yc-pitch-deck
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseYC Pitch Deck
YC Pitch Deck
Create a compelling startup pitch deck that follows the structure proven to raise billions from top investors. Master the YC and Sequoia formats that get founders funded.
创建极具吸引力的初创公司Pitch Deck,采用经顶级投资者验证、已成功撬动数十亿美元募资的成熟结构,掌握可帮助创始人拿到融资的YC和Sequoia标准模板。
When to Use This Skill
何时使用本技能
- Fundraising to create investor pitch decks
- YC application to structure your narrative
- Demo Day prep to craft your 2-minute pitch
- Angel investors to communicate your opportunity
- Partnership pitches to structure compelling asks
- Internal alignment to articulate your strategy clearly
- 募资时制作面向投资者的Pitch Deck
- YC申请时搭建你的叙事框架
- Demo Day筹备时打磨你的2分钟路演
- 对接天使投资人时清晰阐述你的商业机会
- 合作推介时构建有说服力的诉求
- 内部对齐时清晰表述你的战略方向
Methodology Foundation
方法底层依据
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Source | YC (Y Combinator), Sequoia Capital pitch framework |
| Core Principle | "The best pitch decks tell a story: Problem → Solution → Why Now → Why You. Every slide must earn its place." |
| Why This Matters | Investors see thousands of decks. You have 3 minutes of attention. A great deck doesn't get you funded—a bad deck gets you rejected. |
| 维度 | 详情 |
|---|---|
| 来源 | YC(Y Combinator)、红杉资本(Sequoia Capital)Pitch框架 |
| 核心理念 | "优秀的Pitch Deck本质是讲故事:问题→解决方案→为什么是现在→为什么是你。每一页幻灯片都要有存在的价值。" |
| 重要性 | 投资者每年会看到数千份Pitch Deck,你只有3分钟的注意力窗口。一份好的Deck不一定能帮你拿到融资,但一份差的Deck一定会让你直接被拒绝。 |
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
Claude负责的内容 vs 你需要决策的内容
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Structures video workflow | Final creative vision |
| Suggests shot compositions | Equipment selection |
| Creates storyboard templates | Brand aesthetics |
| Generates script frameworks | Final approval |
| Identifies technical requirements | Budget allocation |
| Claude负责 | 你需要决策 |
|---|---|
| 搭建视频工作流 | 最终创意方向 |
| 建议镜头构图 | 设备选择 |
| 创建故事板模板 | 品牌美学风格 |
| 生成脚本框架 | 最终内容审核 |
| 明确技术要求 | 预算分配 |
What This Skill Does
本技能的功能
- Structures your narrative - Proven slide sequence that works
- Crafts compelling slides - What goes on each slide
- Identifies what to include/exclude - Signal vs. noise
- Tailors for stage - Pre-seed vs. Seed vs. Series A
- Prepares you for Q&A - What investors will ask
- Provides templates - Starting points for each slide
- 搭建叙事结构 - 经过市场验证的幻灯片排序逻辑
- 打磨优质幻灯片内容 - 明确每一页需要呈现的信息
- 明确内容取舍边界 - 区分有效信息和噪音
- 适配不同融资阶段 - 针对Pre-seed、Seed、Series A阶段做定制化调整
- 帮你准备问答环节 - 预判投资者会提出的问题
- 提供现成模板 - 每一页幻灯片都有可直接使用的起始模板
How to Use
使用方式
Create a Pitch Deck from Scratch
从零创建Pitch Deck
Help me create a pitch deck for my startup:
[Description of company]
Stage: [Pre-seed/Seed/Series A]
Raising: [$X]
Key metrics: [if any]Help me create a pitch deck for my startup:
[Description of company]
Stage: [Pre-seed/Seed/Series A]
Raising: [$X]
Key metrics: [if any]Review an Existing Pitch Deck
审核已有Pitch Deck
Review my pitch deck against YC/Sequoia best practices:
[Paste slide content or describe]
What's working? What needs improvement?Review my pitch deck against YC/Sequoia best practices:
[Paste slide content or describe]
What's working? What needs improvement?Prepare for Demo Day
筹备Demo Day
I have 2 minutes for Demo Day.
Here's my company: [description]
Help me structure the 2-minute pitch.I have 2 minutes for Demo Day.
