ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning: Backlog Decomposition And Task Planning

ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning:待办事项分解与任务规划

Internal AI SDLC skill, not client-facing by default. Every rule below is important to follow. None of it can be skipped. Before producing the final artifact, confirm required inputs, target audience, missing facts, output format, and constraints when they are unclear. Do not invent missing information. Ask concise clarification questions when required inputs are absent.
内部AI SDLC技能,默认不面向客户。 以下每条规则都必须遵守,不可跳过任何一条。 在生成最终工件前,若所需输入、目标受众、缺失信息、输出格式和约束条件不明确,请先确认这些内容。 不得编造缺失信息。当所需输入缺失时,请提出简洁的澄清问题。

0. Skill Card

0. 技能卡片

  • Skill name:
    ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning
  • Primary audience: PM
  • Supporting audience: BA, QA, Dev Lead, Delivery
  • Audience tags: PM, BA, QA, Dev
  • SDLC stage: Backlog decomposition
  • Purpose: Convert planning structure into a delivery-oriented backlog with cross-functional work represented explicitly.
  • Output: Features, user stories, acceptance summaries, and cross-functional delivery tasks
  • 技能名称:
    ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning
  • 主要受众:PM
  • 支持受众:BA、QA、开发负责人、交付人员
  • 受众标签:PM、BA、QA、Dev
  • SDLC阶段:待办事项分解
  • 目的:将规划结构转换为明确体现跨职能工作的交付型待办事项。
  • 输出:功能、用户故事、验收摘要和跨职能交付任务

0.1 Required Inputs

0.1 必需输入

  • Defined goals, capabilities, and epics.
  • MVP or release boundary.
  • Known dependencies, constraints, and cross-functional needs.
  • 已定义的目标、能力和Epic。
  • MVP或发布边界。
  • 已知依赖项、约束条件和跨职能需求。

0.2 Clarification Rules

0.2 澄清规则

  • Ask concise questions before finalizing when role, artifact, requirements, scope, audience, or constraints are unclear.
  • If optional information is missing, mark it as
    TBD
    ,
    Not provided
    , or
    Assumption
    instead of inventing it.
  • Separate confirmed facts from assumptions and open questions.
  • Do not proceed to downstream synthesis when a required upstream artifact or decision is missing.
  • 当角色、工件、需求、范围、受众或约束条件不明确时,在最终确定前提出简洁的问题。
  • 若可选信息缺失,标记为
    TBD
    未提供
    假设
    ,而非编造信息。
  • 将已确认事实与假设和未解决问题分开。
  • 当所需的上游工件或决策缺失时,不得进行下游合成工作。

0.2.1 Flow Mode Flags

0.2.1 流程模式标志

  • Support two explicit execution flags:
    --quick-flow
    and
    --full-flow
    .
  • If both flags are supplied,
    --full-flow
    takes precedence because it is the stricter mode.
  • --quick-flow
    : move fast, make high-quality progress with available context, avoid clarification questions unless continuing would create material product, security, compliance, data-loss, or irreversible implementation risk.
  • In
    --quick-flow
    , use documented assumptions, recommended defaults, existing repository patterns, and the nearest available artifact evidence; record important assumptions and decisions in
    decision-log.md
    .
  • In
    --quick-flow
    , run only focused checks that are directly relevant, cheap, and likely to catch regressions for the requested work; report any skipped broader checks as residual risk.
  • --full-flow
    : ask concise clarification questions when inputs, scope, ownership, acceptance criteria, or decisions are unclear; do not silently assume material requirements.
  • In
    --full-flow
    , verify upstream and downstream artifacts, decision-log entries, traceability links, acceptance criteria, and validation evidence before finalizing.
  • In
    --full-flow
    , run or recommend the skill-appropriate gates, reviews, scripts, and validation commands needed for end-to-end confidence; document any blocked verification explicitly.
  • When neither flag is supplied, follow the skill default rules and choose the least risky behavior for the request size and domain.
  • 支持两种明确的执行标志:
    --quick-flow
    --full-flow
  • 若同时提供两个标志,
    --full-flow
    优先,因为它是更严格的模式。
  • --quick-flow
    :快速推进,利用现有上下文取得高质量进展,除非继续执行会造成重大产品、安全、合规、数据丢失或不可逆的实施风险,否则避免提出澄清问题。
  • --quick-flow
    模式下,使用已记录的假设、推荐默认值、现有仓库模式和最近可用的工件证据;将重要假设和决策记录在
    decision-log.md
    中。
  • --quick-flow
    模式下,仅运行与请求工作直接相关、成本低且可能发现回归问题的针对性检查;将任何跳过的更广泛检查报告为残余风险。
  • --full-flow
    :当输入、范围、所有权、验收标准或决策不明确时,提出简洁的澄清问题;不得默认假设重要需求。
  • --full-flow
    模式下,在最终确定前验证上游和下游工件、决策日志条目、可追溯性链接、验收标准和验证证据。
  • --full-flow
    模式下,运行或推荐适合该技能的关卡、评审、脚本和验证命令,以实现端到端的信心;明确记录任何受阻的验证工作。
  • 当未提供任何标志时,遵循技能默认规则,并根据请求规模和领域选择风险最低的行为。

