Back to Details

research

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Research Skill

研究技能

Tool-assisted research with Tavily integration. Transforms basic questions into comprehensive search strategies using AI-optimized web search.
集成Tavily的工具辅助研究。利用AI优化的网络搜索将基础问题转化为全面的搜索策略。

Setup

设置

This skill includes a bundled Tavily CLI script at 
scripts/tavily-cli.ts
.
本技能在
scripts/tavily-cli.ts
中包含一个捆绑的Tavily CLI脚本。

Requirements

要求

  1. Deno - Install from https://deno.land
  2. Tavily API Key - Get one at https://tavily.com (free tier available)
  1. Deno - 从https://deno.land安装
  2. Tavily API密钥 - 在https://tavily.com获取（提供免费层级）

Configuration

配置

Set your API key:
bash
export TAVILY_API_KEY="your-key-here"
Create an alias for convenience (add to your shell profile):
bash
undefined
设置你的API密钥：
bash
export TAVILY_API_KEY="your-key-here"
创建别名以方便使用（添加到你的Shell配置文件中）：
bash
undefined

Adjust path to where this skill is installed

调整路径到本技能的安装位置

alias tavily='deno run --allow-net --allow-env /path/to/skills/research/scripts/tavily-cli.ts'

Or run directly:
```bash
deno run --allow-net --allow-env ./scripts/tavily-cli.ts "your query"
Commands below use 
tavily
assuming the alias is configured.
alias tavily='deno run --allow-net --allow-env /path/to/skills/research/scripts/tavily-cli.ts'

或者直接运行：
```bash
deno run --allow-net --allow-env ./scripts/tavily-cli.ts "your query"
以下命令假设已配置好
tavily
别名。

Quick Reference

快速参考

Common Commands

常用命令

bash
undefined
bash
undefined

Basic search

基础搜索

tavily "your query"
tavily "your query"

With AI answer summary

包含AI生成的答案摘要

tavily "your query" --answer
tavily "your query" --answer

Deep search with more results

深度搜索，返回更多结果

tavily "your query" --depth advanced --results 10 --answer
tavily "your query" --depth advanced --results 10 --answer

News/recent content

新闻/近期内容

tavily "your query" --topic news --time week
tavily "your query" --topic news --time week

Exclude familiar sources to find new perspectives

排除熟悉的来源以获取新视角

tavily "your query" --exclude wikipedia.org,reddit.com
undefined
tavily "your query" --exclude wikipedia.org,reddit.com
undefined

Phase Summary

阶段摘要

PhaseTypePurpose
0ManualAnalyze topic, set scope
1TavilyDiscover expert terminology
2TavilyFoundational search
3TavilyCounter-perspectives
4ManualSynthesize findings
阶段类型目的
0手动分析主题，设定范围
1Tavily发现专业术语
2Tavily基础搜索
3Tavily对立视角搜索
4手动整合研究结果

Scope → Tavily Depth

范围 → Tavily搜索深度

Decision StakesTavily Settings
Low, reversible
--depth basic --results 3
Moderate
--depth basic --results 5 --answer
High, irreversible
--depth advanced --results 10 --answer
决策风险Tavily设置
低、可逆
--depth basic --results 3
中等
--depth basic --results 5 --answer
高、不可逆
--depth advanced --results 10 --answer

Phase 0: Analysis

阶段0：分析

Goal: Structure topic before searching. Prevents unfocused searches and scope mismatch.
目标：在搜索前构建主题结构。避免无重点的搜索和范围不匹配。

Scope Calibration

范围校准

Before searching, assess stakes:
Decision TypeConfidence NeededResearch Depth
Reversible, low-stakes60-70%Quick scan (minutes)
Reversible, moderate75-85%Working knowledge
Irreversible, moderate85-90%Solid grounding
Irreversible, high90-95%Deep expertise
搜索前，评估决策风险：
决策类型所需置信度研究深度
可逆、低风险60-70%快速浏览（数分钟）
可逆、中等风险75-85%工作级知识
不可逆、中等风险85-90%扎实的基础
不可逆、高风险90-95%深度专业知识

Analysis Template

分析模板

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Research Analysis: [Topic]

研究分析：[主题]

Core Concepts

核心概念

  • Primary terms: [Key terms requiring definition]
  • Terminology variants: [Synonyms, jargon, historical terms]
  • Ambiguous terms: [Terms with multiple meanings]
  • 主要术语：[需要定义的关键术语]
  • 术语变体：[同义词、行话、历史术语]
  • 歧义术语：[具有多种含义的术语]

