ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chineseai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery: Working Backwards Discovery
ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery: 反向工作法发现访谈
Internal AI SDLC skill, not client-facing by default. Every rule below is important to follow. None of it can be skipped. Before producing the final artifact, confirm required inputs, target audience, missing facts, output format, and constraints when they are unclear. Do not invent missing information. Ask concise clarification questions when required inputs are absent.
内部AI SDLC技能,默认不面向客户。 以下每条规则都必须遵守,不可跳过。 在生成最终工件前,若所需输入、目标受众、缺失信息、输出格式和约束条件不明确,请先确认。 不得编造缺失信息,必要时提出简洁的澄清问题。
0. Skill Card
0. 技能卡片
- Skill name:
ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery - Primary audience: PM
- Supporting audience: BA, Delivery
- Audience tags: PM, BA
- SDLC stage: Discovery / initiative framing
- Purpose: Run the discovery interview that turns an initiative idea into a structured, business-grounded definition.
- Output: Structured discovery notes, clarified assumptions, open questions, and PRFAQ-ready facts
- 技能名称:
ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery - 核心受众:PM(产品经理)
- 支持受众:BA(业务分析师)、交付团队
- 受众标签:PM, BA
- SDLC阶段:发现/倡议框架搭建
- 目的:开展发现访谈,将倡议构想转化为结构化、基于业务逻辑的定义
- 输出:结构化发现笔记、已明确的假设、待解决问题、可用于撰写PRFAQ的事实信息
0.1 Required Inputs
0.1 必填输入项
- Initiative idea or product problem.
- Known customer, user, or stakeholder context.
- Business goal, constraint, or launch driver if available.
- 倡议构想或产品问题
- 已知的客户、用户或利益相关者背景
- 若有可用的业务目标、约束条件或上线驱动因素
0.2 Clarification Rules
0.2 澄清规则
- Ask concise questions before finalizing when role, artifact, requirements, scope, audience, or constraints are unclear.
- If optional information is missing, mark it as ,
TBD, orNot providedinstead of inventing it.Assumption - Separate confirmed facts from assumptions and open questions.
- Do not proceed to downstream synthesis when a required upstream artifact or decision is missing.
- 当角色、工件、需求、范围、受众或约束条件不明确时,在最终定稿前提出简洁的问题
- 若可选信息缺失,标记为(待确定)、
TBD(未提供)或Not provided(假设),不得编造Assumption - 将已确认事实与假设、待解决问题分开
- 当前游必填工件或决策缺失时,不得进入下游合成环节
0.2.1 Flow Mode Flags
0.2.1 流程模式标记
- Support two explicit execution flags: and
--quick-flow.--full-flow - If both flags are supplied, takes precedence because it is the stricter mode.
--full-flow - : move fast, make high-quality progress with available context, avoid clarification questions unless continuing would create material product, security, compliance, data-loss, or irreversible implementation risk.
--quick-flow - In , use documented assumptions, recommended defaults, existing repository patterns, and the nearest available artifact evidence; record important assumptions and decisions in
--quick-flow.decision-log.md - In , run only focused checks that are directly relevant, cheap, and likely to catch regressions for the requested work; report any skipped broader checks as residual risk.
--quick-flow - : ask concise clarification questions when inputs, scope, ownership, acceptance criteria, or decisions are unclear; do not silently assume material requirements.
--full-flow - In , verify upstream and downstream artifacts, decision-log entries, traceability links, acceptance criteria, and validation evidence before finalizing.
--full-flow - In , run or recommend the skill-appropriate gates, reviews, scripts, and validation commands needed for end-to-end confidence; document any blocked verification explicitly.
--full-flow - When neither flag is supplied, follow the skill default rules and choose the least risky behavior for the request size and domain.
