workflows
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
Chinese工作流组合
Workflow Combination
"政策和策略是党的生命，各级领导同志务必充分注意，万万不可粗心大意。" —— 毛泽东
方法论的威力不在于单独使用某一件思想武器，而在于在正确的时机以正确的顺序组合使用。本 skill 提供三条标准化工作流，定义 skill 的调用顺序、步骤间的数据传递格式和终止条件。
"Policies and strategies are the life of the Party. Leading comrades at all levels must pay full attention to them and must never be careless." —— Mao Zedong
The power of methodology does not lie in using a single ideological tool alone, but in combining and using them in the correct order at the right time. This skill provides three standardized workflows, which define the calling sequence of skills, the data transfer format between steps, and termination conditions.
Workflow 1：新项目启动
Workflow 1: New Project Launch
适用场景： 从零开始面对一个新任务/项目/领域，目标已知但路径未知，资源有限。
触发信号： 新项目、新领域、MVP、从零开始、不知道从哪里下手
Applicable scenarios: Facing a new task/project/field from scratch, the goal is known but the path is unknown, and resources are limited.
Trigger signals: new project, new field, MVP, start from scratch, don't know where to start
工作流
Workflow
investigation-first → contradiction-analysis → spark-prairie-fire → protracted-strategy
调查研究 → 矛盾分析 → 星火燎原 → 持久战略investigation-first → contradiction-analysis → spark-prairie-fire → protracted-strategy
调查研究 → 矛盾分析 → 星火燎原 → 持久战略步骤详解
Step Details
Step 1：investigation-first（调查研究）
- 目标：摸清现状，占有第一手材料
- 输出格式（传递给 Step 2）：
调查结论： - 现状是：…… - 关键约束是：…… - 主要的未知项是：…… - 已知的可依托基础是：…… - 终止条件：能够回答"现在是什么情况"这个问题
Step 2：contradiction-analysis（矛盾分析）
- 输入：Step 1 的调查结论
- 目标：从调查材料中识别主要矛盾，找到最值得突破的切入点
- 输出格式（传递给 Step 3）：
主要矛盾：[A] vs [B] 矛盾性质：[对抗性/非对抗性] 最值得突破的切入点：…… 原因：解决了它，[X]、[Y] 问题随之缓解 - 终止条件：找到一个明确的主要矛盾和切入点
Step 3：spark-prairie-fire（星火燎原）
- 输入：Step 2 识别的切入点
- 目标：以切入点为根据地，制定从小到大的发展路线
- 输出格式（传递给 Step 4）：
根据地：[具体切入点] 发展路线： 第1步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… 第2步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… 第3步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… - 终止条件：有一条清晰的、从当前能力出发的发展路线
Step 4：protracted-strategy（持久战略）
- 输入：Step 3 的发展路线
- 目标：将发展路线纳入阶段性战略框架，确定当前处于哪个阶段，设置阶段转换条件
- 输出格式：
当前阶段：战略防御期 本阶段核心任务：[Step 3 第1步] 转入相持期的条件：当 [具体里程碑] 达成时 - 终止条件：有明确的阶段定位和转换条件
Step 1: investigation-first (Investigation and Research)
- Goal: Find out the current situation and obtain first-hand materials
- Output format (passed to Step 2):
调查结论： - 现状是：…… - 关键约束是：…… - 主要的未知项是：…… - 已知的可依托基础是：…… - Termination condition: Able to answer the question "What is the current situation?"
Step 2: contradiction-analysis (Contradiction Analysis)
- Input: Investigation conclusion from Step 1
- Goal: Identify the main contradiction from the investigation materials and find the most worthwhile breakthrough point
- Output format (passed to Step 3):
主要矛盾：[A] vs [B] 矛盾性质：[对抗性/非对抗性] 最值得突破的切入点：…… 原因：解决了它，[X]、[Y] 问题随之缓解 - Termination condition: Find a clear main contradiction and breakthrough point
Step 3: spark-prairie-fire (A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire)
- Input: Breakthrough point identified in Step 2
- Goal: Take the breakthrough point as the base and formulate a development route from small to large
- Output format (passed to Step 4):
根据地：[具体切入点] 发展路线： 第1步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… 第2步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… 第3步：[具体行动] → 成功标志：…… - Termination condition: Have a clear development route based on current capabilities
Step 4: protracted-strategy (Protracted Strategy)
- Input: Development route from Step 3
- Goal: Incorporate the development route into the phased strategic framework, determine which stage you are currently in, and set stage transition conditions
- Output format:
当前阶段：战略防御期 本阶段核心任务：[Step 3 第1步] 转入相持期的条件：当 [具体里程碑] 达成时 - Termination condition: Have clear stage positioning and transition conditions
Workflow 2：复杂问题攻坚
Workflow 2: Complex Problem Tackling
适用场景： 面对一个已知存在但难以解决的具体问题，问题边界清楚但原因不明或路径不清。
触发信号： 疑难 bug、架构瓶颈、反复失败的尝试、根因不明的问题
Applicable scenarios: Facing a specific known problem that is difficult to solve, the problem boundary is clear but the cause is unknown or the path is unclear.
