reciprocity-offer-design

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Reciprocity Offer Design

互惠式邀约设计

Use reciprocity to create real value before asking, while avoiding obligation traps. The rule is powerful because people feel pressure to repay favors, including some they did not request.

利用互惠原则，在提出请求前创造真实价值，同时规避义务陷阱。这一原则之所以强大，是因为人们会感到有回报恩惠的压力，包括一些他们并未主动要求的恩惠。

Quick Start

快速开始

Read
```
guidelines.md
```
to choose the smallest useful reference set.

Load

references/reciprocity/knowledge.md

for concepts and

references/reciprocity/rules.md

for operating rules.

Use
```
workflows/design-value-first-offer.md
```
for repeatable tasks.
For audits, surface both the active influence cue and the ethical rewrite.

阅读
```
guidelines.md
```
以选择最精简实用的参考资料集。

加载

references/reciprocity/knowledge.md

获取核心概念，加载

references/reciprocity/rules.md

获取操作规则。

使用
```
workflows/design-value-first-offer.md
```
处理可重复任务。
进行审核时，既要明确当前使用的影响线索，也要给出符合伦理的改写方案。

目录内容

File	Purpose
references/reciprocity/knowledge.md	Core concepts and source-grounded definitions
references/reciprocity/rules.md	Rules, boundaries, and practical guidelines
references/reciprocity/examples.md	Bad/better examples for applied situations
references/reciprocity/smells.md	Red flags and anti-patterns to detect
references/reciprocity/checklist.md	Fast review checklist
workflows/design-value-first-offer.md	Create a free or front-loaded offer that builds trust without manufacturing debt.

文件	用途
references/reciprocity/knowledge.md	核心概念及基于来源的定义
references/reciprocity/rules.md	规则、边界及实用指南
references/reciprocity/examples.md	不同应用场景下的反面/优化示例
references/reciprocity/smells.md	需要警惕的危险信号与反模式
references/reciprocity/checklist.md	快速审核清单
workflows/design-value-first-offer.md	创建免费或前置价值的邀约，在不制造心理负债的前提下建立信任。

Operating Principles

操作原则

Use only honest evidence. Do not invent popularity, scarcity, credentials, endorsements, or social connection.
Separate helping a good decision from pushing a shortcut response. If the cue is counterfeit, treat it as a red flag.
When rewriting, preserve user agency: add context, alternatives, and enough time to decide when stakes are meaningful.

仅使用真实证据。不得虚构受欢迎程度、稀缺性、资质、背书或社交关联。
将助力明智决策与推动仓促回应区分开。若线索是虚假的，将其视为危险信号。
改写时，保留用户自主权：当决策涉及重大利益时，补充背景信息、替代选项，并给予充足的决策时间。

Output Pattern

输出模式

Diagnosis - name the influence principle or cue.
Evidence Check - state what proof supports or is missing from the cue.
Risk - explain manipulation, trust, or decision-quality risk.
Rewrite or Recommendation - provide an ethical alternative.

诊断 - 明确所使用的影响原则或线索。
证据核查 - 说明支持或缺失该线索的证据。
风险 - 解释操纵、信任或决策质量方面的风险。
改写或建议 - 提供符合伦理的替代方案。

Validation

验证

Use the prompts in

evals/evals.json

as smoke tests. A good result identifies the relevant Influence principle, preserves user agency, and avoids fabricated evidence or coercive pressure.

使用

evals/evals.json

中的提示作为冒烟测试。优质结果应能识别相关的影响原则，保留用户自主权，避免伪造证据或施加强制压力。