financial-unit-economics
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseFinancial Unit Economics
财务单位经济效益
Table of Contents
目录
Purpose
用途
Financial Unit Economics analyzes the profitability of individual units (customers, products, transactions) to determine if a business model is viable and scalable. This skill guides you through calculating key metrics (CAC, LTV, contribution margin), interpreting ratios, conducting cohort analysis, and making data-driven decisions about pricing, marketing spend, and growth strategy.
财务单位经济效益分析通过评估单个单元(客户、产品、交易)的盈利能力,判断商业模式是否可行且具备可扩展性。本方法将引导你计算关键指标(CAC、LTV、边际贡献)、解读比率、开展群组分析,并基于数据制定定价、营销支出及增长策略相关决策。
When to Use
适用场景
Use this skill when:
- Business model validation: Determine if startup/new product can be profitable at scale
- Pricing decisions: Set prices based on target margins and customer economics
- Marketing spend: Assess ROI of acquisition channels, optimize CAC
- Growth strategy: Decide when to scale (raise funding, increase spend) based on unit economics
- Product roadmap: Prioritize features that improve retention or reduce churn (increase LTV)
- Investor pitch: Demonstrate business model viability with CAC, LTV, payback metrics
- Channel optimization: Compare profitability across customer segments or acquisition channels
- Subscription models: Analyze recurring revenue, churn, cohort retention curves
- Marketplace economics: Model take rate, supply/demand side economics, liquidity
- Financial planning: Forecast cash flow, runway, burn rate based on unit economics
Trigger phrases: "unit economics", "CAC/LTV", "customer acquisition cost", "lifetime value", "contribution margin", "payback period", "customer profitability", "break-even", "cohort analysis", "is this business viable?"
在以下场景中使用本方法:
- 商业模式验证:判断初创企业/新产品能否实现规模化盈利
- 定价决策:基于目标利润率和客户经济模型设定价格
- 营销支出优化:评估获客渠道的投资回报率,优化CAC
- 增长策略制定:根据单位经济效益判断何时适合规模化扩张(融资、增加支出)
- 产品路线规划:优先开发能提升留存率或降低客户流失率(进而提升LTV)的功能
- 投资者沟通:通过CAC、LTV、投资回收期等指标展示商业模式的可行性
- 渠道优化:对比不同客户细分群体或获客渠道的盈利能力
- 订阅模式分析:评估 recurring revenue( recurring revenue保留英文)、客户流失率、群组留存曲线
- 平台型商业模式分析:建模抽成率、供需双方经济模型、流动性
- 财务规划:基于单位经济效益预测现金流、资金储备、烧钱率
触发关键词:"单位经济效益"、"CAC/LTV"、"客户获取成本"、"客户生命周期价值"、"边际贡献"、"投资回收期"、"客户盈利能力"、"盈亏平衡"、"群组分析"、"该商业模式是否可行?"
What Is It?
什么是财务单位经济效益?
Financial Unit Economics is the practice of measuring profitability at the most granular level (per customer, product, or transaction) to understand if revenue from a single unit exceeds the cost to acquire and serve it.
Core components:
- CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost): Total sales/marketing spend ÷ new customers acquired
- LTV (Lifetime Value): Revenue from customer over their lifetime minus variable costs
- Contribution Margin: (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue (as %)
- LTV/CAC Ratio: Measures return on acquisition investment (target: 3:1 or higher)
- Payback Period: Months to recover CAC from customer revenue
- Cohort Analysis: Track metrics over time for customer groups (by acquisition month/channel)
Quick example:
Scenario: SaaS startup, subscription model ($100/month), analyzing unit economics.
Metrics:
- CAC: $20k marketing spend, 100 new customers → CAC = $200
- Monthly revenue per customer: $100
- Variable costs: $20/customer/month (hosting, support)
- Gross margin: ($100 - $20) / $100 = 80%
- Monthly churn: 5% → Average lifetime = 1 / 0.05 = 20 months
- LTV: $100 revenue × 20 months × 80% margin = $1,600
- LTV/CAC: $1,600 / $200 = 8:1 ✓ (healthy, >3:1)
- Payback period: $200 CAC ÷ ($100 × 80% margin) = 2.5 months ✓ (good, <12 months)
Interpretation: Strong unit economics. Each customer generates 8× their acquisition cost. Can profitably scale marketing spend. Payback in 2.5 months means fast capital recovery.