Here's my company: [description]
Help me structure the 2-minute pitch.Instructions
使用指南
Step 1: Understand the Standard Structure
步骤1:了解标准结构
undefinedundefinedPitch Deck Structure (10-15 slides)
Pitch Deck结构(10-15页)
Core Slides (Required)
核心页(必填)
| # | Slide | Purpose | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Title | Who are you, what do you do | 5 sec |
| 2 | Problem | What problem are you solving | 30 sec |
| 3 | Solution | How you solve it | 30 sec |
| 4 | Why Now | Market timing | 20 sec |
| 5 | Market Size | How big is the opportunity | 20 sec |
| 6 | Product | Demo/screenshots | 45 sec |
| 7 | Traction | Proof it's working | 30 sec |
| 8 | Business Model | How you make money | 20 sec |
| 9 | Competition | Why you win | 20 sec |
| 10 | Team | Why you're the ones | 20 sec |
| 11 | Ask | What you need | 20 sec |
| 序号 | 页面主题 | 目的 | 讲解时长 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 标题页 | 你是谁,做什么业务 | 5秒 |
| 2 | 问题页 | 你要解决什么问题 | 30秒 |
| 3 | 解决方案页 | 你如何解决这个问题 | 30秒 |
| 4 | 为什么是现在页 | 市场时机说明 | 20秒 |
| 5 | 市场规模页 | 机会体量有多大 | 20秒 |
| 6 | 产品页 | 演示/产品截图 | 45秒 |
| 7 | 业务进展页 | 证明你的模式可行 | 30秒 |
| 8 | 商业模式页 | 你如何盈利 | 20秒 |
| 9 | 竞争格局页 | 为什么你能胜出 | 20秒 |
| 10 | 团队页 | 为什么你们是做这件事的合适人选 | 20秒 |
| 11 | 融资诉求页 | 你需要什么支持 | 20秒 |
Optional Slides (Based on Stage/Story)
可选页(根据阶段/叙事需求选择)
- Go-to-Market: How you acquire customers
- Roadmap: Where you're going
- Unit Economics: LTV/CAC, margins
- Vision: 10-year view
- Financials: Projections (Series A+)
- 市场进入策略(Go-to-Market): 你如何获取客户
- 路线图: 未来的发展规划
- 单位经济学: LTV/CAC、利润率
- 愿景: 10年长期目标
- 财务数据: 预测(Series A及之后阶段需要)
What NOT to Include
不需要包含的内容
- Detailed financial projections (too early stage)
- Technical architecture (unless deep tech)
- Advisory board (unless remarkable)
- Patents pending (rarely impressive)
- Long text blocks (nobody reads)
---- 详细的财务预测(阶段过早时不需要)
- 技术架构(除非是硬科技项目)
- 顾问委员会名单(除非顾问背景极其亮眼)
- 待审批专利(很少能给投资者留下深刻印象)
- 大段文字(没人会读)
---Step 2: Craft Each Slide
步骤2:逐页打磨内容
undefinedundefinedSlide-by-Slide Guide
逐页制作指南
SLIDE 1: Title
第1页:标题页
Purpose: First impression. Who are you?
Include:
- Company name and logo
- One-line description (what you do)
- Your name and contact
Format:
[Logo]
"[One-line description]"
[Founder Name] | [email]
Example:
"Stripe for healthcare payments"
"AI that writes sales emails that actually get responses"
Don't: Start with "We are..." or use jargon.
目的: 第一印象。你是谁?
需要包含:
- 公司名称和logo
- 一句话业务描述(你做什么)
- 你的姓名和联系方式
格式:
[Logo]
"[一句话业务描述]"
[创始人姓名] | [邮箱]
示例:
"面向医疗支付领域的Stripe"
"能写出真实获客的销售邮件的AI"
注意事项: 不要以"我们是..."开头,不要使用行业黑话。
SLIDE 2: Problem
第2页:问题页
Purpose: Make investors feel the pain.
Structure:
- Who has the problem? (specific customer)
- What is the problem? (concrete, relatable)
- Why is it painful? (stakes, cost)
Do:
- Use a specific customer story
- Quantify the pain ($, time, frequency)
- Make it visceral/emotional
Don't:
- List multiple unrelated problems
- Use abstract language
- Describe your solution yet
Example Template:
"[Customer type] struggle with [problem].
Currently they [painful workaround].
This costs them [quantified impact]."
Strong Example:
"Marketing teams spend 6+ hours/week manually pulling data from 5 different tools to answer one question: 'What's working?'"
目的: 让投资者感受到痛点的迫切性。
结构:
- 谁有这个问题?(明确具体的客户群体)
- 问题是什么?(具体、可感知)
- 为什么这个问题很痛?(后果、成本)
建议做法:
- 使用具体的客户故事
- 量化痛点(金额、时间、发生频率)
- 让描述有代入感/情绪共鸣
注意事项:
- 不要罗列多个不相关的问题
- 不要使用抽象表述
- 不要在这里提前描述你的解决方案
示例模板:
"[客户类型]深受[问题]的困扰。
目前他们只能[痛苦的临时解决方案]。
这会给他们带来[量化的损失]。"
优秀示例:
"营销团队每周需要花费6个多小时,手动从5个不同的工具中拉取数据,只为回答一个问题:'什么策略有效?'"
SLIDE 3: Solution
第3页:解决方案页
Purpose: Your answer to the problem.
Structure:
- What is your solution? (one sentence)
- How does it work? (simple explanation)
- What's the key insight? (why this approach)
Do:
- Start with the customer benefit, not features
- Keep it simple (if you can't explain simply, you don't understand it)
- Show, don't tell (visual if possible)
Don't:
- List features
- Use technical jargon
- Describe every capability
Example Template:
"[Product] is [category] that [key benefit].
Unlike [alternative], we [unique approach].
The result: [outcome]."
Strong Example:
"Databox pulls all your marketing data into one dashboard, automatically. No spreadsheets, no manual work. See what's working in 30 seconds."
