deep-post-ideas
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseDeep Post Ideas
深度帖子创意
Extract 5 distinct, high-engagement post outlines from reference materials. Focus on paradoxical truths, transformational narratives, and powerful insights — outlines only, not complete posts.
从参考资料中提取5个独特、高互动性的帖子大纲。聚焦于矛盾真相、变革性叙事和深刻见解——仅生成大纲，而非完整帖子。
Workflow
工作流程
Step 1: Analyze Reference Material
步骤1：分析参考资料
From the user's input, identify:
- Core themes and transformational insights
- Counterintuitive truths and paradoxes
- Core problems and pain points
- Aspirational archetypes
- Reader objections
- Key insights or wisdom
- Potential metaphors and powerful narratives
- Universal principles with emotional resonance
从用户输入中识别：
- 核心主题与变革性见解
- 违反直觉的真相与矛盾点
- 核心问题与痛点
- 理想原型
- 读者异议
- 关键见解或智慧
- 潜在隐喻与有力叙事
- 具有情感共鸣的普遍原则
Step 2: Develop 5 Post Concepts
步骤2：开发5个帖子概念
For each concept:
- Choose a counterintuitive truth from the reference material
- Frame it as an absolute principle
- Develop short, practical examples
- Build a narrative arc: destruction/challenge -> revelation -> transcendence
- Craft a memorable closing insight
针对每个概念：
- 从参考资料中选取一个违反直觉的真相
- 将其构建为绝对原则
- 撰写简短、实用的示例
- 构建叙事弧：困境/挑战 -> 顿悟 -> 超越
- 打造令人难忘的收尾见解
Step 3: Output 5 Outlines
步骤3：输出5个大纲
For each outline, provide:
POST OUTLINE [N]:
- Core Paradox: [Central counterintuitive truth]
- [Rephrase 3 ways, getting shorter each time]
- Key Quotes:
- [Quote 1 from reference material]
- [Quote 2]
- [Quote 3]
- Transformation Arc: [Challenge -> revelation -> transcendence]
- Core Problems:
- [Problem 1 — tangible, relatable]
- [Problem 2]
- [Problem 3]
- Key Examples:
- [Example 1 — concrete illustration]
- [Example 2]
- [Example 3]
- Reader Objections:
- [Objection 1 — written as the reader]
- [Objection 2]
- [Objection 3]
- Aspirational Statement: [1-2 sentences on traits/skills to develop]
- Actionable Steps: [3+ staccato-style steps]
- Big Idea: [Transformational concept in 1-2 sentences]
- Memorable Closing Insight: [One sentence that ties everything together]每个大纲需包含：
POST OUTLINE [N]:
- Core Paradox: [Central counterintuitive truth]
- [Rephrase 3 ways, getting shorter each time]
- Key Quotes:
- [Quote 1 from reference material]
- [Quote 2]
- [Quote 3]
- Transformation Arc: [Challenge -> revelation -> transcendence]
- Core Problems:
- [Problem 1 — tangible, relatable]
- [Problem 2]
- [Problem 3]
- Key Examples:
- [Example 1 — concrete illustration]
- [Example 2]
- [Example 3]
- Reader Objections:
- [Objection 1 — written as the reader]
- [Objection 2]
- [Objection 3]
- Aspirational Statement: [1-2 sentences on traits/skills to develop]
- Actionable Steps: [3+ staccato-style steps]
- Big Idea: [Transformational concept in 1-2 sentences]
- Memorable Closing Insight: [One sentence that ties everything together]Language Techniques
语言技巧
Apply across all outlines:
- Use second-person "you" consistently
- Employ imperative verbs: "Be", "Reset", "Let go"
- Create visual metaphors involving elemental forces
- Embrace absolutes: "never", "everything", "impossible"
- Avoid qualifiers, hedges, or uncertainty markers
- Use concrete timeframes for authority
- Create opposing pairs to highlight paradoxes
所有大纲均需应用以下技巧：
- 持续使用第二人称“你”
- 使用祈使动词：“成为”、“重置”、“放手”
- 创造涉及自然力量的视觉隐喻
- 运用绝对表述：“绝不”、“一切”、“不可能”
- 避免限定词、模糊表述或不确定性标记
- 使用具体时间框架以增强权威性
- 创建对立组合以突出矛盾点
Constraints
约束条件
- Generate outlines only, not complete posts
- Focus on depth and emotional resonance over tactical advice
- Each outline must have a distinct theme
- Prioritize quality and engagement potential
- Don't add information not implied in the reference material
- 仅生成大纲，而非完整帖子
- 优先考虑深度与情感共鸣，而非战术建议
- 每个大纲必须有独特主题
- 优先保证质量与互动潜力
- 不得添加参考资料中未隐含的信息
Reference Examples
参考示例
See references/example-phrasing.md for example phrasing styles that demonstrate the desired tone and structure.
请查看 references/example-phrasing.md 获取示例措辞风格，以了解所需的语气与结构。