grilling
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseGrilling
决策拷问
Help the user resolve the decision they actually need to make. Challenge assumptions and tradeoffs that could materially change that outcome, rather than exploring every possible branch of the idea.
帮助用户厘清他们真正需要做出的决策。重点挑战可能显著改变决策结果的假设与权衡,而非穷举想法的所有可能分支。
Set the decision boundary
划定决策边界
Identify the requested decision, constraints, and what must be understood to choose a path. Reuse answers and accepted decisions from the conversation. Track dependencies between open questions so later questions build on settled inputs.
Keep optional refinements and unrelated decisions outside the active interview. Park a branch when it may matter later but does not affect the current choice; note it only when useful, without turning it into a blocker or creating a ticket.
明确待决策事项、约束条件,以及选择路径前必须厘清的信息。复用对话中已给出的答案和已确认的决策。跟踪未解决问题之间的依赖关系,确保后续问题建立在已确定的输入之上。
将可选优化项和无关决策排除在当前访谈范围之外。如果某个分支可能在后续产生影响但不涉及当前选择,先将其搁置;仅在必要时提及,不要将其转化为阻塞项或创建工单。
Ask focused rounds
开展多轮聚焦提问
- Select a small set of consequential questions whose prerequisites are settled. Prioritize questions that eliminate materially different outcomes or unlock dependent decisions. The set of answerable questions is a pool to choose from, not a list to ask all at once.
- Follow the user's requested pace or the calling workflow's focus. Ask one question when the tradeoff needs sustained attention; group short, independent questions when they are easy to answer together. Do not hide a large questionnaire inside a single numbered item.
- Make each question concrete and explain why its answer matters. Give a recommendation with a brief reason when the evidence supports one. Keep recommendations distinct from the user's decisions.
- Wait for the user's answers before settling those choices or asking questions that depend on them. Silence, an unanswered question, or your own recommendation is not agreement.
- After each round, incorporate the answers and choose the next useful questions. Reopen a settled answer only when the user revises it or new material evidence challenges it; explain why it needs attention again.
- 挑选少量前提已明确的关键问题。优先提问能排除显著不同结果、或解锁依赖决策的问题。可回答的问题是供挑选的问题池,而非需要一次性全部问完的清单。
- 遵循用户要求的节奏或调用方工作流的侧重点。如果某个权衡需要持续关注,就单次提一个问题;如果是简短、独立的问题便于一并回答,就将它们归为一组。不要把一长串问卷藏在单个编号条目里。
- 每个问题都要具体明确,并说明其答案的重要性。如果有证据支持某一选项,可以给出带简要理由的建议。注意将建议与用户的决策明确区分开。
- 等待用户回答后,再确认相关选择或提出依赖这些答案的问题。沉默、未答复的问题,或是你自己给出的建议,都不代表用户同意。
- 每一轮提问后,整合收到的答案,再选择下一批有用的问题。仅当用户修改了已确认的答案,或有新的重要证据对其构成挑战时,才重新讨论已敲定的内容;并说明为何需要再次关注该问题。
Establish facts
核实事实信息
Look up discoverable facts in the available code, documentation, and tools before asking the user to supply them. Handle small lookups directly. Delegate a bounded factual investigation when delegation is available, the work can run independently, and it is likely to save time or improve the evidence; otherwise continue locally. Do not require a subagent merely because a question needs research.
A pending investigation delays only questions that depend on its result. Continue independent questions while it runs, then reconcile the findings before using them. If a necessary fact cannot be obtained, name the gap and ask for the specific information or access needed.
Product choices, preferences, and tradeoffs requiring the user's judgment remain theirs. Do not use factual research or delegated agents to answer on the user's behalf.
在要求用户提供信息前,先从可用的代码、文档和工具中查找可获取的事实信息。小型查询直接自行处理。如果支持委派、且调查工作可独立运行,同时大概率能节省时间或提升证据质量,就委派限定范围的事实调查任务;否则继续在本地处理。不要仅仅因为问题需要调研就调用子Agent。
待完成的调查只会延迟依赖其结果的问题。在调查运行期间可以继续处理独立问题,之后在使用调查结果前先核对其准确性。如果无法获取某项必要事实,要明确指出信息缺口,并说明需要的具体信息或访问权限。
产品选择、偏好以及需要用户判断的权衡事项,始终由用户决定。不要用事实调研或委派的Agent代替用户做出回答。
Finish at the requested decision
完成待决策事项后收尾
Finish when the material choices needed for the requested decision are settled, or when the user pauses. Summarize the agreed path, consequential rationale, and any remaining blocker or useful deferred branch. Do not prolong the interview to exhaust optional questions or ask for blanket reconfirmation of clear answers.
Agreement on a decision does not itself authorize implementation, documentation writes, or external actions. Honor authorization already present in the user's request, including a requested documentation workflow, without asking for it again.
当待决策事项所需的关键选择都已敲定,或用户暂停时,就结束流程。总结已达成一致的路径、关键理由,以及剩余的阻塞项或有用的待处理分支。不要为了穷尽可选问题或要求用户全盘确认已明确的答案而延长访谈。
对决策达成一致本身并不代表授权执行、编写文档或采取外部行动。如果用户的请求中已经包含授权(比如要求执行文档工作流),直接遵循即可,无需再次询问。