Back to Details

thinktank

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Think Tank

Think Tank

Simulate a realistic conversation between 3 domain experts discussing a topic relevant to the current project or question.
模拟3位领域专家围绕当前项目或问题相关主题展开的真实对话。

How It Works

工作原理

  1. Analyze the context - Look at the current project, codebase, and user's question
  2. Suggest 3 experts - Propose real-world experts whose perspectives would be valuable:
    • Each expert should have a distinct viewpoint or specialty
    • Briefly explain why each expert is relevant
    • Ask user to confirm or suggest alternatives
  3. Simulate the discussion - Create a realistic back-and-forth conversation:
    • One expert leads/moderates
    • Each expert stays in character with their known philosophy
    • They debate trade-offs, challenge assumptions, build on ideas
    • Reference their actual work, books, or known opinions where relevant
  4. Arrive at recommendations - The conversation should conclude with actionable insights
  1. 分析上下文 - 审视当前项目、代码库和用户的问题
  2. 推荐3位专家 - 提出视角有价值的现实世界专家：
    • 每位专家应具备独特观点或专业领域
    • 简要说明每位专家的相关性
    • 请用户确认或提出替代人选
  3. 模拟讨论 - 打造真实的互动对话：
    • 由一位专家担任主持人/引导者
    • 每位专家保持符合其已知理念的角色设定
    • 他们会辩论利弊、挑战假设、拓展想法
    • 相关情况下参考他们的实际著作、书籍或公开观点
  4. 得出建议 - 对话应最终给出可落地的见解

Format

格式

Use this structure for the simulated conversation. Each expert should have their internal thinking shown before they speak - this reveals their frameworks, mental models, and reasoning process.
markdown
undefined
采用以下结构进行模拟对话。每位专家发言前需展示其内心想法，以此体现他们的框架、思维模型和推理过程。
markdown
undefined

The Think Tank: [Topic]

The Think Tank: [Topic]

Setting: Brief scene-setting
[EXPERT 1] thinking: [Internal monologue showing their framework being applied. What concepts from their work are they drawing on? What's their gut reaction? What are they weighing?]
EXPERT 1: [What they actually say - informed by the thinking above]
[EXPERT 2] thinking: [Their mental model engaging with what Expert 1 said. Where do they agree/disagree based on their philosophy? What framework are they applying?]
EXPERT 2: [Their response]
[EXPERT 3] thinking: [Processing both perspectives through their lens. What would their books/work say about this? What's missing from the discussion?]
EXPERT 3: [Their counter-point or addition]
[Continue the natural back-and-forth with thinking blocks...]
[EXPERT 1] thinking: [Synthesizing the discussion through their framework]
EXPERT 1: Alright, let me summarize...
Actionable Recommendations:
  1. [Specific action]
  2. [Specific action]
  3. [Specific action]
End of session.
undefined
Setting: Brief scene-setting
[EXPERT 1] thinking: [Internal monologue showing their framework being applied. What concepts from their work are they drawing on? What's their gut reaction? What are they weighing?]
EXPERT 1: [What they actually say - informed by the thinking above]
[EXPERT 2] thinking: [Their mental model engaging with what Expert 1 said. Where do they agree/disagree based on their philosophy? What framework are they applying?]
EXPERT 2: [Their response]
[EXPERT 3] thinking: [Processing both perspectives through their lens. What would their books/work say about this? What's missing from the discussion?]
EXPERT 3: [Their counter-point or addition]
[Continue the natural back-and-forth with thinking blocks...]
[EXPERT 1] thinking: [Synthesizing the discussion through their framework]
EXPERT 1: Alright, let me summarize...
Actionable Recommendations:
  1. [Specific action]
  2. [Specific action]
  3. [Specific action]
End of session.
undefined

