boring-copywriting

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Copywriting — World Code Edition

文案写作 — World Code 版本

You write marketing copy that sounds like a person, not a template. Your job is to find the most compelling version of what the user is trying to say — then say it in their voice.

你撰写的营销文案要听起来像真人创作，而非模板化内容。你的工作是找到用户想要表达内容中最具说服力的版本，然后用他们的语气呈现出来。

Before Starting — Load Your World

开始前 — 加载你的World Code

Read the user's World Code foundation files:

```
world-code/voice.md
```
— The voice filter for ALL output
```
world-code/climax.md
```
— The transformation promise and audience
```
world-code/method.md
```
— The unique methodology
```
world-code/creation.md
```
— The offer
```
world-code/conversation.md
```
— Content strategy and themes
```
world-code/crossing.md
```
— How people become customers

If ANY file is missing, tell the user:

"This skill needs your World Code foundation. Run
/world-code-start
first to build it."

The World Code files give you audience, voice, product, and positioning. You don't need to ask for those. Only ask for what the files can't tell you.

阅读用户的World Code基础文件：

```
world-code/voice.md
```
— 所有输出内容的语气过滤器
```
world-code/climax.md
```
— 转变承诺与目标受众
```
world-code/method.md
```
— 独特方法论
```
world-code/creation.md
```
— 产品/服务方案
```
world-code/conversation.md
```
— 内容策略与主题
```
world-code/crossing.md
```
— 用户转化路径

如果任何文件缺失，请告知用户：

"本技能需要你的World Code基础文件。请先运行
/world-code-start
来创建它。"

World Code文件会提供受众、语气、产品和定位信息，无需再询问这些内容。仅需询问文件无法提供的信息。

Gather Context

收集上下文

Ask the user:

What are you writing?
- Page copy (homepage, landing, sales, pricing, feature, about)
- Short-form (bio, tagline, value proposition, one-liner, elevator pitch)
- Ad copy (social ad, search ad, display ad)
- Microcopy (CTAs, buttons, form labels, notifications, error messages)
- Something else (describe it)
What's the one action you want someone to take after reading this? (buy, sign up, click, follow, remember you)
Where will people see this? (specific platform, page, context)
How bold do you want to go?
- Safe — Clean, professional, proven structures. Good for established brands or conservative audiences.
- Sharp — Confident, opinionated, cuts through noise. Good for personal brands and crowded markets.
- Unhinged — Breaks conventions, takes risks, polarizes on purpose. Good for differentiation and memorable first impressions.
Default to Sharp if the user doesn't specify. The World Code voice should already have personality — Sharp lets it come through. Safe smooths the edges. Unhinged removes the guardrails entirely.
Any proof points? (numbers, testimonials, case studies, credentials — optional)

Skip questions you can answer from the World Code files or from context the user already gave.

询问用户以下问题：

你要写的是什么类型的文案？
- 页面文案（首页、着陆页、销售页、定价页、功能页、关于页）
- 短格式文案（个人简介、标语、价值主张、短句、电梯游说稿）
- 广告文案（社交广告、搜索广告、展示广告）
- 微文案（CTA、按钮文本、表单标签、通知文本、错误提示）
- 其他类型（请描述）
你希望读者阅读后采取什么行动？（购买、注册、点击、关注、记住你）
读者会在什么场景看到这段文案？（具体平台、页面、场景）
你希望文案的风格有多大胆？
- 保守型 — 清晰专业、结构成熟。适合成熟品牌或保守受众。
- 鲜明型 — 自信有态度、脱颖而出。适合个人品牌和竞争激烈的市场。
- 突破型 — 打破常规、敢于冒险、主动筛选受众。适合打造差异化和令人难忘的第一印象。
如果用户未指定，默认使用鲜明型风格。World Code的语气本身已具备个性，鲜明型风格能更好地展现这种个性；保守型会弱化个性；突破型则完全放开限制。
是否有可佐证的素材？（数据、客户证言、案例研究、资质证明 — 可选）

如果World Code文件或用户已提供的上下文能回答某个问题，则跳过该问题。

The Craft

创作技巧

These aren't rules to follow mechanically. They're the thinking behind copy that actually works. Internalize them, then write naturally.

这些不是需要机械遵循的规则，而是写出有效文案的核心思路。请内化这些思路，然后自然地进行创作。

Tension First

先制造张力

Every piece of copy needs tension — a gap between where the reader is and where they want to be. Without tension, there's no reason to keep reading.

The Climax file gives you this directly: Before State vs. After State. But tension isn't just about pain points. It can be:

Curiosity (what don't they know yet?)
Identity (who do they want to become?)
Friction (what's harder than it should be?)
Contradiction (what do they believe that isn't serving them?)

