ccf-rebuttal-writer

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

CCF Rebuttal Writer

Core Rule

核心规则

Handle post-review communication and revision accountability. Responses must be calm, factual, evidence-grounded, and promise only feasible changes. Resubmission adaptation is conservative by default: no new experiments and no bibliography changes unless the user explicitly authorizes them. Follow the user's requested response format: plain text, TeX, reviewer-by-reviewer, issue-grouped, table-first, or short response.

处理评审后的沟通事宜与修订问责工作。回复需保持冷静、基于事实与证据，仅承诺可行的修改。默认采用保守型重投适配策略：除非用户明确授权，否则不得添加新实验或修改参考文献。遵循用户要求的回复格式：纯文本、TeX、按审稿人逐一回复、按问题分组、表格优先或简短回复。

Modes

模式

```
rebuttal
```
: reviewer/AC response under a word or time budget.
```
revision-ledger
```
: reviewer comment -> action -> manuscript location -> owner -> status.
```
response-letter
```
: revision summary or camera-ready response letter.
```
resubmission
```
: adapt an already written paper to a new venue with conservative defaults.

```
rebuttal
```
：在字数或时间限制内回复审稿人/AC。
```
revision-ledger
```
：审稿意见 -> 行动方案 -> 稿件位置 -> 负责人 -> 状态。
```
response-letter
```
：修订摘要或终稿回复函。
```
resubmission
```
：将已完成的稿件适配至新期刊/会议，默认采用保守策略。

Workflow

工作流程

Identify venue, response format, word budget, deadline, review scores/confidence, and whether this is rebuttal, revision, or resubmission.
Parse comments into issue groups by reviewer, concern type, severity, available evidence, response strategy, and promised paper change.
Load
```
references/response-strategy.md
```
and
```
../ccf-paper-writer/references/prose-quality-guardrails.md
```
; answer high-impact concerns first: soundness, novelty, missing evidence, incorrect assumptions, and shared concerns.
Load
```
references/revision-ledger.md
```
whenever promised edits, manuscript locations, resubmission actions, review rounds, or cross-version score changes must be tracked. Update one canonical ledger in place; do not create a separate ledger per round unless the user requests snapshots.
For full rebuttals, load
```
references/tex-templates.md
```
and use the TeX templates in
```
assets/templates/
```
when useful.
For resubmission, map old reviewer concerns to the new venue's constraints through
```
ccf-submission-checker
```
; do not silently add experiments or bibliography changes.
Hand off to
```
ccf-paper-writer
```
for manuscript revisions,
```
ccf-experiment-designer
```
for authorized new evidence, and
```
ccf-submission-checker
```
for venue/package checks.

确认期刊/会议、回复格式、字数限制、截止日期、评审分数/置信度，以及当前场景是反驳、修订还是重投。
将审稿意见按审稿人、问题类型、严重程度、可用证据、回复策略、承诺的稿件修改进行分组。
加载
```
references/response-strategy.md
```
和
```
../ccf-paper-writer/references/prose-quality-guardrails.md
```
；优先处理高影响问题：合理性、创新性、缺失证据、错误假设以及多个审稿人共同提出的问题。
当需要跟踪承诺的修改、稿件位置、重投行动、评审轮次或跨版本分数变化时，加载
```
references/revision-ledger.md
```
。更新统一的标准台账；除非用户要求快照，否则请勿为每一轮评审创建单独台账。
针对完整反驳信，加载
```
references/tex-templates.md
```
，并在适用时使用
```
assets/templates/
```
中的TeX模板。
针对重投场景，通过
```
ccf-submission-checker
```
将原审稿意见映射至新期刊/会议的约束条件；不得擅自添加实验或修改参考文献。
将稿件修订任务移交至
```
ccf-paper-writer
```
，授权的新证据获取任务移交至
```
ccf-experiment-designer
```
，期刊/会议打包检查任务移交至
```
ccf-submission-checker
```
。

Adaptive Output Contract

自适应输出约定

Put the requested response artifact first. For "write rebuttal", output the rebuttal text or TeX first. For "make a ledger", output the ledger first. Use the full structure below for standard multi-reviewer response planning or when the user asks for strategy plus draft:

text

Mode:
Venue and constraints:
Issue table:
Response strategy:
Draft response or response file:
Promised paper changes:
Revision ledger:
Resubmission adaptation notes:
Claims/promises to avoid:
Next CCFA owner:
Checklist status:

优先输出用户请求的回复成果。若用户要求“撰写反驳信”，则先输出反驳文本或TeX内容；若要求“制作台账”，则先输出台账内容。当需要进行标准多审稿人回复规划，或用户要求同时提供策略与草稿时，使用以下完整结构：

text

Mode:
Venue and constraints:
Issue table:
Response strategy:
Draft response or response file:
Promised paper changes:
Revision ledger:
Resubmission adaptation notes:
Claims/promises to avoid:
Next CCFA owner:
Checklist status:

References

参考资料

```
references/response-strategy.md
```
: response tactics.
```
references/response-checklists.md
```
: tone, evidence, promises, and word-budget checks.
```
../ccf-paper-writer/references/prose-quality-guardrails.md
```
: concise, non-defensive response prose and anti-pattern checks.
```
references/tex-templates.md
```
: reusable TeX response templates.
```
references/revision-ledger.md
```
: tracking reviewer comments and manuscript actions.
```
../ccf-paper-reviewer/references/version-comparison.md
```
: frozen scoring contract and issue provenance for cross-version review; rebuttal prose must not redefine that contract.

```
references/response-strategy.md
```
：回复策略。
```
references/response-checklists.md
```
：语气、证据、承诺及字数限制检查清单。
```
../ccf-paper-writer/references/prose-quality-guardrails.md
```
：简洁、无防御性的回复措辞及反模式检查。
```
references/tex-templates.md
```
：可复用的TeX回复模板。
```
references/revision-ledger.md
```
：审稿意见与稿件行动跟踪。
```
../ccf-paper-reviewer/references/version-comparison.md
```
：跨版本评审的固定评分约定与问题来源；反驳信措辞不得重新定义该约定。