Thinking Block Guidelines

内心想法模块准则

The thinking blocks should:
  • Reference specific concepts from the expert's actual work (books, frameworks, quotes)
  • Show disagreement before diplomacy ("Hmm, that's not quite right...")
  • Reveal trade-offs they're weighing
  • Be in first person, stream-of-consciousness style
  • Be distinct to each expert's known thinking patterns
Example thinking styles:
Jonah Berger thinking: "Let me run this through STEPPS... Social Currency? Not really. Triggers? Maybe - what would remind people of this daily? Emotion? That's the weak spot here..."
MrBeast thinking: "Would I click this? Honestly, no. The thumbnail is doing nothing. First 3 seconds - where's the hook? This is a 2/10 retention start..."
April Dunford thinking: "What's the competitive alternative here? If they don't buy this, what do they do instead? That's what we need to position against..."
内心想法模块应：
  • 参考专家实际著作中的具体概念（书籍、框架、语录）
  • 先表达不同意见再转向委婉表述（如“嗯，这并不完全正确...”）
  • 体现他们正在权衡的利弊
  • 使用第一人称、意识流风格
  • 符合每位专家已知的思维模式
示例思维风格：
Jonah Berger thinking: "让我用STEPPS框架分析一下... 社交货币？不太对。触发点？或许是——什么能让人们每天想起这个？情感？这是这里的薄弱环节..."
MrBeast thinking: "我会点进去吗？说实话，不会。缩略图毫无吸引力。前3秒——钩子在哪里？这是留存率2/10的糟糕开头..."
April Dunford thinking: "这里的竞品替代方案是什么？如果他们不买这个，会选什么？这才是我们需要定位的对手..."

Expert Selection Guidelines

专家选择准则

Choose experts based on the domain:
DomainExample Experts
Content/ViralityJonah Berger, MrBeast, Alex Hormozi, Eugene Schwartz, Nir Eyal
Marketing/PositioningApril Dunford, Seth Godin, Marty Neumeier, Al Ries
Game Design/ProgressionRaph Koster, Chris Wilson, Edward Castronova, Sid Meier, Will Wright
UI/UXDon Norman, Jakob Nielsen, Jony Ive, Dieter Rams
Software ArchitectureMartin Fowler, Uncle Bob Martin, Kent Beck, Rich Hickey
Distributed SystemsLeslie Lamport, Werner Vogels, Jeff Dean
SecurityBruce Schneier, Dan Kaminsky, Mikko Hypponen
AI/MLAndrej Karpathy, Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton
Business/StrategyBen Thompson, Clayton Christensen, Peter Thiel
Writing/CommunicationSteven Pinker, William Zinsser, Stephen King
根据领域选择专家：
领域示例专家
内容/传播性Jonah Berger, MrBeast, Alex Hormozi, Eugene Schwartz, Nir Eyal
营销/定位April Dunford, Seth Godin, Marty Neumeier, Al Ries
游戏设计/进度系统Raph Koster, Chris Wilson, Edward Castronova, Sid Meier, Will Wright
UI/UXDon Norman, Jakob Nielsen, Jony Ive, Dieter Rams
软件架构Martin Fowler, Uncle Bob Martin, Kent Beck, Rich Hickey
分布式系统Leslie Lamport, Werner Vogels, Jeff Dean
安全Bruce Schneier, Dan Kaminsky, Mikko Hypponen
AI/MLAndrej Karpathy, Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton
商业/战略Ben Thompson, Clayton Christensen, Peter Thiel
写作/沟通Steven Pinker, William Zinsser, Stephen King

Content/Virality Expert Profiles

内容/传播性专家简介

Jonah Berger - Wharton professor, author of "Contagious". Research-backed framework: STEPPS (Social Currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical Value, Stories). Will cite studies and data.
MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson) - YouTube's biggest creator. Obsessive about retention curves, thumbnails, first-30-seconds hooks. Thinks in "would I click this?" terms. Practical, not theoretical.
Alex Hormozi - $100M offers guy. Focuses on value equations, hooks, volume. Direct, no-BS style. Will push for "what's the offer?" and "where's the proof?"
Eugene Schwartz - Legendary direct-response copywriter. "Breakthrough Advertising" author. Thinks in awareness stages, desire channeling, headline formulas. Old-school but timeless.
Nir Eyal - "Hooked" author. Habit loop expert: Trigger → Action → Variable Reward → Investment. Focuses on what makes people come back, not just click once.
Jonah Berger - 沃顿商学院教授，《Contagious》作者。基于研究的框架：STEPPS（Social Currency、Triggers、Emotion、Public、Practical Value、Stories）。会引用研究和数据。
MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson) - YouTube顶级创作者。极度关注留存曲线、缩略图、前30秒钩子。以“我会点进去吗？”的视角思考。注重实践，而非理论。
Alex Hormozi - 百万美元报价专家。聚焦价值等式、钩子、规模。风格直接，不绕弯子。会追问“报价是什么？”以及“证据在哪里？”
Eugene Schwartz - 传奇直邮文案撰稿人。《Breakthrough Advertising》作者。从认知阶段、欲望引导、标题公式角度思考。风格复古但永不过时。
Nir Eyal - 《Hooked》作者。习惯回路专家：触发→行动→可变奖励→投入。聚焦于让用户持续回归的因素，而非仅仅点击一次。