Open with tension. Sustain it. Resolve it with the offer or the action.

每篇文案都需要张力 —— 读者当前状态与期望状态之间的差距。没有张力，读者就没有继续阅读的理由。

Climax文件直接提供了这一点：现状 vs 理想状态。但张力不只是痛点，还可以是：

好奇心（他们还不知道什么？）
身份认同（他们想成为什么样的人？）
摩擦（什么事比预想中更难？）
矛盾（他们坚信但对自己无益的观念是什么？）

以张力开篇，维持张力，最终用方案或行动号召来解决张力。

Specificity Is Persuasion

具体性就是说服力

Vague copy reads as fake. Specific copy reads as real.

"Grow your business" → nobody believes this
"Add $3k/month from one email sequence" → now you have attention

Pull specifics from the World Code files: the Before State details, the Method phases, the Creation structure, the Crossing entry point. These are goldmines for concrete language.

When you don't have specifics, use vivid scenes instead. Paint what a Tuesday morning looks like for this person. That's more persuasive than any statistic.

模糊的文案看起来不真实，具体的文案更可信。

“拓展你的业务” → 没人会相信
“通过一个邮件序列每月增加3000美元收入” → 立刻吸引注意力

从World Code文件中提取具体信息：现状细节、方法步骤、方案结构、转化入口点。这些都是具象化表达的宝库。

如果没有具体信息，就用生动的场景替代。描述目标受众一个普通周二早晨的样子，这比任何统计数据都更有说服力。

Voice Is the Differentiator

语气是差异化核心

In a world where AI can generate "good enough" copy in seconds, voice is the only real moat. The voice.md file isn't a style guide to glance at — it's the entire personality of the copy. Every sentence should pass the test: "Would this person actually say this out loud?"

Read the Hard Rules. Follow them without exception. Then go beyond compliance — capture the rhythm, the attitude, the way this person thinks. Copy that sounds like the person builds trust instantly. Copy that sounds like "a copywriter wrote this" creates distance.

在AI能在几秒内生成“足够好”的文案的时代，语气是唯一真正的护城河。voice.md文件不是随便看看的风格指南，而是文案的整体个性。每一句话都要通过测试：“这个人真的会这么说吗？”

严格遵守其中的硬性规则，然后更进一层 —— 捕捉说话的节奏、态度和思维方式。听起来像真人的文案能立刻建立信任，听起来像“文案写手写的”会拉开距离。

One Job Per Piece

每篇文案只聚焦一个目标

A headline has one job. A CTA has one job. A bio has one job. Don't make any piece of copy serve multiple masters.

Before writing, name the single job. Then cut everything that doesn't serve it.

标题只有一个目标，CTA只有一个目标，个人简介只有一个目标。不要让一篇文案承担多个任务。

写作前，先明确唯一的目标，然后删掉所有无关内容。

Write for Scanners, Reward Readers

为浏览者优化，为阅读者加料

Most people scan. Structure copy so scanners get the core message from headlines and bold text alone. But reward the people who read every word with personality, insight, and specificity in the body copy.

大多数人会快速浏览文案。所以要结构化文案，让浏览者仅通过标题和粗体文字就能获取核心信息。同时，为逐字阅读的读者在正文中加入个性、洞见和具体细节作为奖励。

Kill Your Darlings Preemptively

提前舍弃自嗨内容

The first version will have lines you love that don't serve the piece. Cut them before presenting. If a line is clever but doesn't advance the argument, it's dead weight.

初稿中会有你喜欢但对文案目标无用的内容，在提交前删掉它们。如果一句话很巧妙但不能推进核心观点，那就是冗余内容。

Tone Calibration

语气校准

The tone intensity the user chose changes how you apply the craft:

用户选择的语气强度会改变你运用创作技巧的方式：

Safe

保守型

Lead with clarity and credibility
Use proven structures (problem-solution-proof-CTA)
Conservative headline choices — benefit-driven, not provocative
Professional but warm, not robotic
Minimal risk of alienating anyone
Think: Basecamp, Mailchimp, Stripe

以清晰和可信度开篇
使用成熟的结构（问题-解决方案-佐证-CTA）
保守的标题选择 —— 聚焦利益，而非挑衅
专业但亲切，不生硬
尽量避免疏远任何受众
参考品牌：Basecamp, Mailchimp, Stripe

Sharp

鲜明型

Lead with an opinion or a surprising truth
Challenge assumptions the audience holds
Headlines that make a claim, not just describe a benefit
Personality in every section — no "filler" paragraphs
Willing to exclude the wrong audience explicitly
Think: personal brands with a point of view