Stakeholders

利益相关者

  • Primary actors: [Who is directly involved?]
  • Affected groups: [Who bears consequences?]
  • Opposing interests: [Who benefits from different outcomes?]
  • 主要参与者：[直接相关者是谁？]
  • 受影响群体：[谁会承担后果？]
  • 对立利益方：[谁能从不同结果中获益？]

Temporal Scope

时间范围

  • Historical origins: [When did this begin?]
  • Key transitions: [What changed and when?]
  • Current state: [What's happening now?]
  • 历史起源：[这一主题何时开始？]
  • 关键转变：[发生了什么变化，何时发生？]
  • 当前状态：[现在的情况如何？]

Domains

领域

  • Primary field: [Main discipline]
  • Adjacent fields: [Related disciplines]
  • 主要领域：[主要学科]
  • 相邻领域：[相关学科]

Controversies

争议点

  • Active debates: [What's contested?]
  • Competing frameworks: [Different ways of understanding]
undefined
  • 活跃辩论：[存在哪些争议？]
  • 竞争框架：[不同的理解方式]
undefined

Phase 0 Checklist

阶段0检查清单

  • Identified primary terms
  • Listed potential stakeholders
  • Assessed decision stakes
  • Determined appropriate research depth
  • 确定了主要术语
  • 列出了潜在的利益相关者
  • 评估了决策风险
  • 确定了合适的研究深度

Phase 1: Vocabulary Discovery

阶段1：词汇发现

Goal: Discover expert terminology to unlock deeper search results.
目标：发现专业术语以获取更深入的搜索结果。

Why Vocabulary Matters

词汇的重要性

  • Outsider terms → introductory material
  • Expert terms → research, nuanced analysis
  • Cross-domain terms → bridge bodies of work
  • 外行术语 → 入门级资料
  • 专业术语 → 研究、细致分析
  • 跨领域术语 → 连接不同研究体系

Tavily Commands for Vocabulary Discovery

用于词汇发现的Tavily命令

Discovery NeedCommand
Expert terminology
tavily "[topic] terminology experts" --answer
Academic terms
tavily "[topic] academic research terminology" --answer
Cross-domain synonyms
tavily "[topic] also known as called" --answer
Historical terms
tavily "[topic] history original term" --answer
发现需求命令
专业术语
tavily "[topic] terminology experts" --answer
学术术语
tavily "[topic] academic research terminology" --answer
跨领域同义词
tavily "[topic] also known as called" --answer
历史术语
tavily "[topic] history original term" --answer

Vocabulary Discovery Process

词汇发现流程

  1. Run initial terminology search:
    bash
    tavily "[topic] terminology" --answer --results 5
  2. From results, note:
    • Expert terms (technical vocabulary)
    • Outsider terms (popular/introductory language)
    • Cross-domain equivalents
  3. Update vocabulary map (template below)
  4. Re-run searches with expert terms:
    bash
    tavily "[expert-term]" --answer
  5. Compare result quality - expert terms should surface deeper content
  1. 运行初始术语搜索：
    bash
    tavily "[topic] terminology" --answer --results 5
  2. 从结果中记录：
    • 专业术语（技术词汇）
    • 外行术语（通俗/入门语言）
    • 跨领域等效术语
  3. 更新词汇映射表（模板如下）
  4. 使用专业术语重新运行搜索：
    bash
    tavily "[expert-term]" --answer
  5. 比较结果质量 - 专业术语应能呈现更深入的内容

Vocabulary Map Template

词汇映射表模板

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Core Terms

核心术语

TermDomainDepth Level
[expert term][field]Expert
[outsider term]GeneralIntroductory
术语领域深度级别
[专业术语][领域]专业级
[外行术语]通用入门级

Cross-Domain Synonyms

跨领域同义词

ConceptTerms by Domain
[concept]Field A: [term], Field B: [term]
概念各领域术语
[概念]领域A：[术语]，领域B：[术语]

Depth Indicators

深度指标

LevelTermsWhat They Surface
Introductory[terms]Overviews, explainers
Expert[terms]Research, nuanced analysis
undefined
级别术语可获取的内容
入门级[术语]概述、讲解
专业级[术语]研究、细致分析
undefined

