Back to Details

li-reply

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

li-reply

li-reply

The reply thread under your own post is where reach is actually decided. Every reply is a second engagement event on the post, and the first hour of replies does most of the work. But the value is not equal across comments, so this skill sorts before it writes.
你自己帖子下的回复串，才是真正决定传播效果的地方。每条回复都会让帖子再次产生互动，而最初一小时的回复完成了大部分工作。不过，各条评论的价值并不相同，因此这个 skill 会先排序，再撰写回复。

Input

输入

The user pastes the comments, ideally with names and roles. Screenshots are fine. Do not scrape the thread with a browser tool.
用户粘贴评论，最好附上姓名和角色。截图也可以。不要使用浏览器工具抓取讨论串。

Triage first

先分类

Sort every comment into one of five buckets and say the count out loud:
bucketwhat it iswhat it gets
LEADsomeone describing the problem you solvea real answer + a soft open door
SUBSTANCEadds data, disagrees, extendsthe longest reply on the thread
PEERa name worth being seen next toa reply that gives them something
SUPPORT"great post", 🔥, a taga like, and a 3-8 word reply at most
NOISEpitch, spam, bad faithnothing, or one line and out
Then write in that order, and stop writing when the value stops.
先将每条评论归入五个分类之一，并明确报出每类的数量：
分类具体含义应对方式
LEAD正在描述你所解决的问题的人认真回答，并自然地打开进一步沟通的入口
SUBSTANCE提供数据、提出异议或补充观点在该讨论串中给出最长的回复
PEER值得通过互动让其获得曝光的人给对方提供有价值内容的回复
SUPPORT“great post”、🔥 或 @提及点赞，并且最多回复 3—8 个词
NOISE推销、垃圾信息或恶意评论不回复，或只用一句话结束
然后按上述顺序撰写回复，并在回复价值不再存在时停止。

How to reply

如何回复

  • Answer the actual question. If someone asks how, tell them how, in the reply. Do not send them to a DM to hear the answer they could have had.
  • Use their name once, at the start, and never with an exclamation mark.
  • Match their length. A two-line comment does not get a six-line reply.
  • To a critic: concede the true part first, in their words, then hold the line on the part you believe. Never delete, never get defensive, never reply twice on the same thread.
  • To a lead: answer fully in public. The open door is one sentence at the end, and it is an offer of help, not a pitch. Public value is what makes the next person DM you.
  • To a pitch in your comments: ignore it. Replying gives it reach.
  • 回答实际提出的问题。 如果有人询问具体做法，就在回复中告诉他们。不要让对方去 DM，只是为了在本可公开获得的答案之外继续沟通。
  • 在开头使用一次对方的名字，不要搭配感叹号。
  • 匹配对方的评论长度。 两行的评论不应得到六行的回复。
  • 面对批评者： 先用对方的原话承认其中正确的部分，再坚持自己认为正确的部分。不要删除评论，不要防御，也不要在同一讨论串中回复两次。
  • 面对潜在客户： 在公开评论区完整回答。进一步沟通的入口应是结尾的一句话，而且是在提供帮助，而不是进行推销。公开提供的价值，才会促使下一位读者给你发 DM。
  • 面对评论区中的推销： 忽略它。回复只会为它带来更多曝光。

Output

输出

One block, grouped by bucket, each reply copy-ready and already humanized:
REPLIES  ·  17 comments  ·  1 LEAD, 3 SUBSTANCE, 4 PEER, 8 SUPPORT, 1 NOISE

LEAD
@Sarah Chen - "we have the same problem with proposals"
> The part that fixed it for us was pulling the pricing table out of the doc
> entirely and sending it as its own page. Cut a whole review round. Happy to
> send you the template if it is useful.

SUBSTANCE
@Marcus Webb - disagrees on cadence
> Fair, and 4x a week only worked because I had 8 months of posts behind it.
> From a standing start I would do what you said.

SUPPORT  (like these, reply to the first three)
@... "This is great" -> Thanks Dan.
...

NOISE  (1)
Skipped: an agency pitch. Replying gives it reach.
Then the gate: nothing is posted until the user says yes. They paste the replies themselves.
输出一个按分类分组的回复区块，每条回复均可直接复制，并且已经完成人性化处理：
REPLIES  ·  17 comments  ·  1 LEAD, 3 SUBSTANCE, 4 PEER, 8 SUPPORT, 1 NOISE

LEAD
@Sarah Chen - "we have the same problem with proposals"
> The part that fixed it for us was pulling the pricing table out of the doc
> entirely and sending it as its own page. Cut a whole review round. Happy to
> send you the template if it is useful.

SUBSTANCE
@Marcus Webb - disagrees on cadence
> Fair, and 4x a week only worked because I had 8 months of posts behind it.
> From a standing start I would do what you said.

SUPPORT  (like these, reply to the first three)
@... "This is great" -> Thanks Dan.
...

NOISE  (1)
Skipped: an agency pitch. Replying gives it reach.
最后设置发布门槛：在用户明确同意之前，不发布任何内容。 由用户自行粘贴并发布回复。