的参数化、索引、事务、NULL值/约束及可移植性问题?
- 每个问题发现是否都包含位置、类别=language-sql、严重程度、标题、描述及可选的建议?
- 问题是否标注了文件:行号或查询标识符?
Examples
示例
Example 1: String concatenation in query
示例1:查询中使用字符串拼接
- Input: Query built with string concatenation including user input.
- Expected: Emit a critical finding for SQL injection; suggest parameterized query or prepared statement. Category = language-sql.
- 输入:通过字符串拼接构建包含用户输入的查询。
- 预期输出:输出一个SQL注入相关的严重问题发现;建议使用参数化查询或预编译语句。类别=language-sql。
Example 2: Large table without paging
示例2:大表未使用分页
- Input: SELECT * FROM large_table ORDER BY id without LIMIT or paging.
- Expected: Emit finding for performance and scalability; suggest paging (e.g. keyset or OFFSET/FETCH) and avoid SELECT * if not needed. Category = language-sql.
- 输入:在大表上执行SELECT * FROM large_table ORDER BY id且未使用LIMIT或分页。
- 预期输出:输出一个性能与可扩展性相关的问题发现;建议使用分页(如键集分页或OFFSET/FETCH),若无需全部字段则避免使用SELECT *。类别=language-sql。
Edge case: ORM-generated SQL
边缘案例:ORM生成的SQL
- Input: Only application code using an ORM; generated SQL not visible.
- Expected: Review any raw SQL or query builders in the code; if no SQL is visible, state that and skip or report "No SQL to review in scope." Do not invent SQL.
- 输入:仅包含使用ORM的应用代码;生成的SQL不可见。
- 预期输出:审查代码中的原生SQL或查询构建器;若无可视化SQL,则说明情况并跳过,或报告“当前范围内无SQL可审查”。不得虚构SQL内容。
Appendix: Output contract
附录:输出约定
Each finding MUST follow the standard findings format:
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Location | |
| Category | |
| Severity | |
| Title | Short one-line summary. |
| Description | 1–3 sentences. |
| Suggestion | Concrete fix or improvement (optional). |
Example:
markdown
- **Location**: `scripts/orders.sql:12`
- **Category**: language-sql
- **Severity**: critical
- **Title**: Query built with string concatenation; injection risk
- **Description**: User-controlled input is concatenated into the WHERE clause.
- **Suggestion**: Use parameterized query or prepared statement with placeholders.每个问题发现必须遵循标准格式:
| 元素 | 要求 |
|---|---|
| 位置 | |
| 类别 | |
| 严重程度 | |
| 标题 | 简短的单行摘要。 |
| 描述 | 1-3句话。 |
| 建议 | 具体的修复或改进方案(可选)。 |
示例:
markdown
- **Location**: `scripts/orders.sql:12`
- **Category**: language-sql
- **Severity**: critical
- **Title**: Query built with string concatenation; injection risk
- **Description**: User-controlled input is concatenated into the WHERE clause.
- **Suggestion**: Use parameterized query or prepared statement with placeholders.