目的: 你针对问题给出的答案。
结构:
- 你的解决方案是什么?(一句话说明)
- 它是如何运作的?(简单解释)
- 核心洞察是什么?(为什么选择这个解法)
建议做法:
- 从客户收益切入,而不是功能
- 保持表述简单(如果你不能简单解释,说明你自己也没理解透彻)
- 多用展示,少用描述(尽可能配可视化内容)
注意事项:
- 不要罗列功能
- 不要使用技术黑话
- 不要描述所有能力
示例模板:
"[产品名]是[品类],可以[核心收益]。
和[替代方案]不同,我们[独特优势]。
最终可以实现[效果]。"
优秀示例:
"Databox可以自动把你所有的营销数据汇总到一个看板。不需要电子表格,不需要手动操作。30秒就能知道什么策略有效。"
SLIDE 4: Why Now
第4页:为什么是现在页
Purpose: Why is THIS the moment?
Market timing matters more than you think.
Great ideas at the wrong time fail.
Why Now Categories:
- Technology shift: "AI/ML now makes X possible"
- Regulatory change: "New regulation requires X"
- Behavior change: "COVID changed how people X"
- Cost inflection: "Cloud costs dropped, now X is viable"
- Platform shift: "Mobile/AR/crypto created X opportunity"
Structure:
"[Recent change] has created [new reality].
This means [customers] now [new behavior/need].
We're positioned to [capture opportunity]."
Don't:
- Say "It's just time" without specifics
- Claim first mover advantage alone
- Ignore the "why not 5 years ago" question
目的: 为什么当下是做这件事的最佳时机?
市场时机的重要性远超你的想象。
再好的想法选错了时间也会失败。
时机成立的常见原因分类:
- 技术变革: "AI/ML的发展让X成为可能"
- 监管变化: "新的监管要求必须做到X"
- 行为变化: "新冠疫情改变了人们X的方式"
- 成本拐点: "云成本下降,现在X模式已经可以盈利"
- 平台变革: "移动/AR/加密货币创造了X机会"
结构:
"[近期的变化]催生了[新的现实]。
这意味着[客户]现在有了[新的行为/需求]。
我们有能力[抓住这个机会]。"
注意事项:
- 不要没有具体依据就说"时机刚好"
- 不要只宣称自己有先发优势
- 不要回避"为什么5年前不做这件事"的问题
SLIDE 5: Market Size
第5页:市场规模页
Purpose: Is the opportunity big enough?
The Hierarchy:
- TAM: Total Addressable Market (everyone who could buy)
- SAM: Serviceable Addressable Market (who you could realistically reach)
- SOM: Serviceable Obtainable Market (what you'll capture in 3-5 years)
How to Calculate:
Bottom-up (preferred): # customers × price = market size
Top-down: Industry reports (less credible)
What Investors Want:
- Believable path to $100M+ revenue
- Clear logic in numbers
- SAM/SOM more important than TAM
Example:
"TAM: $50B (all SMB marketing software)
SAM: $5B (SMBs with marketing teams)
SOM: $500M (marketing teams using data tools)
We're targeting the SOM, growing SAM over time."
Don't:
- Throw out huge TAM with no logic
- Say "if we capture 1% of TAM..." (red flag)
- Ignore competition in market sizing
目的: 机会是否足够大?
市场规模分层:
- TAM: 总潜在市场(所有可能购买的用户)
- SAM: 可服务潜在市场(你实际能触达的用户)
- SOM: 可获得服务市场(你3-5年内能拿下的市场份额)
计算方式:
自下而上(更推荐):用户数 × 单价 = 市场规模
自上而下:行业报告数据(可信度较低)
投资者看重的点:
- 有可信的路径实现1亿美元以上年收入
- 数字背后有清晰的逻辑支撑
- SAM/SOM比TAM更重要
示例:
"TAM:500亿美元(所有中小微企业营销软件)
SAM:50亿美元(有营销团队的中小微企业)
SOM:5亿美元(使用数据工具的营销团队)
我们的目标是先拿下SOM,长期逐步扩大SAM。"
注意事项:
- 不要没有逻辑支撑就抛出巨大的TAM数字
- 不要说"如果我们能拿下1%的TAM..."(这是投资者眼中的危险信号)
- 做市场规模测算时不要忽略竞争
SLIDE 6: Product
第6页:产品页
Purpose: Show what you built.
Options:
- Screenshots (annotated)
- Short demo video (30-60 sec)
- Before/After
- Product in action
Do:
- Show the core experience
- Highlight what's different
- Keep it simple
Don't:
- Show every feature
- Include UI-heavy screenshots with no context
- Use mockups if you have a real product
For Pre-Product:
- Show prototype/mockup
- Be clear it's not built yet
- Focus on the experience you'll create
目的: 展示你做出的成果。
可选呈现形式:
- 带标注的产品截图
- 30-60秒的短演示视频
- 前后效果对比
- 产品实际运行演示
建议做法:
- 展示核心使用体验
- 突出差异化特点
- 保持内容简单
注意事项:
- 不要展示所有功能
- 不要放没有上下文、满是UI元素的截图
- 如果有真实产品就不要用 mockup
还没做出产品的阶段:
- 展示原型/mockup
- 明确说明还未开发完成
- 重点放在你要打造的用户体验上
SLIDE 7: Traction
第7页:业务进展页
Purpose: Prove it's working.