Phase 1 Checklist

阶段1检查清单

  • Ran terminology discovery search
  • Identified expert vs. outsider terms
  • Mapped cross-domain synonyms
  • Created vocabulary map
  • 运行了术语发现搜索
  • 区分了专业术语与外行术语
  • 映射了跨领域同义词
  • 创建了词汇映射表

Phase 2: Foundational Search

阶段2：基础搜索

Goal: Build foundational understanding with authoritative sources.
目标：通过权威来源构建基础理解。

Question Pattern → Tavily Command

问题模式 → Tavily命令

Question PatternStrategyCommand
"What is X?"Consensus from authorities
tavily "[expert-term] definition" --answer --depth advanced
"Should I X?"Pros/cons, alternatives
tavily "[expert-term] pros cons comparison" --answer
"Is X true?"Evidence, counter-evidence
tavily "[claim] evidence research" --answer --depth advanced
"How do I X?"Step-by-step, pitfalls
tavily "[expert-term] guide tutorial" --answer
Historical contextOrigins and evolution
tavily "[topic] history origins development" --answer
问题模式策略命令
"什么是X？"权威共识
tavily "[expert-term] definition" --answer --depth advanced
"我应该做X吗？"优缺点、替代方案
tavily "[expert-term] pros cons comparison" --answer
"X是真的吗？"证据、反证
tavily "[claim] evidence research" --answer --depth advanced
"我如何做X？"步骤、注意事项
tavily "[expert-term] guide tutorial" --answer
历史背景起源与演变
tavily "[topic] history origins development" --answer

Source Type Selection

来源类型选择

Source TypeBest ForTavily Approach
Academic/ResearchMechanism, causation
--depth advanced --results 10
Practitioner contentHow things work, edge cases
--topic general --answer
News/CurrentRecent developments
--topic news --time week
Official docsTechnical specs, policy
--include [official-domain]
来源类型最佳用途Tavily方法
学术/研究机制、因果关系
--depth advanced --results 10
从业者内容实际运作、边缘情况
--topic general --answer
新闻/时事近期动态
--topic news --time week
官方文档技术规格、政策
--include [official-domain]

Foundational Search Process

基础搜索流程

  1. Start with expert terminology from Phase 1
  2. Run foundational queries:
    bash
    # Definition/overview
tavily "[expert-term] comprehensive overview" --answer --depth advanced

# Key perspectives
tavily "[expert-term] major approaches" --answer --results 7
  3. For each major perspective found, get 2-3 authoritative sources:
    bash
    tavily "[perspective-name] [expert-term]" --answer --results 5
  4. Track sources in research notes
  1. 从阶段1获取的专业术语开始
  2. 运行基础查询：
    bash
    # 定义/概述
tavily "[expert-term] comprehensive overview" --answer --depth advanced

# 主要视角
tavily "[expert-term] major approaches" --answer --results 7
  3. 针对每个找到的主要视角，获取2-3个权威来源：
    bash
    tavily "[perspective-name] [expert-term]" --answer --results 5
  4. 在研究笔记中记录来源

Phase 2 Checklist

阶段2检查清单

  • Used expert terminology from Phase 1
  • Searched for foundational overview
  • Identified 2-3 major perspectives
  • Found authoritative sources per perspective
  • Tracked sources
  • 使用了阶段1的专业术语
  • 搜索了基础概述
  • 确定了2-3个主要视角
  • 为每个视角找到了权威来源
  • 记录了来源

Phase 3: Counter-Perspective Search

阶段3：对立视角搜索

Goal: Explicitly find opposing viewpoints to avoid confirmation bias.
目标：明确寻找对立观点以避免确认偏差。

Why Counter-Perspectives Matter

对立视角的重要性

Single-perspective research:
  • All sources support one viewpoint
  • Missing counterarguments
  • Echo chamber risk
单一视角研究：
  • 所有来源支持同一观点
  • 遗漏反驳论点
  • 存在回音室风险

Tavily Commands for Counter-Perspectives

用于对立视角搜索的Tavily命令

NeedCommand
General criticism
tavily "[topic] criticism problems" --answer
Opposing viewpoint
tavily "[topic] skeptics critique" --answer
Alternative approaches
tavily "[topic] alternatives instead of" --answer
Failure cases
tavily "[topic] failures when wrong" --answer
Avoid echo chamber
tavily "[topic] debate" --exclude [familiar-sources]
需求命令
一般性批评
tavily "[topic] criticism problems" --answer
对立观点
tavily "[topic] skeptics critique" --answer
替代方案
tavily "[topic] alternatives instead of" --answer
失败案例
tavily "[topic] failures when wrong" --answer
避免回音室
tavily "[topic] debate" --exclude [familiar-sources]

