research-proposal

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Research Proposal Generator

研究计划书生成工具

Generate high-quality academic research proposals for PhD applications following Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions.

生成符合《自然综述》（Nature Reviews）学术写作规范的高质量博士申请研究计划书。

Overview

概述

This skill guides the generation of research proposals through a structured 5-phase workflow:

Requirements Gathering - Collect research topic, domain, language preferences
Literature Collection - Gather relevant literature from multiple sources
Outline Generation - Create structured outline for user approval
Content Writing - Generate full proposal based on approved outline
Output & Review - Deliver Markdown file with quality checklist

Target Output: 2,000-4,000 words (default ~3,000 words) for PhD applications.

本技能通过结构化的5阶段流程指导研究计划书的生成：

需求收集 - 收集研究主题、领域、语言偏好
文献收集 - 从多渠道获取相关文献
大纲生成 - 创建结构化大纲并获取用户认可
内容撰写 - 根据获批大纲生成完整计划书
输出与审核 - 交付Markdown文件及质量检查表

目标产出：博士申请用的2000-4000字计划书（默认约3000字）。

Phase 1: Requirements Gathering

第一阶段：需求收集

Use

AskUserQuestion

to collect the following information:

使用

AskUserQuestion

收集以下信息：

Required Information

必填信息

Research Topic/Direction
- What is the core research question or area?
- Any specific problems to address?
Academic Domain
- STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)
- Humanities (History, Philosophy, Literature, Languages)
- Social Sciences (Sociology, Psychology, Economics, Political Science)
Output Language
- English
- 中文 (Chinese)
Target Word Count
- Default: 3,000 words
- Range: 2,000-4,000 words (humanities may extend to 10,000)

研究主题/方向
- 核心研究问题或方向是什么？
- 有哪些特定需要解决的问题？
学术领域
- STEM（科学、技术、工程、数学）
- 人文科学（历史、哲学、文学、语言学）
- 社会科学（社会学、心理学、经济学、政治学）
输出语言
- 英文
- 中文 (Chinese)
目标字数
- 默认：3000字
- 范围：2000-4000字（人文科学领域可扩展至10000字）

Optional Information

可选信息

Target Institution(s)
- University/research group names
- Specific faculty members of interest
Existing Materials
- User's prior research or publications
- Relevant literature already collected in Zotero

目标院校
- 大学/研究组名称
- 感兴趣的特定教职人员
已有资料
- 用户过往的研究或出版物
- 已上传至Zotero的相关文献

Example Questions

示例问题

Questions to ask the user:

1. "What is your research topic or direction? Please describe the core question or problem you want to investigate."

2. "Which academic domain does your research belong to?"
   - STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics)
   - Humanities (History, Philosophy, Literature)
   - Social Sciences (Sociology, Psychology, Economics)

3. "What language should the proposal be written in?"
   - English
   - 中文 (Chinese)

4. "Do you have a target word count? (Default: ~3,000 words)"

5. "Are you applying to specific institutions or working with particular faculty?"

6. "Have you uploaded relevant literature to your Zotero library that I should reference?"

需要向用户询问的问题：

1. “你的研究主题或方向是什么？请描述你想要研究的核心问题或待解决的问题。”

2. “你的研究属于哪个学术领域？”
   - STEM（科学、技术、工程、数学）
   - 人文科学（历史、哲学、文学）
   - 社会科学（社会学、心理学、经济学）

3. “计划书需要使用什么语言撰写？”
   - 英文
   - 中文 (Chinese)

4. “你有目标字数要求吗？（默认：约3000字）”

5. “你是否申请特定院校，或与特定教职人员合作？”

6. “你是否已将相关文献上传至Zotero图书馆供我参考？”

Phase 2: Literature Collection

第二阶段：文献收集

Literature Sources Strategy

文献来源策略

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Literature Sources                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  General Info    →  WebSearch (trends, news, reviews)   │
│  Open Access     →  arXiv, PubMed (preprints, OA papers)│
│  Closed Access   →  Zotero MCP (user's uploaded papers) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    文献来源渠道                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  通用资讯    →  WebSearch（研究趋势、新闻、综述）   │
│  开放获取文献 →  arXiv、PubMed（预印本、开放获取论文）│
│  付费获取文献 →  Zotero MCP（用户上传的论文）        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Using WebSearch

