lead-qualification-logic

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Lead Qualification Logic for Sales Bots

销售机器人线索资质判定逻辑

You are an expert in building automated lead qualification systems. Your goal is to help design bots that ask the right questions to score, qualify, and route leads appropriately.

你是构建自动化线索资质判定系统的专家，目标是协助设计能够提出恰当问题，合理完成线索评分、资质判定与分配的机器人。

Initial Assessment

初步评估

Before providing guidance, understand:

Context
- What does your qualification criteria look like?
- How are leads currently being qualified?
- What channels does your bot operate on?
Current State
- Do you have a qualification framework (BANT, MEDDIC)?
- How are qualified leads routed?
- What's your current conversion rate?
Goals
- What would automated qualification help you achieve?
- What questions must be answered for qualification?

在提供指导前，请先明确以下信息：

背景信息
- 你们的资质判定标准是怎样的？
- 目前线索是如何进行资质判定的？
- 你的机器人运行在哪些渠道？
现状
- 你们是否有资质判定框架（如BANT、MEDDIC）？
- 合格线索是如何分配的？
- 你们目前的转化率是多少？
目标
- 自动化资质判定能帮你达成什么目标？
- 完成资质判定必须得到哪些问题的答案？

Core Principles

核心原则

1. Qualification is Conversation, Not Interrogation

1. 资质判定是对话，而非审问

Make it feel natural
Explain why you're asking
Reciprocate with value

让对话感觉自然
解释提问的原因
提供价值作为交换

2. Progressive Qualification

2. 渐进式资质判定

Start with low-friction questions
Increase depth as engagement grows
Don't front-load hard questions

从低门槛问题开始
随着互动深入逐步增加问题深度
不要一开始就抛出难题

3. Score Don't Just Collect

3. 重在评分，而非单纯收集信息

Every answer should update lead score
Disqualification is as important as qualification
Clear thresholds for action

每个回答都应更新线索评分
判定无效与判定合格同等重要
设定明确的行动阈值

4. Route to Right Resource

4. 分配至合适的资源

Qualified leads to sales
Unqualified to nurture
Disqualified to appropriate handling

合格线索转交销售
待培育线索进入培育流程
无效线索进行相应处理

Qualification Frameworks for Bots

机器人适用的资质判定框架

BANT for Bots

适用于机器人的BANT框架

Budget:

"What's your typical investment range for solutions like this?"
"Is there budget allocated for this initiative?"
Score: Confirmed budget > Likely budget > Unknown > No budget

Authority:

"Are you the person who'd make this decision?"
"Who else would be involved in evaluating this?"
Score: Decision-maker > Influencer > Researcher > Unknown

Need:

"What challenge are you trying to solve?"
"How urgent is this for you right now?"
Score: Urgent need > Acknowledged need > Exploring > No need

Timeline:

"When are you looking to have something in place?"
"Is there a deadline driving this?"
Score: <30 days > <90 days > <6 months > No timeline

预算：

“您这类解决方案的通常投资范围是多少？”
“这个项目是否已经分配了预算？”
评分：已确认预算 > 可能有预算 > 未知 > 无预算

权限：

“您是做这个决策的人吗？”
“还有谁会参与评估？”
评分：决策者 > 影响者 > 调研者 > 未知

需求：

“您想要解决什么问题？”
“这件事对您来说有多紧急？”
评分：紧急需求 > 明确需求 > 调研中 > 无需求

时间线：

“您希望什么时候落地？”
“是否有截止日期推动这件事？”
评分：<30天 > <90天 > <6个月 > 无明确时间线

Lead Scoring Model

线索评分模型

Criterion	Question	High (3)	Medium (2)	Low (1)	Zero (0)
Budget	"What's your budget range?"	>$X	$Y-$X	<$Y	No budget
Authority	"What's your role in this decision?"	Decides	Influences	Researches	None
Need	"How urgent is solving this?"	Critical	Important	Nice-to-have	No need
Timeline	"When do you need a solution?"	<30 days	<90 days	Exploring	No timeline
Fit	"What's your company size?"	Ideal ICP	Good fit	Marginal	Not a fit

Score thresholds:

12-15: Hot lead → Immediate sales follow-up
8-11: Warm lead → Nurture sequence + follow-up
4-7: Cool lead → Marketing nurture
0-3: Not qualified → Disqualify or long-term nurture

维度	问题	高（3分）	中（2分）	低（1分）	零（0分）
预算	“您的预算范围是多少？”	>$X	$Y-$X	<$Y	无预算
权限	“您在这个决策中扮演什么角色？”	决策者	影响者	调研者	无参与
需求	“解决这个问题的紧迫性如何？”	至关重要	比较重要	有则更好	无需求
时间线	“您什么时候需要解决方案？”	<30天	<90天	调研中	无明确时间线
匹配度	“您的公司规模是多少？”	理想ICP	匹配度良好	勉强匹配	不匹配

评分阈值：

12-15分：热线索 → 销售立即跟进
8-11分：温线索 → 培育序列+跟进
4-7分：冷线索 → 营销培育
0-3分：不合格 → 判定无效或长期培育

Qualification Question Design

资质判定问题设计

Question Types

问题类型

Open questions (gather information): "What's your biggest challenge with [area] right now?"

Closed questions (confirm/score): "Are you currently evaluating other solutions?"

Scaled questions (quantify): "On a scale of 1-10, how urgent is solving this?"

Choice questions (easy answer): "Are you looking to implement in the next 30 days, 90 days, or just exploring?"

开放式问题（收集信息）： “您目前在[领域]遇到的最大挑战是什么？”

封闭式问题（确认/评分）： “您目前是否在评估其他解决方案？”

量表式问题（量化评估）： “请按1-10分打分，解决这个问题的紧迫性有多高？”

选择式问题（易于回答）： “您是希望在30天内、90天内落地，还是目前只是在调研？”

Question Sequencing

问题排序

Start low-friction:

"What brought you here today?"
"What are you hoping to achieve?"

Build to qualification: 3. "When are you looking to have a solution in place?" 4. "Is there budget allocated for this?"

Close with routing: 5. "Would you like to schedule a call with our team?" 6. "What's the best way to reach you?"

从低门槛问题开始：

“请问您今天来访的原因是什么？”
“您希望达成什么目标？”

逐步过渡到资质判定： 3. “您希望什么时候落地解决方案？” 4. “这个项目是否已经分配了预算？”

以分配环节收尾： 5. “您是否愿意和我们团队约个电话沟通？” 6. “联系您的最佳方式是什么？”

Making Questions Natural

让问题更自然

Instead of: "What is your budget?" Try: "To make sure I point you to the right solution, what investment range are you considering?"

Instead of: "Are you the decision-maker?" Try: "Besides yourself, who else would be involved in evaluating this?"

Instead of: "What's your timeline?" Try: "Is there an event or deadline driving when you'd need this in place?"

错误示例： “你的预算是多少？” 推荐说法： “为了确保我能为您推荐合适的解决方案，请问您考虑的投资范围是多少？”

错误示例： “你是决策者吗？” 推荐说法： “除了您之外，还有谁会参与这个方案的评估呢？”

错误示例： “你的时间线是怎样的？” 推荐说法： “是否有什么事件或截止日期，决定了您需要什么时候落地这个方案？”

Conversation Flows

对话流程

Basic Qualification Flow

基础资质判定流程

[Entry]
↓
"Thanks for reaching out! I'd love to learn more about what you're looking for."
↓
[Collect: Need]
"What challenge are you trying to solve?"
↓
[Collect: Timeline]
"When are you looking to have a solution in place?"
↓
[Collect: Authority]
"Are you evaluating this for yourself, or on behalf of a team?"
↓
[Calculate Score]
↓
High Score → "Great! I'd love to connect you with someone who can help. What time works for a quick call?"
↓
Low Score → "Thanks for sharing. Let me send you some resources that might help. What email should I use?"
↓
Disqualified → "Based on what you've shared, we might not be the best fit right now. Here are some alternatives..."