Counter-Perspective Process

对立视角搜索流程

  1. Identify your current understanding/lean
  2. Search for strongest counterargument:
    bash
    tavily "[topic] strongest argument against" --answer --depth advanced
  3. Exclude sources you've already seen:
    bash
    tavily "[topic]" --exclude [domains-already-searched]
  4. Search for failure modes:
    bash
    tavily "[topic] when fails problems limitations" --answer
  5. Document opposing perspectives in research notes
  1. 明确你当前的理解/倾向
  2. 搜索最有力的反驳论点：
    bash
    tavily "[topic] strongest argument against" --answer --depth advanced
  3. 排除你已经看过的来源：
    bash
    tavily "[topic]" --exclude [domains-already-searched]
  4. 搜索失败模式：
    bash
    tavily "[topic] when fails problems limitations" --answer
  5. 在研究笔记中记录对立视角

Phase 3 Checklist

阶段3检查清单

  • Identified current understanding/position
  • Searched for strongest counterargument
  • Used --exclude to find new sources
  • Searched for limitations/failure cases
  • Documented opposing perspectives
  • 明确了当前的理解/立场
  • 搜索了最有力的反驳论点
  • 使用--exclude参数寻找新来源
  • 搜索了局限性/失败案例
  • 记录了对立视角

Phase 4: Synthesis

阶段4：整合

Goal: Synthesize findings with explicit confidence markers.
目标：整合研究结果并添加明确的置信度标记。

Completion Criteria

完成标准

Minimum Viable (Quick Decisions)

最低可行标准（快速决策）

  • Can define core concepts in own words
  • Know 2-3 major perspectives
  • Found authoritative source per perspective
  • Identified known unknowns
  • 能用自己的话定义核心概念
  • 了解2-3个主要视角
  • 为每个视角找到权威来源
  • 确定了已知的未知项

Working Knowledge (Most Decisions)

工作级知识（大多数决策）

  • Can explain historical context
  • Understand stakeholder positions
  • Encountered counterarguments
  • Checked multiple domains
  • 能解释历史背景
  • 理解利益相关者的立场
  • 接触过对立论点
  • 查阅了多个领域的资料

Deep Expertise (High-Stakes)

深度专业知识（高风险决策）

  • Traced claims to primary sources
  • Can evaluate competing evidence
  • Understand knowledge limitations
  • 追踪了主张的原始来源
  • 能评估相互竞争的证据
  • 理解知识的局限性

Diminishing Returns Signals

收益递减信号

Stop when:
  • New sources cite same foundational works (circular)
  • New searches return familiar content (repetitive)
  • Each hour adds less than previous (marginal)
  • Can make decision or take action (sufficient)
当出现以下情况时停止：
  • 新来源引用相同的基础研究（循环引用）
  • 新搜索返回熟悉的内容（重复）
  • 每小时新增的价值低于之前（边际递减）
  • 可以做出决策或采取行动（信息足够）

Confidence Markers

置信度标记

LevelPhrases to Use
Established"X is...", "X works by..."
Strong evidence"Evidence strongly suggests..."
Moderate evidence"Most sources report..."
Limited evidence"One study found..."
Unknown"No reliable information found..."
级别可用表述
已确立"X是..."、"X的工作原理是..."
有力证据"证据强烈表明..."
中等证据"大多数来源报告..."
有限证据"一项研究发现..."
未知"未找到可靠信息..."