- 支持两种明确的执行标记:和
--quick-flow--full-flow - 若同时提供两种标记,优先级更高,因其为更严格的模式
--full-flow - :快速推进,利用现有上下文高效开展工作;除非继续推进会产生重大产品、安全、合规、数据丢失或不可逆的实施风险,否则避免提出澄清问题
--quick-flow - 在模式下,使用已记录的假设、推荐默认值、现有仓库模式和最接近的可用工件证据;将重要假设和决策记录在
--quick-flow中decision-log.md - 在模式下,仅运行与请求工作直接相关、成本低且可能发现回归问题的针对性检查;将任何跳过的全面检查报告为残留风险
--quick-flow - :当输入、范围、所有权、验收标准或决策不明确时,提出简洁的澄清问题;不得默认重要需求
--full-flow - 在模式下,最终定稿前需验证上游和下游工件、决策日志条目、可追溯链接、验收标准和验证证据
--full-flow - 在模式下,运行或推荐技能对应的准入检查、评审、脚本和验证命令,以确保端到端可信度;明确记录任何受阻的验证环节
--full-flow - 若未提供任何标记,遵循技能默认规则,并根据请求规模和领域选择风险最低的行为
0.3 Output Rules
0.3 输出规则
- Keep output structured with headings and bullets.
- Make findings, gaps, risks, and blockers explicit.
- Tie recommendations to evidence from the provided artifact, workspace, stakeholder context, or user-provided source material.
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md> - Include role ownership when the output creates follow-up work for BA, QA, Dev, PM, or Delivery.
- Return progress, completion, validation, and handoff summaries directly in the Codex response.
- Before the final response, emit the contract with
ai-sdlc-handoff/v1,result,blockers, andnext_required; every action includesnext_optional,reason, andcommand.expected_artifact - Do not create ,
summary.txt, or another standalone summary file unless the user explicitly requests one.*-summary.txt - Keep durable writes limited to the canonical lifecycle artifacts, decision log, human-readable index, and machine files.
_ai_sdlc - Let shared helpers migrate legacy paths on the next write; never overwrite or manually merge divergent legacy and canonical files.
- 输出内容需通过标题和项目符号保持结构化
- 明确指出发现结果、差距、风险和阻塞点
- 建议需与提供的工件、工作区、利益相关者背景或用户提供的源材料中的证据关联
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md> - 当输出为BA、QA、开发、PM或交付团队带来后续工作时,需明确角色归属
- 直接在Codex响应中返回进度、完成情况、验证和交接摘要
- 在最终响应前,输出包含、
result、blockers和next_required的next_optional协议;每个操作需包含ai-sdlc-handoff/v1、reason和commandexpected_artifact - 除非用户明确要求,否则不得创建、
summary.txt或其他独立摘要文件*-summary.txt - 持久化写入仅限于标准生命周期工件、决策日志、人类可读索引和机器文件
_ai_sdlc - 让共享助手在下次写入时迁移旧路径;切勿覆盖或手动合并不一致的旧文件与标准文件
0.4 Artifact Routing
0.4 工件路由
-
Maintain a feature decision log whenever this skill records, resolves, changes, or depends on a product, delivery, QA, security, validation, branching, implementation, or rollout decision.
-
For PM, BA, QA, Delivery, discovery, planning, refinement, and readiness work, write decisions to.
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/decision-log.md -
For developer implementation SDD work, write decisions to.
specs/<feature-name>/decision-log.md -
Each decision-log entry must include date, decision, context or evidence, options considered when relevant, owner, status, and links to affected artifacts, tasks, tests, or validation evidence.
-
Use this exact decision-log structure:markdown
# Decision Log | ID | Date | Status | Owner | Decision | Context/Evidence | Options Considered | Affected Artifacts | Validation/Trace Links | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DEC-001 | YYYY-MM-DD | proposed / accepted / superseded / rejected | role or name | concise decision | source facts, artifact links, or evidence | option A; option B; recommended default | affected docs, tasks, code, tests, or rollout notes | requirement IDs, test IDs, validation commands, PRs, commits, or tickets | -
When writing or updating files, place PM, BA, QA, Delivery, discovery, planning, refinement, and readiness artifacts at.
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md> -
Use the path pattern; choose a stable feature slug when known, otherwise use
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>fortbd-<short-topic>.<feature-name> -
Do not write this skill's output into; that folder is reserved for developer implementation SDD artifacts.
specs/ -
If the user explicitly asks to convert a refined artifact into developer implementation work, hand off to.
