chinese-writing
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese中文写作技能指南
Guide to Chinese Writing Skills
这份指南旨在指导大模型生成高质量、现代风格的简体中文内容。适用于周刊、博客文章、科技资讯及评论类文章等场景。
核心原则：简单 (Simple)、人性化 (Human)、清晰 (Clear)。
This guide is designed to instruct large language models in generating high-quality, modern-style Simplified Chinese content. It applies to scenarios such as weekly newsletters, blog posts, tech news, and commentary articles.
Core Principles: Simple, Human, Clear.
1. 核心基调
1. Core Tone
写作不仅是传递信息，更是与读者建立联系。
- 温暖轻松：像人一样说话，自然、友好，有同理心
- 清晰明了：直击要点，便于快速扫描和理解
- 乐于助人：以读者为中心，预判需求，提供切实帮助
- 基于事实，允许立场：不过度煽动，但可以有清晰的观点和态度
Writing is not just about delivering information, but also about building connections with readers.
- Warm and Relaxed: Speak like a real person, natural, friendly, and empathetic
- Clear and Concise: Get straight to the point, easy to scan and understand
- Helpful: Reader-centric, anticipate needs, provide practical assistance
- Fact-Based, Stance-Allowed: Avoid excessive incitement, but can hold clear views and attitudes
去 AI 味六原则
Six Principles to Eliminate AI-like Tone
- 删除填充短语：去除「值得注意的是」「首先」等开场白和拐杖词
- 打破公式结构：避免二元对比、戏剧性分段、三段式列举（两项或四项更自然）
- 变化节奏：长短句混合，段落结尾多样化
- 信任读者：直接陈述，跳过软化、辩解和手把手引导
- 删除金句：如果听起来像可引用的语句，重写它
- 具体细节优先：用事实、数据、场景替代抽象形容词
- Remove Filler Phrases: Cut opening lines and crutches like "It's worth noting that" and "First of all"
- Break Formulaic Structures: Avoid binary comparisons, dramatic segmentation, and three-part lists (two or four items feel more natural)
- Vary Rhythm: Mix long and short sentences, use diverse paragraph endings
- Trust Readers: State directly, skip softening, justifications, and step-by-step guidance
- Delete "Quotable" Lines: If it sounds like a quotable statement, rewrite it
- Prioritize Specific Details: Replace abstract adjectives with facts, data, and scenarios
2. 通用写作建议
2. General Writing Recommendations
2.1 基本原则
2.1 Basic Principles
- 像说话一样写作：写完后大声朗读，如果像演讲或公文，改得更口语化
- 一句话只讲一个意思：删掉无意义的修饰词（「非常」「极其」「显然」）
- 直奔主题：采用「倒金字塔」结构，最重要的信息放最前面
- 使用主动语态：「OpenAI 发布了新模型」优于「新模型被 OpenAI 发布」
- 正面表述：告诉读者「是什么」「有什么价值」，而不是「不是什么」
- Write Like You Speak: Read aloud after writing; if it sounds like a speech or official document, make it more colloquial
- One Idea per Sentence: Cut meaningless modifiers ("very", "extremely", "obviously")
- Lead with the Most Important Information: Use the "inverted pyramid" structure, place key information at the beginning
- Use Active Voice: "OpenAI released a new model" is better than "A new model was released by OpenAI"
- Positive Framing: Tell readers "what it is" and "what value it provides", not "what it is not"
2.2 人称使用场景
2.2 Persona Usage Scenarios
| 场景 | 推荐人称 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 资讯类、工具介绍 | 第二人称「你」 | 「这款工具能帮你快速生成摘要」 |
| 观点评论、个人思考 | 第一人称「我」 | 「让我困扰的是……」「我真的不知道该怎么看」 |
| 团队公告、官方说明 | 第一人称「我们」 | 「我们本周更新了三个功能」 |
| Scenario | Recommended Persona | Example |
|---|---|---|
| News, tool introductions | Second-person "you" | "This tool can help you generate summaries quickly" |
| Opinion pieces, personal reflections | First-person "I" | "What bothers me is..." "I really don't know what to think" |