0.3 Output Rules

0.3 输出规则

  • Keep output structured with headings and bullets.
  • Make findings, gaps, risks, and blockers explicit.
  • Tie recommendations to evidence from the provided artifact,
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    workspace, or user context.
  • Include role ownership when the output creates follow-up work for BA, QA, Dev, PM, or Delivery.
  • Return progress, completion, validation, and handoff summaries directly in the Codex response.
  • Before the final response, emit the
    ai-sdlc-handoff/v1
    contract with
    result
    ,
    blockers
    ,
    next_required
    , and
    next_optional
    ; every action includes
    reason
    ,
    command
    , and
    expected_artifact
    .
  • Do not create
    summary.txt
    ,
    *-summary.txt
    , or another standalone summary file unless the user explicitly requests one.
  • Keep durable writes limited to the canonical lifecycle artifacts, decision log, human-readable index, and
    _ai_sdlc
    machine files.
  • Let shared helpers migrate legacy paths on the next write; never overwrite or manually merge divergent legacy and canonical files.
  • 保持输出结构清晰,使用标题和项目符号。
  • 明确指出发现结果、差距、风险和障碍。
  • 将建议与提供的工件、
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    工作区或用户上下文的证据关联起来。
  • 当输出为BA、QA、Dev、PM或交付人员创建后续工作时,包含角色所有权信息。
  • 在Codex响应中直接返回进度、完成情况、验证和交接摘要。
  • 在最终响应前,发出包含
    result
    blockers
    next_required
    next_optional
    ai-sdlc-handoff/v1
    契约;每个操作都包含
    reason
    command
    expected_artifact
  • 除非用户明确要求,否则不得创建
    summary.txt
    *-summary.txt
    或其他独立摘要文件。
  • 仅将持久化写入限制在规范生命周期工件、决策日志、人类可读索引和
    _ai_sdlc
    机器文件中。
  • 让共享助手在下次写入时迁移旧路径;切勿覆盖或手动合并不一致的旧文件和规范文件。

0.4 Artifact Routing

0.4 工件路由

  • Maintain a feature decision log whenever this skill records, resolves, changes, or depends on a product, delivery, QA, security, validation, branching, implementation, or rollout decision.
  • For PM, BA, QA, Delivery, discovery, planning, refinement, and readiness work, write decisions to
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/decision-log.md
    .
  • For developer implementation SDD work, write decisions to
    specs/<feature-name>/decision-log.md
    .
  • Each decision-log entry must include date, decision, context or evidence, options considered when relevant, owner, status, and links to affected artifacts, tasks, tests, or validation evidence.
  • Use this exact decision-log structure:
    markdown
    # Decision Log
    
