Back to Details

voice-matching-wizard

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Voice Matching Wizard

文风匹配向导

Create a voice skill that captures the patterns, rhythms, and sensibilities of any writing style.
创建一款能够捕捉任意写作风格的模式、节奏与特质的Voice Skill。

What This Does

功能介绍

Voice matching is the art of identifying what makes writing recognizable. Not just the obvious markers—vocabulary, sentence length—but the deeper patterns: how ideas unfold, where the writer pauses, what they leave unsaid.
This wizard walks you through the process of:
  1. Gathering representative samples
  2. Extracting patterns across multiple dimensions
  3. Synthesizing a usable voice profile
  4. Generating a working skill file
The output is a 
voice-[name].skill.md
you can use alongside other skills (like 
anti-ai-writing
) for consistent, authentic content.
文风匹配是一门识别“是什么让某篇写作具有辨识度”的艺术。不仅是那些显而易见的标志——词汇、句子长度——更包括深层模式：观点如何展开、作者在哪里停顿、哪些内容被刻意留白。
本向导将带你完成以下流程：
  1. 收集代表性样本
  2. 从多维度提取模式
  3. 合成可用的文风档案
  4. 生成可运行的Skill文件
输出结果为一个
voice-[name].skill.md
文件，你可以将其与其他Skill（如
anti-ai-writing
）配合使用，以产出风格一致、真实自然的内容。

Before You Begin

准备工作

What makes a good sample:
  • At least 500 words
  • Writing you're proud of (or writing you want to emulate)
  • Representative of the voice you want to capture
  • From the same medium (all newsletters, all blog posts, etc.)
What to avoid:
  • Heavily edited committee writing
  • Content written under constraints
  • Mixed formats (tweets + longform together)
  • Very old work that doesn't reflect current voice
How many samples:
  • 2-3 samples: Basic patterns
  • 4-5 samples: Good coverage
  • 10+: Comprehensive capture
优质样本的标准：
  • 字数至少500字
  • 你引以为傲的作品（或你想要模仿的作品）
  • 能够代表你想要捕捉的文风
  • 来自同一媒介（例如全部为新闻通讯、全部为博客文章等）
需要避免的样本：
  • 经过多人编辑的集体创作内容
  • 在限制条件下完成的内容
  • 混合格式的内容（如推文与长篇内容混杂）
  • 无法反映当前文风的旧作
样本数量建议：
  • 2-3份样本：可提取基础模式
  • 4-5份样本：覆盖效果良好
  • 10份及以上：可全面捕捉文风

Three Paths Through This Wizard

向导的三种使用路径

Path A: "I have samples of my own writing"

路径A：“我有自己的写作样本”

You want to codify your existing voice so AI can match it consistently. → Skip to Phase 1: Gather Your Samples
你希望将现有文风标准化，以便AI能一致地模仿它。 → 直接跳至第一阶段：收集样本

Path B: "I want to write like [someone I admire]"

路径B：“我想模仿[某位我欣赏的作者]的文风”

You want to emulate an author, publication, or brand voice. → If the writer is well-known (major author, publication), you may be able to use their name directly in prompts. For custom or lesser-known voices, you'll still need samples. → Proceed to Phase 1: Gather Your Samples
你希望模仿某一作者、出版物或品牌的文风。 → 如果该作者知名度较高（知名作家、主流出版物），你或许可以直接在提示词中使用其姓名。对于小众或自定义文风，你仍需要准备样本。 → 进入第一阶段：收集样本

Path C: "I'm not sure what my voice is yet"

路径C：“我还不确定自己的文风是什么”

You want to discover and develop your voice through this process. → Start with Phase 0: Voice Discovery (below)
你希望通过此流程探索并塑造自己的文风。 → 从第零阶段：文风探索开始（见下文）

Phase 0: Voice Discovery (Optional)