Core benefits:
- Early warning system: Detect unsustainable business models before scaling losses
- Data-driven growth: Know when unit economics justify increasing spend
- Channel optimization: Identify which acquisition channels are profitable
- Pricing power: Quantify impact of price changes on profitability
- Investor confidence: Demonstrate path to profitability with clear metrics
财务单位经济效益是指从最细分的维度(单个客户、产品或交易)衡量盈利能力,判断单个单元带来的收入是否超过获取及服务该单元的成本。
核心组成部分:
- CAC(客户获取成本):总销售/营销支出 ÷ 新增客户数量
- LTV(客户生命周期价值):客户生命周期内产生的收入减去可变成本
- 边际贡献:(收入 - 可变成本) ÷ 收入(百分比形式)
- LTV/CAC比率:衡量获客投资的回报(目标值:3:1及以上)
- 投资回收期:通过客户收入收回CAC所需的月数
- 群组分析:按客户群组(按获客月份/渠道)追踪指标随时间的变化
快速示例:
场景:SaaS初创企业,订阅模式(每月100美元),分析单位经济效益。
指标计算:
- CAC:营销支出2万美元,新增客户100人 → CAC = 200美元
- 单客户月收入:100美元
- 可变成本:每位客户每月20美元(服务器托管、客服)
- 毛利率:(100 - 20) / 100 = 80%
- 月流失率:5% → 平均客户生命周期 = 1 / 0.05 = 20个月
- LTV:100美元月收入 × 20个月 × 80%毛利率 = 1600美元
- LTV/CAC:1600美元 / 200美元 = 8:1 ✓(健康水平,>3:1)
- 投资回收期:200美元CAC ÷ (100美元 × 80%毛利率) = 2.5个月 ✓(良好水平,<12个月)
解读:单位经济效益强劲。每位客户产生的收益是其获客成本的8倍。可盈利性地扩大营销支出。2.5个月的投资回收期意味着资金回笼速度快。
核心价值:
- 早期预警机制:在规模化亏损前发现不可持续的商业模式
- 数据驱动增长:明确何时单位经济效益支持增加支出
- 渠道优化:识别盈利的获客渠道
- 定价能力:量化价格变动对盈利能力的影响
- 提升投资者信心:通过清晰的指标展示盈利路径
Workflow
分析流程
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Unit Economics Analysis Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Define the unit
- [ ] Step 2: Calculate CAC
- [ ] Step 3: Calculate LTV
- [ ] Step 4: Assess contribution margin
- [ ] Step 5: Analyze cohorts
- [ ] Step 6: Interpret and recommendStep 1: Define the unit
What is your unit of analysis? (Customer, product SKU, transaction, subscription). See resources/template.md.
Step 2: Calculate CAC
Total acquisition costs (sales + marketing) ÷ new units acquired. Break down by channel if applicable. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 3: Calculate LTV
Revenue over unit lifetime minus variable costs. Use cohort data for retention/churn. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 4: Assess contribution margin
(Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue. Identify levers to improve margin. See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 5: Analyze cohorts
Track retention, LTV, payback by customer cohort (acquisition month/channel/segment). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Step 6: Interpret and recommend
Assess LTV/CAC ratio, payback period, cash efficiency. Make recommendations (pricing, channels, growth). See resources/template.md and resources/methodology.md.
Validate using resources/evaluators/rubric_financial_unit_economics.json. Minimum standard: Average score ≥ 3.5.