Trigger signals: difficult bug, architecture bottleneck, repeated failed attempts, problem with unknown root cause
工作流
Workflow
investigation-first → contradiction-analysis → concentrate-forces → practice-cognition → criticism-self-criticism
调查研究 → 矛盾分析 → 集中兵力 → 实践认识论 → 批评与自我批评investigation-first → contradiction-analysis → concentrate-forces → practice-cognition → criticism-self-criticism
调查研究 → 矛盾分析 → 集中兵力 → 实践认识论 → 批评与自我批评步骤详解
Step Details
Step 1：investigation-first（调查研究）
- 目标：弄清问题的真实面目（而非症状）
- 输出（传递给 Step 2）：
调查结论： - 问题的现象是：…… - 问题出现的条件是：…… - 已经排除的原因是：…… - 还未调查的方向是：…… - 终止条件：能够精确描述问题（而非"好像是 X 出了问题"）
Step 2：contradiction-analysis（矛盾分析）
- 输入：Step 1 的调查结论
- 目标：找到问题中的主要矛盾（根本冲突点）
- 输出（传递给 Step 3）：
主要矛盾：[根本冲突点] 我的假说：这个冲突导致了……，因为…… 验证方式：如果假说正确，应该能观察到…… - 终止条件：有一个可以验证的假说
Step 3：concentrate-forces（集中兵力）
- 输入：Step 2 的假说和验证方式
- 目标：围绕验证这个假说，集中全部力量，拒绝分心
- 输出（传递给 Step 4）：
🎯 主攻目标：验证假说"[假说内容]" 验证方法：[具体的验证步骤] 完成信号：[假说被证实或证伪] 暂缓的其他方向：…… - 终止条件：假说被验证（证实或证伪均可）
Step 4：practice-cognition（实践认识论）
- 输入：Step 3 的验证结果
- 目标：根据验证结果，更新认识，进入下一轮（如果假说被证伪则回到 Step 2）
- 循环终止条件：问题被彻底解决（可以明确描述原因和解决方案）
Step 5：criticism-self-criticism（批评与自我批评）
- 输入：整个攻坚过程
- 目标：审视攻坚过程中的方法论失误，防止下次犯同类错误
- 必须输出：结构化工作审视报告
Step 1: investigation-first (Investigation and Research)
- Goal: Figure out the real nature of the problem (not just symptoms)
- Output (passed to Step 2):
调查结论： - 问题的现象是：…… - 问题出现的条件是：…… - 已经排除的原因是：…… - 还未调查的方向是：…… - Termination condition: Able to describe the problem accurately (instead of "it seems that X has a problem")
Step 2: contradiction-analysis (Contradiction Analysis)
- Input: Investigation conclusion from Step 1
- Goal: Find the main contradiction (root conflict point) in the problem
- Output (passed to Step 3):
主要矛盾：[根本冲突点] 我的假说：这个冲突导致了……，因为…… 验证方式：如果假说正确，应该能观察到…… - Termination condition: Have a verifiable hypothesis
Step 3: concentrate-forces (Concentrate Forces)
- Input: Hypothesis and verification method from Step 2
- Goal: Focus all efforts on verifying this hypothesis and refuse distractions
- Output (passed to Step 4):
🎯 主攻目标：验证假说"[假说内容]" 验证方法：[具体的验证步骤] 完成信号：[假说被证实或证伪] 暂缓的其他方向：…… - Termination condition: The hypothesis is verified (either confirmed or falsified)
Step 4: practice-cognition (Practice Epistemology)
- Input: Verification result from Step 3
- Goal: Update cognition based on verification results and enter the next round (return to Step 2 if the hypothesis is falsified)
- Cycle termination condition: The problem is completely solved (can clearly describe the cause and solution)
Step 5: criticism-self-criticism (Criticism and Self-criticism)
- Input: The entire tackling process
- Goal: Review methodological errors in the tackling process to prevent similar mistakes next time
- Required output: Structured work review report
Workflow 3：方案迭代优化
Workflow 3: Solution Iteration and Optimization
适用场景： 已有一个基础方案，需要通过收集反馈、分析问题、迭代改进来提升质量。
触发信号： 迭代优化、用户反馈、代码审查后改进、方案效果不理想
Applicable scenarios: There is already a basic solution, which needs to be improved in quality by collecting feedback, analyzing problems, and iterating improvements.