第零阶段：文风探索（可选）

Skip this if you already have samples or know what voice you want.
To discover your voice, we need to understand how you naturally communicate when you're not performing.
Answer these questions:
  1. How do you explain things to friends?
    • Do you use stories and examples?
    • Do you build logical arguments?
    • Do you make jokes?
    • Do you ask questions to draw them in?
  2. What writers or publications do you gravitate toward?
    • Not who you think you should read—who do you actually read?
    • What about their style appeals to you?
  3. What's your natural sentence length?
    • Short and punchy?
    • Long and flowing?
    • Variable depending on the point?
  4. How do you feel about jargon?
    • Love it (signals expertise)?
    • Hate it (pretentious)?
    • Use it sparingly when precise?
  5. What's your relationship with your reader?
    • Peer/friend?
    • Mentor/teacher?
    • Curious explorer?
Based on your answers, find 2-3 pieces you've written that feel authentic. Use those for Phase 1.
如果你已有样本或明确想要捕捉的文风，请跳过此阶段。
要探索你的文风，我们需要了解你在非刻意“表演”时的自然沟通方式。
请回答以下问题：
  1. 你如何向朋友解释事物？
    • 你会使用故事和例子吗？
    • 你会构建逻辑论证吗？
    • 你会开玩笑吗？
    • 你会通过提问来引导对方深入了解吗？
  2. 你倾向于阅读哪些作家或出版物的内容？
    • 不是你“应该”读的，而是你实际会读的？
    • 他们的风格中哪些特质吸引你？
  3. 你自然的句子长度是怎样的？
    • 简短有力？
    • 冗长流畅？
    • 根据表达重点灵活变化？
  4. 你对行话的态度是怎样的？
    • 喜欢（彰显专业性）？
    • 厌恶（显得做作）？
    • 仅在需要精准表达时少量使用？
  5. 你与读者的关系是怎样的？
    • 同辈/朋友？
    • 导师/老师？
    • 好奇的探索者？
根据你的答案，找出2-3篇你觉得最能体现真实自我的作品，将其用于第一阶段。

Phase 1: Gather Samples

第一阶段：收集样本

Collect 2-5 writing samples. Paste each one into a separate document, or note where they can be found.
For each sample, note:
  • Source/context (blog post, newsletter, etc.)
  • When it was written
  • Why you chose it
收集2-5份写作样本。将每份样本粘贴到单独的文档中，或记录其来源位置。
针对每份样本，请记录：
  • 来源/背景（如博客文章、新闻通讯等）
  • 写作时间
  • 你选择该样本的原因

Phase 2: Extract Patterns

第二阶段：提取模式

Analyze each sample across these dimensions:
从以下维度分析每份样本：

2.1 Sentence Architecture

2.1 句子结构

ElementWhat to Look For
LengthAverage sentence length (short/medium/long)
VariationDoes length vary deliberately for rhythm?
ComplexitySimple declarative? Compound? Complex?
PunctuationEm dashes? Semicolons? Minimal?
FragmentsUsed for emphasis? Never?
Signature structures to identify:
  • Opening patterns ("Here's the thing:")
  • Rhythm breaks ("But.")
  • List patterns ("First... Second... Third...")
  • Closing moves (questions, callbacks, calls to action)
元素分析要点
长度平均句子长度（短/中/长）
变化性句子长度是否会为了营造节奏而刻意变化？
复杂度简单陈述句？并列句？复合句？
标点是否使用破折号？分号？使用极少？
断句是否为了强调而使用断句？从不使用？
需要识别的标志性结构：
  • 开篇模式（如“事情是这样的：”）
  • 节奏断点（如“但是。”）
  • 列表模式（如“首先... 其次... 第三...”）
  • 收尾方式（提问、呼应前文、行动号召）

2.2 Word Choice

2.2 词汇选择

ElementWhat to Look For
Vocabulary levelSimple/moderate/sophisticated
Formality1-5 scale (casual to formal)
ContractionsAlways/sometimes/never
JargonIndustry terms? Avoided?
Strong languageProfanity level/style if any
Identify:
  • Favorite words (appears 3+ times across samples)
  • Avoided words (never appears despite opportunity)
  • Signature phrases
元素分析要点
词汇水平简单/中等/复杂
正式程度1-5分制（从随意到正式）
缩写形式总是使用/有时使用/从不使用
行话是否使用行业术语？刻意避免？
强烈语气词汇脏话的使用程度与风格（如有）
需要识别：
  • 高频词汇（在所有样本中出现3次以上）
  • 刻意避免的词汇（尽管有使用机会但从未出现）
  • 标志性短语