复制以下清单并跟踪进度:
单位经济效益分析进度:
- [ ] 步骤1:定义分析单元
- [ ] 步骤2:计算CAC
- [ ] 步骤3:计算LTV
- [ ] 步骤4:评估边际贡献
- [ ] 步骤5:进行群组分析
- [ ] 步骤6:解读并给出建议步骤1:定义分析单元
你的分析单元是什么?(客户、产品SKU、交易、订阅)参考resources/template.md。
步骤2:计算CAC
总获客成本(销售+营销)÷ 新增单元数量。若适用,按渠道拆分计算。参考resources/template.md和resources/methodology.md。
步骤3:计算LTV
单元生命周期内的收入减去可变成本。使用群组数据评估留存/流失率。参考resources/template.md和resources/methodology.md。
步骤4:评估边际贡献
(收入 - 可变成本) ÷ 收入。识别提升利润率的关键因素。参考resources/template.md和resources/methodology.md。
步骤5:进行群组分析
按客户群组(获客月份/渠道/细分群体)追踪留存率、LTV、投资回收期。参考resources/template.md和resources/methodology.md。
步骤6:解读并给出建议
评估LTV/CAC比率、投资回收期、资金使用效率。给出定价、渠道、增长相关建议。参考resources/template.md和resources/methodology.md。
使用resources/evaluators/rubric_financial_unit_economics.json进行验证。最低标准:平均得分≥3.5。
Common Patterns
常见模式
Pattern 1: SaaS Subscription Model
- Key metrics: MRR, ARR, churn rate, LTV/CAC, payback period, CAC payback
- Calculation: LTV = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Churn Rate
- Benchmarks: LTV/CAC ≥3:1, Payback <12 months, Churn <5% monthly (B2C) or <2% (B2B)
- Levers: Reduce churn (increase LTV), upsell/cross-sell (increase ARPU), optimize channels (reduce CAC)
- When: Subscription business, recurring revenue, retention critical
Pattern 2: E-commerce / Transactional
- Key metrics: AOV (Average Order Value), repeat purchase rate, contribution margin per order, CAC
- Calculation: LTV = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Customer Lifetime (years)
- Benchmarks: Contribution margin ≥40%, Repeat purchase rate ≥25%, LTV/CAC ≥2:1
- Levers: Increase AOV (bundling, upsells), drive repeat purchases (loyalty programs), reduce variable costs
- When: Transactional business, e-commerce, retail
Pattern 3: Marketplace / Platform
- Key metrics: Take rate, GMV (Gross Merchandise Value), supply/demand CAC, liquidity
- Calculation: LTV = GMV per user × Take Rate × Gross Margin % ÷ Churn Rate
- Benchmarks: Take rate 10-30%, LTV/CAC ≥3:1 for both sides, network effects kicking in
- Levers: Increase take rate (value-added services), improve matching (increase GMV), balance supply/demand
- When: Two-sided marketplace, platform business
Pattern 4: Freemium / PLG (Product-Led Growth)
- Key metrics: Free-to-paid conversion rate, time to convert, paid user LTV, blended CAC
- Calculation: Blended LTV = (Free users × Conversion % × Paid LTV) - (Free user costs)
- Benchmarks: Conversion ≥2%, Time to convert <90 days, Paid LTV/CAC ≥4:1
- Levers: Increase conversion rate (improve product, optimize paywall), reduce time to value, lower CAC via virality
- When: Product-led growth, freemium model, viral product
Pattern 5: Enterprise / High-Touch Sales
- Key metrics: CAC (including sales team costs), sales cycle length, NRR (Net Revenue Retention), LTV
- Calculation: LTV = ACV (Annual Contract Value) × Gross Margin % × Average Customer Lifetime (years)
- Benchmarks: LTV/CAC ≥3:1, Sales efficiency (ARR added ÷ S&M spend) ≥1.0, NRR ≥110%
- Levers: Shorten sales cycle, increase ACV (upsell, premium tiers), improve retention (NRR)
- When: Enterprise sales, high ACV, long sales cycles