    | ID | Date | Status | Owner | Decision | Context/Evidence | Options Considered | Affected Artifacts | Validation/Trace Links |
    | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
    | DEC-001 | YYYY-MM-DD | proposed / accepted / superseded / rejected | role or name | concise decision | source facts, artifact links, or evidence | option A; option B; recommended default | affected docs, tasks, code, tests, or rollout notes | requirement IDs, test IDs, validation commands, PRs, commits, or tickets |
  • When writing or updating files, place PM, BA, QA, Delivery, discovery, planning, refinement, and readiness artifacts at
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    .
  • Use the path pattern
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    ; choose a stable feature slug when known, otherwise use
    tbd-<short-topic>
    for
    <feature-name>
    .
  • Do not write this skill's output into
    specs/
    ; that folder is reserved for developer implementation SDD artifacts.
  • If the user explicitly asks to convert a refined artifact into developer implementation work, hand off to
    $ai-sdlc-sdd
    .
  • 每当该技能记录、解决、更改或依赖产品、交付、QA、安全、验证、分支、实施或发布决策时,维护功能决策日志。
  • 对于PM、BA、QA、交付、探索、规划、细化和准备工作,将决策写入
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/decision-log.md
  • 对于开发人员实施SDD工作,将决策写入
    specs/<feature-name>/decision-log.md
  • 每个决策日志条目必须包含日期、决策、上下文或证据、相关备选方案(如有)、负责人、状态以及指向受影响工件、任务、测试或验证证据的链接。
  • 使用以下精确的决策日志结构:
    markdown
    # Decision Log
    
    | ID | Date | Status | Owner | Decision | Context/Evidence | Options Considered | Affected Artifacts | Validation/Trace Links |
    | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
    | DEC-001 | YYYY-MM-DD | proposed / accepted / superseded / rejected | role or name | concise decision | source facts, artifact links, or evidence | option A; option B; recommended default | affected docs, tasks, code, tests, or rollout notes | requirement IDs, test IDs, validation commands, PRs, commits, or tickets |
  • 写入或更新文件时,将PM、BA、QA、交付、探索、规划、细化和准备工件放置在
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    路径下。
  • 使用路径模式
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/<file.md>
    ;若已知稳定的功能别名则使用该别名,否则
    <feature-name>
    使用
    tbd-<short-topic>
  • 不得将该技能的输出写入
    specs/
    文件夹;该文件夹专为开发人员实施SDD工件保留。
  • 若用户明确要求将细化后的工件转换为开发人员实施工作,则交接给
    $ai-sdlc-sdd

0.5 Feature State Machine

0.5 功能状态机

  • Maintain feature lifecycle state in TOON at
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon
    for refinement work and
    specs/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon
    for implementation work.
  • Before executing this skill for a feature, check the state machine with
    python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py check --feature <feature-name> --skill <this-skill-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow
    .
  • When this skill starts durable work, mark it in progress with
    begin
    ; when the skill's required artifact or review is complete, mark it done with
    complete
    and include
    --artifacts <path>
    plus
    --decision-ref DEC-###
    when a decision was involved.
  • In
    --full-flow
    , do not proceed when predecessor stages are incomplete, another lifecycle skill is active, or the state file reports a blocker.
  • In
    --quick-flow
    , a predecessor skip is allowed only when continuing is low risk and the command includes
    --assumption "..."
    or
    --decision-ref DEC-###
    ; record the same assumption or decision in
    decision-log.md
    .
  • Use
    python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py status --feature <feature-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --format toon
    to emit compact LLM-readable state before choosing the next skill.
  • The state machine is feature-scoped: do not reuse a
    state.toon
    across unrelated feature folders.
  • 在TOON中维护功能生命周期状态:细化工作的状态文件为
    specs-refiniment/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon
    ,实施工作的状态文件为
    specs/<feature-name>/_ai_sdlc/state.toon
  • 在为某个功能执行该技能前,使用
    python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py check --feature <feature-name> --skill <this-skill-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow
    检查状态机。
  • 当该技能开始持久化工作时,使用
    begin
    标记为进行中;当技能所需的工件或评审完成时,使用
    complete
    标记为已完成,并在涉及决策时添加
    --artifacts <path>
    --decision-ref DEC-###
  • --full-flow
    模式下,当前置阶段未完成、另一个生命周期技能处于活动状态或状态文件报告障碍时,不得继续执行。
  • --quick-flow
    模式下,仅当继续执行风险较低且命令包含
    --assumption "..."
    --decision-ref DEC-###
    时,才允许跳过前置阶段;同时在
    decision-log.md
    中记录相同的假设或决策。
  • 使用
    python3 skills/_shared/state_machine.py status --feature <feature-name> --workspace <refinement|implementation> --format toon
    在选择下一个技能前生成紧凑的LLM可读状态。
  • 状态机以功能为范围:不得在不相关的功能文件夹之间重用
    state.toon

