contract-review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseContract Review
合同审查
Systematically analyze contracts to identify risks, unfavorable clauses, and negotiation opportunities before signing.
在签署前系统性分析合同,识别风险、不利条款以及谈判契机。
When to Use This Skill
何时使用该Skill
- Reviewing vendor/SaaS contracts
- Analyzing partnership agreements
- Evaluating client service agreements
- Reviewing employment contracts
- Due diligence on M&A documents
- 审查供应商/SaaS合同
- 分析合作协议
- 评估客户服务协议
- 审查雇佣合同
- 并购文件尽职调查
Methodology Foundation
方法论基础
Based on legal contract analysis frameworks combined with:
- Risk assessment matrices
- Common clause libraries
- Industry-standard benchmarks
- Negotiation leverage analysis
基于法律合同分析框架,结合以下内容:
- 风险评估矩阵
- 常见条款库
- 行业标准基准
- 谈判杠杆分析
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
Claude的职责 vs 你的决策
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Identifies risky clauses | Risk tolerance level |
| Flags unusual terms | What to negotiate |
| Compares to standards | Final accept/reject |
| Suggests alternatives | Business trade-offs |
| Summarizes obligations | Legal counsel needs |
| Claude的职责 | 你的决策 |
|---|---|
| 识别高风险条款 | 风险容忍度 |
| 标记异常条款 | 谈判内容 |
| 与标准条款对比 | 最终接受/拒绝 |
| 提出替代方案 | 业务权衡 |
| 总结义务条款 | 是否需要法律顾问 |
Instructions
操作步骤
Step 1: Contract Overview
步骤1:合同概述
Initial Assessment:
| Element | What to Capture |
|---|---|
| Parties | Who's bound |
| Type | Service, license, partnership |
| Term | Duration, renewal |
| Value | Total commitment |
| Jurisdiction | Governing law |
初步评估:
| 要素 | 需记录内容 |
|---|---|
| 参与方 | 合同约束对象 |
| 类型 | 服务、许可、合作 |
| 期限 | 有效期、续约规则 |
| 价值 | 总承诺金额 |
| 管辖范围 | 适用法律 |
Step 2: Risk Categories
步骤2:风险分类
Clause Risk Matrix:
| Category | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability | Mutual caps | Uncapped | Unlimited indemnity |
| Term | Monthly | Annual | Multi-year auto-renew |
| Data | Standard DPA | Custom terms | Broad usage rights |
| IP | License only | Work for hire | Assignment |
| Termination | 30-day notice | For cause only | Penalties |
条款风险矩阵:
| 类别 | 低风险 | 中风险 | 高风险 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 责任 | 双方责任上限 | 无上限 | 无限赔偿 |
| 期限 | 月度 | 年度 | 多年自动续约 |
| 数据 | 标准数据处理协议(DPA) | 自定义条款 | 广泛使用权限 |
| 知识产权(IP) | 仅许可 | 委托作品 | 权利转让 |
| 终止 | 30天通知期 | 仅因违约终止 | 终止违约金 |
Step 3: Clause-by-Clause Analysis
步骤3:逐条条款分析
Key Clauses to Review:
Payment Terms:
- Net terms (30/60/90)
- Late payment penalties
- Price escalation clauses
- Audit rights
Liability & Indemnification:
- Cap on liability (multiple of fees)
- Carve-outs (willful misconduct, IP)
- Indemnification scope
- Insurance requirements
Termination:
- For convenience vs. for cause
- Notice periods
- Transition assistance
- Data return/destruction
IP & Data:
- Ownership of deliverables
- License scope
- Data usage rights
- Confidentiality obligations
重点审查条款:
付款条款:
- 账期(30/60/90天)
- 逾期付款违约金
- 价格上调条款
- 审计权限
责任与赔偿:
- 责任上限(费用倍数)
- 例外情况(故意不当行为、知识产权)
- 赔偿范围
- 保险要求
终止条款:
- 任意终止 vs 违约终止
- 通知期
- 过渡协助
- 数据返还/销毁
知识产权与数据:
- 交付物所有权
- 许可范围
- 数据使用权限
- 保密义务
Step 4: Benchmarking
步骤4:基准对比
Industry Standards:
| Clause | Typical | Favorable | Unfavorable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability cap | 12 mo fees | 24 mo fees | Uncapped |
| Payment | Net 30 | Net 45 | Net 15 |
| Termination | 30 days | 60 days | 90+ days |
| Auto-renewal | 30-day opt-out | 60-day opt-out | 90-day opt-out |
行业标准:
| 条款 | 典型情况 | 有利情况 | 不利情况 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 责任上限 | 12个月费用 | 24个月费用 | 无上限 |
| 付款 | 30天账期 | 45天账期 | 15天账期 |
| 终止通知期 | 30天 | 60天 | 90天以上 |
| 自动续约 | 30天退出通知 | 60天退出通知 | 90天退出通知 |
Step 5: Generate Recommendations
步骤5:生成建议
Output Structure:
- Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
- Risk rating (Low/Medium/High/Critical)
- Red flags (must address)
- Yellow flags (should negotiate)
- Green flags (acceptable)
- Recommended redlines
- Questions for counsel
输出结构:
- 执行摘要(2-3句话)
- 风险等级(低/中/高/严重)
- 红色预警(必须解决)
- 黄色预警(应谈判)
- 绿色通过(可接受)
- 建议修订内容
- 需向法律顾问咨询的问题
Examples
示例
Example 1: SaaS Vendor Contract Review
示例1:SaaS供应商合同审查
Input:
Review this SaaS contract summary:
- 3-year term with 90-day auto-renewal notice
- Unlimited liability for data breaches
- Vendor can change pricing with 30-day notice
- Data can be used for "service improvement"
- Termination only for material breachOutput:
undefined输入:
Review this SaaS contract summary:
- 3-year term with 90-day auto-renewal notice
- Unlimited liability for data breaches
- Vendor can change pricing with 30-day notice
- Data can be used for "service improvement"
- Termination only for material breach输出:
undefinedContract Review: SaaS Vendor Agreement
Contract Review: SaaS Vendor Agreement
Risk Rating: HIGH
Risk Rating: HIGH
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
This contract heavily favors the vendor with limited termination rights, uncapped liability exposure for you, and one-sided price increase provisions. Recommend significant negotiation before signing.
This contract heavily favors the vendor with limited termination rights, uncapped liability exposure for you, and one-sided price increase provisions. Recommend significant negotiation before signing.
Red Flags (Must Address)
Red Flags (Must Address)
| Clause | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto-Renewal | 90-day notice for 3-year contract | Lock-in risk | Reduce to 30-60 days |
| Pricing | Vendor can change with 30-day notice | Budget risk | Cap increases at 5%/year or CPI |
| Termination | Material breach only | Lock-in risk | Add termination for convenience with notice |
| Liability | Unlimited for data breaches | Financial risk | Cap at 24 months of fees |
| Clause | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto-Renewal | 90-day notice for 3-year contract | Lock-in risk | Reduce to 30-60 days |
| Pricing | Vendor can change with 30-day notice | Budget risk | Cap increases at 5%/year or CPI |
| Termination | Material breach only | Lock-in risk | Add termination for convenience with notice |
| Liability | Unlimited for data breaches | Financial risk | Cap at 24 months of fees |
Yellow Flags (Should Negotiate)
Yellow Flags (Should Negotiate)
| Clause | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Data Usage | "Service improvement" is vague | Define scope, exclude training AI |
| Term Length | 3 years is long | Request 1-year with renewal option |
| SLA | None mentioned | Require 99.9% uptime with credits |
| Clause | Issue | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Data Usage | "Service improvement" is vague | Define scope, exclude training AI |
| Term Length | 3 years is long | Request 1-year with renewal option |
| SLA | None mentioned | Require 99.9% uptime with credits |
Green Flags (Acceptable)
Green Flags (Acceptable)
- Standard confidentiality provisions
- Reasonable IP license terms
- Clear support response times
- Standard confidentiality provisions
- Reasonable IP license terms
- Clear support response times
Recommended Redlines
Recommended Redlines
Priority 1 (Deal Breakers):
Section 8.2: Change "90 days" to "30 days"
Section 12.1: Add "and termination for convenience
with 60 days written notice"
Section 14.3: Add "not to exceed 24 months of fees
paid under this Agreement"Priority 2 (Strongly Preferred):
Section 5.1: Add "Price increases shall not exceed
5% annually"
Section 9.4: Change "service improvement" to
"providing and improving the Service
for Customer"Priority 1 (Deal Breakers):
Section 8.2: Change "90 days" to "30 days"
Section 12.1: Add "and termination for convenience
with 60 days written notice"
Section 14.3: Add "not to exceed 24 months of fees
paid under this Agreement"Priority 2 (Strongly Preferred):
Section 5.1: Add "Price increases shall not exceed
5% annually"
Section 9.4: Change "service improvement" to
"providing and improving the Service
for Customer"Questions for Legal Counsel
Questions for Legal Counsel
- Is unlimited data breach liability acceptable given our cyber insurance coverage?
- What's our exposure if we need to exit before term completion?
- Are there regulatory implications for the data usage clause?
- Is unlimited data breach liability acceptable given our cyber insurance coverage?