$ai-sdlc-sdd
-
每当该技能记录、解决、更改或依赖产品、交付、QA、安全、验证、分支、实施或发布决策时,需维护功能决策日志
-
针对PM、BA、QA、交付团队的发现、规划、细化和准备工作,将决策写入
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/decision-log.md -
针对开发人员实施SDD(软件设计文档)的工作,将决策写入
specs/<feature-name>/decision-log.md -
每个决策日志条目必须包含日期、决策内容、背景或证据、相关备选方案(如有)、负责人、状态以及关联工件、任务、测试或验证证据的链接
-
使用以下精确的决策日志结构:markdown
# Decision Log | ID | Date | Status | Owner | Decision | Context/Evidence | Options Considered | Affected Artifacts | Validation/Trace Links | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DEC-001 | YYYY-MM-DD | proposed / accepted / superseded / rejected | role or name | concise decision | source facts, artifact links, or evidence | option A; option B; recommended default | affected docs, tasks, code, tests, or rollout notes | requirement IDs, test IDs, validation commands, PRs, commits, or tickets | -
写入或更新文件时,将PM、BA、QA、交付团队的发现、规划、细化和准备工件放置在路径下
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md> -
使用路径模式;已知稳定功能别名时使用该别名,否则
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>使用<feature-name>tbd-<short-topic> -
不得将该技能的输出写入文件夹;该文件夹专为开发人员实施SDD的工件保留
specs/ -
若用户明确要求将已细化的工件转换为开发实施工作,需交接给
$ai-sdlc-sdd
0.5 Feature State Machine
0.5 功能状态机
- Maintain feature lifecycle state in TOON at for refinement work and
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toonfor implementation work.specs/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon - Before executing this skill for a feature, check the state machine with .
python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py check --feature <feature-name> --skill <this-skill-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow - When this skill starts durable work, mark it in progress with ; when the skill's required artifact or review is complete, mark it done with
beginand includecompleteplus--artifacts <path>when a decision was involved.--decision-ref DEC-### - In , do not proceed when predecessor stages are incomplete, another lifecycle skill is active, or the state file reports a blocker.
--full-flow - In , a predecessor skip is allowed only when continuing is low risk and the command includes
--quick-flowor--assumption "..."; record the same assumption or decision in--decision-ref DEC-###.decision-log.md - Use to emit compact LLM-readable state before choosing the next skill.
python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py status --feature <feature-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --format toon - The state machine is feature-scoped: do not reuse a across unrelated feature folders.
state.toon
- 在TOON中维护功能生命周期状态:细化工作对应,实施工作对应
specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toonspecs/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon - 针对某功能执行该技能前,使用检查状态机
python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py check --feature <feature-name> --skill <this-skill-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow - 当该技能开始持久化工作时,用标记为进行中;当技能所需工件或评审完成时,用
begin标记为已完成,若涉及决策需添加complete和--artifacts <path>--decision-ref DEC-### - 在模式下,当前游阶段未完成、其他生命周期技能正在运行或状态文件报告阻塞时,不得推进
--full-flow - 在模式下,仅当继续推进风险低且命令包含
--quick-flow或--assumption "..."时,才可跳过上游阶段;需在--decision-ref DEC-###中记录相同的假设或决策decision-log.md - 使用输出紧凑的LLM可读状态,再选择下一个技能
python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py status --feature <feature-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --format toon - 状态机以功能为范围:不得在无关功能文件夹间复用
state.toon
0.6 Artifact Metadata And Metatags
0.6 工件元数据与元标签
- Every Markdown artifact generated or updated by this skill must start with an YAML frontmatter block before the first visible heading.
artifact_metadata - Use schema and keep these fields current:
ai-sdlc-artifact-metadata/v1,feature,artifact,path,workspace,skill,flow_mode,state_file,decision_log,status,owner,created_at,updated_at,trace_ids,related_artifacts, andvalidation.metatags - must include at minimum
metatags, the workspace (ai-sdlcorrefinement), this skill name, the artifact type or filename stem, and a lifecycle/status tag such asimplementation,draft,review, orapproved.validated - When is active, set
--quick-flow, keep assumptions visible in the body, and add tags for major defaults or unresolved risk only when they help retrieval.flow_mode: quick - When is active, set
--full-flow, keep blockers and validation evidence reflected inflow_mode: full,status,validation, andtrace_ids.related_artifacts - Update metadata whenever the artifact path, status, owner, trace links, validation evidence, related artifacts, or decision references change.