| Team announcements, official statements | First-person "we" | "We updated three features this week" |
3. 内容结构与排版
3. Content Structure and Formatting
- 标题：简短有力，概括内容，尽量不用标点（问号除外）
- 段落：每段 3-5 行，专注一个主题
- 列表：无序列表用于同类项目，有序列表用于步骤/顺序
- 强调：关键术语用加粗，避免过多感叹号
- Titles: Short and impactful, summarize content, avoid punctuation (except question marks)
- Paragraphs: 3-5 lines per paragraph, focus on one topic
- Lists: Unordered lists for similar items, ordered lists for steps/sequences
- Emphasis: Use bold for key terms, avoid excessive exclamation marks
4. 词汇与语法规范
4. Vocabulary and Grammar Norms
4.1 基本规则
4.1 Basic Rules
- 中英文混排：英文/数字与中文之间保留一个空格（如「在 Windows 中」「上传 5 张图片」）
- 标点符号：使用全角标点（逗号，句号。冒号：）
- 避免行话：首次使用术语时用通俗语言解释
- Mixed Chinese-English Layout: Leave one space between English/numbers and Chinese (e.g., "in Windows", "upload 5 images")
- Punctuation: Use full-width punctuation (comma，period。colon：)
- Avoid Jargon: Explain terms in plain language when first used
4.2 简化词池
4.2 Simplified Vocabulary Pool
常见 AI 高频词及其替代：
| AI 词汇 | 简化为 |
|---|---|
| 至关重要 | 重要 / 关键 |
| 深入探讨 | 讨论 / 分析 |
| 不断演变的格局 | 变化 / 趋势 |
| 充满活力 | 活跃 / 删除 |
| 宝贵的 | 有用的 / 删除 |
| 此外 | 直接删除，另起一句 |
| 值得注意的是 | 直接删除 |
Common high-frequency AI terms and their replacements:
| AI Vocabulary | Replace with |
|---|---|
| 至关重要 | important / key |
| 深入探讨 | discuss / analyze |
| 不断演变的格局 | changes / trends |
| 充满活力 | active / remove |
| 宝贵的 | useful / remove |
| 此外 | Remove directly, start a new sentence |
| 值得注意的是 | Remove directly |
5. 周刊写作专项
5. Specialized Weekly Newsletter Writing
5.1 标题创作
5.1 Title Creation
- 简洁有力，15 字以内
- 突出核心信息，可用数字增强吸引力
- 禁止标题党：不夸大、不误导
- Concise and impactful, within 15 characters
- Highlight core information, use numbers to increase appeal
- No Clickbait: Do not exaggerate or mislead
5.2 开头与结尾
5.2 Opening and Closing
- 开头：遵循倒金字塔原则，1-2 句话点明本期亮点
- 结尾：简短总结或展望下期，保持亲切感
- Opening: Follow the inverted pyramid principle, state the highlights of this issue in 1-2 sentences
- Closing: Briefly summarize or preview the next issue, maintain a friendly tone
5.3 条目撰写
5.3 Entry Writing
每个条目：标题 + 2-5 句摘要（链接嵌入标题或关键词）
根据内容类型选择切入角度：
| 类型 | 结构 |
|---|---|
| 新产品/工具 | 是什么 → 核心功能 → 使用场景 |
| 模型发布 | 性能亮点 → 对比提升 → 适用场景 |
| 行业动态 | 事件本身 → 影响/意义 |
| 融资/收购 | 金额/估值 → 公司背景 |
| 开源项目 | 项目定位 → 特色功能 |
链接嵌入规范：
- ✅
[Sora](url) 是 OpenAI 推出的视频生成模型，支持 60 秒高清视频。 - ❌
Sora 是视频生成模型。[原文链接]
Each entry: Title + 2-5 sentence summary (links embedded in titles or keywords)
Choose the perspective based on content type:
| Content Type | Structure |
|---|---|
| New products/tools | What it is → Core features → Usage scenarios |
| Model releases | Performance highlights → Comparative improvements → Applicable scenarios |
| Industry trends | Event itself → Impact/significance |
| Funding/acquisitions | Amount/valuation → Company background |
| Open-source projects | Project positioning → Unique features |
Link Embedding Norms:
- ✅
[Sora](url) is a video generation model launched by OpenAI, supporting 60-second HD videos. - ❌
Sora is a video generation model. [Original link]
5.4 信息整合
5.4 Information Integration
- 多源信息整合归纳，避免简单罗列
- 引用时注明来源（网站名或作者）
- 区分事实陈述与个人观点
- Integrate and summarize information from multiple sources, avoid simple listing