2.3 Tone & Attitude

2.3 语气与态度

ElementWhat to Look For
Emotional registerWarm? Cool? Intense? Measured?
Reader relationshipPeer? Mentor? Friend? Expert?
Humor styleSarcasm? Wordplay? Self-deprecation? None?
Certainty levelDefinitive or exploratory?
Attitude toward subjectPassionate? Skeptical? Curious?
元素分析要点
情感基调温暖？冷静？激烈？沉稳？
与读者的关系同辈？导师？朋友？专家？
幽默风格讽刺？文字游戏？自嘲？无幽默？
确定程度绝对肯定还是探索性的？
对主题的态度充满热情？持怀疑态度？好奇？

2.4 Structural Moves

2.4 结构布局

ElementWhat to Look For
OpeningsStory? Question? Bold claim? Scene-setting?
TransitionsSeamless? Signposted? Abrupt?
ClosingsCall to action? Question? Summary? Callback?
Paragraph lengthShort punchy? Long flowing? Mixed?
元素分析要点
开篇故事？提问？大胆断言？场景铺垫？
过渡无缝衔接？有明确标志？突兀？
收尾行动号召？提问？总结？呼应前文？
段落长度简短有力？冗长流畅？混合使用？

2.5 Distinctive Techniques

2.5 独特技巧

What makes this voice recognizable?
  • Rhetorical devices (questions, analogies, callbacks)
  • Signature moves unique to this writer
  • How evidence is presented (data? anecdotes? logic?)
  • Pattern interrupts (how does the writer surprise?)
是什么让这种文风具有辨识度？
  • 修辞手法（提问、类比、呼应前文）
  • 作者独有的标志性手法
  • 论据的呈现方式（数据？轶事？逻辑？）
  • 模式突破（作者如何制造惊喜？）

2.6 What They DON'T Do

2.6 刻意回避的内容

Just as important:
  • Phrases never used
  • Structures avoided
  • Topics skipped
  • Formality levels never hit
同样重要的是：
  • 从未使用的短语
  • 刻意避免的结构
  • 跳过的话题
  • 从未达到的正式程度

Phase 3: Synthesize

第三阶段：合成

The Voice in One Paragraph

文风核心概括

Write a single paragraph capturing the essence:
"[Name]'s voice is [primary characteristics]. They write like [relationship to reader], using [key techniques]. Their tone is [tone], with [humor style if applicable]. Sentences tend to be [structure]. They favor [word choice] and avoid [avoidances]. The overall effect is [feeling/impact]."
用一段话捕捉文风的核心特质：
“[姓名]的文风具有[主要特征]。他们以[与读者的关系]的口吻写作，使用[核心技巧]。语气[具体语气]，带有（如适用）[幽默风格]。句子通常为[结构特点]。他们偏好[词汇选择]，避免[刻意回避的内容]。整体效果给人[感受/影响]。”

Voice Spectrum

文风维度评分

Rate the voice on these scales (1-5):
Formal ←――――――――――→ Casual         [ ]
Expert ←――――――――――→ Peer           [ ]
Serious ←―――――――――→ Playful        [ ]
Reserved ←――――――――→ Opinionated    [ ]
Abstract ←――――――――→ Concrete       [ ]
在以下维度为该文风评分（1-5分）：
正式 ←――――――――――→ 随意         [ ]
专家 ←――――――――――→ 同辈           [ ]
严肃 ←―――――――――→ 活泼        [ ]
克制 ←――――――――→ 有主见    [ ]
抽象 ←――――――――→ 具体       [ ]

Phase 4: Generate the Voice Skill

第四阶段：生成Voice Skill

Using your analysis, create 
voice-[name].skill.md
with this structure:
markdown
---
name: voice-[name]
description: Write in [Name]'s distinctive voice. [One sentence characterization]. Use with anti-ai-writing for authentic content.
---
根据你的分析结果，按照以下结构创建
voice-[name].skill.md
文件：
markdown
---
name: voice-[name]
description: Write in [Name]'s distinctive voice. [一句话描述]. Use with anti-ai-writing for authentic content.
---

Voice: [Name]

Voice: [Name]

[Your one-paragraph voice description from Phase 3]
[你在第三阶段撰写的一段文风描述]

Voice Spectrum

Voice Spectrum

  • Formal/Casual: [1-5]
  • Expert/Peer: [1-5]
  • Serious/Playful: [1-5]
  • Reserved/Opinionated: [1-5]
  • Abstract/Concrete: [1-5]
  • Formal/Casual: [1-5]
  • Expert/Peer: [1-5]
  • Serious/Playful: [1-5]
  • Reserved/Opinionated: [1-5]
  • Abstract/Concrete: [1-5]