- Metadata is an index for routing, retrieval, and traceability; it does not replace the artifact body, , or
decision-log.md.state.toon
- 该技能生成或更新的每个Markdown工件,必须在第一个可见标题前包含YAML前置块
artifact_metadata - 使用schema,并保持以下字段更新:
ai-sdlc-artifact-metadata/v1、feature、artifact、path、workspace、skill、flow_mode、state_file、decision_log、status、owner、created_at、updated_at、trace_ids、related_artifacts和validationmetatags - 至少必须包含
metatags、工作区(ai-sdlc或refinement)、该技能名称、工件类型或文件名主干,以及生命周期/状态标签(如implementation、draft、review或approved)validated - 当激活时,设置
--quick-flow,在正文中显示假设,仅当有助于检索时才添加主要默认值或未解决风险的标签flow_mode: quick - 当激活时,设置
--full-flow,在flow_mode: full、status、validation和trace_ids中反映阻塞点和验证证据related_artifacts - 当工件路径、状态、负责人、追溯链接、验证证据、关联工件或决策引用发生变化时,更新元数据
- 元数据用于路由、检索和可追溯性;不得替代工件正文、或
decision-log.mdstate.toon
0.7 Specs Index
0.7 规格索引
- Before searching across feature folders, inspect the compact LLM index first: for refinement work or
specs-refiniment/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toonfor implementation work.specs/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon - Use the human-readable index at or
specs-refiniment/specs-index.mdwhen reporting feature coverage, artifact inventory, or handoff status to people.specs/specs-index.md - After this skill creates or materially updates an artifact, refresh the matching workspace index with .
python3 skills/_shared/ai_sdlc_specs_index.py --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow - In , rely on
--quick-flowto choose the smallest relevant artifact set before opening files.specs-index.toon - In , verify the updated artifact appears in both
--full-flowandspecs-index.toonbefore final handoff.specs-index.md - The specs index summarizes artifact metadata and state; it does not replace reading the selected source artifacts when details, approvals, or validation evidence matter.
- 在跨功能文件夹搜索前,先查看紧凑的LLM索引:细化工作对应,实施工作对应
specs-refiniment/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toonspecs/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon - 向人员汇报功能覆盖范围、工件清单或交接状态时,使用人类可读索引或
specs-refiniment/specs-index.mdspecs/specs-index.md - 该技能创建或大幅更新工件后,使用刷新对应工作区的索引
python3 skills/_shared/ai_sdlc_specs_index.py --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow - 在模式下,依赖
--quick-flow选择最小相关工件集后再打开文件specs-index.toon - 在模式下,最终交接前需验证更新后的工件是否同时出现在
--full-flow和specs-index.toon中specs-index.md - 规格索引汇总工件元数据和状态;当细节、审批或验证证据重要时,不得替代读取所选源工件
0.8 Complete Refinement Cascade
0.8 完整细化流程
- Trigger the complete cascade only when the user explicitly asks for a full, complete, or end-to-end spec refinement or asks for every refinement artifact. A normal call for one skill remains single-stage.
--full-flow - Before the first durable write, run and start with the earliest reported
python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format toon, including stages earlier than this skill.next_skill - Execute the existing refinement skills in lifecycle order with : discovery, PRFAQ, delivery-package gap review, requirements readiness, goal/capability mapping, backlog gap review, backlog decomposition, story decomposition, release slicing, BA context, delivery spec, QA plan, QA gap review, test strategy, test cases, test suite, QA readiness, and delivery handoff.
--full-flow - Produce all 18 canonical Markdown artifacts. is mandatory for a complete cascade; when release slicing is not applicable, write an explicit evidence-backed N/A artifact and complete the stage instead of skipping it.
release-slicing.md - After every stage, finalize its artifact, record required decisions, mark the stage , and refresh the refinement indexes before selecting the next skill.
done - Do not declare the cascade complete until exits successfully with
python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format markdown. If it fails, continue with the reported next skill or return the concrete blocker and remaining inventory in Codex.18/18 - Surface checkpoint and final summaries in Codex only; never persist a cascade summary as a text file.