Best Traction Metrics by Stage:
| Stage | Good Traction |
|---|---|
| Pre-seed | Waitlist, LOIs, pilot customers |
| Seed | Revenue, users, growth rate |
| Series A | Revenue growth, retention, unit economics |
Structure:
- Lead with strongest metric
- Show growth trajectory (graph)
- Include context (timeline)
What Investors Care About:
- Growth rate (MoM, WoW) > absolute numbers
- Retention > new users
- Revenue > free users
- Engagement > signups
Example:
"$30K MRR, growing 25% MoM
100 paying customers (75% month-over-month retention)
Started charging 4 months ago"
No Traction?
Show other signals:
- Waitlist with conversion
- Letters of intent
- Pilot commitments
- Expert/customer testimonials
目的: 证明你的模式是可行的。
不同阶段的优质进展指标:
| 阶段 | 优质进展指标 |
|---|---|
| Pre-seed | 等待列表、意向书、试点客户 |
| Seed | 收入、用户数、增长率 |
| Series A | 收入增长、留存率、单位经济学 |
结构:
- 放在最前面的是你最强的指标
- 展示增长趋势(用图表)
- 加上上下文(时间线)
投资者关心的优先级:
- 增长率(月环比、周环比)> 绝对数值
- 留存率 > 新增用户数
- 收入 > 免费用户数
- 参与度 > 注册数
示例:
"MRR 3万美元,月环比增长25%
100个付费客户(月留存率75%)
4个月前开始商业化收费"
没有业务进展怎么办?
展示其他信号:
- 有转化率的等待列表
- 合作意向书
- 试点合作承诺
- 专家/客户 testimonial
SLIDE 8: Business Model
第8页:商业模式页
Purpose: How you make money.
Include:
- Revenue model (subscription, transaction, etc.)
- Pricing
- Unit economics (if available)
Keep Simple:
"We charge $X per [unit] per [period]."
"Customer pays [how much] for [what]."
If you have data:
- Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
- Lifetime value (LTV)
- LTV/CAC ratio (3+ is good)
- Payback period
Example:
"SaaS: $99/user/month
Current LTV: $2,400 | CAC: $400 | LTV/CAC: 6x
Payback: 4 months"
目的: 你如何赚钱。
需要包含:
- 收入模式(订阅、交易抽成等)
- 定价
- 单位经济学(如果有数据)
表述尽量简单:
"我们每个[周期]向每个[单位]收取X美元。"
"客户为[产品/服务]支付[金额]。"
如果你有数据:
- 客户获客成本(CAC)
- 用户生命周期价值(LTV)
- LTV/CAC比率(3以上为优秀)
- 成本回收期
示例:
"SaaS模式:每个用户每月99美元
当前LTV:2400美元 | CAC:400美元 | LTV/CAC:6倍
成本回收期:4个月"
SLIDE 9: Competition
第9页:竞争格局页
Purpose: Show you understand the landscape and why you win.
DO NOT: Say "We have no competition."
(It means no market or you don't understand it.)
Best Format: 2×2 Matrix or Feature comparison
2×2 Matrix Example:
| Low [Axis 1] | High [Axis 1] | |
|---|---|---|
| High [Axis 2] | Competitor A | YOU |
| Low [Axis 2] | Competitor B | Competitor C |
Choose axes where you win.
Alternative: Why We Win
- We're faster because [technical advantage]
- We're cheaper because [efficiency]
- We're better for [specific segment] because [focus]
Don't:
- Dismiss competitors
- Show a feature matrix where you check every box
- Ignore the "do nothing" alternative
目的: 证明你了解行业格局,并且你能胜出。
绝对不要说: "我们没有竞争对手。"
(这要么说明没有市场,要么说明你根本不了解行业。)
最佳呈现形式: 2×2矩阵或者功能对比表
2×2矩阵示例:
| [维度1]低 | [维度1]高 | |
|---|---|---|
| [维度2]高 | 竞品A | 你的公司 |
| [维度2]低 | 竞品B | 竞品C |
选择你有优势的维度作为坐标轴。
替代形式:我们的优势
- 我们速度更快,因为[技术优势]
- 我们价格更低,因为[效率优势]
- 我们更适合[特定细分群体],因为[聚焦优势]
注意事项:
- 不要贬低竞争对手
- 不要做一个所有功能你都打勾的对比表
- 不要忽略"什么都不做"这个替代选项
SLIDE 10: Team
第10页:团队页
Purpose: Why YOU can pull this off.
Include:
- Founders (photo, name, relevant background)
- Key relevant experience
- Why this team for this problem
What Matters:
- Relevant domain expertise
- Relevant startup/tech experience
- Co-founder complementarity
- Prior exits (if any)
Format:
[Photo] Name | Role
Previously: [Relevant credential]
[One-line about why they're perfect]
Example:
"Jane (CEO): 10 years at Google Ads, built their SMB product
John (CTO): Ex-Stripe, scaled payments infra 100x
We met this problem daily—now we're solving it."
