// Bad - only tests happy path
test("divide", () => {
  expect(divide(10, 2)).toBe(5);
});

// Good - tests edge cases too
test("divide normal", () => {
  expect(divide(10, 2)).toBe(5);
});

test("divide by zero", () => {
  expect(() => divide(10, 0)).toThrow(RangeError);
});

test("divide negative", () => {
  expect(divide(-10, 2)).toBe(-5);
});

# Run with coverage
vitest run --coverage

# Aim for meaningful coverage, not 100%

// Worth having - documents expected behavior
test("user default role", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice");
  expect(user.role).toBe("member");
});

// Bad - hiding a problem
test.skip("async operation", () => {
  // flaky, fix later
});

// Good - either fix it or document why it's skipped
test.skip("cache invalidation - requires Redis (see CONTRIBUTING.md)", () => {
});

test("pagination boundaries", () => {
  const items = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i);

  // First page
  expect(paginate(items, 1, 10)).toEqual(items.slice(0, 10));

  // Last page
  expect(paginate(items, 10, 10)).toEqual(items.slice(90, 100));

  // Beyond last page
  expect(paginate(items, 11, 10)).toEqual([]);

  // Page zero (invalid)
  expect(() => paginate(items, 0, 10)).toThrow(RangeError);

  // Empty list
  expect(paginate([], 1, 10)).toEqual([]);
});

// Found bug: off-by-one in date calculation
// Now test ALL date boundaries
test("month boundaries", () => {
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 1)).toBe(31); // January
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 2)).toBe(29); // Leap year February
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2023, 2)).toBe(28); // Non-leap February
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 4)).toBe(30); // 30-day month
  expect(lastDayOfMonth(2024, 12)).toBe(31); // December
});

// If all async tests fail intermittently,
// the problem isn't the tests - it's the async handling

// If you can't easily test a function, it probably does too much
// Refactor for testability

// Bad - hits real database
test("user creation", async () => {
  const db = await connectToDatabase(); // Slow!
  const user = await db.createUser("Alice");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

// Good - uses mock or in-memory
test("user creation", async () => {
  const db = new InMemoryDatabase();
  const user = await db.createUser("Alice");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

// Bad - noisy fixture hides the behavior under test
const order: Order = {
  id: "order-1",
  status: "paid",
  customerId: "customer-1",
  lineItems: [],
  discounts: [],
  createdAt: new Date("2026-01-01"),
};

// Good - default valid object, test overrides the relevant fact
const order = buildOrder({ status: "paid" });

// Bad - testing multiple things
test("user", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
  expect(user.email).toBe("alice@example.com");
  expect(user.isValid()).toBe(true);
  user.activate();
  expect(user.isActive).toBe(true);
});

// Good - one concept each
test("user stores name", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.name).toBe("Alice");
});

test("user stores email", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.email).toBe("alice@example.com");
});

test("new user is valid", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  expect(user.isValid()).toBe(true);
});

test("user can be activated", () => {
  const user = new User("Alice", "alice@example.com");
  user.activate();
  expect(user.isActive).toBe(true);
});