0.6 Artifact Metadata And Metatags

0.6 工件元数据和元标签

  • Every Markdown artifact generated or updated by this skill must start with an
    artifact_metadata
    YAML frontmatter block before the first visible heading.
  • Use schema
    ai-sdlc-artifact-metadata/v1
    and keep these fields current:
    feature
    ,
    artifact
    ,
    path
    ,
    workspace
    ,
    skill
    ,
    flow_mode
    ,
    state_file
    ,
    decision_log
    ,
    status
    ,
    owner
    ,
    created_at
    ,
    updated_at
    ,
    trace_ids
    ,
    related_artifacts
    ,
    validation
    , and
    metatags
    .
  • metatags
    must include at minimum
    ai-sdlc
    , the workspace (
    refinement
    or
    implementation
    ), this skill name, the artifact type or filename stem, and a lifecycle/status tag such as
    draft
    ,
    review
    ,
    approved
    , or
    validated
    .
  • When
    --quick-flow
    is active, set
    flow_mode: quick
    , keep assumptions visible in the body, and add tags for major defaults or unresolved risk only when they help retrieval.
  • When
    --full-flow
    is active, set
    flow_mode: full
    , keep blockers and validation evidence reflected in
    status
    ,
    validation
    ,
    trace_ids
    , and
    related_artifacts
    .
  • Update metadata whenever the artifact path, status, owner, trace links, validation evidence, related artifacts, or decision references change.
  • Metadata is an index for routing, retrieval, and traceability; it does not replace the artifact body,
    decision-log.md
    , or
    state.toon
    .
  • 该技能生成或更新的每个Markdown工件必须在第一个可见标题前包含
    artifact_metadata
    YAML前置块。
  • 使用
    ai-sdlc-artifact-metadata/v1
    schema,并保持以下字段最新:
    feature
    artifact
    path
    workspace
    skill
    flow_mode
    state_file
    decision_log
    status
    owner
    created_at
    updated_at
    trace_ids
    related_artifacts
    validation
    metatags
  • metatags
    必须至少包含
    ai-sdlc
    、工作区(
    refinement
    implementation
    )、该技能名称、工件类型或文件名主干,以及生命周期/状态标签(如
    draft
    review
    approved
    validated
    )。
  • --quick-flow
    模式激活时,设置
    flow_mode: quick
    ,在正文中显示假设,仅当有助于检索时才添加主要默认值或未解决风险的标签。
  • --full-flow
    模式激活时,设置
    flow_mode: full
    ,在
    status
    validation
    trace_ids
    related_artifacts
    中反映障碍和验证证据。
  • 当工件路径、状态、负责人、跟踪链接、验证证据、相关工件或决策引用发生变化时,更新元数据。
  • 元数据是用于路由、检索和可追溯性的索引;它不能替代工件正文、
    decision-log.md
    state.toon

