worldbuilding

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English

🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Worldbuilding: Diagnostic Skill

世界观构建：诊断技能

Diagnose world-level problems in fictional settings. Identify what's missing or unconvincing and recommend specific interventions.

诊断虚构设定中的世界观层面问题。识别缺失或缺乏说服力的部分，并给出具体的改进建议。

When to Use This Skill

何时使用该技能

Use this skill when:

Setting feels like a painted backdrop
Technology/magic hasn't transformed society
Institutions feel designed rather than evolved
Economy doesn't make sense
Cultures lack depth

Do NOT use this skill when:

Story problems are character-focused (use character-arc)
Plot structure issues (use scene-sequencing)
Need to generate worlds from scratch (use systemic-worldbuilding)

在以下场景使用本技能：

故事背景仅像一个装饰性的幕布
技术/魔法并未给社会带来变革
设定的机构像是刻意设计而非自然演化
经济体系不合逻辑
文化缺乏深度

请勿在以下场景使用本技能：

故事问题聚焦于角色（请使用character-arc技能）
存在情节结构问题（请使用scene-sequencing技能）
需要从零开始构建世界观（请使用systemic-worldbuilding技能）

Core Principle

核心原则

Worlds fail when they feel designed rather than evolved.

Good worldbuilding creates the perception that the setting has history, internal logic, and processes that operate independently of the plot.

世界观失败的原因在于它给人一种刻意设计而非自然演化的感觉。

优秀的世界观构建会让读者觉得这个设定拥有自身的历史、内在逻辑，并且其运转独立于剧情之外。

The World States

世界观状态分类

W1: Backdrop World

W1: 幕布式世界观

Symptoms: Setting exists but has no independent logic Interventions: systemic-worldbuilding (trace consequences)

症状： 背景设定存在，但无独立逻辑 干预措施： systemic-worldbuilding（追踪因果影响）

W2: World Without Consequences

W2: 无因果影响的世界观

Symptoms: Technology/magic exists but hasn't transformed society Interventions: Consequence Cascade Analysis

症状： 技术/魔法存在，但并未给社会带来变革 干预措施： Consequence Cascade Analysis

W3: Institutions Without History

W3: 无历史积淀的机构

Symptoms: Organizations feel designed last week Interventions: Organic Institutional Design

症状： 设定的机构像是上周才设计出来的 干预措施： Organic Institutional Design

W4: Economy Doesn't Make Sense

W4: 不合逻辑的经济体系

Symptoms: Trade exists without supply chains; prices arbitrary Interventions: economic-systems

症状： 存在贸易但无供应链；价格随意设定 干预措施： economic-systems

W5: Belief Systems Are Shallow

W5: 浅薄的信仰体系

Symptoms: Religion is flavor without theological depth Interventions: belief-systems

症状： 宗教仅作为点缀，缺乏神学深度 干预措施： belief-systems

W6: Culture Without Depth

W6: 缺乏深度的文化

Symptoms: Traditions feel random; surface-level aesthetic Interventions: memetic-depth

症状： 传统显得随机；仅停留在表面审美层面 干预措施： memetic-depth

W7: Flat Non-Humans

W7: 扁平化非人类物种

Symptoms: Aliens/species are humans in costume Interventions: conlang, alien-sensory frameworks

症状： 外星人/物种只是披着外皮的人类 干预措施： conlang, alien-sensory frameworks

W7.5: Language Feels Generic

W7.5: 通用化语言

Symptoms: Names sound like English; no linguistic texture Interventions: conlang, language-evolution

症状： 名称听起来像英语；无语言质感 干预措施： conlang, language-evolution

Consequence Cascade

因果影响链

Apply to any major speculative element:

Initial Element
├── 1st Order: Direct practical effects
│   ├── Who gains immediate advantage?
│   ├── What becomes obsolete?
│   └── Technical limitations?
├── 2nd Order: Systemic adaptations
│   ├── How do economic structures adapt?
│   ├── How do power structures respond?
│   └── What resistance movements arise?
└── 3rd Order: Cultural evolution
    ├── What new language emerges?
    ├── What ethical questions arise?
    └── What becomes normalized?

适用于任何重要的奇幻/科幻设定元素：

Initial Element
├── 1st Order: Direct practical effects
│   ├── Who gains immediate advantage?
│   ├── What becomes obsolete?
│   └── Technical limitations?
├── 2nd Order: Systemic adaptations
│   ├── How do economic structures adapt?
│   ├── How do power structures respond?
│   └── What resistance movements arise?
└── 3rd Order: Cultural evolution
    ├── What new language emerges?
    ├── What ethical questions arise?
    └── What becomes normalized?

Key Diagnostic Questions

核心诊断问题

For Technology/Magic

针对技术/魔法

What's your initial divergence from our world?
Who gains power? What becomes obsolete?
How would the powerful try to control this?

你的设定与现实世界的初始差异是什么？
谁会获得权力？什么会被淘汰？
掌权者会如何试图控制这项技术/魔法？

For Institutions

针对机构设定

When was this organization founded?
What crises has it survived?
What are its internal contradictions?

这个组织是什么时候成立的？
它经历过哪些危机？
它存在哪些内在矛盾？

For Economics

针对经济体系

What's the fundamental scarcity?
How is value determined?
What's the underground economy?

最核心的稀缺资源是什么？
价值是如何被定义的？
地下经济是怎样的？

For Belief Systems

针对信仰体系

What explains existence?
How do beliefs affect daily decisions?
What are the schisms and debates?

该体系如何解释存在的意义？
信仰如何影响日常决策？
存在哪些分裂和争论？

Common Anti-Patterns

常见反模式

The Monoculture

单一文化

One unified culture for entire planets/species. Fix: Add regional variation, class differences, schisms.

整个星球/物种只有统一的文化。 修正方案： 加入地域差异、阶级分化、派系分裂。

The Convenient Technology

按需出现的技术

Technology exists when plot needs it. Fix: Trace consequence cascade.

技术仅在剧情需要时才存在。 修正方案： 追踪因果影响链。

The Static History

静态历史

World unchanged for centuries. Fix: Add recent disruptions, reforms in progress.

世界数百年未曾改变。 修正方案： 加入近期的动荡、正在进行的改革。

The Evil Empire

邪恶帝国

Antagonist nation uniformly evil. Fix: Add internal debates, ordinary people.

敌对国家全员都是恶人。 修正方案： 加入内部争论、普通民众的视角。

The Rubber Forehead Alien

橡胶额头外星人

Non-humans with minor cosmetic differences. Fix: Start with biology, trace to cognition, trace to culture.

非人类物种只有微小的外观差异。 修正方案： 从生物学入手，推导认知模式，再推导文化。

Depth vs Breadth

深度与广度

Go Deep When:

Element is central to plot
Element will be examined closely
Element creates ongoing conflict

Stay Shallow When:

Element is background detail
POV character wouldn't know depth
Mystery is more interesting

需深入挖掘的场景：

元素是剧情的核心
元素会被详细探讨
元素会引发持续的冲突

可保持浅层的场景：

元素只是背景细节
视角角色不会了解其深层内容
保持神秘感更有趣