模式1:SaaS订阅模式
- 关键指标:MRR、ARR、客户流失率、LTV/CAC、投资回收期、CAC回收周期
- 计算公式:LTV = ARPU × 毛利率 ÷ 客户流失率
- 基准值:LTV/CAC ≥3:1,投资回收期<12个月,月流失率B2C<5%或B2B<2%
- 优化方向:降低客户流失率(提升LTV)、交叉销售/向上销售(提升ARPU)、优化获客渠道(降低CAC)
- 适用场景:订阅型业务、 recurring revenue、留存率至关重要的业务
模式2:电商/交易型模式
- 关键指标:AOV(平均订单价值)、复购率、每订单边际贡献、CAC
- 计算公式:LTV = AOV × 购买频率 × 毛利率 × 客户生命周期(年)
- 基准值:边际贡献≥40%,复购率≥25%,LTV/CAC≥2:1
- 优化方向:提升AOV(捆绑销售、向上销售)、促进复购(忠诚度计划)、降低可变成本
- 适用场景:交易型业务、电商、零售
模式3:平台/双边市场模式
- 关键指标:抽成率、GMV(总商品交易额)、供需双方CAC、流动性
- 计算公式:LTV = 单用户GMV × 抽成率 × 毛利率 ÷ 客户流失率
- 基准值:抽成率10-30%,供需双方LTV/CAC≥3:1,网络效应显现
- 优化方向:提升抽成率(增值服务)、优化供需匹配(提升GMV)、平衡供需关系
- 适用场景:双边市场、平台型业务
模式4:免费增值/PLG(产品驱动增长)模式
- 关键指标:免费转付费转化率、转化时长、付费用户LTV、综合CAC
- 计算公式:综合LTV = (免费用户数 × 转化率 × 付费用户LTV) - (免费用户服务成本)
- 基准值:转化率≥2%,转化时长<90天,付费用户LTV/CAC≥4:1
- 优化方向:提升转化率(优化产品、调整付费墙)、缩短价值交付时间、通过病毒传播降低CAC
- 适用场景:产品驱动增长、免费增值模式、病毒型产品
模式5:企业级/高-touch销售模式
- 关键指标:CAC(含销售团队成本)、销售周期长度、NRR(净收入留存率)、LTV
- 计算公式:LTV = ACV(年度合同价值) × 毛利率 × 平均客户生命周期(年)
- 基准值:LTV/CAC≥3:1,销售效率(新增ARR ÷ 销售/营销支出)≥1.0,NRR≥110%
- 优化方向:缩短销售周期、提升ACV(向上销售、 premium tiers保留英文)、提升留存率(NRR)
- 适用场景:企业级销售、高ACV、长销售周期业务
Guardrails
注意事项
Critical requirements:
-
Fully-loaded CAC: Include all acquisition costs (sales salaries, marketing spend, tools, overhead allocation). Underestimating CAC makes unit economics look better than reality. Common miss: excluding sales team salaries.
-
True variable costs: Only include costs that scale with each unit (COGS, hosting per user, transaction fees). Don't include fixed costs (rent, core engineering). LTV calculation requires accurate margin.
-
Cohort-based LTV: Don't average across all customers. Early cohorts ≠ recent cohorts. Track retention curves by cohort (acquisition month/channel). LTV should be based on observed retention, not assumptions.
-
Time horizon matters: LTV is a prediction. Use conservative assumptions. For new products, LTV estimates are unreliable (insufficient data). Weight recent cohorts more heavily.
-
Payback period vs. LTV/CAC: Both matter. High LTV/CAC but long payback (>18 months) strains cash. Fast payback (<6 months) allows rapid reinvestment. Optimize for both.
-
Channel-level analysis: Blended metrics hide truth. CAC and LTV vary by channel (paid search vs. referral vs. content). Analyze separately to optimize spend.
-
Retention is king: Small changes in churn have exponential impact on LTV. Improving monthly churn from 5% to 4% increases LTV by 25%. Retention improvements > acquisition improvements.
-
Gross margin floor: Need ≥60% gross margin for SaaS, ≥40% for e-commerce to be viable. Low margin means high LTV/CAC ratio still yields poor cash flow.
Common pitfalls:
- ❌ Ignoring churn: Assuming customers stay forever. Reality: churn compounds. Use cohort retention curves.
- ❌ Vanity LTV: Using unrealistic retention (e.g., 5 year LTV with 1 month of data). Stick to observed behavior.
- ❌ Blended CAC: Mixing profitable and unprofitable channels. Break down by channel, segment, cohort.
- ❌ Not updating: Unit economics change as product, market, competition evolve. Re-calculate quarterly.
