PR Writer
Write the PR body as a cover note for reviewers, not a changelog, template,
validation log, or file-by-file summary.
Inspect the Change
Requires authenticated
. Inspect the current branch, working tree, PR,
base branch, commits, and full diff:
bash
git branch --show-current
git status --porcelain
gh pr view --json number,title,body,url,baseRefName,headRefName
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef
If
reports that no PR exists, continue with first-time PR
creation. For an existing PR, use its
; otherwise use the
repository default branch. Set
, then inspect:
bash
git log "$BASE"..HEAD --oneline
git diff "$BASE"...HEAD
If on
or
, create a feature branch first. Ensure intended
changes are committed and review the whole branch diff, not only the latest
commit or existing PR text.
Core Rules
- Describe concrete changed behavior, affected surfaces, and reviewer impact
before implementation detail.
- Explain motivation, risk, tradeoffs, migration, or review focus only when
useful.
- Use the smallest structure that makes the change easier to review.
- Replace internal prompt or process terminology with specific behavior.
- When refreshing a PR, rewrite around the current full diff without narrating
review history.
Titles
Use
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
or
.
Allowed types:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
.
- Describe the dominant full-branch change with the narrowest accurate type
and scope.
- Use only when the change breaks an external contract, and explain the
affected surface in the body.
- Avoid vague subjects such as , , , ,
or . Do not add a trailing period.
- Keep an existing title only when it still describes the whole diff.
Body Shape
Choose the minimum useful shape:
| Change | Include |
|---|
| Small or obvious | One concise paragraph without headings. |
| Feature, bug fix, or refactor | Changed behavior and effect; add root cause, unchanged behavior, or non-obvious approach when relevant. |
| Contract or breaking change | Affected API, schema, payload, config, permission, storage, or CLI surface; include compatibility and migration guidance. |
| Operational, visual, or workflow change | User/operator effect, measured impact, failure modes, or flow when useful. |
| Broad, generated, or cross-cutting change | Organizing principle, why the breadth is necessary, and where review should start. |
Default:
markdown
<What changed and what effect it has.>
<Why the approach, risk, migration, or review focus matters, if not obvious.>
For review-feedback updates, describe the resulting PR as a whole rather than
the sequence of revisions.
Reviewer Aids
Use an aid only when it reduces reviewer reconstruction work:
- A compact before/after or interface example for changed contracts.
- A small Mermaid diagram for async flows or state transitions.
- A screenshot or recording note when visual evidence exists.
- A rollout, compatibility, risk, or review-order note when reviewers or
adopters need it.
Introduce an artifact with one sentence explaining what reviewers should
notice. Omit it when prose is clearer.
Boundaries
- Do not add default , , or sections.
- Omit routine validation unless it changes risk assessment or explains
meaningful regression coverage. For docs, skills, copy, or config changes,
omit it by default.
- Do not paste commands, CI logs, validation dumps, commit logs, placeholders,
or exhaustive file lists.
- Never include customer or organization names, user emails, support ticket
contents, secrets, or PII.
- Use issue references only when verified from user input, branch names,
commits, PR discussion, or tracker output. closes;
only links.
Create or Update
Create new PRs as drafts. Write the body to a temporary Markdown file, then run:
bash
gh pr create --draft --title '<title>' --body-file /tmp/pr-body.md
Update existing PRs with
:
bash
gh api -X PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/PR_NUMBER \
-f title='<title>' \
-F body=@/tmp/pr-body.md
Refresh the title and body when follow-up commits materially change scope,
approach, breaking behavior, risk, migration, or review expectations. Skip
typo-only, formatting-only, and rename-only follow-ups.
Examples
Small change:
markdown
The AI Customizations section now starts collapsed so it does not consume
sidebar space before users need it. Expanding it preserves the existing saved
preference behavior.
Breaking contract:
markdown
Run logs now emit chunk-level records instead of one skill-level record.
Consumers that read top-level `findings` must iterate over
`chunk.findings` for each record.
Before:
```json
{"skill": "security-review", "findings": [...]}
```
After:
```json
{"schemaVersion": 1, "chunk": {"index": 1, "findings": [...]}}
```