If team is weak:
- Show advisors
- Show early hires you'll make
- Be honest about gaps and how you'll fill them
目的: 为什么你们能做成这件事。
需要包含:
- 创始人(照片、姓名、相关背景)
- 关键相关经验
- 为什么这个团队适合解决这个问题
投资者看重的点:
- 相关领域专业知识
- 相关的创业/技术经验
- 联合创始人能力互补
- 过往成功退出经验(如果有)
格式:
[照片] 姓名 | 角色
过往经历:[相关资质]
[一句话说明为什么他们是合适的人选]
示例:
"Jane(CEO):在Google Ads工作10年,主导了中小微企业产品线
John(CTO):前Stripe员工,曾将支付基础设施规模扩展100倍
我们每天都面对这个问题,现在我们要解决它。"
如果团队背景不够亮眼:
- 展示顾问团队
- 展示你计划招聘的早期核心岗位
- 坦诚说明团队的缺口以及你计划如何填补
SLIDE 11: Ask
第11页:融资诉求页
Purpose: What do you want?
Include:
- Amount raising
- What you'll do with it
- Key milestones you'll hit
Example:
"Raising $2M Seed
Use of funds:
- 50% Engineering (ship v2, integrations)
- 30% GTM (first sales hire, marketing)
- 20% Operations (12-month runway)
Milestones: $500K ARR, 500 customers, Series A ready"
Don't:
- Be vague about use of funds
- Ask for too wide a range ("$1-5M")
- Skip this slide
---目的: 你想要什么支持?
需要包含:
- 融资金额
- 资金用途
- 你将达成的关键里程碑
示例:
"Pre-seed轮融资75万美元
资金用途:
- 50% 研发(上线v2版本、集成能力)
- 30% 市场进入(招聘第一个销售、营销投入)
- 20% 运营(12个月的现金流储备)
里程碑:ARR 50万美元、500个付费客户、达到Series A融资标准"
注意事项:
- 不要模糊资金用途
- 不要给出太宽的融资区间(比如"100-500万美元")
- 不要省略这一页
---Step 3: Apply Stage-Specific Adjustments
步骤3:根据融资阶段做调整
undefinedundefinedAdjustments by Stage
不同阶段的调整方案
Pre-Seed ($500K-$1M)
Pre-Seed(50万-100万美元)
Focus: Problem, solution, team, early signal
Acceptable to not have: Revenue, clear CAC/LTV, full team
Key question: "Is this a problem worth solving by these people?"
重点: 问题、解决方案、团队、早期信号
可以没有的内容: 收入、清晰的CAC/LTV、完整团队
核心问题: "这个问题值得这个团队去解决吗?"
Seed ($1M-$3M)
Seed(100万-300万美元)
Focus: Traction, product-market fit signal, GTM hypothesis
Expected: Some revenue or strong engagement, clear positioning
Key question: "Is this working? Can it scale?"
重点: 业务进展、产品市场匹配信号、市场进入假设
预期需要有: 一定收入或者高用户参与度、清晰的定位
核心问题: "这个模式跑通了吗?可以规模化吗?"
Series A ($5M-$15M)
Series A(500万-1500万美元)
Focus: Unit economics, scalable GTM, repeatable sales
Expected: $1M+ ARR, clear path to $10M+, proven CAC/LTV
Key question: "Does this scale? What does $100M look like?"
---重点: 单位经济学、可规模化的市场进入策略、可复制的销售模式
预期需要有: ARR 100万美元以上、清晰的路径达到1000万美元ARR、经过验证的CAC/LTV
核心问题: "这个模式可以规模化吗?做到1亿美元规模的路径是什么?"
---Step 4: The 2-Minute Pitch (Demo Day)
步骤4:2分钟路演(Demo Day)
undefinedundefinedDemo Day Format
Demo Day格式
Total Time: 2 minutes
总时长:2分钟
Structure:
结构:
Hook (10 sec):
"[Company] is [category] for [customer]."
Or: "[X] companies have [problem]. We fix that."
Problem (20 sec):
Who, what, why it hurts—specific and relatable.
Solution (20 sec):
What you built, how it works, key insight.
Traction (20 sec):
Best metrics, growth rate, proof it works.
Business Model (15 sec):
How you make money, unit economics if strong.
Market/Why Now (15 sec):
Big opportunity, market timing.
Ask (10 sec):
What you're raising, what you'll do with it.
Close (10 sec):
Memorable one-liner, call to action.
钩子(10秒):
"[公司名]是面向[客户群体]的[品类]。"
或者:"[X]家企业都有[问题]。我们可以解决。"
问题(20秒):
受众是谁、问题是什么、痛点有多痛——具体且有代入感。
解决方案(20秒):
你做了什么产品、如何运作、核心洞察是什么。
业务进展(20秒):
最好的指标、增长率、模式可行的证明。
商业模式(15秒):
你如何赚钱,如果单位经济学表现好可以提。
市场/时机(15秒):
巨大的机会、市场时机合理性。
融资诉求(10秒):
你要融多少钱、资金用途是什么。
收尾(10秒):
让人印象深刻的一句话、行动号召。
Demo Day Tips
Demo Day Tips
- Practice until it's natural
- Don't rush—pause for impact
- Memorize the flow, not word-for-word
- End with energy
- Have your email visible
---- 反复练习直到表达自然
- 不要赶进度——适当停顿增强感染力
- 记住流程,不要逐字背诵
- 收尾要有活力
- 让你的邮箱一直展示在显眼位置
---Examples
示例
Example 1: Pre-Seed Pitch Deck
示例1:Pre-Seed轮Pitch Deck
Input:
"Create a pitch deck for my AI sales email tool. We help SDRs write personalized emails. Pre-seed, raising $750K. We have a working product and 50 beta users."