- ❌ Missing costs: Forgetting support costs, payment processing fees, fraud losses, refunds. Track everything.
- ❌ Premature scaling: Growing before unit economics work (LTV/CAC <2:1). "We'll make it up in volume" rarely works.
核心要求:
-
全成本核算CAC:包含所有获客成本(销售薪资、营销支出、工具费用、间接成本分摊)。低估CAC会让单位经济效益看起来比实际更好。常见疏漏:未包含销售团队薪资。
-
真实可变成本:仅包含随单元数量增长而变化的成本(COGS、单用户服务器托管费、交易手续费)。不要包含固定成本(房租、核心工程团队成本)。LTV计算需要准确的利润率数据。
-
基于群组的LTV计算:不要对所有客户取平均值。早期客户群组≠近期客户群组。按群组(获客月份/渠道)追踪留存曲线。LTV应基于实际观察到的留存数据,而非假设。
-
时间维度的重要性:LTV是预测值。使用保守假设。对于新产品,LTV预估不可靠(数据不足)。应更重视近期客户群组的数据。
-
投资回收期与LTV/CAC同样重要:两者缺一不可。高LTV/CAC但长投资回收期(>18个月)会造成现金流压力。短投资回收期(<6个月)允许快速再投资。需同时优化两者。
-
渠道维度分析:综合指标会掩盖真实情况。不同渠道(付费搜索、推荐、内容营销)的CAC和LTV差异显著。需单独分析以优化支出。
-
留存率是核心:客户流失率的微小变化会对LTV产生指数级影响。将月流失率从5%降至4%,LTV会提升25%。提升留存率的效果优于提升获客能力。
-
毛利率底线:SaaS业务需≥60%的毛利率,电商业务需≥40%的毛利率才能具备可行性。低毛利率意味着即使LTV/CAC比率较高,现金流仍可能不佳。
常见误区:
- ❌ 忽略客户流失率:假设客户会永久留存。实际情况是流失率会持续累积。需使用群组留存曲线。
- ❌ 虚高LTV:使用不切实际的留存假设(例如,仅用1个月数据预估5年LTV)。应基于实际观察到的行为。
- ❌ 综合CAC计算:混合盈利与非盈利渠道的指标。需按渠道、细分群体、群组拆分分析。
- ❌ 未定期更新:单位经济效益会随产品、市场、竞争环境变化而变化。需每季度重新计算。
- ❌ 遗漏成本:忘记计算客服成本、支付手续费、欺诈损失、退款。需跟踪所有相关成本。
- ❌ 过早规模化:在单位经济效益未验证通过前就扩张(LTV/CAC<2:1)。“通过规模效应摊薄成本”通常行不通。
Quick Reference
快速参考
Key formulas:
CAC = (Sales + Marketing Costs) ÷ New Customers Acquired
LTV (subscription) = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
LTV (transactional) = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Lifetime (years)
Contribution Margin % = (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue
LTV/CAC Ratio = Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost
Payback Period (months) = CAC ÷ (Monthly Revenue × Gross Margin %)
CAC Payback (months) = S&M Spend ÷ (New ARR × Gross Margin %)
Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue
Customer Lifetime (months) = 1 ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) = Sum of all monthly subscriptions
ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) = MRR × 12
ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Total Revenue ÷ Total Users
NRR (Net Revenue Retention) = (Starting ARR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) ÷ Starting ARRBenchmarks (varies by stage and industry):
| Metric | Good | Acceptable | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTV/CAC Ratio | ≥5:1 | 3:1 - 5:1 | <3:1 |
| Payback Period | <6 months | 6-12 months | >18 months |
| Gross Margin (SaaS) | ≥80% | 60-80% | <60% |
| Gross Margin (E-commerce) | ≥50% | 40-50% | <40% |
| Monthly Churn (B2C SaaS) | <3% | 3-7% | >7% |
| Monthly Churn (B2B SaaS) | <1% | 1-3% | >3% |
| CAC Payback (SaaS) | <12 months | 12-18 months | >18 months |
| NRR (SaaS) | ≥120% | 100-120% | <100% |
Decision framework:
| LTV/CAC | Payback | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| <1:1 | Any | Stop: Losing money on every customer. Fix model or pivot. |
| 1:1 - 2:1 | >12 months | Caution: Marginal economics. Don't scale yet. Improve retention or reduce CAC. |