使用WebSearch

Search for:

Recent review articles and meta-analyses
Research trends and emerging topics
News about breakthroughs in the field
Methodological advances

Example searches:

"{topic} systematic review 2024 2025"
"{topic} research trends future directions"
"{topic} methodology recent advances"

搜索内容包括：

近期综述文章和元分析
研究趋势与新兴主题
领域内突破相关新闻
方法论进展

示例搜索词：

"{topic} systematic review 2024 2025"
"{topic} research trends future directions"
"{topic} methodology recent advances"

Using Zotero MCP

使用Zotero MCP

IMPORTANT: Remind users to upload relevant closed-access literature to Zotero before starting.

重要提示：提醒用户在开始前将相关付费文献上传至Zotero。

Search User's Library

搜索用户图书馆

undefined

undefined

Search by topic keywords

按主题关键词搜索

Use: mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items Parameters: query = "{research topic keywords}"

使用: mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items 参数: query = "{research topic keywords}"

Advanced search with filters

带筛选条件的高级搜索

Use: mcp__zotero__zotero_advanced_search Parameters: conditions based on author, title, year, tags

使用: mcp__zotero__zotero_advanced_search 参数: 基于作者、标题、年份、标签的筛选条件

Semantic search for related papers

Get full text content

获取全文内容

Use: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext Parameters: item_key = "{item key from search}"

使用: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext 参数: item_key = "{item key from search}"

Get user's annotations and highlights

获取用户的注释和高亮内容

Use: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_annotations Parameters: item_key = "{item key}"

使用: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_annotations 参数: item_key = "{item key}"

Get user's notes

获取用户的笔记

Use: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_notes Parameters: item_key = "{item key}"

undefined

使用: mcp__zotero__zotero_get_notes 参数: item_key = "{item key}"

undefined

Literature Organization

文献分类整理

Organize collected literature into categories:

Background/Context - Foundational papers establishing the field
Current State - Recent advances and state-of-the-art
Research Gap - Papers identifying limitations or open questions
Methodology - Papers with relevant methods to adopt/adapt
Related Work - Adjacent research areas for comparison

将收集到的文献分为以下类别：

背景/研究语境 - 奠定领域基础的核心论文
研究现状 - 近期进展与前沿成果
研究缺口 - 指出当前研究局限或待解决问题的论文
方法论 - 可借鉴或适配的相关方法类论文
相关研究 - 用于对比参考的相邻研究领域成果

Phase 3: Outline Generation

第三阶段：大纲生成

Proposal Structure by Domain

分领域计划书结构

Read the reference file for domain-specific guidance:

```
references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
```
- Detailed section guidelines
```
references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md
```
- STEM vs Humanities differences

参考以下文件获取领域专属指导：

```
references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md
```
- 各章节详细写作指南
```
references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md
```
- STEM与人文科学领域的结构差异

Standard Outline Template

标准大纲模板

markdown

undefined

markdown

undefined

[Research Title]

[研究标题]

Abstract (150-300 words, 5-10%)

摘要（150-300字，占比5-10%）

Research problem summary
Research questions/objectives
Methodology overview
Expected significance

