rebuttal-writing

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Rebuttal Writing

反驳文档撰写

Generate structured, evidence-based rebuttals to peer review comments.

生成结构化、基于证据的同行评审意见反驳内容。

Input

输入

```
$0
```
— Reviewer comments (text file, or pasted directly)
Optional: current paper draft for reference

```
$0
```
— 审稿人意见（文本文件，或直接粘贴）
可选：供参考的当前论文草稿

References

参考资料

Rebuttal prompts and format templates:

~/.claude/skills/rebuttal-writing/references/rebuttal-prompts.md

反驳提示词与格式模板：

~/.claude/skills/rebuttal-writing/references/rebuttal-prompts.md

Workflow

工作流程

Step 1: Parse Review Comments

步骤1：解析评审意见

For each reviewer:

Extract individual concerns/questions/weaknesses
Categorize each: major concern, minor concern, question, suggestion
Identify the core issue behind each concern

针对每位审稿人：

提取单独的关注点/问题/不足之处
对每条内容分类：主要关注点、次要关注点、问题、建议
识别每条关注点背后的核心问题

Step 2: Generate Responses

步骤2：生成回复

For each concern:

Acknowledge the reviewer's point
Respond with evidence — cite specific sections, equations, experiments, or results from the paper
Describe what was done (not what will be done) — "We have added...", "Our experiments show..."
If additional experiments are needed, describe the new results concretely

针对每条关注点：

认可审稿人的观点
提供证据支持的回复 — 引用论文中的特定章节、公式、实验或结果
说明已完成的工作（而非将要做的）—— 例如“我们已添加……”、“我们的实验表明……”
如果需要补充实验，需具体描述新的实验结果

Step 3: Format Rebuttal

步骤3：格式化反驳文档

Use the standard rebuttal format:

undefined

使用标准的反驳文档格式：

undefined

Response to Reviewers

致审稿人的回复

We thank all reviewers for their constructive feedback. We address each concern below.

感谢所有审稿人提出的建设性反馈。我们将在下方逐一回应各关注点。

Reviewer #1

审稿人#1

Concern #1: [extracted concern] Author Response: [detailed response with evidence]

Concern #2: [extracted concern] Author Response: [detailed response with evidence]

关注点#1：[提取的关注点] 作者回复：[包含证据的详细回复]

关注点#2：[提取的关注点] 作者回复：[包含证据的详细回复]

Reviewer #2

审稿人#2

...

undefined

...

undefined

Step 4: Summary of Changes

步骤4：变更摘要

Add a brief summary at the top listing all major changes made to the paper:

New experiments added
Sections revised
Clarifications made

在文档顶部添加简短摘要，列出对论文做出的所有主要修改：

新增实验
修订章节
内容澄清

Rules

规则

Reply with what was done, not what will be done — "We have conducted additional experiments" not "We will conduct..."
Be specific — Reference exact sections, table numbers, equation numbers
Be respectful — Thank reviewers, acknowledge valid concerns
Address every concern — Do not skip any reviewer point
Provide evidence — Every response should include concrete data, citations, or reasoning
Keep responses concise — Detailed enough to address the concern, but not padded
Highlight changes — When referring to modified text, use blue text or clearly mark revisions

回复已完成的工作，而非计划做的 — 例如用“我们已开展补充实验”而非“我们将开展……”
内容具体 — 引用确切的章节、表格编号、公式编号
态度尊重 — 感谢审稿人，认可合理的关注点
回应所有关注点 — 不要遗漏任何审稿人的意见
提供证据 — 每条回复都应包含具体数据、引用或推理
回复简洁 — 内容需足够详细以回应关注点，但避免冗余
突出修改内容 — 提及修改后的文本时，使用蓝色字体或清晰标记修订内容