| 2:1 - 3:1 | 6-12 months | Optimize: Unit economics acceptable. Focus on improving before scaling. |
| 3:1 - 5:1 | <12 months | Scale: Good economics. Can profitably invest in growth. |
| >5:1 | <6 months | Aggressive scale: Excellent economics. Raise capital, increase spend rapidly. |
Inputs required:
- Revenue data: Pricing, ARPU, AOV, transaction frequency
- Cost data: Sales/marketing spend, COGS, variable costs per customer
- Retention data: Churn rate, cohort retention curves, repeat purchase behavior
- Channel data: CAC by acquisition channel, LTV by segment
- Time period: Cohort definition (monthly, quarterly), historical data range
Outputs produced:
- : Full analysis with CAC, LTV, ratios, cohort breakdowns
unit-economics-analysis.md - : Retention curves by cohort
cohort-retention-table.csv - : CAC and LTV by acquisition channel
channel-profitability.csv - : Pricing, channel, growth recommendations based on metrics
recommendations.md
关键公式:
CAC = (Sales + Marketing Costs) ÷ New Customers Acquired
LTV (subscription) = ARPU × Gross Margin % ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
LTV (transactional) = AOV × Purchase Frequency × Gross Margin % × Lifetime (years)
Contribution Margin % = (Revenue - Variable Costs) ÷ Revenue
LTV/CAC Ratio = Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost
Payback Period (months) = CAC ÷ (Monthly Revenue × Gross Margin %)
CAC Payback (months) = S&M Spend ÷ (New ARR × Gross Margin %)
Gross Margin % = (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue
Customer Lifetime (months) = 1 ÷ Monthly Churn Rate
MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) = Sum of all monthly subscriptions
ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) = MRR × 12
ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) = Total Revenue ÷ Total Users
NRR (Net Revenue Retention) = (Starting ARR + Expansion - Contraction - Churn) ÷ Starting ARR基准值(因企业阶段和行业而异):
| 指标 | 优秀 | 合格 | 不佳 |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTV/CAC比率 | ≥5:1 | 3:1 - 5:1 | <3:1 |
| 投资回收期 | <6个月 | 6-12个月 | >18个月 |
| SaaS毛利率 | ≥80% | 60-80% | <60% |
| 电商毛利率 | ≥50% | 40-50% | <40% |
| B2C SaaS月流失率 | <3% | 3-7% | >7% |
| B2B SaaS月流失率 | <1% | 1-3% | >3% |
| SaaS CAC回收周期 | <12个月 | 12-18个月 | >18个月 |
| SaaS NRR | ≥120% | 100-120% | <100% |
决策框架:
| LTV/CAC | 投资回收期 | 建议 |
|---|---|---|
| <1:1 | 任意 | 停止:每获取一个客户都会亏损。调整商业模式或转型。 |
| 1:1 - 2:1 | >12个月 | 谨慎:经济效益微薄。暂不扩张。提升留存率或降低CAC。 |
| 2:1 - 3:1 | 6-12个月 | 优化:单位经济效益可接受。先优化再考虑扩张。 |
| 3:1 - 5:1 | <12个月 | 扩张:经济效益良好。可盈利性地投入增长。 |
| >5:1 | <6个月 | 激进扩张:经济效益极佳。融资并快速增加支出。 |
所需输入数据:
- 收入数据:定价、ARPU、AOV、交易频率
- 成本数据:销售/营销支出、COGS、单客户可变成本
- 留存数据:客户流失率、群组留存曲线、复购行为
- 渠道数据:分渠道CAC、分细分群体LTV
- 时间维度:群组定义(月度、季度)、历史数据范围
输出成果:
- :包含CAC、LTV、比率、群组拆分的完整分析报告
unit-economics-analysis.md - :按群组划分的留存曲线
cohort-retention-table.csv - :分渠道的CAC和LTV数据
channel-profitability.csv - :基于指标给出的定价、渠道、增长建议
recommendations.md