研究问题概述
研究问题/目标
方法论概述
预期研究意义

1. Introduction (500-800 words, 15-20%)

1. 引言（500-800字，占比15-20%）

1.1 Background and Context

1.1 背景与研究语境

1.2 Problem Statement

1.2 问题陈述

1.3 Research Questions/Objectives

1.3 研究问题/目标

1.4 Scope and Delimitations

1.4 研究范围与边界

2. Literature Review (500-1000 words, 20-25%)

2. 文献综述（500-1000字，占比20-25%）

2.1 Theoretical Framework

2.1 理论框架

2.2 Current State of Research

2.2 研究现状

2.3 Research Gap Analysis

2.3 研究缺口分析

2.4 Positioning of This Study

2.4 本研究的定位

3. Methodology (500-800 words, 20-25%)

3. 研究方法（500-800字，占比20-25%）

3.1 Research Design

3.1 研究设计

3.2 Data Collection Methods

3.2 数据收集方法

3.3 Data Analysis Approach

3.3 数据分析思路

3.4 Validity and Limitations

3.4 研究效度与局限

4. Timeline (200-300 words, 5-10%)

4. 研究时间线（200-300字，占比5-10%）

4.1 Research Phases

4.1 研究阶段

4.2 Key Milestones

4.2 关键里程碑

4.3 Gantt Chart (optional)

4.3 甘特图（可选）

5. Significance and Expected Contributions (200-400 words, 10-15%)

5. 研究意义与预期贡献（200-400字，占比10-15%）

5.1 Theoretical Contributions

5.1 理论贡献

5.2 Practical Implications

5.2 实践意义

5.3 Broader Impact

5.3 更广泛的影响

References (minimum 40 references)

参考文献（至少40篇）


**Note**: Do NOT include Appendix sections. All essential content should be integrated into the main body.


**注意**：请勿包含附录部分，所有核心内容需整合至正文章节中。

User Confirmation

用户确认

CRITICAL: Present the outline to the user and wait for confirmation before proceeding to content generation.

Present the generated outline and ask:

"Here is the proposed outline for your research proposal:

[Display outline with section titles and estimated word counts]

Please review and let me know:
1. Is the overall structure acceptable?
2. Would you like to add, remove, or modify any sections?
3. Should any section receive more/less emphasis?

I will proceed with content generation once you approve the outline."

关键步骤：向用户展示生成的大纲，待用户确认后再进入内容撰写阶段。

向用户展示生成的大纲并询问：

“以下是为你生成的研究计划书大纲：

[展示包含章节标题及预估字数的大纲]

请审阅并告知：
1. 整体结构是否符合要求？
2. 是否需要添加、删除或修改任何章节？
3. 是否需要对某些章节进行重点展开或简化？

待你确认大纲后，我将开始撰写内容。”

Phase 4: Content Writing

第四阶段：内容撰写

Writing Style Guidelines

写作风格指南

Read and apply:

references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md

阅读并遵循：

references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md

Key Principles

核心原则

Academic Register
- Formal tone, avoid colloquialisms
- Third person preferred, limited first person plural ("we")
- Precise terminology

Prose-Based Writing Style (CRITICAL)

AVOID point-by-point enumeration. Academic proposals should read as flowing, connected prose rather than bulleted lists or numbered items. Use transitional phrases and coherent paragraphs to present ideas.

Avoid	Use Instead
Bullet points listing objectives	Integrated paragraph describing objectives with transitions
Numbered lists of contributions	Narrative prose explaining contributions in context
Tables for methodology steps	Flowing description of research design

When lists ARE appropriate (use sparingly):

Research questions/objectives (as a focused set of 2-4 items)
Timeline milestones (where tabular format aids clarity)
Technical specifications that require precise enumeration

Example transformation:

❌ Poor (point-by-point):

The contributions include:
- Novel segmentation algorithm
- Multi-modal fusion framework
- Clinical validation study

✓ Good (prose-based):

This research is expected to advance the field through several interconnected
contributions. First, the development of a novel segmentation algorithm will
enable automated plaque detection with accuracy surpassing current methods.
Building on this foundation, a multi-modal fusion framework will integrate
complementary imaging data to capture plaque characteristics inaccessible to
any single modality. Finally, rigorous clinical validation will establish
the prognostic value of these computational biomarkers for predicting
cardiovascular events.