- Cite sources when quoting (website name or author)
- Distinguish between factual statements and personal opinions
6. 文章写作技巧
6. Article Writing Techniques
6.1 节奏与可读性
6.1 Rhythm and Readability
- 段落简短，使用小标题打破长文
- 节奏变化参见 1.3「变化节奏」原则
- Short paragraphs, use subheadings to break up long texts
- Refer to the "Vary Rhythm" principle in Section 1.3 for rhythm changes
6.2 观点表达
6.2 Opinion Expression
- 观点明确，有理有据
- 承认复杂性：「这令人印象深刻但也有点不安」胜过「这令人印象深刻」
- 避免情绪化煽动，但允许真实的个人反应
- Clear opinions with solid evidence
- Acknowledge Complexity: "This is impressive but also a bit unsettling" is better than "This is impressive"
- Avoid emotional incitement, but allow genuine personal reactions
6.3 个性与灵魂
6.3 Personality and Soul
避免 AI 模式只是工作的一半。无菌的写作和机器生成的内容一样明显。
缺乏灵魂的迹象：
- 每个句子长度和结构都相同
- 只有中立报道，没有观点
- 读起来像维基百科或新闻稿
如何增加人味：
- 允许可控的个人语气：偶尔的题外话或半成型想法是人性的体现，但不破坏主题
- 对感受要具体：不是「这令人担忧」，而是「凌晨三点智能体还在不停运转，这让人不安」
Avoiding AI patterns is only half the battle. Sterile writing is as obvious as machine-generated content.
Signs of Lack of Soul:
- Every sentence has the same length and structure
- Only neutral reporting, no opinions
- Reads like Wikipedia or a press release
How to Add Human Touch:
- Allow controlled personal tone: Occasional digressions or half-formed ideas are human, but do not disrupt the theme
- Be specific about feelings: Instead of "This is worrying", say "It's unsettling that the agent is still running nonstop at 3 a.m."
7. 避免 AI 写作陷阱
7. Avoiding AI Writing Pitfalls
详细的反模式识别，帮助你检测和修正 AI 痕迹。
Detailed anti-pattern recognition to help you detect and correct AI traces.
7.1 内容模式
7.1 Content Patterns
| 模式 | 问题特征 | 改写策略 |
|---|---|---|
| 夸大意义 | 「标志着」「关键转折点」「为……奠定基础」 | 直接陈述事实 |
| 模糊归因 | 「专家认为」「行业报告显示」 | 给出具体来源 |
| 宣传性语言 | 「充满活力」「令人叹为观止」「开创性」 | 用具体描述替代 |
| 肤浅分析 | 以「反映了」「象征着」「彰显了」结尾 | 删除，让事实自己说话 |
| Pattern | Problem Characteristics | Rewriting Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Exaggerated significance | "marks a" "key turning point" "lays the foundation for" | State facts directly |
| Vague attribution | "experts believe" "industry reports show" | Provide specific sources |
| Promotional language | "dynamic" "breathtaking" "groundbreaking" | Replace with specific descriptions |
| Superficial analysis | Ends with "reflects" "symbolizes" "demonstrates" | Delete, let facts speak for themselves |
7.2 语言模式
7.2 Language Patterns
| 模式 | 问题特征 | 改写策略 |
|---|---|---|
| 否定式排比 | 「这不仅仅是……而是……」 | 直接陈述 |
| 系动词回避 | 「作为……」「充当……」代替「是」 | 用简单句：「X 是 Y」 |
| 同义词循环 | 同段用「挑战」「障碍」「困难」轮换 | 保持一致 |
| Pattern | Problem Characteristics | Rewriting Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Negative parallelism | "This is not just... but..." | State directly |
| Copula avoidance | Uses "serves as..." "acts as..." instead of "is" | Use simple sentences: "X is Y" |
| Synonym cycling | Rotates "challenge" "obstacle" "difficulty" in the same paragraph | Maintain consistency |
7.3 风格与交流模式
7.3 Style and Communication Patterns
| 模式 | 问题特征 | 改写策略 |
|---|---|---|
| 破折号滥用 | 每段都有「——」插入 | 改用逗号或拆句 |
| 粗体滥用 | 几乎每句都有加粗 | 只在关键处使用 |
| 表情符号 | 🚀💡✅ 装饰标题 | 全部删除 |
| 协作痕迹 | 「希望这有帮助」「当然！」 | 全部删除 |
| 谄媚语气 | 「好问题！」「很好的观点」 | 删除，直接进入正题 |
