copy-editor

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Copy Editor

文案编辑工具

A general-purpose copy editing skill that reviews and edits text for grammar, style, and clarity. Supports custom project style guides with a comprehensive default fallback.

一款通用型文案编辑技能，可对文本进行语法、风格和清晰度的审核与编辑。支持自定义项目风格指南，同时提供全面的默认规则作为备选。

When to Use

适用场景

Reviewing marketing copy, landing pages, or ad text
Editing blog posts, articles, or thought leadership pieces
Polishing documentation or technical writing
Improving email campaigns or newsletters
Refining product descriptions or UI text
Any business writing that needs professional polish

审核营销文案、落地页或广告文本
编辑博客文章、专栏文章或思想领导力内容
优化文档或技术写作内容
提升电子邮件营销活动或新闻稿的质量
完善产品描述或UI文本
任何需要专业优化的商务写作内容

Methodology

工作流程

Follow these four phases sequentially for thorough copy review.

请按以下四个阶段依次进行，以完成全面的文案审核。

Phase 1: Context Analysis

第一阶段：上下文分析

Before editing, understand the document:

Document Type: Marketing copy, blog post, documentation, email, etc.
Target Audience: Technical, general, executive, customer-facing
Intended Tone: Formal, conversational, persuasive, informative
Purpose: Inform, persuade, instruct, engage

Note these factors as they influence which style rules apply. Marketing copy allows more creative freedom than documentation.

在开始编辑前，先了解文档的相关信息：

文档类型：营销文案、博客文章、文档、电子邮件等
目标受众：技术人员、普通大众、管理层、客户群体
预期语气：正式、口语化、有说服力、信息性
写作目的：告知、说服、指导、吸引用户

请记录这些因素，因为它们会影响适用的风格规则。例如，营销文案比文档允许更多的创作自由。

Phase 2: Style Guide Resolution

第二阶段：风格指南匹配

Locate the applicable style guide in this order:

Project root: Check for
```
STYLE_GUIDE.md
```
Claude directory: Check for
```
.claude/style-guide.md
```
Docs folder: Check for
```
docs/style-guide.md
```
Default fallback: Use
```
references/DEFAULT_STYLE_GUIDE.md
```
from this skill

bash

undefined

按以下顺序查找适用的风格指南：

项目根目录：检查是否存在
```
STYLE_GUIDE.md
```
Claude目录：检查是否存在
```
.claude/style-guide.md
```
Docs文件夹：检查是否存在
```
docs/style-guide.md
```
默认备选：使用本技能中的
```
references/DEFAULT_STYLE_GUIDE.md
```

bash

undefined

Search for project style guide

搜索项目风格指南

glob "STYLE_GUIDE.md" || glob ".claude/style-guide.md" || glob "docs/style-guide.md"


If a project style guide exists, prioritize its rules. The default guide provides universal best practices for cases not covered.

glob "STYLE_GUIDE.md" || glob ".claude/style-guide.md" || glob "docs/style-guide.md"


如果存在项目风格指南，请优先遵循其规则。默认指南提供了适用于未覆盖场景的通用最佳实践。

Phase 3: Line-by-Line Review

第三阶段：逐行审核

Systematically review the copy for:

Grammar & Mechanics

Subject-verb agreement
Punctuation (commas, semicolons, apostrophes)
Capitalization consistency
Number formatting
Spelling and typos

Voice & Clarity

Active vs. passive voice (prefer active)
Sentence length and readability
Jargon and unnecessary complexity
Redundant words and phrases
Parallel structure in lists

Style Adherence

Consistency with style guide rules
Tone appropriate for audience
Brand voice alignment (if applicable)
Formatting conventions

Content Quality

Logical flow and transitions
Clear headlines and subheadings
Effective calls-to-action
Accurate claims and statements

AI Writing Tells (see

references/AI_WRITING_TELLS.md

)

Vocabulary clusters (delve, landscape, pivotal, robust, etc.)
Formulaic phrases ("In today's...", "In conclusion...")
Vague attributions ("some experts", "widely regarded")
Structural patterns (mechanical balance, essay format)
Sycophantic phrases ("I hope this helps")

系统地审核文案的以下方面：

语法与格式规范

主谓一致
标点符号（逗号、分号、撇号）
大小写一致性
数字格式
拼写与错别字

语气与清晰度

主动语态与被动语态（优先使用主动语态）
句子长度与可读性
行话与不必要的复杂表达
冗余词汇与短语
列表中的平行结构

风格合规性

与风格指南规则的一致性
符合受众的语气要求
品牌语气对齐（如适用）
格式约定

内容质量

逻辑流程与过渡
清晰的标题与副标题
有效的行动号召
准确的声明与表述

AI写作特征（详见

references/AI_WRITING_TELLS.md

）

词汇集群（如delve、landscape、pivotal、robust等）
公式化短语（如“In today's...”、“In conclusion...”）
模糊归因（如“some experts”、“widely regarded”）
结构化模板（机械平衡、议论文格式）
奉承性短语（如“I hope this helps”）