Synthesis Template

整合模板

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Summary

摘要

[Direct answer to question]
[问题的直接答案]

Confidence Level

置信度级别

[High/Medium/Low] - [Justification]
[高/中/低] - [理由]

Key Findings

关键发现

  1. [Finding with source type]
  1. [发现及来源类型]

Perspectives

视角

PerspectiveKey ArgumentSource Quality
[view][argument][assessment]
视角核心论点来源质量
[观点][论点][评估]

Counter-Evidence

反证

  • [What argues against the main conclusion]
  • [与主要结论相悖的内容]

Caveats

注意事项

  • [What wasn't consulted]
  • [What assumptions were made]
  • [未查阅的内容]
  • [做出的假设]

For Deeper Investigation

深入研究方向

[What would increase confidence]
undefined
[能提升置信度的内容]
undefined

Phase 4 Checklist

阶段4检查清单

  • Met completion criteria for stakes level
  • Checked diminishing returns signals
  • Applied confidence markers
  • Completed synthesis template
  • Stored findings for future reference
  • 达到了对应风险级别的完成标准
  • 检查了收益递减信号
  • 添加了置信度标记
  • 完成了整合模板
  • 保存了研究结果以备未来参考

Tavily Command Reference

Tavily命令参考

Basic Usage

基础用法

bash
tavily "search query" [options]
bash
tavily "search query" [options]

Options

选项

OptionDescriptionValues
--answer
Include AI-generated answer summaryflag
--depth
Search depth
basic
(default), 
advanced
--results
Number of results1-20 (default: 5)
--topic
Topic category
general
(default), 
news
, 
finance
--time
Time filter
day
, 
week
, 
month
, 
year
--include
Only include domainscomma-separated
--exclude
Exclude domainscomma-separated
--raw
Include raw page contentflag
--json
Output as JSONflag
选项描述取值
--answer
包含AI生成的答案摘要标记
--depth
搜索深度
basic
（默认）、
advanced
--results
结果数量1-20（默认：5）
--topic
主题分类
general
（默认）、
news
、
finance
--time
时间筛选
day
、
week
、
month
、
year
--include
仅包含指定域名逗号分隔
--exclude
排除指定域名逗号分隔
--raw
包含原始页面内容标记
--json
以JSON格式输出标记

Scenario → Command Mapping

场景 → 命令映射

Research ScenarioCommand
Quick overview
tavily "query" --answer
Deep dive
tavily "query" --depth advanced --results 10 --answer
Recent news
tavily "query" --topic news --time week
Academic focus
tavily "query" --depth advanced --include scholar.google.com,arxiv.org
Avoid Wikipedia
tavily "query" --exclude wikipedia.org
Fresh perspectives
tavily "query" --exclude [already-seen-domains]
Financial data
tavily "query" --topic finance --answer
Raw content for analysis
tavily "query" --raw --json
研究场景命令
快速概述
tavily "query" --answer
深度探索
tavily "query" --depth advanced --results 10 --answer
近期新闻
tavily "query" --topic news --time week
学术聚焦
tavily "query" --depth advanced --include scholar.google.com,arxiv.org
排除维基百科
tavily "query" --exclude wikipedia.org
全新视角
tavily "query" --exclude [已浏览域名]
金融数据
tavily "query" --topic finance --answer
用于分析的原始内容
tavily "query" --raw --json

Diagnostic States

诊断状态

Use these to identify where research is stuck and which phase to revisit.
StateSymptomPhase to Revisit
R0: No AnalysisSearching without structuring topicPhase 0
R1: No VocabularyUsing outsider terms, finding only surface contentPhase 1
R2: Single-PerspectiveAll sources support one viewPhase 3
R3: Domain BlindnessSearching only in familiar fieldPhase 1 (cross-domain terms)
R4: Recency BiasOnly recent sourcesPhase 2 (historical queries)
R5: Breadth Without DepthMany tabs, no synthesisPhase 4
R6: Completion UncertaintyUnsure when to stopPhase 4 (completion criteria)
R7: CompleteCan explain, identify uncertainties, actDone
使用这些状态来识别研究停滞的原因以及需要回顾的阶段。
状态症状需回顾的阶段
R0: 未分析未构建主题结构就开始搜索阶段0
R1: 词汇不足使用外行术语，仅找到表面内容阶段1
R2: 单一视角所有来源支持同一观点阶段3
R3: 领域盲区仅在熟悉的领域搜索阶段1（跨领域术语）
R4: 近期偏差仅使用近期来源阶段2（历史查询）
R5: 广而不深打开大量标签但未整合阶段4
R6: 完成不确定不确定何时停止阶段4（完成标准）
R7: 已完成能解释主题、识别不确定性并采取行动完成