Output:
输入:
"Create a pitch deck for my AI sales email tool. We help SDRs write personalized emails. Pre-seed, raising $750K. We have a working product and 50 beta users."
输出:
Pitch Deck: [SalesFlow AI]
Pitch Deck: [SalesFlow AI]
Slide 1: Title
[SalesFlow Logo]
AI-Powered Sales Emails That Get Responses
Jane Smith | jane@salesflow.aiSlide 2: Problem
SDRs spend 40% of their time writing emails.
Most of those emails get ignored.
The average SDR:
• Sends 100+ emails/day
• Gets <2% response rate
• Wastes 3+ hours/day on copy-paste personalization
Top performers personalize deeply—but that doesn't scale.Slide 3: Solution
SalesFlow writes personalized emails in seconds.
Input: prospect LinkedIn + company data
Output: unique, personalized email
Not templates. Not mail merge.
Actually personalized—every email is different.
[Screenshot: Before/After of generic vs. personalized email]Slide 4: Why Now
Three shifts make this possible:
1. GPT-4 quality: AI can write like humans now
2. Data availability: LinkedIn, company data, news all accessible
3. Buyer expectations: Generic emails don't work anymore
2024: The year personalization becomes mandatory.Slide 5: Market
$4.5B Sales Engagement Market
TAM: $4.5B (all sales software)
SAM: $800M (email/outreach tools)
SOM: $100M (AI writing for sales)
3M+ SDRs in the US alone
Each worth $500-2000/yearSlide 6: Product
[Product screenshots showing:]
1. Paste LinkedIn URL
2. AI analyzes profile + company
3. Generates personalized email
4. One-click send to sequence
"Write 100 personalized emails in 10 minutes"Slide 7: Traction
Early but promising:
• 50 beta users (SDRs at 20 companies)
• 15,000 emails generated
• 4.2% response rate (vs. 2% baseline)
• 3 paid pilots starting ($500/mo each)
[Graph showing weekly email volume growth]Slide 8: Business Model
SaaS: $99/user/month
Target customer: SDR teams of 5-50
Contract value: $500-5,000/month
At scale:
CAC target: <$500
LTV: $2,000 (20-month lifespan)
LTV/CAC: 4x+Slide 9: Competition
↑ Personalization
|
Lavender ←─────────────────→ [SalesFlow]
| |
| • Manual research • AI-generated
| • Time-consuming • Instant
| • Suggestions only • Full emails
|
Outreach, Salesloft
|
└─────────────────────────→ Automation
We're the only tool that writes truly personalized emails, not templates.Slide 10: Team
[Photo] Jane Smith | CEO
• 8 years at Salesforce, led SMB product
• Sold to thousands of sales teams
[Photo] Tom Chen | CTO
• ML engineer, ex-OpenAI
• Built GPT applications at scale
We've lived this problem and built the solution.Slide 11: Ask
Raising: $750K Pre-Seed
Use of funds:
• 60% Product (AI model, integrations)
• 30% Go-to-market (first customers)
• 10% Ops (runway)
Milestones to Seed:
• $50K MRR
• 500 paying users
• Prove 2x response rate improvement第1页:标题
[SalesFlow Logo]
AI-Powered Sales Emails That Get Responses
Jane Smith | jane@salesflow.ai第2页:问题
SDRs spend 40% of their time writing emails.
Most of those emails get ignored.
The average SDR:
• Sends 100+ emails/day
• Gets <2% response rate
• Wastes 3+ hours/day on copy-paste personalization
Top performers personalize deeply—but that doesn't scale.第3页:解决方案
SalesFlow writes personalized emails in seconds.
Input: prospect LinkedIn + company data
Output: unique, personalized email
Not templates. Not mail merge.
Actually personalized—every email is different.