Phase 4: Structured Report

第四阶段：结构化报告

Present findings in this format:

markdown

undefined

请按以下格式呈现审核结果：

markdown

undefined

Copy Review Report

文案审核报告

Document: [filename or description] Word Count: [count] Issues Found: [total count]

文档：[文件名或描述] 字数：[统计数] 问题总数：[统计数]

Summary

摘要

[1-2 sentence overview of document quality and main areas for improvement]

[1-2句话概述文档质量及主要改进方向]

Issues by Category

问题分类

Grammar & Mechanics ([count])

语法与格式规范 ([统计数])

Location	Original	Issue	Suggested Fix
Line X	"exact quote"	[issue type]	"corrected text"

位置	原文	问题类型	建议修正
第X行	"准确引用原文"	[问题类型]	"修正后的文本"

Voice & Clarity ([count])

语气与清晰度 ([统计数])

Location	Original	Issue	Suggested Fix
Line X	"exact quote"	[issue type]	"corrected text"

位置	原文	问题类型	建议修正
第X行	"准确引用原文"	[问题类型]	"修正后的文本"

Style Guide Violations ([count])

风格指南违规 ([统计数])

Location	Original	Rule Violated	Suggested Fix
Line X	"exact quote"	[rule reference]	"corrected text"

位置	原文	违反规则	建议修正
第X行	"准确引用原文"	[规则参考]	"修正后的文本"

AI Writing Tells ([count])

AI写作特征 ([统计数])

Location	Original	Pattern Type	Suggested Fix
Line X	"exact quote"	[vocabulary/phrase/structure/attribution]	"corrected text"

位置	原文	模式类型	建议修正
第X行	"准确引用原文"	[词汇/短语/结构/归因]	"修正后的文本"

Recurring Patterns

重复出现的问题模式

[Pattern 1]: Appears X times - [recommendation]
[Pattern 2]: Appears X times - [recommendation]

[模式1]：出现X次 - [改进建议]
[模式2]：出现X次 - [改进建议]

Top 3 Recommendations

三大优先改进建议

[Most impactful improvement]
[Second priority]
[Third priority]

[影响最大的改进点]
[次优先改进点]
[第三优先改进点]

Style Guide Compliance

风格指南合规性检查

AI Writing Check

AI写作检查

No AI vocabulary clusters
No formulaic phrases
Specific attributions (not "some experts")
Natural structure (not essay format)

undefined

无AI词汇集群
无公式化短语
具体归因（非“some experts”）
自然结构（非议论文格式）

undefined

Guiding Principles

指导原则

Quote exactly: Always show the original text verbatim
Cite rules: Reference specific style guide rules when applicable
Preserve voice: Maintain the author's style while improving clarity
Prioritize impact: Focus on issues that affect comprehension first
Be constructive: Frame suggestions positively, explain the "why"
Note ambiguity: When rules conflict or are unclear, explain options

准确引用：始终完整引用原文
规则溯源：适用时参考具体的风格指南规则
保留作者语气：在提升清晰度的同时保留作者的写作风格
优先影响：优先处理影响理解的问题
建设性建议：以积极的方式提出建议，并解释原因
标注歧义：当规则冲突或不明确时，说明可选方案

Output Options

输出选项

Based on user request, provide:

Full report: Complete analysis with all categories
Quick scan: Top 5 most important issues only
Category focus: Deep dive on specific area (grammar, style, etc.)
Inline edits: Apply fixes directly with Edit tool (with user permission)

根据用户需求，可提供以下输出：

完整报告：包含所有分类的全面分析
快速扫描：仅列出最重要的5个问题
分类聚焦：针对特定领域进行深度分析（如语法、风格等）
Inline编辑：在获得用户许可后，使用编辑工具直接应用修正

Example Usage

示例用法

User: Review my landing page copy for issues
Assistant: I'll use the copy-editor skill to review your landing page.

[Executes Phase 1-4, produces structured report]

User: Quick grammar check on this email
Assistant: I'll do a quick scan focusing on grammar and mechanics.

[Produces abbreviated report with top issues]

用户：帮我审核我的落地页文案
助手：我将使用copy-editor技能来审核您的落地页文案。

[执行第一至第四阶段，生成结构化报告]

用户：快速检查这封邮件的语法
助手：我将进行快速扫描，重点关注语法与格式规范。

[生成包含主要问题的简化报告]