0.7 Specs Index

0.7 规格索引

  • Before searching across feature folders, inspect the compact LLM index first:
    specs-refiniment/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon
    for refinement work or
    specs/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon
    for implementation work.
  • Use the human-readable index at
    specs-refiniment/specs-index.md
    or
    specs/specs-index.md
    when reporting feature coverage, artifact inventory, or handoff status to people.
  • After this skill creates or materially updates an artifact, refresh the matching workspace index with
    python3 skills/_shared/ai_sdlc_specs_index.py --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow
    .
  • In
    --quick-flow
    , rely on
    specs-index.toon
    to choose the smallest relevant artifact set before opening files.
  • In
    --full-flow
    , verify the updated artifact appears in both
    specs-index.toon
    and
    specs-index.md
    before final handoff.
  • The specs index summarizes artifact metadata and state; it does not replace reading the selected source artifacts when details, approvals, or validation evidence matter.
  • 在跨功能文件夹搜索前,先查看紧凑的LLM索引:细化工作的索引为
    specs-refiniment/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon
    ,实施工作的索引为
    specs/_ai_sdlc/specs-index.toon
  • 向人员报告功能覆盖范围、工件清单或交接状态时,使用人类可读索引
    specs-refiniment/specs-index.md
    specs/specs-index.md
  • 该技能创建或实质性更新工件后,使用
    python3 skills/_shared/ai_sdlc_specs_index.py --workspace <refinement|implementation> --quick-flow|--full-flow
    刷新匹配的工作区索引。
  • --quick-flow
    模式下,依赖
    specs-index.toon
    选择最小的相关工件集,然后再打开文件。
  • --full-flow
    模式下,在最终交接前验证更新后的工件是否同时出现在
    specs-index.toon
    specs-index.md
    中。
  • 规格索引汇总了工件元数据和状态;当细节、批准或验证证据很重要时,它不能替代阅读选定的源工件。

0.8 Complete Refinement Cascade

0.8 完整细化流程

  • Trigger the complete cascade only when the user explicitly asks for a full, complete, or end-to-end spec refinement or asks for every refinement artifact. A normal
    --full-flow
    call for one skill remains single-stage.
  • Before the first durable write, run
    python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format toon
    and start with the earliest reported
    next_skill
    , including stages earlier than this skill.
  • Execute the existing refinement skills in lifecycle order with
    --full-flow
    : discovery, PRFAQ, delivery-package gap review, requirements readiness, goal/capability mapping, backlog gap review, backlog decomposition, story decomposition, release slicing, BA context, delivery spec, QA plan, QA gap review, test strategy, test cases, test suite, QA readiness, and delivery handoff.
  • Produce all 18 canonical Markdown artifacts.
    release-slicing.md
    is mandatory for a complete cascade; when release slicing is not applicable, write an explicit evidence-backed N/A artifact and complete the stage instead of skipping it.
  • After every stage, finalize its artifact, record required decisions, mark the stage
    done
    , and refresh the refinement indexes before selecting the next skill.
  • Do not declare the cascade complete until
    python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format markdown
    exits successfully with
    18/18
    . If it fails, continue with the reported next skill or return the concrete blocker and remaining inventory in Codex.
  • Surface checkpoint and final summaries in Codex only; never persist a cascade summary as a text file.
  • 仅当用户明确要求完整、全面或端到端的规格细化,或要求所有细化工件时,才触发完整流程。正常的
    --full-flow
    调用单个技能仍为单阶段。
  • 在第一次持久化写入前,运行
    python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format toon
    ,并从最早报告的
    next_skill
    开始,包括早于该技能的阶段。
  • 按生命周期顺序使用
    --full-flow
    执行现有细化技能:探索、PRFAQ、交付包差距评审、需求准备、目标/能力映射、待办事项差距评审、待办事项分解、故事分解、发布切片、BA上下文、交付规格、QA计划、QA差距评审、测试策略、测试用例、测试套件、QA准备和交付交接。
  • 生成所有18个规范Markdown工件。
    release-slicing.md
    对于完整流程是必需的;当发布切片不适用时,编写一个明确的基于证据的N/A工件并完成该阶段,而非跳过。
  • 每个阶段完成后,最终确定其工件、记录所需决策、将阶段标记为
    done
    ,并在选择下一个技能前刷新细化索引。
  • 仅当
    python3 skills/_shared/refinement_status.py --feature <feature-name> --gate full --format markdown
    成功退出并显示
    18/18
    时,才宣布流程完成。若失败,则继续执行报告的下一个技能,或在Codex中返回具体障碍和剩余清单。
  • 仅在Codex中显示检查点和最终摘要;切勿将流程摘要保存为文本文件。

