content-scoring
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseContent Scoring Skill
内容评分Skill
When scoring content for GEO optimization:
针对GEO优化进行内容评分时:
The 10 GEO Criteria
10项GEO评估标准
Score each criterion 0-10:
| # | Criterion | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ranking Emphasis | "best", "top", "#1", superlatives, leadership claims |
| 2 | User Intent | Direct answers, addresses specific needs, solves problems |
| 3 | Competitive Diff | Unique advantages, "unlike others", differentiators |
| 4 | Social Proof | Stats, testimonials, reviews, customer counts, ratings |
| 5 | Narrative | Engaging flow, persuasive language, compelling story |
| 6 | Authority | Expert tone, credentials, specific knowledge, confidence |
| 7 | USPs | Clear unique value, what makes it special |
| 8 | Urgency | Time limits, scarcity, "now", limited availability |
| 9 | Scannable | Headers, bullets, short paragraphs, clear structure |
| 10 | Factual | Verifiable claims, specific numbers, accurate info |
为每项标准评分(0-10分):
| 序号 | 评估标准 | 评估要点 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 排名强调 | "best"、"top"、"#1"等最高级表述、领先性声明 |
| 2 | 用户意图匹配 | 直接给出答案、满足特定需求、解决实际问题 |
| 3 | 差异化竞争力 | 独特优势、“与众不同”的差异化特点 |
| 4 | 社交证明 | 数据统计、客户证言、用户评价、客户数量、评分 |
| 5 | 叙事吸引力 | 流畅引人的叙述、有说服力的语言、引人入胜的故事 |
| 6 | 权威性 | 专家语气、资质证明、专业知识、自信表达 |
| 7 | 独特卖点(USPs) | 清晰的独特价值、与众不同之处 |
| 8 | 紧迫感 | 时间限制、稀缺性、“立即”、限量供应 |
| 9 | 易读性 | 标题、项目符号、短段落、清晰结构 |
| 10 | 真实性 | 可验证的声明、具体数据、准确信息 |
Scoring Guide
评分指南
- 0-2: Missing or severely lacking
- 3-4: Present but weak
- 5-6: Adequate, room for improvement
- 7-8: Good, minor improvements possible
- 9-10: Excellent, near optimal
- 0-2分:缺失或严重不足
- 3-4分:存在但表现薄弱
- 5-6分:合格,有改进空间
- 7-8分:良好,可做小幅改进
- 9-10分:优秀,接近最优水平
Output Format
输出格式
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📊 GEO CONTENT SCORE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ OVERALL SCORE: XX/100 │
│ ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ XX% │
│ │
│ BREAKDOWN │
│ ───────── │
│ 1. Ranking Emphasis ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 2. User Intent ██████████ 10/10 │
│ 3. Competitive Diff ████░░░░░░ 4/10 │
│ 4. Social Proof ██░░░░░░░░ 2/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 5. Narrative ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 6. Authority ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 7. USPs ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 8. Urgency ░░░░░░░░░░ 0/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 9. Scannable ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 10. Factual ██████████ 10/10 │
│ │
│ TOP PRIORITIES │
│ ────────────── │
│ 1. Add social proof (+15-20 points potential) │
│ 2. Add urgency signals (+5-10 points potential) │
│ 3. Strengthen competitive differentiation (+8 points) │
│ │
│ EVIDENCE │
│ ──────── │
│ ✓ Good: "industry-leading solution" (ranking emphasis) │
│ ✗ Missing: No customer testimonials (social proof) │
│ ✗ Missing: No time-sensitive offers (urgency) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 📊 GEO CONTENT SCORE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ OVERALL SCORE: XX/100 │
│ ██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ XX% │
│ │
│ BREAKDOWN │
│ ───────── │
│ 1. Ranking Emphasis ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 2. User Intent ██████████ 10/10 │
│ 3. Competitive Diff ████░░░░░░ 4/10 │
│ 4. Social Proof ██░░░░░░░░ 2/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 5. Narrative ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 6. Authority ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 7. USPs ██████░░░░ 6/10 │
│ 8. Urgency ░░░░░░░░░░ 0/10 ⚠️ Priority │
│ 9. Scannable ████████░░ 8/10 │
│ 10. Factual ██████████ 10/10 │
│ │
│ TOP PRIORITIES │
│ ────────────── │
│ 1. Add social proof (+15-20 points potential) │
│ 2. Add urgency signals (+5-10 points potential) │
│ 3. Strengthen competitive differentiation (+8 points) │
│ │
│ EVIDENCE │
│ ──────── │
│ ✓ Good: "industry-leading solution" (ranking emphasis) │
│ ✗ Missing: No customer testimonials (social proof) │
│ ✗ Missing: No time-sensitive offers (urgency) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Rules
规则
- Always show evidence from the actual content
- Prioritize improvements by potential impact
- Be specific about what's missing and how to fix it
- Calculate total score as sum of all criteria
- 始终展示来自实际内容的证据
- 按潜在影响优先级排序改进建议
- 明确说明缺失内容及修复方式
- 总分为所有标准得分之和