cw-story-critique

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Story Critique

故事点评

Analyze story content and provide constructive feedback.
分析故事内容并提供建设性反馈。

Process

流程

1. Understand Context First

1. 先了解背景信息

Always ask about audience and goals before critiquing:
Before I critique this, help me understand:

1. Target audience? (YA, adult, genre, platform)
2. What feedback are you looking for? (big picture, line-level, both, harsh-only)
3. Draft stage? (early = focus on major issues, later = details OK)
If user doesn't provide context, infer from content or ask targeted follow-ups.
点评前务必先询问受众和目标:
Before I critique this, help me understand:

1. Target audience? (YA, adult, genre, platform)
2. What feedback are you looking for? (big picture, line-level, both, harsh-only)
3. Draft stage? (early = focus on major issues, later = details OK)
如果用户未提供背景信息,可从内容中推断或提出针对性的后续问题。

2. Adapt Structure to Story Needs

2. 根据故事需求调整点评结构

Don't force rigid templates. Each story needs different things:
  • Sometimes extensive character analysis, minimal plot discussion
  • Sometimes pacing is the main issue and everything else works
  • Sometimes prose quality overshadows other concerns
Common areas to consider (not mandatory):
  • Plot & structure (causation, stakes, logic)
  • Character (motivation, consistency, agency)
  • Pacing & flow
  • Dialogue
  • Prose quality
  • Genre/audience fit
See
references/critique-areas.md
for detailed breakdowns - this is a reference, not a checklist.
**不要套用僵化的模板。**每个故事的需求各不相同:
  • 有时需要深入的角色分析,对情节的讨论则点到为止
  • 有时节奏是核心问题,其他方面都没问题
  • 有时文笔质量会掩盖其他问题
常见考量维度(非强制):
  • 情节与结构(因果关系、冲突张力、逻辑合理性)
  • 角色(动机、一致性、自主性)
  • 节奏与流畅度
  • 对话
  • 文笔质量
  • 体裁/受众适配性
详见
references/critique-areas.md
中的详细说明——这是参考资料,而非检查清单。

3. Trust Your Analysis

3. 相信你的分析判断

Notice what matters, not just what's listed. If something affects the story but isn't in any reference guide, say it:
  • Unusual structural choices
  • Tonal issues
  • Thematic confusion
  • Unique voice elements
  • Anything else relevant
**关注关键问题,而非仅局限于列出的条目。**如果某内容对故事有影响但未出现在任何参考指南中,也请提出:
  • 非常规的结构选择
  • 基调问题
  • 主题模糊
  • 独特的叙事风格元素
  • 其他任何相关问题

4. Use Web Search When Helpful

4. 必要时使用网络搜索

Search when you'd benefit from:
  • Genre convention verification
  • Narrative technique terminology
  • How similar stories handled challenges
  • Fact checking
  • Craft advice on specific techniques
在以下场景中可借助搜索:
  • 验证体裁惯例
  • 查找叙事技巧术语
  • 了解同类故事如何应对挑战
  • 事实核查
  • 特定写作技巧的专业建议

5. Calibrate to Context

5. 根据背景调整点评侧重点

  • Early draft → big picture issues
  • Later draft → line-level details OK
  • Genre matters (thriller vs literary, fanfic vs traditional)
  • Platform matters (web serial needs hooks, traditional needs opening, fanfic needs canon adherence)
  • 初稿阶段 → 聚焦宏观问题
  • 终稿阶段 → 可关注逐行细节
  • 体裁至关重要(惊悚 vs 文学性,同人小说 vs 传统小说)
  • 发布平台也很重要(网络连载需要钩子,传统出版需要亮眼开篇,同人小说需要遵循原作设定)

Output Modes

输出模式

Balanced (default): Strengths + areas for improvement + priorities
Harsh (if requested): Focus on problems, minimize or skip strengths section
Flexible: Whatever structure serves this story best
均衡模式(默认):优势+改进方向+优先级
尖锐模式(按需选择):聚焦问题,尽量减少或跳过优势部分
灵活模式:采用最适合该故事的结构

Skills are Composable

技能可组合使用

Feel free to combine with other skills when helpful - e.g., using cw-official-docs to check canon accuracy during critique.
必要时可自由组合其他技能使用——例如,在点评时使用cw-official-docs来核查原作设定的准确性。