References

参考资料

  • Use
    scripts/backlog_matrix.py
    when deterministic scaffolding, planning, or formatting is useful for this workflow; pass the same
    --quick-flow
    or
    --full-flow
    flag that was supplied to the skill.
  • Read
    references/backlog-structures.md
    when the task needs the detailed structure, checklist, or examples for this skill.
  • 当确定性脚手架、规划或格式对该工作流有用时,使用
    scripts/backlog_matrix.py
    ;传递与技能相同的
    --quick-flow
    --full-flow
    标志。
  • 当任务需要该技能的详细结构、检查表或示例时,阅读
    references/backlog-structures.md

Script Usage

脚本使用

  • In default and full flow, always run this skill's primary analysis script with
    --format toon --budget-tokens 24000
    before drafting; explicit inputs are priority evidence but do not replace the rest of the feature package.
  • Read this skill's reference file before writing sections. Use its detailed tables and quality bar, not only the compact scaffold headings.
  • Run the primary script with
    --emit-template
    in the active flow mode to obtain the exact shared context headings and required stage table columns before section writes.
  • Make every default/full artifact self-contained by completing all ten shared feature-context sections plus the stage-specific profile sections. Quick flow may use the compact stage-only draft.
  • Follow every
    next_reads
    entry before finalization and list every consumed source in
    Source Coverage
    ; do not claim whole-feature context from a partial source set.
  • Keep the final artifact within
    --max-artifact-tokens 24000
    ; condense repetition instead of dropping feature dimensions or source traceability.
  • Run
    scripts/backlog_matrix.py
    before drafting or updating this skill's artifact when inputs are longer than a few bullets, when traceability matters, or when a flow flag is supplied. For agent analysis, pass
    --format toon
    , read
    anchors
    first, and open only
    next_reads
    ; without that flag the script keeps its human-readable Markdown output.
  • Quick flow analysis:
    python3 skills/ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning/scripts/backlog_matrix.py --feature <feature-name> --quick-flow <input.md>...
  • Full flow analysis:
    python3 skills/ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning/scripts/backlog_matrix.py --feature <feature-name> --full-flow <input.md>...
  • To write content, pass one canonical heading with
    --section "<section>"
    ; provide only that section body on stdin, without H1, H2, frontmatter, or a temporary content file.
  • Repeat
    --section
    for each required section, then run the same script with
    --finalize
    to validate the artifact and refresh metadata and specs indexes.
  • The AI must not write or directly edit the routed Markdown artifact; the script owns scaffold creation, section placement, and durable file writes.
  • Use
    --decision-row
    with one nine-cell Markdown table row on stdin when a decision-log entry is required.
  • Legacy
    --emit-template
    ,
    --emit-decision-log-entry
    , and
    --write
    remain available for compatibility.
  • Use
    --quick-flow
    for first-pass synthesis with assumptions; use
    --full-flow
    before readiness, handoff, signoff, or any decision-sensitive output.
  • 在默认和完整流程中,在起草前始终使用
    --format toon --budget-tokens 24000
    运行该技能的主要分析脚本;明确输入是优先证据,但不能替代其余功能包。
  • 在编写章节前阅读该技能的参考文件。使用其详细表格和质量标准,而非仅使用紧凑的脚手架标题。
  • 在活动流程模式下使用
    --emit-template
    运行主脚本,以获取精确的共享上下文标题和所需阶段表格列,然后再进行章节编写。
  • 使每个默认/完整工件自包含,完成所有十个共享功能上下文章节以及阶段特定的配置文件章节。快速流程可使用紧凑的仅阶段草稿。
  • 在最终确定前遵循每个
    next_reads
    条目,并在
    Source Coverage
    中列出每个使用的源;不得从部分源集声称具备完整功能上下文。
  • 将最终工件限制在
    --max-artifact-tokens 24000
    以内;压缩重复内容,而非删除功能维度或源可追溯性。
  • 当输入超过几个项目符号、可追溯性很重要或提供了流程标志时,在起草或更新该技能的工件前运行
    scripts/backlog_matrix.py
    。对于代理分析,传递
    --format toon
    ,先读取
    anchors
    ,然后仅打开
    next_reads
    ;若无该标志,脚本将保持其人类可读的Markdown输出。
  • 快速流程分析:
    python3 skills/ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning/scripts/backlog_matrix.py --feature <feature-name> --quick-flow <input.md>...
  • 完整流程分析:
    python3 skills/ai-sdlc-backlog-decomposition-and-task-planning/scripts/backlog_matrix.py --feature <feature-name> --full-flow <input.md>...
  • 要编写内容,使用
    --section "<section>"
    传递一个规范标题;仅在标准输入中提供该章节正文,无需H1、H2、前置内容或临时内容文件。
  • 对每个所需章节重复
    --section
    ,然后使用
    --finalize
    运行相同的脚本,以验证工件并刷新元数据和规格索引。
  • AI不得写入或直接编辑路由的Markdown工件;脚本负责脚手架创建、章节放置和持久化文件写入。
  • 当需要决策日志条目时,使用
    --decision-row
    并在标准输入中提供一个九单元格的Markdown表格行。
  • 为兼容起见,仍支持旧版
    --emit-template
    --emit-decision-log-entry
    --write
  • 使用
    --quick-flow
    进行基于假设的首次合成;在准备、交接、签署或任何决策敏感输出前使用
    --full-flow