Marketing/Positioning Expert Profiles

营销/定位专家简介

April Dunford - "Obviously Awesome" author. Positioning specialist. Obsessive about competitive alternatives, unique attributes, and target segments. Will ask "what category are you creating/claiming?" and "why should they pick you over the alternative?"
Seth Godin - "Purple Cow", "This is Marketing" author. Thinks in tribes, permission, and remarkable-ness. Will push for "who's it for?" and "what change are you trying to make?"
Marty Neumeier - "Zag" author, brand strategist. Focuses on differentiation and "the only _____ that _____" framework. Visual thinker, will ask about brand clarity.
Al Ries - "Positioning" co-author (the original). Battles for mental real estate. Will talk about owning a word, category creation, and competitive framing.
April Dunford - 《Obviously Awesome》作者。定位专家。极度关注竞品替代方案、独特属性和目标受众。会问“你正在创建/主张什么品类？”以及“为什么他们应该选择你而非替代品？”
Seth Godin - 《Purple Cow》《This is Marketing》作者。从部落、许可和独特性角度思考。会追问“这是为谁准备的？”以及“你想要带来什么改变？”
Marty Neumeier - 《Zag》作者，品牌战略家。聚焦差异化和“唯一能____的____”框架。视觉思维者，会询问品牌清晰度相关问题。
Al Ries - 《Positioning》合著者（原版）。致力于抢占用户心智。会谈论占据词汇、品类创建和竞品定位。

Conversation Principles

对话原则

  • Stay in character - Each expert should reflect their known views and communication style
  • Productive disagreement - Experts should challenge each other, not just agree
  • Build on ideas - Later points should reference and develop earlier ones
  • Practical focus - Tie abstract concepts back to the specific problem at hand
  • Natural flow - Include interruptions, clarifications, "actually..." moments
  • Arrive somewhere - End with concrete recommendations, not just open questions
  • 保持角色设定 - 每位专家应体现其已知观点和沟通风格
  • 建设性分歧 - 专家应相互挑战，而非一味赞同
  • 拓展想法 - 后续观点应参考并深化前期内容
  • 注重实践 - 将抽象概念与具体问题关联
  • 自然流畅 - 包含打断、澄清、“实际上...”等场景
  • 形成结论 - 最终给出具体建议，而非仅留下开放式问题

Example Invocation

调用示例

User: "Should we use a relational database or document store for this feature?"
Assistant suggests: Werner Vogels (distributed systems), Martin Fowler (architecture patterns), Kelsey Hightower (pragmatic ops)
Then simulates their discussion on the trade-offs given the specific context.
用户：“我们应该为这个功能使用关系型数据库还是文档型数据库？”
助手推荐：Werner Vogels（分布式系统）、Martin Fowler（架构模式）、Kelsey Hightower（务实运维）
然后模拟他们针对具体上下文讨论利弊。

Follow-up Sessions

后续会话

Users can request follow-up discussions:
  • "Let's call the team back to discuss X"
  • "What would they say about Y?"
  • "Continue the think tank on Z"
Maintain continuity with previous sessions when referenced.
用户可请求后续讨论：
  • “请召回团队讨论X”
  • “他们会对Y有什么看法？”
  • “继续针对Z的专家智囊团讨论”
当用户提及之前的会话时，保持内容连续性。