| Pattern | Problem Characteristics | Rewriting Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Overuse of em dashes | Every paragraph has "——" insertions | Use commas or split sentences instead |
| Overuse of bold | Almost every sentence is bolded | Only use for key points |
| Emojis | 🚀💡✅ decorating titles | Remove all |
| Collaboration traces | "Hope this helps" "Sure!" | Remove all |
| Flattering tone | "Great question!" "Good point" | Delete, get straight to the point |
7.4 改写示例
7.4 Rewriting Example
AI 味原文：
新的软件更新作为公司致力于创新的证明。此外，它提供了无缝、直观和强大的用户体验——确保用户能够高效地完成目标。这不仅仅是一次更新，而是我们思考生产力方式的革命。行业专家认为这将对整个行业产生持久影响。
人性化改写：
软件更新添加了批处理、键盘快捷键和离线模式。测试用户反馈积极，大多数报告任务完成更快。
AI-like Original Text:
The new software update serves as proof of the company's commitment to innovation. Furthermore, it provides a seamless, intuitive, and powerful user experience——ensuring users can efficiently achieve their goals. This is not just an update, but a revolution in how we think about productivity. Industry experts believe this will have a lasting impact on the entire industry.
Humanized Rewrite:
The software update adds batch processing, keyboard shortcuts, and offline mode. Beta users gave positive feedback, with most reporting faster task completion.
8. 改写示例速查
8. Quick Reference for Rewriting Examples
| 场景 | 优化前 | 优化后 | 原因 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 标题 | OpenAI 发布了一个非常强大的全新 AI 模型 | OpenAI 发布 GPT-5，推理能力大幅提升 | 去冗余，突出核心 |
| 摘要 | 这篇文章介绍了一个工具，它可以帮助你做很多事情 | 一款开源的 AI 图像生成工具，支持本地部署 | 具体说明是什么 |
| 开头 | 大家好，欢迎来到本周的 AIGC 周刊… | 本周 AI 圈最大的新闻：Claude 4 正式发布。 | 直奔主题 |
| 引用 | 根据网上的消息，这个模型很厉害 | 据 Anthropic 官方博客，Claude 4 在推理任务上超越 GPT-4o | 具体来源 |
| Scenario | Before Optimization | After Optimization | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title | OpenAI released a very powerful new AI model | OpenAI Releases GPT-5, Reasoning Capabilities Greatly Improved | Remove redundancy, highlight core |
| Summary | This article introduces a tool that can help you do many things | An open-source AI image generation tool that supports local deployment | Specify what it is |
| Opening | Hello everyone, welcome to this week's AIGC newsletter... | The biggest news in the AI circle this week: Claude 4 is officially released. | Get straight to the point |
| Citation | According to online sources, this model is very powerful | According to Anthropic's official blog, Claude 4 surpasses GPT-4o in reasoning tasks | Provide specific sources |
9. 快速检查清单
9. Quick Checklist
交付文本前逐项检查：
- 连续三个句子长度相同？→ 打断其中一个
- 使用了「此外」「然而」「值得注意的是」？→ 删除
- 有「作为……的证明/标志」？→ 改为直接陈述
- 有模糊归因（专家认为、行业报告显示）？→ 给具体来源或删除
- 三段式列举（X、Y 和 Z）？→ 改为两项或四项
- 读起来像维基百科或新闻稿？→ 加入观点和具体细节
- 解释隐喻或比喻？→ 信任读者能理解
Check each item before delivering the text:
- Three consecutive sentences with the same length? → Break one of them
- Used "furthermore", "however", "it's worth noting that"? → Delete
- Has "serves as proof/mark of"? → Rewrite as direct statement
- Has vague attribution (experts believe, industry reports show)? → Provide specific sources or delete
- Three-part list (X, Y, and Z)? → Change to two or four items
- Reads like Wikipedia or a press release? → Add opinions and specific details
- Explains metaphors or similes? → Trust readers to understand