Trigger signals: iteration optimization, user feedback, improvement after code review, unsatisfactory solution effect
工作流
Workflow
mass-line → contradiction-analysis → practice-cognition → criticism-self-criticism → mass-line（循环）
群众路线 → 矛盾分析 → 实践认识论 → 批评与自我批评 → 群众路线（下一轮）mass-line → contradiction-analysis → practice-cognition → criticism-self-criticism → mass-line（循环）
群众路线 → 矛盾分析 → 实践认识论 → 批评与自我批评 → 群众路线（下一轮）步骤详解
Step Details
Step 1：mass-line（群众路线）
- 目标：从多个信息源收集对现有方案的反馈
- 信息源清单（根据具体情况选择）：
- 用户的明确反馈
- 测试结果/运行结果
- 代码审查意见
- 性能数据/指标
- 代码库中相关模式的启示
- 输出（传递给 Step 2）：
收集到的多源反馈： - [信息源1]：…… - [信息源2]：…… 各源之间的矛盾之处：…… 共同指向的问题：…… - 终止条件：有来自至少 2 个信息源的反馈
Step 2：contradiction-analysis（矛盾分析）
- 输入：Step 1 的多源反馈
- 目标：从反馈中识别出需要优先解决的主要矛盾
- 输出（传递给 Step 3）：
本轮迭代的主要矛盾：[当前方案的核心问题] 改进假说：如果……，则…… 验证方式：……
Step 3：practice-cognition（实践认识论）
- 输入：Step 2 的改进假说
- 目标：实施改进并验证效果
- 循环终止条件（开始前明确说明）：当 [具体指标] 达到 [具体数值/状态] 时，本轮迭代完成
Step 4：criticism-self-criticism（批评与自我批评）
- 目标：审视本轮迭代的过程质量
- 必须输出：工作审视报告
Step 5：mass-line（下一轮）
- 基于本轮的改进结果，重新收集反馈，开始新的迭代循环
整体循环终止条件： 当 mass-line 的多源反馈显示"没有新的重要问题"或用户确认满意时，退出循环。
Step 1: mass-line (Mass Line)
- Goal: Collect feedback on existing solutions from multiple information sources
- Information source list (selected according to specific situations):
- Explicit user feedback
- Test results/running results
- Code review opinions
- Performance data/indicators
- Inspiration from related patterns in the code base
- Output (passed to Step 2):
收集到的多源反馈： - [信息源1]：…… - [信息源2]：…… 各源之间的矛盾之处：…… 共同指向的问题：…… - Termination condition: Have feedback from at least 2 information sources
Step 2: contradiction-analysis (Contradiction Analysis)
- Input: Multi-source feedback from Step 1
- Goal: Identify the main contradiction that needs to be prioritized from the feedback
- Output (passed to Step 3):
本轮迭代的主要矛盾：[当前方案的核心问题] 改进假说：如果……，则…… 验证方式：……
Step 3: practice-cognition (Practice Epistemology)
- Input: Improvement hypothesis from Step 2
- Goal: Implement improvements and verify effects
- Cycle termination condition (clearly stated before starting): When [specific indicator] reaches [specific value/status], this round of iteration is completed
Step 4: criticism-self-criticism (Criticism and Self-criticism)
- Goal: Review the process quality of this round of iteration
- Required output: Work review report
Step 5: mass-line (Next Round)
- Based on the improvement results of this round, re-collect feedback and start a new iteration cycle
Overall cycle termination condition: When the multi-source feedback from mass-line shows "no new important problems" or the user confirms satisfaction, exit the cycle.
工作流选择指南
Workflow Selection Guide
| 你的情况 | 推荐工作流 |
|---|---|
| 面对全新的项目/任务，不知道从哪里下手 | Workflow 1：新项目启动 |
| 有一个具体的疑难问题，需要找到根因并解决 | Workflow 2：复杂问题攻坚 |
| 已有方案但效果不理想，需要迭代优化 | Workflow 3：方案迭代优化 |
| 以上都不完全符合 | 回到 |
| Your situation | Recommended workflow |
|---|---|
| Facing a brand new project/task, don't know where to start | Workflow 1: New Project Launch |
| Have a specific difficult problem, need to find the root cause and solve it | Workflow 2: Complex Problem Tackling |
| Existing solution has unsatisfactory effect, need iteration and optimization | Workflow 3: Solution Iteration and Optimization |
| None of the above fully matches | Return to the scheduling table of |
数据传递规则
Data Transfer Rules
工作流中每个步骤的输出必须显式传递给下一步骤。具体做法：
- 每个步骤结束时，写出格式化的"传递给下一步的信息"
- 下一步开始时，确认收到并引用上一步的输出
- 不得跳步骤执行（如不得跳过 contradiction-analysis 直接进入 concentrate-forces）
The output of each step in the workflow must be explicitly passed to the next step. Specific practices:
- At the end of each step, write the formatted "information passed to the next step"
- At the beginning of the next step, confirm receipt and reference the output of the previous step
- Do not skip steps (e.g. do not skip contradiction-analysis and directly enter concentrate-forces)
工作流中断处理
Workflow Interruption Handling
如果在工作流执行过程中遇到阻塞：
- 信息不足 → 插入一次 ，补充信息后继续
investigation-first - 假说被证伪 → 返回 ，重新分析
contradiction-analysis - 发现新的更重要的矛盾 → 用 评估是否需要调整工作流
overall-planning
If you encounter blocking during workflow execution:
- Insufficient information → Insert a call, continue after supplementing information
investigation-first - Hypothesis is falsified → Return to and re-analyze
contradiction-analysis - New and more important contradictions are found → Use to evaluate whether the workflow needs to be adjusted
overall-planning