- 仅当用户明确要求完整或端到端的规格细化,或要求所有细化工件时,才触发完整流程。正常的单技能调用仍为单阶段
--full-flow - 在首次持久化写入前,运行,从报告的最早
python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format toon开始,包括早于该技能的阶段next_skill - 按生命周期顺序使用执行现有细化技能:发现、PRFAQ、交付包差距评审、需求就绪、目标/能力映射、待办事项差距评审、待办事项分解、用户故事分解、发布切片、BA背景、交付规格、QA计划、QA差距评审、测试策略、测试用例、测试套件、QA就绪、交付交接
--full-flow - 生成全部18个标准Markdown工件。完整流程中为必填项;若发布切片不适用,需写入明确的有证据支持的N/A工件并完成该阶段,不得跳过
release-slicing.md - 每个阶段结束后,定稿其工件、记录必填决策、标记阶段为、刷新细化索引,再选择下一个技能
done - 仅当成功退出且显示
python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format markdown时,才可宣布流程完成。若失败,继续执行报告的下一个技能,或在Codex中返回具体阻塞点和剩余工件清单18/18 - 仅在Codex中展示检查点和最终摘要;不得将流程摘要保存为文本文件
References
参考资料
- Use when deterministic scaffolding, planning, or formatting is useful for this workflow; pass the same
scripts/discovery_interview_plan.pyor--quick-flowflag that was supplied to the skill.--full-flow - Read when the task needs the detailed structure, checklist, or examples for this skill.
references/interview-framework.md
- 当该工作流需要确定性脚手架、规划或格式化时,使用;传递与技能相同的
scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py或--quick-flow标记--full-flow - 当任务需要该技能的详细结构、检查清单或示例时,阅读
references/interview-framework.md
Script Usage
脚本使用
-
In default and full flow, always run this skill's primary analysis script withbefore drafting; explicit inputs are priority evidence but do not replace the rest of the feature package.
--format toon --budget-tokens 24000 -
Read this skill's reference file before writing sections. Use its detailed tables and quality bar, not only the compact scaffold headings.
-
Run the primary script within the active flow mode to obtain the exact shared context headings and required stage table columns before section writes.
--emit-template -
Make every default/full artifact self-contained by completing all ten shared feature-context sections plus the stage-specific profile sections. Quick flow may use the compact stage-only draft.
-
Follow everyentry before finalization and list every consumed source in
next_reads; do not claim whole-feature context from a partial source set.Source Coverage -
Keep the final artifact within; condense repetition instead of dropping feature dimensions or source traceability.
--max-artifact-tokens 24000 -
Runbefore drafting or updating this skill's artifact when inputs are longer than a few bullets, when traceability matters, or when a flow flag is supplied. For agent analysis, pass
scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py, read--format toonfirst, and open onlyanchors; without that flag the script keeps its human-readable Markdown output.next_reads -
Quick flow analysis:
python3 skills/ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery/scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py --feature <feature-name> --quick-flow <input.md>... -
Full flow analysis:
python3 skills/ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery/scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py --feature <feature-name> --full-flow <input.md>... -
To write content, pass one canonical heading with; provide only that section body on stdin, without H1, H2, frontmatter, or a temporary content file.
--section "<section>" -
Repeatfor each required section, then run the same script with
--sectionto validate the artifact and refresh metadata and specs indexes.--finalize -
The AI must not write or directly edit the routed Markdown artifact; the script owns scaffold creation, section placement, and durable file writes.
-
Usewith one nine-cell Markdown table row on stdin when a decision-log entry is required.
