paper-revision

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Paper Revision

论文修订

Systematically revise papers based on reviewer feedback.

根据审稿人反馈系统性地修改论文。

Input

输入

```
$0
```
— Reviewer comments/feedback
```
$1
```
— Current paper draft (main.tex or paper directory)

```
$0
```
— 审稿人意见/反馈
```
$1
```
— 当前论文草稿（main.tex 文件或论文目录）

References

参考资料

Revision workflow and prompts:

~/.claude/skills/paper-revision/references/revision-prompts.md

修订工作流与提示词：

~/.claude/skills/paper-revision/references/revision-prompts.md

Workflow

工作流

Step 1: Parse and Prioritize Concerns

步骤1：解析并排序关注点

For each reviewer comment:

Extract the specific concern
Classify: major revision, minor revision, question, suggestion
Map to affected paper section(s)
Prioritize: address major concerns first

针对每条审稿人意见：

提取具体关注点
分类：重大修订、微小修订、疑问、建议
对应到受影响的论文章节
排序：优先处理重大关注点

Step 2: Plan Revisions

步骤2：制定修订计划

Create a revision plan:

Concern → Affected Section → Required Action → New Content/Experiment

Categories of actions:

Clarification: Rewrite text for clarity
Additional experiment: Run new experiment, add results
New analysis: Add ablation, statistical test, or comparison
Structural change: Move, merge, or split sections
Citation: Add missing references

创建修订计划：

关注点 → 受影响章节 → 所需操作 → 新内容/实验

操作类别：

澄清说明：重写文本以提升清晰度
补充实验：开展新实验，添加结果
新增分析：添加消融实验、统计检验或对比分析
结构调整：移动、合并或拆分章节
引用补充：添加缺失的参考文献

Step 3: Execute Revisions

步骤3：执行修订

For each planned revision:

Read the current section
Apply targeted edits (preserve surrounding structure)
If new experiments needed: use experiment-code skill
If new figures/tables needed: use figure-generation / table-generation skills
Mark changes (use
```
\textcolor{blue}{...}
```
for revised text)

针对每项计划的修订：

阅读当前章节内容
进行针对性修改（保留周边结构）
若需补充实验：使用experiment-code skill
若需新增图表：使用figure-generation / table-generation skills
标记修改内容（使用
```
\textcolor{blue}{...}
```
标记修订文本）

Step 4: Verify Improvements

步骤4：验证修改效果

Re-run self-review skill to check if scores improved
Verify all reviewer concerns are addressed
Check that revisions don't introduce new issues
Ensure page count still fits venue requirements

重新运行self-review skill以检查评分是否提升
验证所有审稿人关注点均已解决
检查修订是否引入新问题
确保页数仍符合会议/期刊要求

Step 5: Write Revision Summary

步骤5：撰写修订总结

Generate a diff summary:

List all changes made with section references
Note any new experiments, figures, or tables added
Cross-reference each change to the reviewer concern it addresses

生成差异总结：

列出所有修改内容并标注对应章节
记录新增的实验、图表
将每项修改与对应的审稿人关注点关联

Rules

规则

Address EVERY reviewer concern — do not skip any
Preserve paper structure unless structural change is explicitly needed
New results must come from actual experiments, not hallucinated
Mark all revised text clearly for the reviewers
Keep a copy of the previous version before revising
Compare new scores vs previous scores after revision

必须处理每一条审稿人意见 — 不得遗漏
除非明确需要调整结构，否则保留论文原有结构
新结果必须来自真实实验，不得虚构
为审稿人清晰标记所有修订内容
修订前保留旧版本备份
修订后对比新旧版本的评分