Hedging Language (Academic Caution)

Avoid Use Instead
"will prove" "aims to demonstrate"
"definitely" "likely", "potentially"
"is obvious" "evidence suggests"
"proves" "indicates", "demonstrates"
Sentence Templates

Introducing Background:
- "Over the past decade, [X] has emerged as a critical area of..."
- "Recent advances in [X] have opened new possibilities for..."
Identifying Gaps:
- "However, [X] remains poorly understood."
- "Despite these advances, significant challenges persist in..."
- "A critical gap exists in our understanding of..."
Stating Objectives:
- "This research aims to address [X] by..."
- "The primary objective of this study is to..."
- "This proposal seeks to investigate..."
Methodology Justification:
- "Building on previous work, this study proposes to..."
- "This approach was selected because..."
- "[Method] offers several advantages for studying [X]..."
Expected Contributions:
- "This work has the potential to advance..."
- "The findings may contribute to..."
- "This research could provide insights into..."
Transitions and Connectors
- Addition: Moreover, Furthermore, In addition, Additionally
- Contrast: However, Nevertheless, Conversely, On the other hand
- Causation: Therefore, Consequently, As a result, Thus
- Emphasis: Importantly, Notably, Of particular significance
- Sequence: First, Subsequently, Finally, Following this
Paragraph Structure
```
Topic Sentence → Supporting Evidence (with citations) → Synthesis/Implications
```
- 4-8 sentences per paragraph
- Clear logical progression
- Explicit transitions between paragraphs

Avoid	Use Instead
"will prove"	"aims to demonstrate"
"definitely"	"likely", "potentially"
"is obvious"	"evidence suggests"
"proves"	"indicates", "demonstrates"

学术语体
- 正式语气，避免口语化表达
- 优先使用第三人称，有限使用第一人称复数（“我们”）
- 使用精准专业术语

散文式写作风格（关键要求）

避免使用逐条列举的格式。学术计划书应呈现为连贯流畅的散文，而非项目符号列表或编号条目。使用过渡短语和连贯段落来表达观点。

需避免的格式	推荐格式
用项目符号列出研究目标	用整合式段落描述目标并添加过渡衔接
用编号列表列出研究贡献	用叙事性散文结合语境解释研究贡献
用表格展示方法步骤	用流畅的文字描述研究设计

可适当使用列表的场景（谨慎使用）：

研究问题/目标（聚焦2-4项内容）
时间线里程碑（表格格式更便于清晰展示）
需要精准列举的技术规格

示例转换：

❌ 不佳（逐条列举）：

本研究的贡献包括：
- 新型分割算法
- 多模态融合框架
- 临床验证研究

✓ 优秀（散文式）：

本研究预计通过多个相互关联的贡献推动领域发展。首先，新型分割算法的开发将实现自动化斑块检测，其准确率将超越现有方法。在此基础上，多模态融合框架将整合互补成像数据，捕捉单一模态无法获取的斑块特征。最后，严谨的临床验证将确立这些计算生物标志物在预测心血管事件方面的预后价值。

谨慎性表述（学术写作规范）

需避免的表述推荐表述
“将证明” “旨在论证”
“毫无疑问” “有可能”“潜在地”
“显然” “有证据表明”
“证明了” “表明”“论证了”
句式模板

介绍研究背景：
- “过去十年间，[X]已成为……的关键研究领域”
- “[X]领域的近期进展为……开辟了新的可能性”
指出研究缺口：
- “然而，[X]仍未被充分理解”
- “尽管取得了这些进展，……领域仍存在重大挑战”
- “我们对……的理解存在关键缺口”
陈述研究目标：
- “本研究旨在通过……解决[X]问题”
- “本研究的核心目标是……”
- “本计划书旨在探讨……”
论证方法合理性：
- “基于已有研究，本研究提出……”
- “选择该方法是因为……”
- “[方法]为研究[X]提供了诸多优势……”
阐述预期贡献：
- “本研究有望推动……的发展”
- “研究结果可能为……做出贡献”
- “本研究可为……提供新的见解”

需避免的表述	推荐表述
“将证明”	“旨在论证”
“毫无疑问”	“有可能”“潜在地”
“显然”	“有证据表明”
“证明了”	“表明”“论证了”

段落结构

主题句 → 支撑证据（含引用） → 综合分析/意义阐释

每段4-8句话
逻辑递进清晰
段落间过渡明确

Citation Formatting

引用格式

Based on domain:

STEM: APA style (Author, Year)
Humanities: MLA or Chicago style
Social Sciences: APA or Chicago style

First mention of abbreviations: "coronary CT angiography (CCTA)"

Integrate citations into text: "Recent studies (Smith et al., 2023; Jones, 2024) have demonstrated..."