[Screenshot: Before/After of generic vs. personalized email]第4页:为什么是现在
Three shifts make this possible:
1. GPT-4 quality: AI can write like humans now
2. Data availability: LinkedIn, company data, news all accessible
3. Buyer expectations: Generic emails don't work anymore
2024: The year personalization becomes mandatory.第5页:市场
$4.5B Sales Engagement Market
TAM: $4.5B (all sales software)
SAM: $800M (email/outreach tools)
SOM: $100M (AI writing for sales)
3M+ SDRs in the US alone
Each worth $500-2000/year第6页:产品
[Product screenshots showing:]
1. Paste LinkedIn URL
2. AI analyzes profile + company
3. Generates personalized email
4. One-click send to sequence
"Write 100 personalized emails in 10 minutes"第7页:业务进展
Early but promising:
• 50 beta users (SDRs at 20 companies)
• 15,000 emails generated
• 4.2% response rate (vs. 2% baseline)
• 3 paid pilots starting ($500/mo each)
[Graph showing weekly email volume growth]第8页:商业模式
SaaS: $99/user/month
Target customer: SDR teams of 5-50
Contract value: $500-5,000/month
At scale:
CAC target: <$500
LTV: $2,000 (20-month lifespan)
LTV/CAC: 4x+第9页:竞争格局
↑ Personalization
|
Lavender ←─────────────────→ [SalesFlow]
| |
| • Manual research • AI-generated
| • Time-consuming • Instant
| • Suggestions only • Full emails
|
Outreach, Salesloft
|
└─────────────────────────→ Automation
We're the only tool that writes truly personalized emails, not templates.第10页:团队
[Photo] Jane Smith | CEO
• 8 years at Salesforce, led SMB product
• Sold to thousands of sales teams
[Photo] Tom Chen | CTO
• ML engineer, ex-OpenAI
• Built GPT applications at scale
We've lived this problem and built the solution.第11页:融资诉求
Raising: $750K Pre-Seed
Use of funds:
• 60% Product (AI model, integrations)
• 30% Go-to-market (first customers)
• 10% Ops (runway)
Milestones to Seed:
• $50K MRR
• 500 paying users
• Prove 2x response rate improvementExample 2: Demo Day Script
示例2:Demo Day脚本
Input:
"Write my 2-minute Demo Day pitch based on the deck above."
Output:
输入:
"Write my 2-minute Demo Day pitch based on the deck above."
输出:
Demo Day Script (2:00)
Demo Day Script (2:00)
[0:00-0:10] Hook
"SDRs spend half their day writing emails that nobody opens.
SalesFlow is AI that writes personalized sales emails that actually get responses."
[0:10-0:30] Problem
"The average SDR sends 100 emails a day. Response rate? Under 2%.
The problem isn't effort—it's personalization. Top performers research every prospect. But that takes hours—it doesn't scale.
Generic emails don't work anymore. Buyers know when they're in a sequence."
[0:30-0:55] Solution
"SalesFlow solves this. You give us a LinkedIn profile. Our AI reads their background, their company, recent news, and writes a unique email—not a template, not mail merge—actually personalized.
What took 5 minutes now takes 5 seconds. Scale AND personalization."
[0:55-1:15] Traction
"We launched 8 weeks ago. 50 beta users have sent 15,000 emails.
Their response rates doubled—4.2% versus the 2% baseline.
We just signed our first three paying pilots, $500 a month each. This works."
[1:15-1:30] Business Model + Market
"We charge $99 per user per month. There are 3 million SDRs in the US—this is an $800 million market.
The shift to AI writing is happening now. GPT-4 made this possible."
[1:30-1:45] Team
"I'm Jane. I spent 8 years at Salesforce selling to these teams. Tom, my co-founder, built GPT applications at OpenAI.
We lived this problem. Now we're solving it."
[1:45-2:00] Ask
"We're raising $750K to get to $50K MRR and prove we can 2x response rates at scale.
If you're an SDR, a sales leader, or an investor who's tired of bad cold emails—come talk to us.
SalesFlow. Personalized emails that get responses."
[0:00-0:10] 钩子
"SDRs spend half their day writing emails that nobody opens.
SalesFlow is AI that writes personalized sales emails that actually get responses."
[0:10-0:30] 问题
"The average SDR sends 100 emails a day. Response rate? Under 2%.
The problem isn't effort—it's personalization. Top performers research every prospect. But that takes hours—it doesn't scale.
Generic emails don't work anymore. Buyers know when they're in a sequence."
[0:30-0:55] 解决方案
"SalesFlow solves this. You give us a LinkedIn profile. Our AI reads their background, their company, recent news, and writes a unique email—not a template, not mail merge—actually personalized.
What took 5 minutes now takes 5 seconds. Scale AND personalization."
[0:55-1:15] 业务进展
"We launched 8 weeks ago. 50 beta users have sent 15,000 emails.
Their response rates doubled—4.2% versus the 2% baseline.
We just signed our first three paying pilots, $500 a month each. This works."
[1:15-1:30] 商业模式+市场
"We charge $99 per user per month. There are 3 million SDRs in the US—this is an $800 million market.
The shift to AI writing is happening now. GPT-4 made this possible."
[1:30-1:45] 团队
"I'm Jane. I spent 8 years at Salesforce selling to these teams. Tom, my co-founder, built GPT applications at OpenAI.
We lived this problem. Now we're solving it."
[1:45-2:00] 融资诉求
"We're raising $750K to get to $50K MRR and prove we can 2x response rates at scale.
If you're an SDR, a sales leader, or an investor who's tired of bad cold emails—come talk to us.
SalesFlow. Personalized emails that get responses."
