terms-of-service

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

terms-of-service

服务条款

Terms are the rules of this product. Generic terms for a product that has no accounts, or missing terms for one that takes money, both mislead. This skill maps real features to real clauses and leaves the legal choices to the owner.
条款是本产品的规则。针对没有账户的产品套用通用条款,或对于收费产品缺失条款,都会造成误导。本 skill 将实际功能映射为对应条款,并将法律选择留给产品所有者。

Activate when

适用场景

  • The product has accounts, user-generated content, purchases or subscriptions, a marketplace, an API, or acceptable-use concerns; or a terms link exists with no page behind it.
  • Existing terms describe features the product lacks or omit ones it has.
  • Not for a static brochure with no commitments (say so), and not to provide legal advice.
  • 产品具有账户、用户生成内容、购买或订阅、marketplace、API,或存在可接受使用方面的顾虑;或者存在条款链接,但其指向的页面不存在。
  • 现有条款描述了产品不具备的功能,或遗漏了产品已有的功能。
  • 不适用于没有任何承诺的静态宣传页(应明确说明这一点),也不能用于提供法律建议。

Working alone

独立运行

This skill is self-contained. Its companions (declared in its metadata) are skills whose method it may need to do its own promised work. Use of a companion can be conditional: declaring one does not mean running it. When a companion's lane applies, use the skill if it is installed; if not, follow its short entry in references/companion-methods.md and say in your report which lanes ran inline at reduced depth. Never skip an applicable lane silently. Skills mentioned here only for escalation, referral, documentation, or optional deeper follow-up are not dependencies: report the hand-off and finish honestly.
Companions:
user-content-safety
,
payments-readiness
,
subscription-readiness
,
consumer-protection-readiness
,
ai-features-readiness
,
policy-consistency
,
design-system-reconnaissance
.
本 skill 是自包含的。它的 companions(在元数据中声明)是本 skill 在完成自身承诺的工作时可能需要采用其方法的 skills。companion 的使用可以是条件性的:声明某个 companion 并不意味着一定会运行它。当某个 companion 的工作范围适用时,如果已安装该 skill,就使用它;如果未安装,则遵循 references/companion-methods.md 中的简短说明,并在报告中说明哪些工作范围因缺少 companion 而以较低深度在当前流程中完成。绝不静默跳过任何适用工作范围。此处仅因升级、转介、文档记录或可选的进一步跟进而提及的 skill 并非依赖项:应报告移交情况,并如实完成工作。
Companions:
user-content-safety
、
payments-readiness
、
subscription-readiness
、
consumer-protection-readiness
、
ai-features-readiness
、
policy-consistency
、
design-system-reconnaissance
。

Inspect

检查

  1. Feature map from recon: accounts and roles; user content and who sees it (
    user-content-safety
    ); payments, subscriptions, trials, refunds (
    payments-readiness
    ,
    subscription-readiness
    ,
    consumer-protection-readiness
    ); free vs paid tiers; API or automated access; AI-generated content (
    ai-features-readiness
    ); third-party services users must accept; marketplace or multi-party flows; downloads/licensing (
    legal-identity-notices
    ).
  2. Existing text, if any: compare each clause to features (a subscription clause with no billing code; refunds promised in the FAQ but absent from terms; account termination with no account system).
  3. Owner facts required (mark MISSING unless provided): legal entity and contact; governing law and venue; liability caps and disclaimers; fee amounts, billing cycle, taxes, refund/cancellation windows; acceptable-use enforcement; age minimum; notice/dispute process; effective date. Treat all of these as owner or lawyer decisions.
  4. Draft only supported sections, in plain language, tied to features: what the service is; accounts and security; acceptable use; user content and license grant only if the owner states the license; payments, renewal, cancellation, refunds only with the owner's real terms; termination; changes to terms; contact. Skip whole sections for features that do not exist.
  5. Acceptance mechanics. If terms bind users, check how they are presented: checkbox or "by signing up you agree" text next to the signup button, link to the actual page, and the terms/privacy links in the footer. Do not pre-tick consent boxes.
  6. Reuse the site's shell and place at
    /terms
    (
    design-system-reconnaissance
    ,
    legal-navigation
    ).
  1. 从 recon 得出的功能映射:账户与角色;用户内容及其可见范围(
    user-content-safety
    );支付、订阅、试用、退款(
    payments-readiness
    、
    subscription-readiness
    、
    consumer-protection-readiness
    );免费与付费层级;API 或自动化访问;AI 生成内容(
    ai-features-readiness
    );用户必须接受的第三方服务;marketplace 或多方业务流程;下载与授权(
    legal-identity-notices
    )。
  2. 现有文本(如有):将每项条款与实际功能逐一比对(例如,订阅条款中没有计费代码;FAQ 承诺退款但条款中未提及;条款要求终止账户,但系统并不支持账户终止)。
  3. 所需的产品所有者事实(除非已提供,否则标记为 MISSING):法律实体及联系方式;适用法律及管辖地;责任上限及免责声明;费用金额、计费周期、税费、退款/取消期限;可接受使用(acceptable use)规则的执行方式;最低年龄;通知/争议处理流程;生效日期。所有这些均视为产品所有者或律师的决定。
  4. 仅起草有依据的章节,使用通俗语言,并与实际功能对应:服务内容;账户与安全;可接受使用;用户内容及许可授予(仅当所有者说明许可内容时);支付、续订、取消、退款(仅采用所有者提供的真实条款);终止;条款变更;联系方式。对于不存在的功能,整节跳过。
  5. 同意机制。如果条款对用户具有约束力,应检查其呈现方式:注册按钮旁是否提供复选框或“注册即表示您同意”的文本,是否链接到实际页面,以及页脚中是否包含条款/隐私政策链接。不要预先勾选同意框。
  6. 复用站点的设计框架,并将页面放在
    /terms
    (
    design-system-reconnaissance
    、
    legal-navigation
    )。

