Create Config
You're using a skill that will guide you through creating a config in LaunchDarkly. Your job is to understand the use case, choose the right mode, create the config and its variations, and verify everything is set up correctly.
⚠️ This skill creates a config — it does not make it servable. A freshly-created config has its
fallthrough pointing at an auto-generated disabled variation, not at the variation you just created. The SDK will return
on every evaluation until you flip targeting on and point the fallthrough at your new variation. This is not a bug — it's the default state.
You must run (or the equivalent REST / CLI call shown in Step 5) before verifying against the SDK, or verification will look like the LD-served path is broken when it isn't. The single most common failure mode users hit with this skill is skipping the targeting step and spending time debugging
in their application code.
Prerequisites
This skill requires the remotely hosted LaunchDarkly MCP server to be configured in your environment.
Primary MCP tool:
- -- create a config with its first variation in one step (recommended)
Alternative MCP tools (for more control):
- -- create just the config shell (key, name, mode)
create-ai-config-variation
-- add a variation with model, prompts, and parameters
- -- verify the config was created correctly
Optional MCP tools (enhance workflow):
- -- browse existing configs to understand naming conventions
- -- create a project if one doesn't exist yet
Important: Bias Towards Action
When the user provides enough context (use case, model, mode), proceed through the entire workflow without stopping to ask for details you can infer. Use reasonable defaults for unspecified fields:
for variation key, the use case as the basis for instructions/messages, kebab-case for config keys. Complete all steps (create + verify) in one pass.
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Use Case
Before creating, identify what you're building:
- What framework? LangGraph, LangChain, CrewAI, Strands, OpenAI SDK, Anthropic SDK, custom
- What does the agent need? Just text generation, or tools/function calling?
- Agent or completion? See the decision matrix below
Step 2: Choose Agent vs Completion Mode
This choice is about
input schema and framework compatibility, not execution behavior. Agent mode returns an
string; completion mode returns a
array. Both provide provider abstraction, A/B testing, and metrics tracking.
| Your Need | Mode | Why |
|---|
| LangGraph, CrewAI, Strands, AutoGen frameworks | Agent | Frameworks expect goal/instruction input |
| Persistent instructions across interactions | Agent | Single instructions string, SDK method: (Python) / (Node) |
| Direct OpenAI/Anthropic API calls | Completion | Messages array maps directly to provider APIs |
| Full control of message structure | Completion | System/user/assistant role-based messages |
| One-off text generation | Completion | Standard chat format |
| Need online evaluations (LLM-as-judge) | Completion | Online evals are only available in completion mode |
Both modes support tools. Not all models support agent mode -- check model compatibility if using agent mode. If unsure, start with completion mode (it's the API default and more flexible).
Step 3: Create the Config (Recommended: One Step)
Use
to create the config and its first variation in one call. This is the recommended approach: it handles creation, variation setup, and verification automatically.
Config fields:
- -- unique identifier (lowercase, hyphens)
- -- human-readable name
- -- or
- Optional: ,
Variation fields:
- , -- identifiers for the first variation
- -- must be format (e.g., ,
Anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5
)
- -- the model identifier (e.g., ). Always pass this in the initial call — leaving it off produces a variation that displays "NO MODEL" and forces a second PATCH to set it. The field is ; it is not or on this endpoint.
For agent mode, provide:
- -- a string with the agent's system instructions
Example agent-mode call:
json
{
"projectKey": "my-project", "key": "support-agent", "name": "Support Agent",
"mode": "agent", "variationKey": "default", "variationName": "Default",
"modelConfigKey": "OpenAI.gpt-4o", "modelName": "gpt-4o",
"instructions": "You are a customer support agent. Help users resolve their issues."
}
For completion mode, provide:
- -- an array of objects (system, user, assistant)
Example completion-mode call:
json
{
"projectKey": "my-project", "key": "product-descriptions", "name": "Product Descriptions",
"mode": "completion", "variationKey": "default", "variationName": "Default",
"modelConfigKey": "Anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5", "modelName": "claude-sonnet-4-5",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a product copywriter. Write compelling descriptions."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Write a description for: {{product_name}}"}
]
}
Optional:
- -- model parameters like
{temperature: 0.7, max_tokens: 2000}
(match the UI's snake_case keys)
The tool returns the full verified config detail with the variation attached.
Step 3 (Alternative): Two-Step Creation
If the user asks for more control or a step-by-step approach, use the individual tools:
- -- create the config shell
create-ai-config-variation
-- add the variation with model, prompts, and parameters
- -- verify the result
Execute all three steps without stopping to ask for details. Infer the variation key (
), name (
), instructions/messages, and model from the user's request context. If the user asked for GPT-4o agent mode, you have enough to complete the entire flow. Only ask clarifying questions if the mode or model is truly ambiguous.
