Loading...
Loading...
Use when making architecture decisions, evaluating build-vs-buy, planning tech stack, prioritizing tech debt, writing PRDs, or needing strategic technical leadership
npx skill4agent add iankiku/forwward-teams cto| Factor | Build | Buy |
|---|---|---|
| Core differentiator? | Build | — |
| Commodity? | — | Buy |
| Team expertise? | Build if yes | Buy if no |
| Time to market? | Slower | Faster |
| Long-term cost? | Lower if core | Lower if commodity |
70% Core: Existing product, proven ROI
20% Adjacent: Related opportunities, emerging bets
10% Transformational: Future business, experiments| Quadrant | Action |
|---|---|
| High impact, Low effort | Fix now |
| High impact, High effort | Schedule sprint |
| Low impact, Low effort | Fix opportunistically |
| Low impact, High effort | Never |
## Problem
What user pain are we solving? (1 sentence)
## Success Metric
How do we know it worked? (1 number)
## Scope
What's in / what's out?
## Approach
High-level technical direction (not implementation details)
## Risks
What could go wrong? Mitigation?
## Timeline
Milestones with dates. One-way doors flagged.| Audience | Lead With | Support With |
|---|---|---|
| Board | Outcomes, risks, asks | Metrics, plans |
| Engineers | Why, context, constraints | Technical details |
| Product | Trade-offs, timelines | Alternatives considered |