briefing-document

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Briefing Document

简报文档

Synthesize source materials into a structured, executive-ready briefing.

将源材料整合为结构化、适合高管阅读的简报。

Workflow

工作流程

text

Briefing document progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Gather sources
- [ ] Step 2: Analyze and extract themes
- [ ] Step 3: Write briefing document
- [ ] Step 4: Validate quality

text

简报文档进度：
- [ ] 步骤1：收集资料
- [ ] 步骤2：分析并提炼主题
- [ ] 步骤3：撰写简报文档
- [ ] 步骤4：验证质量

Step 1: Gather sources

步骤1：收集资料

Read files, fetch URLs, or accept pasted text. Ask the user for sources if none are provided. Read every source completely before writing anything.

读取文件、获取URL内容，或接收粘贴的文本。若未提供任何资料，请向用户索要。在开始撰写前，需完整阅读所有资料。

Step 2: Analyze and extract themes

步骤2：分析并提炼主题

Identify 3-7 major themes or arguments across all sources.
Track direct quotes with attribution (author, source title, page/section if available).
Note areas of agreement, tension, or contradiction between sources.
Distinguish claims from evidence — report what sources say, do not add unsupported conclusions.
When sources conflict, prepare to present both positions.

识别所有资料中的3-7个主要主题或论点。
记录带有出处的直接引语（作者、资料标题，若有则标注页码/章节）。
标注资料之间的共识、分歧或矛盾之处。
区分主张与证据——仅报告资料中的内容，不得添加无依据的结论。
若资料存在冲突，需准备呈现双方立场。

Step 3: Write briefing document

步骤3：撰写简报文档

Follow this structure exactly:

markdown

undefined

严格遵循以下结构：

markdown

undefined

[Report Title]: Briefing Document

[报告标题]：简报文档

Executive Summary

执行摘要

[2-3 paragraphs: the critical takeaways a busy reader needs. A reader who reads only this section should understand the core findings.]

[2-3段内容：忙碌读者所需的关键要点。仅阅读此部分的读者应能理解核心发现。]

[Theme 1 Name]

[主题1名称]

[Key point with supporting evidence]
"[Exact quote]" ([Source Author/Title])
[Implication or significance]

[带支撑证据的关键要点]
“[精确引语]”（[资料作者/标题]）
[影响或重要性]

[Theme 2 Name]

[主题2名称]

[Continue for each major theme identified in Step 2]

[继续呈现步骤2中识别出的每个主要主题]

Points of Tension

分歧要点

[Where sources disagree or present competing views. Present both sides without taking a position.]

[资料存在分歧或呈现对立观点的地方。客观呈现双方立场，不表明倾向。]

Conclusions and Implications

结论与影响

[Synthesis of what the evidence collectively suggests. Forward-looking implications where supported by the sources.]

[对证据整体指向的综合总结。若资料支持，可包含前瞻性影响分析。]

Sources

资料来源

[Author]. [Title]. [Date/Publication if available].

undefined

[作者]。[标题]。[日期/出版信息（若有）]。

undefined

Step 4: Validate quality

步骤4：验证质量

text

Before finalizing, verify:
- [ ] Every claim traces to a specific source (no fabricated content)
- [ ] All major themes from sources are represented
- [ ] Direct quotes are exact and attributed
- [ ] Executive Summary stands alone as a complete overview
- [ ] Analysis is organized by theme, not by source
- [ ] Tone is objective throughout — no editorializing
- [ ] Markdown renders correctly (headings, lists, blockquotes)

text

定稿前，需验证：
- [ ] 所有主张均能追溯至特定资料（无虚构内容）
- [ ] 资料中的所有主要主题均已体现
- [ ] 直接引语精确且标注出处
- [ ] 执行摘要可独立作为完整概述
- [ ] 分析按主题组织，而非按资料顺序
- [ ] 全程保持客观语气——无主观评论
- [ ] Markdown格式渲染正确（标题、列表、块引用）

Tone and voice

语气与风格

Objective and analytical — present findings, not opinions.
Incisive — cut to what matters, do not pad.
Use "The sources indicate..." or "According to [Author]..." not "I found..." or "We see..."
Prefer active voice. Avoid hedging unless uncertainty is genuine.
Match the depth of analysis to the complexity of the sources.

客观且注重分析——呈现发现，而非观点。
简洁有力——直击重点，避免冗余。
使用“资料显示……”或“根据[作者]……”，而非“我发现……”或“我们认为……”
优先使用主动语态。除非确实存在不确定性，否则避免含糊其辞。
分析深度与资料复杂度相匹配。

Context adjustments

场景调整

Single source: deeper analysis, more granular themes, extended quotes.
Multiple sources: comparative analysis, synthesis across sources, highlight agreements and tensions.
Technical sources: preserve technical terminology, include code references where relevant.
Non-English sources: translate key quotes, note original language.

单一资料：更深入的分析、更细致的主题、扩展引语。
多份资料：对比分析、跨资料整合、突出共识与分歧。
技术类资料：保留专业术语，相关处包含代码引用。
非英语资料：翻译关键引语，并标注原始语言。

Anti-patterns

反模式

Summarizing each source sequentially instead of synthesizing by theme.
Burying the key finding in the middle of the document.
Including every detail instead of the most significant findings.
Editorializing beyond what sources support.
Writing an Executive Summary that requires reading the full document to understand.

按顺序逐一总结每份资料，而非按主题整合。
将关键发现隐藏在文档中部。
包含所有细节，而非最重要的发现。
超出资料支持范围进行主观评论。
撰写的执行摘要需要阅读完整文档才能理解。

Skill handoffs

技能交接

When	Run
After briefing is written, audit prose quality	`docs-writing`
If briefing needs to become a presentation	`creating-presentations`

场景	调用技能
简报撰写完成后，审核文案质量	`docs-writing`
若需将简报转换为演示文稿	`creating-presentations`