Quick Diagnostic

快速诊断

  1. Can you explain the topic in expert terminology? → If no, Phase 1
  2. Have you found opposing viewpoints? → If no, Phase 3
  3. Can you state your confidence level with justification? → If no, Phase 4
  4. Is your research depth proportional to stakes? → If no, Phase 0
  1. 你能用专业术语解释该主题吗？→ 不能，回顾阶段1
  2. 你找到了对立观点吗？→ 不能，回顾阶段3
  3. 你能说明自己的置信度级别及理由吗？→ 不能，回顾阶段4
  4. 你的研究深度与风险匹配吗？→ 不能，回顾阶段0

Anti-Patterns

反模式

PatternSymptomFix
Confirmation TrapSearching to confirm, not learnPhase 3: Search for strongest counterargument
Authority FallacyAccepting claims by source prestigeEvaluate evidence, not source
Recency TrapOnly recent sourcesPhase 2: Historical context queries
Breadth Trap50 tabs, none readPhase 4: 3-source rule, synthesize before continuing
Single-SourceOne source as final answerRequire 3 independent sources
Jargon Blind SpotMissing other fields' terminologyPhase 1: Cross-domain vocabulary
Infinite Rabbit HoleLost original purposePhase 0: Return to scope/stakes
Echo ChamberSame sources repeatedlyPhase 3: Use --exclude flag
模式症状解决方法
确认陷阱搜索是为了确认而非学习阶段3：搜索最有力的反驳论点
权威谬误仅凭来源声望接受主张评估证据而非来源
近期陷阱仅使用近期来源阶段2：查询历史背景
广度陷阱打开50个标签但未阅读阶段4：遵循3来源规则，先整合再继续
单一来源将一个来源作为最终答案要求3个独立来源
行话盲区忽略其他领域的术语阶段1：跨领域词汇
无限兔子洞偏离最初目标阶段0：回到范围/风险设定
回音室反复看到相同来源阶段3：使用--exclude标记

Output Persistence

输出持久化

Output Discovery

输出位置确认

Before doing any other work:
  1. Check for 
    context/output-config.md
    in the project
  2. If found, look for this skill's entry
  3. If not found or no entry for this skill, ask the user first:
    • "Where should I save output from this research session?"
    • Suggest: 
      explorations/research/
      or a sensible location for this project
  4. Store the user's preference
在进行任何其他工作之前：
  1. 检查项目中是否存在
    context/output-config.md
  2. 如果存在，查找本技能的条目
  3. 如果不存在或无本技能的条目，先询问用户：
    • "我应该将本次研究的输出保存到哪里？"
    • 建议：
      explorations/research/
      或项目中的合理位置
  4. 保存用户的偏好

What to Store

需保存的内容

LayerContents
Vocabulary MapTerms, domains, depth levels
SourcesURLs, relevance scores, quality notes
SynthesisSummary, confidence, findings, caveats
Query LogTavily commands that worked/failed
GapsWhat remains unknown
层级内容
词汇映射表术语、领域、深度级别
来源URL、相关性评分、质量说明
整合结果摘要、置信度、发现、注意事项
查询日志有效的/无效的Tavily命令
空白点仍未知的内容

File Naming

文件命名规则

Pattern: 
{topic}-research-{date}.md
Example: 
competency-frameworks-research-2025-01-15.md
格式：
{topic}-research-{date}.md
示例：
competency-frameworks-research-2025-01-15.md

Integration Points

集成点

SkillConnection
doppelgangerResearch informs decisions; apply /truth-check to findings
context-networksStore research findings in appropriate network node
boundary-critiqueApply to advice and recommendations encountered
技能关联
doppelganger研究为决策提供信息；对研究结果应用/truth-check
context-networks将研究结果存储到合适的网络节点
boundary-critique应用于遇到的建议和推荐

Health Check Questions

健康检查问题

During research, ask:
  1. Am I searching to learn or to confirm?
  2. What's the strongest argument against my current view?
  3. Have I looked outside my familiar domains?
  4. Am I using expert or outsider vocabulary?
  5. Is my depth proportional to the stakes?
  6. Have I stored what I've learned for future use?
研究过程中，询问自己：
  1. 我搜索是为了学习还是为了确认？
  2. 针对我当前的观点，最有力的反驳论点是什么？
  3. 我是否查阅了熟悉领域之外的资料？
  4. 我使用的是专业术语还是外行术语？
  5. 我的研究深度与风险匹配吗？
  6. 我是否保存了所学内容以备未来使用？

Source Framework

来源框架

Derived from: 
references/research-framework.md
衍生自：
references/research-framework.md