Checklists & Templates
检查清单与模板
Pitch Deck Review Checklist
Pitch Deck审核清单
undefinedundefinedDeck Quality Check
Deck质量检查
Structure
结构
- 10-15 slides max
- Follows standard order
- No unnecessary slides
- Each slide has one point
- 最多10-15页
- 遵循标准排序
- 没有多余的页面
- 每页只讲一个核心点
Content
内容
- Problem is specific and quantified
- Solution is clear in 10 seconds
- "Why now" is compelling
- Market size is bottom-up credible
- Traction is the best available
- Competition is honest
- Team backgrounds are relevant
- Ask is specific
- 问题具体且有量化支撑
- 解决方案10秒内能讲清楚
- "为什么是现在"的逻辑有说服力
- 市场规模是自下而上测算的、可信
- 展示了当前阶段能拿出的最好的业务进展数据
- 竞争分析客观诚实
- 团队背景和业务相关
- 融资诉求明确
Design
设计
- Readable at 8pt (presentation size)
- Minimal text per slide
- Visuals support, not distract
- Consistent formatting
- No typos
- 8号字体也能看清(演示场景)
- 每页文字量极少
- 可视化内容是辅助信息,不会分散注意力
- 格式统一
- 没有拼写错误
Story
叙事
- Flows logically
- Builds excitement
- Ends with clear action
---- 逻辑流畅
- 能调动听众的兴趣
- 结尾有清晰的行动号召
---Slide Content Templates
页面内容模板
undefinedundefinedQuick Templates
快速模板
Problem Slide
问题页
"[Customer segment] struggle with [problem].
Currently they [painful workaround].
This costs them [impact]."
"[客户群体]深受[问题]的困扰。
目前他们只能[痛苦的临时解决方案]。
这会给他们带来[影响]。"
Solution Slide
解决方案页
"[Product] is [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], we [differentiation]."
"[产品名]是[品类],可以[收益]。
和[替代方案]不同,我们[差异化优势]。"
Why Now Slide
为什么是现在页
"[Change] has created [opportunity].
We're positioned to [capture it]."
"[变化]催生了[机会]。
我们有能力[抓住机会]。"
Market Slide
市场页
"TAM: $[X] ([total market])
SAM: $[Y] ([reachable segment])
SOM: $[Z] ([our target])"
"TAM: $[X] ([总市场])
SAM: $[Y] ([可触达细分群体])
SOM: $[Z] ([我们的目标市场])"
Traction Slide
业务进展页
"$[X] MRR | [Y]% MoM growth
[Z] customers | [A]% retention
[Timeline context]"
"$[X] MRR | [Y]% 月环比增长
[Z] 个客户 | [A]% 留存率
[时间线上下文]"
Ask Slide
融资诉求页
"Raising $[X] [stage]
Use: [breakdown]
Milestones: [targets]"
---"[轮次]融资$[X]
用途:[资金分配]
里程碑:[目标]"
---Skill Boundaries
技能边界
What This Skill Does Well
本技能擅长的领域
- Structuring video production workflows
- Creating storyboard frameworks
- Suggesting technical approaches
- Providing creative direction templates
- 搭建视频制作工作流
- 创建故事板框架
- 提供技术方案建议
- 提供创意方向模板
What This Skill Cannot Do
本技能无法做到的事
- Replace professional videography
- Edit video files directly
- Make final creative judgments
- Guarantee audience engagement
- 替代专业摄像工作
- 直接编辑视频文件
- 做出最终的创意判断
- 保证受众参与度
References
参考资料
- Y Combinator. "How to Make a Pitch Deck" (YC library)
- Sequoia Capital. "Writing a Business Plan" (classic framework)
- Reid Hoffman. "Blitzscaling Lectures" - LinkedIn pitch deck
- DocSend. "Pitch Deck Data Reports" (what gets funded)
- Kawasaki, Guy. "The Art of the Start" - 10/20/30 rule
- Y Combinator. "How to Make a Pitch Deck"(YC知识库)
- 红杉资本. "Writing a Business Plan"(经典框架)
- 里德·霍夫曼. "闪电式扩张讲座" - LinkedIn Pitch Deck
- DocSend. "Pitch Deck数据报告"(什么样的Deck能拿到融资)
- 盖伊·川崎. "创业的艺术" - 10/20/30规则
Related Skills
相关技能
- fundraising-narrative - Story beyond the deck
- startup-metrics - What metrics to include
- positioning - Differentiation strategy
- storytelling-storybrand - Narrative structure
- fundraising-narrative - Pitch Deck之外的叙事故事
- startup-metrics - 需要包含哪些指标
- positioning - 差异化策略
- storytelling-storybrand - 叙事结构
Skill Metadata
技能元数据
- Mode: cyborg
yaml
name: yc-pitch-deck
category: startup
subcategory: fundraising
version: 1.0
author: MKTG Skills
source_expert: Y Combinator, Sequoia Capital
source_work: YC Library, Sequoia Business Plan
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_value: $10,000 pitch deck consulting
tags: [pitch-deck, fundraising, YC, Sequoia, startups, investors, Demo-Day]
created: 2026-01-25
updated: 2026-01-25- Mode: cyborg
yaml
name: yc-pitch-deck
category: startup
subcategory: fundraising
version: 1.0
author: MKTG Skills
source_expert: Y Combinator, Sequoia Capital
source_work: YC Library, Sequoia Business Plan
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_value: $10,000 pitch deck consulting
tags: [pitch-deck, fundraising, YC, Sequoia, startups, investors, Demo-Day]
created: 2026-01-25
updated: 2026-01-25