analyzer

Original🇺🇸 English
Translated

Content Analyzer — any content (URL, text, transcript) into structured analysis report with actionable insights. Use when user asks to analyze, summarize, or extract key takeaways from content.

5installs
Added on

NPX Install

npx skill4agent add ibigqiang/feedgrab analyzer

Content Analyzer Skill

Any content → structured analysis report with actionable insights

Trigger

When user sends content (URL, text, or transcript) with analysis intent:
  • /analyze [URL]
  • "Analyze this article"
  • "What are the key takeaways?"
  • Auto-triggered after video/podcast transcription (from video skill)

Pipeline

Step 1: Get Content

Choose tool based on input type:
InputTool
Tweet URL
fetch_tweet
or Jina Reader
Web URL
WebFetch
or Jina Reader
Local fileRead file directly
Transcript from video skillUse directly

Step 2: Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Scan content across these dimensions. Only output dimensions with actual content — skip empty ones.
markdown
## 📖 Summary

[1-3 sentence core thesis]

**Source**: [author/publisher] · [date]
**Type**: [tweet/article/video/podcast/report]

---

## 💡 Key Insights

### 🎯 Core Arguments
- **Thesis**: [Main argument or finding]
- **Evidence**: [Supporting data or reasoning]
- **Strength**: [How convincing? What's missing?]

### 🤖 Tools & Methods
- **What**: [Tools, frameworks, or techniques mentioned]
- **How**: [How they're used or applied]
- **Relevance**: [Could you use this?]

### ⚙️ Workflow Ideas
- **Optimization**: [Process improvements mentioned]
- **Automation**: [What could be automated]
- **Integration**: [How to fit into existing workflow]

### 📊 Data & Numbers
- **Key metrics**: [Important numbers mentioned]
- **Trends**: [Patterns in the data]
- **Gaps**: [What data is missing]

### ⚠️ Risks & Warnings
- **Pitfalls**: [Explicitly mentioned risks]
- **Blind spots**: [What the author might be missing]
- **Counter-arguments**: [Alternative perspectives]

### 🔗 Resources
- **Tools/APIs**: [Mentioned tools or data sources]
- **People**: [Worth following or referencing]
- **Further reading**: [Related content]

### 🧠 Mental Model Shifts
- **Before**: [Common assumption]
- **After**: [New understanding from this content]
- **Impact**: [How this changes decisions]

---

## ✅ Action Items

### Quick Wins (< 30 min)
- [ ] [Action 1] — Impact: ★★★★ | Effort: Easy
- [ ] [Action 2] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Easy

### Deeper Work (1-3 hours)
- [ ] [Action 3] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Medium
- [ ] [Action 4] — Impact: ★★ | Effort: Medium

### Exploration (needs validation)
- [ ] [Action 5] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Hard | Nature: Exploratory

Step 3: Personalized Relevance (Customizable)

Map insights to YOUR context. Edit the dimensions below to match your own projects, interests, and systems.
markdown
## 🔄 How This Applies to Me

### My Projects
- **[Project A]**: [How this insight connects]
- **[Project B]**: [What I could apply]

### My Knowledge Base
- **Update**: [Which notes/docs to update]
- **New entry**: [What to add to my knowledge system]

### My Decision Log
- **Changed my mind about**: [what and why]
- **Confirmed my belief that**: [what]
Customization: Edit the dimensions in Step 2 and Step 3 to match your own domain. A trader might add "Market Impact" and "Risk Assessment". A developer might add "Architecture Patterns" and "Tech Debt". Make it yours.

Output Modes

ModeTriggerOutput
Full (default)
/analyze [URL]
All dimensions
Sparse
/analyze [URL] --sparse
Only hit dimensions, skip empty
Brief
/analyze [URL] --brief
Action items only

Best Practices

  1. Scan all dimensions, but don't force-fill — skip empty dimensions cleanly
  2. Actions must be specific — not "learn about X" but "read X docs chapter Y"
  3. Distinguish fact from opinion — mark the author's claims vs verified facts
  4. Source everything — tag where each insight comes from in the original content
  5. ROI awareness — not every action is worth doing, assess effort vs impact