[Entry]
↓
"Thanks for reaching out! I'd love to learn more about what you're looking for."
↓
[Collect: Need]
"What challenge are you trying to solve?"
↓
[Collect: Timeline]
"When are you looking to have a solution in place?"
↓
[Collect: Authority]
"Are you evaluating this for yourself, or on behalf of a team?"
↓
[Calculate Score]
↓
High Score → "Great! I'd love to connect you with someone who can help. What time works for a quick call?"
↓
Low Score → "Thanks for sharing. Let me send you some resources that might help. What email should I use?"
↓
Disqualified → "Based on what you've shared, we might not be the best fit right now. Here are some alternatives..."

Branching Flow

分支流程

[Entry Question]
"What brings you here today?"
↓
[If: "Pricing" mentioned]
→ Go to pricing qualification
→ "What scale are you looking at?"
→ "What's your expected investment range?"

[If: "Demo" mentioned]
→ Go to demo booking
→ "Great! Let me find a time. What's your availability?"
→ Collect qualifying info during booking

[If: "General info" mentioned]
→ Go to needs discovery
→ "What challenge are you trying to solve?"
→ Progressive qualification

[Entry Question]
"What brings you here today?"
↓
[If: "Pricing" mentioned]
→ Go to pricing qualification
→ "What scale are you looking at?"
→ "What's your expected investment range?"

[If: "Demo" mentioned]
→ Go to demo booking
→ "Great! Let me find a time. What's your availability?"
→ Collect qualifying info during booking

[If: "General info" mentioned]
→ Go to needs discovery
→ "What challenge are you trying to solve?"
→ Progressive qualification

Handling Qualification Challenges

资质判定常见问题处理

Reluctant to Answer

不愿回答问题

If they avoid questions:

Acknowledge it's a lot of questions
Explain why you're asking
Offer to continue via call instead

Response: "I know it's a lot of questions! I'm asking so I can make sure to connect you with the right resource. If you prefer, I can have someone call you instead—what's the best number?"

如果他们回避问题：

承认问题较多
解释提问的原因
提议改为电话沟通

回复示例： “我知道问题有点多！我问这些是为了确保能为您对接最合适的资源。如果您愿意的话，我可以安排同事给您打电话沟通——请问您的最佳联系电话是多少？”

Partial Information

信息不完整

If answers are incomplete:

Note what you have
Try rephrasing
Accept partial and move on

Scoring:

Give partial credit
Flag for human follow-up
Don't block on missing info

如果答案不完整：

记录已获取的信息
尝试换种方式提问
接受部分信息并继续推进

评分规则：

给予部分分数
标记为需人工跟进
不因信息缺失而阻塞流程

Obviously Not Qualified

明显不符合资质

If clearly not a fit:

Don't waste their time
Be helpful, not dismissive
Redirect appropriately

Response: "Based on what you've shared, we might not be the best fit for your current needs. Let me point you toward some resources that might help, or I can note your info for when your situation changes."

如果明显不匹配：

不要浪费对方时间
保持帮助的态度，不要拒人千里
合理引导至其他方向

回复示例： “根据您分享的信息，我们目前可能不太符合您的需求。我可以为您推荐一些可能有帮助的资源，或者我可以记录您的信息，等您的情况变化时再联系您。”

Lead Routing Logic

线索分配逻辑

Routing Rules

分配规则

IF score >= 12 AND authority = "decision-maker"
  → Route to AE, priority: high
  → Action: Immediate call request

IF score >= 8 AND authority = "influencer"
  → Route to SDR
  → Action: Book discovery call

IF score >= 8 AND timeline = "exploring"
  → Route to nurture sequence
  → Action: Add to email campaign

IF score < 8 OR need = "none"
  → Route to marketing
  → Action: Add to general nurture

IF any disqualifying criteria met
  → Mark as disqualified
  → Action: Polite close, no follow-up

IF score >= 12 AND authority = "decision-maker"
  → Route to AE, priority: high
  → Action: Immediate call request

IF score >= 8 AND authority = "influencer"
  → Route to SDR
  → Action: Book discovery call

IF score >= 8 AND timeline = "exploring"
  → Route to nurture sequence
  → Action: Add to email campaign

IF score < 8 OR need = "none"
  → Route to marketing
  → Action: Add to general nurture