Evidence that counts

有效证据

Label each claim OBSERVED, SOURCE-INDICATED, DECLARED, INFERRED, UNKNOWN, or REVIEW REQUIRED. UNKNOWN is never a pass and never a failure.
  • A clause about a feature needs evidence the feature exists (a route, a billing integration, a content form).
  • Commercial terms (fees, refunds) are DECLARED by the owner; unsupported ones are
    [[OWNER TO PROVIDE: …]]
    placeholders.
  • Whether terms are enforceable or sufficient is not observable. It is REVIEW REQUIRED.
  • Legal specifics: never from memory. When a rule, deadline, threshold, or required wording matters, read the current text or guidance at an official source while you run (start from references/official-sources.md), cite the source and access date, and treat applicability to this business as REVIEW REQUIRED. If you cannot look it up, the answer is UNKNOWN.
将每项主张标记为 OBSERVED、SOURCE-INDICATED、DECLARED、INFERRED、UNKNOWN 或 REVIEW REQUIRED。UNKNOWN 既不表示通过,也不表示失败。
  • 关于某项功能的条款需要证明该功能确实存在的证据,例如路由、支付集成或内容表单。
  • 商业条款(费用、退款)由所有者 DECLARED;没有依据的条款使用
    [[OWNER TO PROVIDE: …]]
    占位符。
  • 条款是否可执行或充分无法通过观察得出,应标记为 REVIEW REQUIRED。
  • 法律细节绝不能凭记忆生成。 当规则、期限、阈值或必要措辞很重要时,应在执行过程中查阅官方来源上的现行文本或指南(从 references/official-sources.md 开始),注明来源及访问日期,并将该规则对此业务的适用性视为 REVIEW REQUIRED。如果无法查阅,答案应为 UNKNOWN。

May change

可以执行的修改

Create or update the terms page; align feature-specific clauses with real features; add acceptance text near signup/checkout; fix broken terms links. Never overwrite lawyer-written terms; produce a mismatch list instead.
创建或更新条款页面;使针对具体功能的条款与真实功能保持一致;在注册/结账附近添加同意文本;修复失效的条款链接。绝不覆盖律师撰写的条款;应改为输出不匹配项清单。

Must not claim

不得声称

That terms are "legally binding", "enforceable", "comprehensive", "compliant with consumer law", or "protect you from liability". Do not invent governing law, jurisdiction, arbitration clauses, liability caps, warranties disclaimers, refund periods, fee schedules, minimum ages, or a company name. Never copy another company's terms.
不得声称条款“具有法律约束力”“可执行”“全面”“符合消费者法律”或“可以保护你免于责任”。不得臆造适用法律、管辖权、仲裁条款、责任上限、免责声明、退款期限、收费表、最低年龄或公司名称。绝不复制其他公司的条款。

Verify

验证

Every substantive clause maps to a real feature; every owner-only fact is a visible
[[OWNER TO PROVIDE: …]]
marker listed for the owner (
node scripts/audit-markup.mjs --url <site> --render
, path relative to this skill's folder, reports each as a HIGH
PLACEHOLDER_TEXT
finding: the page is not launch-ready until they are supplied); links resolve; signup/checkout reference the terms if they are meant to bind; the page renders in the site's design at desktop and 375px. Cross-check with
policy-consistency
and
subscription-readiness
(terms must agree with what checkout shows).
每项实质性条款都应对应真实功能;每项只能由所有者确定的事实都以可见的
[[OWNER TO PROVIDE: …]]
标记呈现,并汇总给所有者(
node scripts/audit-markup.mjs --url <site> --render
,路径相对于本 skill 所在目录;该命令会将每个标记报告为 HIGH
PLACEHOLDER_TEXT
finding:在这些内容补齐前,页面尚不具备上线条件);链接可正常解析;如果条款 intended to bind users,注册/结账流程应引用条款;页面在桌面端和 375px 下均能按照站点设计正常渲染。与
policy-consistency
和
subscription-readiness
进行交叉核对(条款必须与结账页面显示的内容一致)。

Escalate

升级处理

Money, subscriptions, minors, user content with safety risk, marketplaces, health/finance/legal services, and any cross-border sale: REVIEW REQUIRED. Say specifically what you could not determine (governing law, liability, refund terms, acceptable-use enforcement). Keep the recommendation proportional: name the specific unresolved fact or risk that warrants it (minors, sensitive data, a regulated domain, cross-border sale, unclear markets, contested wording), and do not tell an ordinary low-risk site to hire a lawyer.
涉及资金、订阅、未成年人、存在安全风险的用户内容、marketplace、健康/金融/法律服务以及任何跨境销售:REVIEW REQUIRED。应具体说明无法确定的内容(适用法律、责任限制、退款条款、可接受使用规则的执行方式)。建议应与风险相称:明确指出足以触发升级的具体未决事实或风险(未成年人、敏感数据、受监管领域、跨境销售、目标市场不明确、措辞存在争议),不要建议普通低风险网站聘请律师。

No change is valid when

无需修改的有效情况

The site makes no commitments (no accounts, purchases, or user content) and a terms page would add nothing; or existing terms match the features and were reviewed. Say "no terms change needed; recheck when accounts, payments, or content features are added".
网站不作出任何承诺(没有账户、购买或用户内容),且添加条款页面不会带来任何实际意义;或者现有条款与产品功能一致且已经过审查。此时应表示:“无需修改条款;当新增账户、支付或内容功能时请重新检查。”