Step 4: Verify
If you used
, verification is automatic: the response includes the full config with variations. Check:
- Config exists with the correct mode
- Variation has a model assigned (not "NO MODEL")
- Instructions or messages are present
- Parameters are set
Use for the verification call — do not drop to raw + . The MCP tool returns a typed object you can inspect directly. Hand-rolled
filters against the REST response routinely break: the configs detail endpoint returns the variation list under different keys depending on
, and a filter like
will fail with
Cannot index array with string "items"
when the response shape is a bare array. If you must call the REST API, use
first to inspect the actual shape before drilling in.
Report results:
- Config created with correct structure
- Variation has model assigned
- Flag any missing model or parameters
- Provide config URL:
https://app.launchdarkly.com/projects/{projectKey}/ai-configs/{configKey}
Step 5: Make the variation servable
and
create-ai-config-variation
create the variation but
do not promote it to fallthrough. The new config will return
to every consumer until targeting is updated. This is the single most common "I created a config but my SDK still gets the fallback" failure.
The workflow is not complete until this step is done.
What to tell the user
Print this checklist verbatim to the user after Step 4, then wait for confirmation. Do not claim the skill succeeded until the user confirms the fallthrough was flipped.
✅ Config and variation are created.
🔴
The SDK will return until you flip targeting on. The fallthrough is currently pointing at an auto-generated disabled variation, not at the
you just created.
Next step — run with these inputs:
- Project key:
- Config key:
- Environment key: the env whose SDK key is in your (usually or )
- Fallthrough variation: (the one this skill just created)
Verify after targeting is flipped by:
- Opening the config in the LD UI, switching to the correct environment, and confirming "Default rule serves: " is shown with targeting On.
- Running a quick test:
ai_config = ai_client.{completion|agent}_config(...)
and asserting ai_config.enabled is True
.
Direct shortcut if the user wants to flip targeting without invoking the sibling skill
is the canonical path — it handles percentage rollouts, targeted rules, and variation-ID lookups. But for the simplest case ("promote the new variation to fallthrough in one environment"), you can run the underlying semantic PATCH yourself once you know the new variation's
.
Get the variation ID (use
MCP, or):
bash
curl -s "https://app.launchdarkly.com/api/v2/projects/$PROJECT/ai-configs/$CONFIG_KEY/targeting?env=$ENV" \
-H "Authorization: $LD_API_KEY" -H "LD-API-Version: beta" \
| jq '.variations[] | {key, _id}'
Flip the fallthrough to point at it:
bash
curl -X PATCH "https://app.launchdarkly.com/api/v2/projects/$PROJECT/ai-configs/$CONFIG_KEY/targeting?env=$ENV" \
-H "Authorization: $LD_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json; domain-model=launchdarkly.semanticpatch" \
-H "LD-API-Version: beta" \
-d '{"instructions":[{"kind":"updateFallthroughVariationOrRollout","variationId":"<id-from-step-above>"}]}'
Or the same thing via the LD CLI if it's installed locally:
bash
ldcli resources ai-configs update-ai-config-targeting \
--projectKey $PROJECT --configKey $CONFIG_KEY --envKey $ENV \
--data '{"instructions":[{"kind":"updateFallthroughVariationOrRollout","variationId":"<id>"}]}'
Do not use
— that semantic-patch instruction does
not work for configs.
updateFallthroughVariationOrRollout
is the only instruction that actually flips the fallthrough.
modelConfigKey Format
Required for models to display in the UI. Format:
Anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5
Anthropic.claude-3-5-sonnet
The
create-ai-config-variation
tool validates this format and rejects invalid values.
Edge Cases
| Situation | Action |
|---|
| Config already exists | Ask if user wants to update instead |
| Variation shows "NO MODEL" | Use update-ai-config-variation
to set modelConfigKey |
| Need to attach tools | Create tools first ( skill), then update the variation |
What NOT to Do
- Don't create configs without understanding the use case
- Don't skip the two-step process (config then variation)
- Don't try to attach tools during initial creation -- update the variation afterward
- Don't forget modelConfigKey (models won't show in the UI)
- Don't omit from the initial variation call. It is required at create time; setting it via a follow-up PATCH is a workaround for a bug, not the intended flow. The PATCH field is also , not .
- Don't drop to raw + for verification. Use (MCP) — it returns a typed object and avoids brittle filters that break on response-shape variation.
- Don't consider the workflow complete until the user has been told to run . A created variation that isn't promoted to fallthrough returns to every consumer.
Related Skills
- -- Create tools before attaching
- -- Add more variations for experimentation
- -- Modify configs based on learnings