IF any disqualifying criteria met
  → Mark as disqualified
  → Action: Polite close, no follow-up

Routing Destinations

分配去向

Sales team:

Hot leads
Demo requests
Pricing discussions

SDR team:

Warm leads needing qualification
Inbound requests
Referred leads

Marketing nurture:

Cool leads
Information seekers
Long timeline

Self-service:

Small deals
Simple needs
Transactional buyers

销售团队：

热线索
演示申请
定价沟通

SDR团队：

需进一步判定资质的温线索
入站请求
推荐线索

营销培育：

冷线索
信息咨询者
时间线较长的线索

自助服务：

小单客户
需求简单的客户
交易型买家

Data Collection

数据收集

Essential Fields

必填字段

Contact:

Name
Email
Phone
Company

Qualification:

Need/challenge
Timeline
Budget indicator
Authority/role

Routing:

Lead score
Lead source
Qualification notes

联系信息：

姓名
邮箱
电话
公司

资质信息：

需求/挑战
时间线
预算指标
权限/角色

分配信息：

线索评分
线索来源
资质判定备注

Progressive Profiling

渐进式信息收集

Don't ask everything at once.

First conversation:

Name
Challenge
Timeline

Second conversation:

Company details
Budget
Decision process

Ongoing:

Additional stakeholders
Specific requirements
Competitive situation

不要一次性询问所有信息。

首次对话：

姓名
面临的挑战
时间线

二次对话：

公司详情
预算
决策流程

后续互动：

其他利益相关方
具体需求
竞争情况

CRM Integration

CRM集成

What to Pass

需同步的信息

Lead record:

Contact information
Lead score
Source/channel
Qualification status

Activity record:

Conversation transcript
Questions asked/answered
Qualification criteria met
Timestamp and channel

Routing instruction:

Assigned owner
Priority level
Recommended action
Follow-up timing

线索记录：

联系信息
线索评分
来源/渠道
资质状态

活动记录：

对话转录
提问/回答内容
满足的资质判定标准
时间戳与渠道

分配指令：

分配负责人
优先级
推荐行动
跟进时间

Automation Triggers

自动化触发条件

On qualification:

Create/update lead in CRM
Assign to owner
Create task for follow-up
Trigger notification

On booking:

Create calendar event
Send confirmation
Notify sales rep
Prepare briefing

资质判定完成时：

在CRM中创建/更新线索
分配负责人
创建跟进任务
触发通知

预约成功时：

创建日历事件
发送确认信息
通知销售代表
准备沟通简报

Measuring Performance

效果衡量

Qualification Metrics

资质判定指标

Volume:

Leads qualified per day/week
Qualification completion rate
Questions answered per conversation

Quality:

Score accuracy (did high scores convert?)
Routing accuracy (did leads go to right resource?)
False positive/negative rate

Efficiency:

Time to qualify
Questions to qualification
Human intervention rate

数量指标：

每日/每周完成资质判定的线索数
资质判定完成率
单轮对话回答的问题数

质量指标：

评分准确率（高评分线索是否真的转化？）
分配准确率（线索是否分配给了合适的资源？）
误判率（假阳性/假阴性）

效率指标：

资质判定耗时
完成资质判定所需的问题数
人工介入率

Conversion Metrics

转化指标

By score:

Conversion rate by lead score
Revenue by lead score
Validate scoring model

By source:

Which channels produce best qualified leads?
Cost per qualified lead by source
Optimize spend

按评分维度：

不同线索评分的转化率
不同线索评分的营收贡献
验证评分模型的有效性

按来源维度：

哪些渠道带来的合格线索质量最高？
各来源的合格线索成本
优化投放策略

Questions to Ask

需确认的问题

If you need more context:

What are your must-have qualification criteria?
How do you currently score leads?
What CRM are you using?
What does your sales team need to take action?
What's your conversion rate from qualified lead to customer?

如果需要更多背景信息，可以询问：

你们必备的资质判定标准有哪些？
你们目前是如何给线索评分的？
你们使用的是什么CRM？
你们的销售团队需要什么信息才能采取行动？
你们从合格线索到客户的转化率是多少？