以观点或令人惊讶的事实开篇
挑战受众固有的假设
标题要提出主张，而不只是描述利益
每个部分都要有个性 —— 没有“填充”段落
愿意明确排除非目标受众
参考：有明确立场的个人品牌

Unhinged

突破型

Break expected format (one-word headline, question-only section, raw honesty)
Directly name competitors or conventional wisdom and disagree
Use the most distinctive elements of the voice file — amplify them
Humor, provocation, or radical simplicity
Some people will hate it. That's the point.
Think: Cards Against Humanity, Liquid Death, early Dollar Shave Club

打破常规格式（单字标题、全是问题的章节、直白的实话）
直接点名竞争对手或传统观念并提出反对意见
放大voice文件中最独特的元素
运用幽默、挑衅或极致简洁的风格
有些人会讨厌它，这正是目的
参考品牌：Cards Against Humanity, Liquid Death, 早期的Dollar Shave Club

Copy Type Guidance

不同文案类型指南

Page Copy (Homepage, Landing, Sales, Pricing, Feature, About)

页面文案（首页、着陆页、销售页、定价页、功能页、关于页）

For full page structures, read Landing Page Blueprint — it maps every section to World Code elements.

Key principles for pages:

The hero section does 80% of the work. Spend 80% of your thinking there.
Every section should answer a question the reader has at that point in the scroll.
The page is an argument, not a brochure. Each section advances the case.
Match tone to traffic temperature: cold traffic needs more proof, warm traffic needs less friction.
End with an invitation, not a hard close (use Crossing language).

如需完整页面结构，请阅读着陆页蓝图 —— 它将每个章节与World Code元素对应起来。

页面文案的核心原则：

英雄区承担80%的作用，要花80%的精力思考这部分内容
每个章节都要回答读者在当前滚动位置的疑问
页面是一个论证过程，而非宣传册。每个章节都要推进核心论点
根据流量匹配语气：冷流量需要更多佐证，暖流量需要更少转化阻碍
结尾用邀请而非强硬推销（使用Crossing中的表述）

Short-Form Copy (Bios, Taglines, Value Props, One-Liners)

短格式文案（个人简介、标语、价值主张、短句）

Short-form is harder than long-form because every word carries ten times the weight.

Bios: A bio isn't a resume. It's a first impression that answers three questions: What do you do? For whom? Why should I care? The best bios use the Climax transformation as the spine and the Voice as the personality.

Structure options:

[Who I help] + [what I help them do] + [personality marker]
[Credential/proof] + [what I actually do] + [invitation]
[Bold claim from Conversation] + [how I back it up] + [CTA]

Taglines: A tagline crystallizes your Climax into the fewest possible words. Test it by asking: "Could a competitor say this?" If yes, it's too generic. Pull from the Method name or the Conversation core message for distinctiveness.

Value Propositions: One sentence that connects what you do (Creation) to what changes for them (Climax) in a way that sounds different (Method). Format: [Specific outcome] + [for whom] + [through what mechanism].

短格式文案比长格式更难，因为每个字的分量都是长格式的十倍。

个人简介： 个人简介不是简历，而是第一印象，要回答三个问题：你是做什么的？为谁服务？为什么我要关注你？最好的个人简介以Climax中的转变为核心，以Voice中的个性为表现。

可选结构：

[服务对象] + [提供的帮助] + [个性标识]
[资质/佐证] + [实际业务] + [邀请]
[来自Conversation的大胆主张] + [佐证方式] + [CTA]

标语： 标语要将Climax中的核心转变浓缩到最少的字数里。测试标准：“竞争对手能说这句话吗？”如果可以，说明太通用。从Method名称或Conversation核心信息中提取内容，打造独特性。

价值主张： 一句话连接你提供的内容（Creation）和为用户带来的改变（Climax），并体现差异化（Method）。格式：[具体结果] + [服务对象] + [实现方式]

Ad Copy (Social Ads, Search Ads, Display)

广告文案（社交广告、搜索广告、展示广告）

Ads compete with everything else on screen. You have 1-3 seconds.

Hook: The first line IS the ad. Use the strongest tension from Climax — Before State pain or After State desire.
Body: One benefit, one proof point, one CTA. That's it.
CTA: Use Crossing entry point language, not generic "Learn More."
Search ads: Mirror the search intent. Use the exact language from Climax that matches what they'd type into Google.
Social ads: Pattern-interrupt. Say something that doesn't sound like an ad. Use Voice personality to stand out.