- What's our exposure if we need to exit before term completion?
- Are there regulatory implications for the data usage clause?
Negotiation Leverage
Negotiation Leverage
Your Position: First-year customer, significant deal size
Their Likely Flex:
- Auto-renewal notice period
- Liability caps
- Pricing caps
Their Likely Firm:
- Base term length
- Core data usage rights
undefinedYour Position: First-year customer, significant deal size
Their Likely Flex:
- Auto-renewal notice period
- Liability caps
- Pricing caps
Their Likely Firm:
- Base term length
- Core data usage rights
undefinedExample 2: Quick Risk Assessment
示例2:快速风险评估
Input:
Quick review - key concerns only:
- Unlimited indemnification for IP claims
- 2x annual fees liability cap
- Net 45 payment terms
- 60-day termination notice
- Standard DPA includedOutput:
undefined输入:
Quick review - key concerns only:
- Unlimited indemnification for IP claims
- 2x annual fees liability cap
- Net 45 payment terms
- 60-day termination notice
- Standard DPA included输出:
undefinedQuick Risk Assessment
Quick Risk Assessment
Overall: MEDIUM RISK
Overall: MEDIUM RISK
| Clause | Rating | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Indemnification | HIGH | Unlimited IP indemnity is risky |
| Liability Cap | GREEN | 2x is standard |
| Payment | GREEN | Net 45 is favorable |
| Termination | GREEN | 60 days is reasonable |
| Data Protection | GREEN | Standard DPA |
| Clause | Rating | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Indemnification | HIGH | Unlimited IP indemnity is risky |
| Liability Cap | GREEN | 2x is standard |
| Payment | GREEN | Net 45 is favorable |
| Termination | GREEN | 60 days is reasonable |
| Data Protection | GREEN | Standard DPA |
Priority Action
Priority Action
Address Indemnification:
- Request mutual cap on IP indemnity
- Propose "lesser of [amount] or 12 months fees"
- Alternative: carve out for willful infringement only
Everything Else: Acceptable, proceed if IP indemnity resolved.
undefinedAddress Indemnification:
- Request mutual cap on IP indemnity
- Propose "lesser of [amount] or 12 months fees"
- Alternative: carve out for willful infringement only
Everything Else: Acceptable, proceed if IP indemnity resolved.
undefinedSkill Boundaries
Skill边界
What This Skill Does Well
该Skill擅长的内容
- Identifying common risk patterns
- Comparing to industry benchmarks
- Structuring negotiation priorities
- Flagging unusual clauses
- 识别常见风险模式
- 与行业基准对比
- 制定谈判优先级
- 标记异常条款
What This Skill Cannot Do
该Skill无法完成的内容
- Provide legal advice
- Know jurisdiction-specific requirements
- Assess strategic business importance
- Replace qualified legal counsel
- 提供法律建议
- 了解特定管辖区域的要求
- 评估战略业务重要性
- 替代合格法律顾问
When to Escalate to Human
何时升级至人工处理
- Contracts over $100K annual value
- Non-standard or heavily negotiated terms
- Any regulated industry requirements
- Indemnification or liability questions
- 年度价值超过10万美元的合同
- 非标准或经过大量谈判的条款
- 任何受监管行业的要求
- 赔偿或责任相关问题
Iteration Guide
迭代指南
Follow-up Prompts:
- "What's the worst-case scenario for the liability clause?"
- "Draft redline language for [specific clause]"
- "How does this compare to [competitor] contracts?"
- "What should we ask for in return if we accept [term]?"
后续提示示例:
- "责任条款的最坏情况是什么?"
- "为[特定条款]起草修订语言"
- "这与[竞争对手]的合同相比如何?"
- "如果我们接受[条款],应该要求什么作为回报?"
References
参考资料
- ACC (Association of Corporate Counsel) Contract Guidelines
- IACCM Contract Terms Benchmarking
- Tech Contract Negotiation Best Practices
- Standard SaaS Agreement Templates
- ACC(企业法律顾问协会)合同指南
- IACCM合同条款基准
- 技术合同谈判最佳实践
- 标准SaaS协议模板
Related Skills
相关Skill
- - Creating proposals
rfp-response - - Confidentiality agreements
nda-generator - - Terms of service review
terms-analyzer
- - 提案创建
rfp-response - - 保密协议
nda-generator - - 服务条款审查
terms-analyzer
Skill Metadata
Skill元数据
- Domain: Legal
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 30-60 min per contract
- Prerequisites: Contract access, business context
- 领域: 法律
- 复杂度: 中级
- 模式: 人机协作(centaur)
- 价值交付时间: 每份合同30-60分钟
- 前提条件: 可访问合同、业务背景