根据领域选择：

STEM：APA格式（作者，年份）
人文科学：MLA或芝加哥格式
社会科学：APA或芝加哥格式

首次提及缩写时需全称加缩写：“冠状动脉CT血管造影（CCTA）”

将引用整合至正文中：“近期研究（Smith等，2023；Jones，2024）表明……”

Figure Suggestions

图表建议

IMPORTANT: Include suggestions for figures at appropriate locations throughout the proposal. Figures significantly enhance readability and demonstrate the applicant's ability to communicate complex ideas visually.

重要提示：在计划书的合适位置添加图表建议。图表可显著提升可读性，体现申请者可视化复杂观点的能力。

Figure Placement Guidelines

图表放置指南

Insert figure suggestions using the following format:

markdown

> **[Figure 1 Suggestion]** *Title: Overview of the proposed research framework*
> Content: A flowchart or schematic diagram illustrating the three-phase research
> design, showing data flow from imaging modalities through AI processing to
> clinical outcomes. Include icons for CCTA/IVUS/OCT inputs, deep learning
> modules, and output predictions.
> Recommended style: Clean vector graphics with consistent color scheme.

使用以下格式插入图表建议：

markdown

> **[图1建议]** *标题：拟议研究框架概述*
> 内容：展示三阶段研究设计的流程图或示意图，呈现从成像模态到AI处理再到临床结果的数据流。包含CCTA/IVUS/OCT输入图标、深度学习模块及输出预测模块。
> 推荐风格：简洁矢量图形，配色方案统一。

Recommended Figure Types by Section

各章节推荐图表类型

Section	Suggested Figure Type
Introduction	Conceptual diagram showing research scope and positioning
Literature Review	Timeline of key developments; Taxonomy/classification of existing methods
Methodology	Research framework flowchart; Network architecture diagram; Data processing pipeline
Timeline	Gantt chart showing research phases and milestones
Significance	Impact diagram showing theoretical and practical contributions

章节	推荐图表类型
引言	展示研究范围与定位的概念图
文献综述	关键发展时间线；现有方法分类体系
研究方法	研究框架流程图；网络架构图；数据处理管线
研究时间线	展示研究阶段与里程碑的甘特图
研究意义	展示理论与实践贡献的影响图

Figure Suggestion Principles

图表建议原则

Strategic placement: Suggest 3-5 figures for a 3,000-word proposal
Self-explanatory: Each figure should convey key information without requiring extensive caption reading
Consistent style: Recommend unified visual language (colors, fonts, icons)
Professional quality: Suggest tools (e.g., Adobe Illustrator, draw.io, BioRender for biomedical)
Accessibility: Recommend colorblind-friendly palettes and sufficient contrast

策略性放置：3000字计划书建议包含3-5个图表
自明性：每个图表无需大量说明文字即可传达核心信息
风格统一：推荐统一的视觉语言（颜色、字体、图标）
专业质量：推荐工具（如Adobe Illustrator、draw.io、生物医学领域用BioRender）
可访问性：推荐色盲友好配色方案与足够对比度

Language-Specific Considerations

语言专属注意事项

English Output

英文输出

Follow standard academic English conventions
Use British or American English consistently
Maintain formal register throughout

遵循标准学术英语规范
统一使用英式或美式英语
全程保持正式语体

Chinese Output (中文)

中文输出

使用规范学术中文
适当使用 hedging 语言:
- "本研究旨在探讨..." (not "本研究将证明...")
- "研究结果可能表明..." (not "研究结果必定显示...")
- "有望推进..." (not "肯定会推进...")
保持正式学术语体
参考文献格式遵循 GB/T 7714

使用规范学术中文
适当使用谨慎性表述：
- "本研究旨在探讨..."（而非"本研究将证明..."）
- "研究结果可能表明..."（而非"研究结果必定显示..."）
- "有望推进..."（而非"肯定会推进..."）
保持正式学术语体
参考文献格式遵循GB/T 7714标准

Phase 5: Output and Review

第五阶段：输出与审核

File Generation

文件生成

Generate the proposal as a Markdown file:

proposal_{topic_slug}_{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

Save to user's working directory or specified location.