Purpose

目的

Convert planning structure into a delivery-oriented backlog with cross-functional work represented explicitly.
将规划结构转换为明确体现跨职能工作的交付型待办事项。

Use When

适用场景

  • Goals, roles, capabilities, and epics are mature enough to decompose.
  • The team needs features, stories, and task breakdowns rather than only planning themes.
  • 目标、角色、能力和Epic足够成熟,可以进行分解。
  • 团队需要功能、故事和任务分解,而非仅规划主题。

Do Not Use When

不适用场景

  • The planning structure is still unstable.
  • The task only needs high-level epic framing.
  • 规划结构仍不稳定。
  • 任务仅需要高层次的Epic框架。

Workflow

工作流

  1. Break epics into features.
  2. Break features into user stories with business value and acceptance summaries.
  3. Add technical, QA, design, analytics, operations, and compliance tasks where relevant.
  4. Capture dependencies, assumptions, open questions, and estimation-readiness signals.
  5. Keep items small enough to estimate and sequence.
  1. 将Epic分解为功能。
  2. 将功能分解为具有业务价值和验收摘要的用户故事。
  3. 添加相关的技术、QA、设计、分析、运营和合规任务。
  4. 记录依赖项、假设、未解决问题和估算就绪信号。
  5. 确保项目足够小,以便进行估算和排序。

Decomposition Rules

分解规则

  • Stories must have a concrete actor and outcome.
  • Features must be testable at a high level.
  • Do not hide complex backend, integration, QA, analytics, or operational work inside a single story.
  • Split items that are too large or mix unrelated workflows.
  • Keep cross-functional tasks linked to a feature, story, or planning need.
  • 故事必须有具体的参与者和成果。
  • 功能必须在高层次上可测试。
  • 不得将复杂的后端、集成、QA、分析或运营工作隐藏在单个故事中。
  • 拆分过大或混合无关工作流的项目。
  • 保持跨职能任务与功能、故事或规划需求相关联。

Structures

结构

Use
references/backlog-structures.md
.
使用
references/backlog-structures.md

Completion Criteria

完成标准

  • Features and stories are specific enough for refinement.
  • Cross-functional tasks are visible instead of being implicit.
  • Oversized or non-estimable items are flagged for splitting or spikes.
  • 功能和故事足够具体,可进行细化。
  • 跨职能任务可见,而非隐含。
  • 过大或无法估算的项目被标记为需要拆分或进行探索任务。