cw-story-critique
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseStory Critique
故事点评
Analyze story content and provide constructive feedback.
分析故事内容并提供建设性反馈。
Process
流程
1. Understand Context First
1. 先了解背景信息
Always ask about audience and goals before critiquing:
Before I critique this, help me understand:
1. Target audience? (YA, adult, genre, platform)
2. What feedback are you looking for? (big picture, line-level, both, harsh-only)
3. Draft stage? (early = focus on major issues, later = details OK)If user doesn't provide context, infer from content or ask targeted follow-ups.
点评前务必先询问受众和目标:
Before I critique this, help me understand:
1. Target audience? (YA, adult, genre, platform)
2. What feedback are you looking for? (big picture, line-level, both, harsh-only)
3. Draft stage? (early = focus on major issues, later = details OK)如果用户未提供背景信息,可从内容中推断或提出针对性的后续问题。
2. Adapt Structure to Story Needs
2. 根据故事需求调整点评结构
Don't force rigid templates. Each story needs different things:
- Sometimes extensive character analysis, minimal plot discussion
- Sometimes pacing is the main issue and everything else works
- Sometimes prose quality overshadows other concerns
Common areas to consider (not mandatory):
- Plot & structure (causation, stakes, logic)
- Character (motivation, consistency, agency)
- Pacing & flow
- Dialogue
- Prose quality
- Genre/audience fit
See for detailed breakdowns - this is a reference, not a checklist.
references/critique-areas.md**不要套用僵化的模板。**每个故事的需求各不相同:
- 有时需要深入的角色分析,对情节的讨论则点到为止
- 有时节奏是核心问题,其他方面都没问题
- 有时文笔质量会掩盖其他问题
常见考量维度(非强制):
- 情节与结构(因果关系、冲突张力、逻辑合理性)
- 角色(动机、一致性、自主性)
- 节奏与流畅度
- 对话
- 文笔质量
- 体裁/受众适配性
详见中的详细说明——这是参考资料,而非检查清单。
references/critique-areas.md3. Trust Your Analysis
3. 相信你的分析判断
Notice what matters, not just what's listed. If something affects the story but isn't in any reference guide, say it:
- Unusual structural choices
- Tonal issues
- Thematic confusion
- Unique voice elements
- Anything else relevant
**关注关键问题,而非仅局限于列出的条目。**如果某内容对故事有影响但未出现在任何参考指南中,也请提出:
- 非常规的结构选择
- 基调问题
- 主题模糊
- 独特的叙事风格元素
- 其他任何相关问题
4. Use Web Search When Helpful
4. 必要时使用网络搜索
Search when you'd benefit from:
- Genre convention verification
- Narrative technique terminology
- How similar stories handled challenges
- Fact checking
- Craft advice on specific techniques
在以下场景中可借助搜索:
- 验证体裁惯例
- 查找叙事技巧术语
- 了解同类故事如何应对挑战
- 事实核查
- 特定写作技巧的专业建议
5. Calibrate to Context
5. 根据背景调整点评侧重点
- Early draft → big picture issues
- Later draft → line-level details OK
- Genre matters (thriller vs literary, fanfic vs traditional)
- Platform matters (web serial needs hooks, traditional needs opening, fanfic needs canon adherence)
- 初稿阶段 → 聚焦宏观问题
- 终稿阶段 → 可关注逐行细节
- 体裁至关重要(惊悚 vs 文学性,同人小说 vs 传统小说)
- 发布平台也很重要(网络连载需要钩子,传统出版需要亮眼开篇,同人小说需要遵循原作设定)
Output Modes
输出模式
Balanced (default): Strengths + areas for improvement + priorities
Harsh (if requested): Focus on problems, minimize or skip strengths section
Flexible: Whatever structure serves this story best
均衡模式(默认):优势+改进方向+优先级
尖锐模式(按需选择):聚焦问题,尽量减少或跳过优势部分
灵活模式:采用最适合该故事的结构
Skills are Composable
技能可组合使用
Feel free to combine with other skills when helpful - e.g., using cw-official-docs to check canon accuracy during critique.
必要时可自由组合其他技能使用——例如,在点评时使用cw-official-docs来核查原作设定的准确性。