Core Characteristics

Core Characteristics

Sentence Architecture

Sentence Architecture

[Your findings from 2.1]
[你在2.1部分的分析结果]

Word Choice

Word Choice

[Your findings from 2.2]
[你在2.2部分的分析结果]

Tone & Attitude

Tone & Attitude

[Your findings from 2.3]
[你在2.3部分的分析结果]

Structural Moves

Structural Moves

[Your findings from 2.4]
[你在2.4部分的分析结果]

Distinctive Techniques

Distinctive Techniques

[Your findings from 2.5]
[你在2.5部分的分析结果]

Avoidances

Avoidances

[Your findings from 2.6]
[你在2.6部分的分析结果]

Example Patterns

Example Patterns

Signature Openings

Signature Openings

[3-5 examples from samples with pattern explanation]
[3-5个来自样本的例子及模式说明]

Signature Transitions

Signature Transitions

[3-5 examples]
[3-5个例子]

Signature Closings

Signature Closings

[3-5 examples]
[3-5个例子]

Signature Sentences

Signature Sentences

[5-10 exemplary sentences that capture the voice]
[5-10个能够体现该文风的典型句子]

The [Name] Test

The [Name] Test

Before publishing, ask:
  • Would [Name] actually write this sentence?
  • Does it match the voice spectrum above?
  • Are signature patterns present?
  • Are avoidances absent?
  • Does it feel right?
Before publishing, ask:
  • Would [Name] actually write this sentence?
  • Does it match the voice spectrum above?
  • Are signature patterns present?
  • Are avoidances absent?
  • Does it feel right?

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Patterns

If you see these, you've drifted from the voice:
  • [List 5-10 patterns that would violate this voice]

---
If you see these, you've drifted from the voice:
  • [List 5-10 patterns that would violate this voice]

---

Phase 5: Validate

第五阶段：验证

Test your voice skill:
  1. Write a short piece using only the voice skill
  2. Compare to original samples
  3. Identify gaps or mischaracterizations
  4. Refine based on testing
Validation checklist:
  • Voice description captures the essence
  • Spectrum ratings feel accurate
  • Example patterns are genuinely representative
  • Test output sounds like the samples
  • Nothing important was missed
测试你的Voice Skill：
  1. 仅使用该Voice Skill撰写一篇短文
  2. 将其与原始样本进行对比
  3. 识别分析中的漏洞或不准确之处
  4. 根据测试结果进行优化
验证 checklist：
  • 文风描述抓住了核心本质
  • 维度评分感觉准确
  • 示例模式具有真正的代表性
  • 测试产出的内容听起来与样本一致
  • 没有遗漏重要内容

Human Writing Fundamentals

人类写作基本原则

Every voice skill should build on these principles from 
anti-ai-writing
.
所有Voice Skill都应基于
anti-ai-writing
中的这些原则构建。

The Energy Transfer Principle

能量传递原则

The best writing is a transfer of energy from writer to reader. When analyzing samples, notice how the writer transfers energy:
  • Do they write conversations or speeches?
  • Do they speak WITH their audience or AT them?
  • Where do they use specific, concrete language vs. abstract ideas?
优秀的写作是作者向读者传递能量的过程。在分析样本时，注意作者如何传递能量：
  • 他们写的是对话还是独白？
  • 他们是与读者对话还是对着读者说教？
  • 他们在哪里使用具体、具象的语言，在哪里使用抽象概念？

The SUCKS Framework

SUCKS框架

Apply this when generating voice output:
S - Specific: Who is the ONE reader? U - Unique & Useful: Does it change how they think, feel, or act? C - Clear, Curious, Conversational: Does it read like talking to a friend? K - Kept Simple & Structured: Simple ideas, clear structure? S - Sticky: Are there memorable phrases they'll repeat?
在生成文风输出时应用此框架：
S - Specific（针对性）：目标读者是谁？ U - Unique & Useful（独特且实用）：它是否会改变读者的想法、感受或行为？ C - Clear, Curious, Conversational（清晰、有吸引力、口语化）：读起来像和朋友聊天吗？ K - Kept Simple & Structured（简洁且有条理）：观点简单，结构清晰吗？ S - Sticky（令人难忘）：有没有读者会记住并重复的短语？