将计划书生成为Markdown文件，命名格式如下：

proposal_{topic_slug}_{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

保存至用户工作目录或指定位置。

Quality Checklist

质量检查表

Read and apply:

references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md

Verify:

阅读并遵循：

references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md

验证内容包括：

Structure

结构

Content

内容

Academic Style

学术风格

Figures

图表

3-5 figure suggestions included at appropriate locations
Figure suggestions include title, content description, and style recommendations
Figures distributed across sections (not clustered)
Each figure serves a clear communicative purpose

在合适位置包含3-5个图表建议
图表建议包含标题、内容描述及风格推荐
图表分散分布于各章节（而非集中放置）
每个图表具备明确的传播目的

Citations

引用

Technical

技术细节

Format Conversion Guidance

格式转换指南

Provide user with conversion instructions:

bash

undefined

为用户提供格式转换说明：

bash

undefined

Convert to Word document

转换为Word文档

pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.docx

Convert to PDF (requires LaTeX)

转换为PDF文件（需安装LaTeX）

pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.pdf

Convert to PDF with custom styling

使用自定义样式转换为PDF

pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.pdf --template=academic.latex

---

pandoc proposal.md -o proposal.pdf --template=academic.latex

---

Reference Files

参考文件

This skill uses the following reference documents:

File	Purpose
`references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md`	Detailed section-by-section writing guide
`references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md`	STEM vs Humanities structural differences
`references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md`	Nature Reviews academic writing style
`references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md`	Complete quality verification checklist
`references/LITERATURE_WORKFLOW.md`	Literature collection workflow details
`assets/proposal_scaffold_en.md`	English template scaffold
`assets/proposal_scaffold_zh.md`	Chinese template scaffold

本技能使用以下参考文档：

文件	用途
`references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.md`	分章节详细写作指南
`references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.md`	STEM与人文科学领域的结构差异说明
`references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.md`	Nature Reviews风格学术写作规范
`references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md`	完整质量验证检查表
`references/LITERATURE_WORKFLOW.md`	文献收集流程细节
`assets/proposal_scaffold_en.md`	英文模板框架
`assets/proposal_scaffold_zh.md`	中文模板框架

Workflow Summary

流程总结

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Research Proposal Generation                   │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                  │
│  Phase 1: Requirements    [Interactive]                          │
│     │     └─ Topic, Domain, Language, Word Count                 │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  Phase 2: Literature      [Automatic]                            │
│     │     └─ WebSearch + Zotero MCP                              │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  Phase 3: Outline         [Interactive - User Approval Required] │
│     │     └─ Generate outline → User confirms → Proceed          │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  Phase 4: Content         [Automatic - One-shot Generation]      │
│     │     └─ Write all sections based on approved outline        │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  Phase 5: Output          [Delivery]                             │
│           └─ Markdown file + Quality checklist + Conversion tips │
│                                                                  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    研究计划书生成流程                   │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                  │
│  阶段1：需求收集    [交互式]                                      │
│     │     └─ 主题、领域、语言、字数要求                 │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  阶段2：文献收集    [自动化]                                      │
│     │     └─ WebSearch + Zotero MCP                              │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  阶段3：大纲生成    [交互式 - 需用户确认]                         │
│     │     └─ 生成大纲 → 用户确认 → 进入下一阶段          │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  阶段4：内容撰写    [自动化 - 一次性生成]                        │
│     │     └─ 根据获批大纲撰写所有章节内容        │
│     ▼                                                            │
│  阶段5：输出交付    [成果交付]                                   │
│           └─ Markdown文件 + 质量检查表 + 格式转换技巧 │
│                                                                  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Error Handling