--decision-row -
Legacy,
--emit-template, and--emit-decision-log-entryremain available for compatibility.--write -
Usefor first-pass synthesis with assumptions; use
--quick-flowbefore readiness, handoff, signoff, or any decision-sensitive output.--full-flow
-
在默认和完整流程中,起草前始终使用运行该技能的主分析脚本;明确输入为优先证据,但不得替代其他功能包内容
--format toon --budget-tokens 24000 -
撰写章节前阅读该技能的参考文件。使用其详细表格和质量标准,而非仅使用紧凑的脚手架标题
-
在当前流程模式下运行主脚本并添加,以获取精确的共享上下文标题和必填阶段表格列,再进行章节撰写
--emit-template -
每个默认/完整工件需包含所有十个共享功能上下文章节加阶段特定配置文件章节,确保自包含。快速流程可使用紧凑的仅阶段草稿
-
定稿前遵循每个条目,并在
next_reads中列出所有已使用的源;不得通过部分源集声称拥有完整功能上下文Source Coverage -
最终工件需控制在范围内;精简重复内容,不得删除功能维度或源可追溯性
--max-artifact-tokens 24000 -
当输入超过几个项目符号、可追溯性重要或提供了流程标记时,起草或更新该技能的工件前运行。针对Agent分析,传递
scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py,先读取--format toon,仅打开anchors;若无该标记,脚本保持人类可读的Markdown输出next_reads -
快速流程分析:
python3 skills/ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery/scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py --feature <feature-name> --quick-flow <input.md>... -
完整流程分析:
python3 skills/ai-sdlc-working-backwards-discovery/scripts/discovery_interview_plan.py --feature <feature-name> --full-flow <input.md>... -
撰写内容时,传递一个标准标题并添加;仅在标准输入中提供该章节正文,无需H1、H2、前置块或临时内容文件
--section "<section>" -
对每个必填章节重复操作,然后运行相同脚本并添加
--section以验证工件并刷新元数据和规格索引--finalize -
AI不得直接写入或编辑路由后的Markdown工件;脚本负责脚手架创建、章节放置和持久化文件写入
-
当需要添加决策日志条目时,使用并在标准输入中提供一行九单元格的Markdown表格
--decision-row -
旧版、
--emit-template和--emit-decision-log-entry仍可兼容使用--write -
使用进行基于假设的首次合成;在就绪、交接、签字或任何决策敏感输出前使用
--quick-flow--full-flow
Purpose
目的
Run the discovery interview that turns an initiative idea into a structured, business-grounded definition.
开展发现访谈,将倡议构想转化为结构化、基于业务逻辑的定义
Use When
使用场景
- The user wants a PRFAQ but the initiative is still fuzzy.
- The user needs help clarifying customer pain, target audience, business goals, requirements, and risks.
- The user wants a critical product partner who will challenge vague statements.
- 用户想要撰写PRFAQ,但倡议仍模糊不清
- 用户需要帮助明确客户痛点、目标受众、业务目标、需求和风险
- 用户需要一个能挑战模糊表述的关键产品合作伙伴
Do Not Use When
禁用场景
- The initiative already has a validated, clear requirements package and only needs final document drafting.
- The task is technical implementation planning without business discovery.
- 倡议已有经过验证的清晰需求包,仅需最终文档起草
- 任务为技术实施规划,无需业务发现
Workflow
工作流程
- Start at Stage 1 initiative context.
- Ask a maximum of 5 to 7 questions at a time.
- After every answer, summarize facts, assumptions, contradictions, and open questions.
- Challenge vague wording until it becomes measurable, observable, or testable.
- Stay in the current stage until the clarity bar is met.
- Do not hand off to synthesis until the discovery minimums are present.
- 从第1阶段的倡议上下文开始
- 每次最多提出5-7个问题
- 每次收到回答后,总结事实、假设、矛盾点和待解决问题
- 挑战模糊表述,直到内容可衡量、可观察或可测试
- 在当前阶段达到清晰度标准前,不得推进到下一阶段
- 发现环节的最低要求未满足前,不得交接给合成环节
Interview Rules
访谈规则
- Ask for real examples and current workarounds.
- Separate facts from assumptions and hypotheses.
- Keep decisions made distinct from decisions still needed.
- Push back if the MVP becomes a disguised full roadmap.
- Capture risks, dependencies, and out-of-scope items as they appear.
- 要求提供真实示例和当前解决方案
- 区分事实与假设、假设与假说
- 明确已做出的决策与仍需做出的决策
- 若MVP演变为伪装的完整路线图,需提出反对
- 随时记录出现的风险、依赖关系和超出范围的事项
Framework
框架
Use for the staged question structure.
references/interview-framework.md使用的分阶段问题结构
references/interview-framework.mdCompletion Criteria
完成标准
- Target customer is specific.
- Customer problem and current workaround are clear.
- Value proposition is explicit.
- Business objective and MVP are defined.
- Success metrics, risks, and dependencies are materially captured.
- 目标客户明确具体
- 客户问题和当前解决方案清晰
- 价值主张明确
- 业务目标和MVP已定义
- 成功指标、风险和依赖关系已充分捕获