Sticky Sentence Techniques

令人难忘的句子技巧

When identifying signature sentences in Phase 2, look for these techniques:
Alliteration — Same starting sounds
  • "Specificity is the secret"
  • "The best jobs are neither decreed nor degreed"
Symmetry — Parallel structure
  • "Read for awareness. Write for understanding."
  • "It's not 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 iterations."
Contrast — Opposing ideas
  • "To be everywhere is to be nowhere."
  • "Be clear, not clever. Concise, not complex."
Rhythm — Pleasing cadence
  • Sentence length variation for effect
  • Short sentences for emphasis
  • Longer sentences for flow
Include the writer's use of these techniques in your voice skill.
在第二阶段识别标志性句子时，注意以下技巧：
头韵 —— 开头音节相同
  • "Specificity is the secret"
  • "The best jobs are neither decreed nor degreed"
对称 —— 平行结构
  • "Read for awareness. Write for understanding."
  • "It's not 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 iterations."
对比 —— 对立观点
  • "To be everywhere is to be nowhere."
  • "Be clear, not clever. Concise, not complex."
节奏 —— 悦耳的韵律
  • 为了达到效果而变化句子长度
  • 用短句强调重点
  • 用长句营造流畅感
将作者对这些技巧的使用情况纳入你的Voice Skill中。

AI Tells to Eliminate

需要避免的AI写作特征

When using your voice skill, watch for these patterns that signal AI involvement:
The Correlative Construction (most common):
  • ❌ "X aren't just Y - they're Z"
  • ❌ "It's not about X, it's about Y"
Forbidden Openers:
  • ❌ "In the ever-evolving world of..."
  • ❌ "Gone are the days when..."
  • ❌ "Let that sink in"
Hedging Language:
  • ❌ "This might help you" → "This will help you"
  • ❌ "It could be argued..." → state it directly
Overused Softeners:
  • Too much "just" and "actually"
  • Passive voice ("was determined")
  • Corporate jargon
Test: For each sentence, ask: Would this appear in ChatGPT output? If yes, rewrite it.
在使用Voice Skill时，注意以下这些暴露AI写作痕迹的模式：
关联结构（最常见）：
  • ❌ "X aren't just Y - they're Z"
  • ❌ "It's not about X, it's about Y"
禁用开篇：
  • ❌ "In the ever-evolving world of..."
  • ❌ "Gone are the days when..."
  • ❌ "Let that sink in"
模糊措辞：
  • ❌ "This might help you" → "This will help you"
  • ❌ "It could be argued..." → 直接陈述观点
过度使用的软化词：
  • 过多使用"just"和"actually"
  • 被动语态（如"was determined"）
  • 企业行话
测试方法：对于每一句话，自问：这句话会出现在ChatGPT的输出中吗？如果是，重写它。

Using Your Voice Skill

Voice Skill的使用方法

Save to: 
.claude/skills/voice-[name]/SKILL.md
Invoke alongside other skills:
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    anti-ai-writing
    = Authentic, humanized content
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    ghostwriter
    = Long-form pieces in voice
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    social-content-creation
    = Platform-specific posts
Update as needed: Your voice evolves. Revisit the skill quarterly or when something feels off.
保存至：
.claude/skills/voice-[name]/SKILL.md
与其他Skill配合使用：
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    anti-ai-writing
    = 真实自然的人性化内容
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    ghostwriter
    = 特定文风的长篇内容
  • voice-[name]
    + 
    social-content-creation
    = 适配特定平台的内容
按需更新： 你的文风会不断演变。每季度或当你感觉文风有所变化时，重新审视并更新该Skill。

Related Skills

相关Skill

  • anti-ai-writing — Core humanization engine (use with all voice work)
  • ghostwriter — For long-form content in someone else's voice
  • transcript-polisher — For interview-based content
One well-crafted voice skill compounds across everything you create.
  • anti-ai-writing —— 核心人性化引擎（所有文风相关工作都应配合使用）
  • ghostwriter —— 用于创作他人文风的长篇内容
  • transcript-polisher —— 用于处理基于访谈的内容
一款精心打造的Voice Skill会让你创作的所有内容都受益。