错误处理

No Zotero Literature Found

未找到Zotero文献

If user's Zotero library has no relevant papers:

Inform user of the limitation
Rely more heavily on WebSearch for open-access sources
Suggest user upload relevant papers and retry

若用户的Zotero图书馆中无相关论文：

告知用户该限制
更多依赖WebSearch获取开放获取文献
建议用户上传相关文献后重试

Insufficient Information

信息不足

If topic is too vague:

Ask clarifying questions about specific aspects
Suggest narrowing the research scope
Provide examples of well-defined research questions

若研究主题过于模糊：

询问用户具体细节
建议缩小研究范围
提供定义清晰的研究问题示例

Word Count Constraints

字数限制

If content exceeds target:

Prioritize essential sections (Introduction, Methodology)
Condense literature review to key points
Offer expanded version as separate file

若内容超出目标字数：

优先保留核心章节（引言、研究方法）
精简文献综述至关键要点
可提供扩展版本作为独立文件

Notes

注意事项

This skill is designed specifically for PhD applications
Default output is approximately 3,000 words
Always confirm outline with user before content generation
Follow Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions
Support both English and Chinese output
Minimum 40 references required for comprehensive literature coverage
Include figure suggestions at appropriate locations (3-5 figures recommended)
NO appendices in the output - keep all content in main body sections
Prefer flowing prose over bullet points and numbered lists

本技能专为博士申请设计
默认产出约3000字的计划书
内容撰写前必须获得用户的大纲确认
严格遵循Nature Reviews风格学术写作规范
支持英文与中文双语言输出
需包含至少40篇参考文献以确保文献综述的全面性
需在合适位置添加图表建议（推荐3-5个）
输出内容不得包含附录，所有核心内容需整合至正文
优先使用流畅散文而非项目符号或编号列表

research-proposal

Original

Translation

Research Proposal Generator

研究计划书生成工具

Overview

概述

Phase 1: Requirements Gathering

第一阶段：需求收集

Required Information

必填信息

Optional Information

可选信息

Example Questions

示例问题

Phase 2: Literature Collection

第二阶段：文献收集

Literature Sources Strategy

文献来源策略

Using WebSearch

使用WebSearch

Using Zotero MCP

使用Zotero MCP

Search User's Library

搜索用户图书馆

Search by topic keywords

按主题关键词搜索

Advanced search with filters

带筛选条件的高级搜索

Semantic search for related papers

相关论文的语义搜索

Retrieve Paper Content

获取论文内容

Get full text content

获取全文内容

Get user's annotations and highlights

获取用户的注释和高亮内容

Get user's notes

获取用户的笔记

Literature Organization

文献分类整理

Phase 3: Outline Generation

第三阶段：大纲生成

Proposal Structure by Domain

分领域计划书结构

Standard Outline Template

标准大纲模板

[Research Title]

[研究标题]

Abstract (150-300 words, 5-10%)

摘要（150-300字，占比5-10%）

1. Introduction (500-800 words, 15-20%)

1. 引言（500-800字，占比15-20%）

1.1 Background and Context

1.1 背景与研究语境

1.2 Problem Statement

1.2 问题陈述

1.3 Research Questions/Objectives

1.3 研究问题/目标

1.4 Scope and Delimitations

1.4 研究范围与边界

2. Literature Review (500-1000 words, 20-25%)

2. 文献综述（500-1000字，占比20-25%）

2.1 Theoretical Framework

2.1 理论框架

2.2 Current State of Research

2.2 研究现状

2.3 Research Gap Analysis

2.3 研究缺口分析

2.4 Positioning of This Study

2.4 本研究的定位

3. Methodology (500-800 words, 20-25%)

3. 研究方法（500-800字，占比20-25%）

3.1 Research Design

3.1 研究设计

3.2 Data Collection Methods

3.2 数据收集方法

3.3 Data Analysis Approach

3.3 数据分析思路

3.4 Validity and Limitations