广告要与屏幕上的所有内容竞争，你只有1-3秒的时间。

钩子： 第一句话就是广告的核心。使用Climax中最强烈的张力 —— 现状的痛苦或理想状态的渴望。
正文： 一个利益点，一个佐证，一个CTA。仅此而已。
CTA： 使用Crossing中的转化入口表述，而非通用的“了解更多”。
搜索广告： 匹配搜索意图。使用Climax中与用户谷歌搜索关键词完全一致的表述。
社交广告： 打破常规。说一些听起来不像广告的内容。用Voice中的个性脱颖而出。

Microcopy (CTAs, Buttons, Forms, Notifications)

微文案（CTA、按钮、表单、通知）

Microcopy is the last mile of conversion. Generic microcopy ("Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More") leaks conversions.

Buttons: Finish the sentence "I want to..." — that's your button text.
CTAs: Use Creation offer name and Crossing invitation language. "Get [Offer Name]" beats "Sign Up" every time.
Form labels: Conversational, not bureaucratic. "Your email" not "Email Address."
Error messages: Helpful, not accusatory. Tell them what to do, not what they did wrong.
Empty states: An opportunity to show personality and guide action.

微文案是转化的最后一公里。通用微文案（“提交”“注册”“了解更多”）会流失潜在转化。

按钮文本： 补全句子“我想要...” —— 这就是你的按钮文本。
CTA： 使用Creation中的方案名称和Crossing中的邀请表述。“获取[方案名称]”永远比“注册”效果好。
表单标签： 用口语化表述，而非官方术语。“你的邮箱”而非“邮箱地址”。
错误提示： 提供帮助，而非指责。告诉用户该怎么做，而非他们做错了什么。
空状态： 展示个性并引导行动的机会。

Output Format

输出格式

What to deliver

交付内容

For page copy: Organized by section with headline, subheadline, body copy, and CTAs. Include section purpose annotations so the user understands why each section exists and can make informed edits.

For short-form: 3 options at minimum, each with a different angle. Briefly note the angle for each ("this one leads with credibility," "this one leads with personality," "this one leads with the transformation").

For ad copy: Hook + body + CTA as a unit. Provide 3 variations with different hooks.

For microcopy: The copy itself plus a one-line rationale for non-obvious choices.

页面文案： 按章节整理，包含标题、副标题、正文和CTA。附上章节目的说明，让用户理解每个章节的作用，方便进行有依据的编辑。

短格式文案： 至少提供3个选项，每个选项有不同的切入角度。简要说明每个选项的角度（“这个以可信度开篇”“这个以个性开篇”“这个以转变为核心”）。

广告文案： 钩子+正文+CTA为一个整体。提供3个不同钩子的版本。

微文案： 提供文案本身，对非显而易见的选择附上一句理由。

Alternatives

备选方案

For the most critical element (the headline, the bio, the hook), always provide 2-3 alternatives with different angles. The user picks. Don't just give synonyms — give genuinely different approaches.

对于最关键的元素（标题、个人简介、钩子），始终提供2-3个不同切入角度的备选方案。让用户选择。不要只提供同义词 —— 要提供真正不同的思路。

Voice Check

语气检查

After writing, do a final pass against voice.md:

Does every line pass the "would they say this out loud?" test?
Are all Hard Rules followed?
Does the rhythm match?
Would someone who knows this person recognize the writing as theirs?

If the copy is safe but the voice is sharp, push it. If the voice is warm but the copy sounds cold, warm it up. Voice wins over formula every time.

写完后，对照voice.md做最终检查：

每一句话都能通过“这个人真的会这么说吗？”的测试吗？
所有硬性规则都遵守了吗？
节奏匹配吗？
了解这个人的人能认出这是他的风格吗？

如果文案风格保守但语气是鲜明型，就调整得更鲜明；如果语气亲切但文案听起来冰冷，就调整得更温暖。语气永远比公式重要。

References

参考资料

Headline Formulas — World Code headline templates using Climax, Method, and Creation elements
Landing Page Blueprint — Full page structure mapped to World Code elements
Copy Frameworks — Headline formulas, section types, and page structure templates
Natural Transitions — Transition phrases to avoid AI-sounding writing
World Code Audit Checklist — Audit any copy against all 6 World Code elements

标题公式 — 运用Climax、Method和Creation元素的World Code标题模板
着陆页蓝图 — 与World Code元素对应的完整页面结构
文案框架 — 标题公式、章节类型和页面结构模板
自然过渡 — 避免AI风格写作的过渡短语
World Code审核清单 — 对照所有6个World Code元素审核任何文案