Agent Platform Alert Configuration
This skill provides dynamic threshold alerting configurations for Google Cloud /
Vertex AI Reasoning Engines (Agent Platform container deployments) using
extended 1-week lookback retention baselines. Standard static thresholds (e.g.,
"latency > 2s") cause excessive alert noise for AI agents. Dynamic PromQL
baselines solve this.
Safety & Confirmation Tiers (CRITICAL)
Before executing any commands or writing configurations on behalf of the user,
you MUST adhere to the following safety tiers based on the action requested:
- Tier R: Read-only ()
- Rule: No confirmation needed. You may execute these scripts
immediately to inspect the telemetry status of the Reasoning Engine.
- Tier B: Billing & Resource Creation ( /
provisioning)
- Rule: Explicit User Confirmation Required. These actions incur
additional billing charges and create cloud resources. The agent MUST
ask the user directly for approval before proceeding.
CRITICAL RULES
- Always configure both Reliability and Quality alerting policies for the
target agent (6 policies in total):
- For Reliability Monitoring: You MUST configure exactly three
alerting policies:
- Latency (anomaly monitoring)
- Error Rate - Fast Burn SLO (1-Hour Window)
- Error Rate - Slow Burn SLO (3-Day Window)
- For Quality Monitoring: You MUST configure exactly three alerting
policies:
- Final Response Quality
- Tool Use Quality
- Hallucination
- Online Monitor Provisioning & Cost Warning: Quality alerting policies
rely on metrics exported by Online Monitors. You MUST ensure the Online
Monitor is provisioned for the agent and telemetry is enabled:
- Brand New Agents (No Traffic History): When setting up alerts for a
brand new agent, you MUST explicitly ask the user what traffic pattern they
expect (Steady, Seasonal, or Bursty) in your response. If immediate setup is
requested, ask the question but proceed using the default Steady/Consistent
(Short-Window Z-Score) pattern. Follow
no_historical_traffic_data.md.
- PromQL for Reliability (No MQL or Threshold Filters): For the 3
reliability metrics, you MUST use
condition_prometheus_query_language
with
PromQL. Do NOT use MQL or standard .
- Standard Threshold Filters for Agent Quality: For the 3 agent quality
metrics, you MUST use standard filters matching the
monitored resource type
aiplatform.googleapis.com/OnlineEvaluator
and
metric type aiplatform.googleapis.com/online_evaluator/scores
. Do NOT
use PromQL.
- Install Terraform if Necessary: You should use terraform to deploy and
must install terraform if you can't find a valid install.
- Terraform Only: Write the generated observability configuration ONLY as
Terraform () files (e.g., , ).
- Dynamic Multi-Resource Alerting (No Single-Resource Pinning): You MUST
NOT hardcode specific agent IDs or resource name filters (e.g.,
{reasoning_engine_id="[AGENT_ID]"}
or
metric.labels.agent_resource_name="[AGENT_NAME]"
) in alerting conditions
unless explicitly requested. Alerting policies must be written to cover all
active agents in the project dynamically:
- For Reliability Metrics using PromQL: ALWAYS use grouping
aggregations () instead of filtering to a
single ID. This allows a single alert policy to dynamically track each
reasoning engine instance separately.
- For Quality Metrics using Standard Threshold Filters: Omit the
filter entirely. Configure the condition filter to
only target the monitored resource type
(
aiplatform.googleapis.com/OnlineEvaluator
) and metric type
(aiplatform.googleapis.com/online_evaluator/scores
) globally for the
project.
- Check for Pre-existing Policies: Avoid creating duplicate alert policies
for a reasoning engine: scan the target directory or workspace to see if a
policy already exists that targets the same metrics using aggregations
grouped by .
- Metric Scope Discovery & Project Inference: Centralize alert policies in
a Metric Scope (scoping project) to save costs. Identify if a scope is used
and where policies should live by checking:
- GCP CLI Check: Run
gcloud beta monitoring metrics-scopes list projects/[PROJECT_ID]
. If a parent scope
locations/global/metricsScopes/[SCOPING_PROJECT_ID]
is returned, a
Metric Scope is active; deploy policies there.
- Infrastructure as Code Scan: Search Terraform configurations for
google_monitoring_monitored_project
resources and extract the scoping
project from the attribute.
- Ambiguity Fallback: If unable to determine, ask the user: "Are you
using a multi-project Cloud Monitoring Metric Scope? If so, what is the
scoping project ID?" Deploy policies to the deduced scoping project
(setting the attribute in HCL), or default to the local
project.
- Directory Inference: Deploy configuration files to target Terraform or
SRE folders (e.g. , , ). Use tools to locate where
alert policies or state pointers exist in the project, rather than blindly
writing to the current working directory.
- Notification Channels: By default, never configure any notification
channels without user input. If the user explicitly provides a notification
channel in their prompt, configure the alerts to use it. If no notification
channel is provided, you MUST explicitly ask the user in your final response
if they would like to configure notification channels. This is a mandatory
question and you MUST NOT omit it from your response. IMPORTANT Do NOT
make assumptions about notification channels. If you search the codebase for
a notification channel you must ALWAYS confirm with the user before using
it.
- Plain English Response: You MUST include a plain English explanation for
what the alerts do in your response. This must explain in plain English what
the alert measures, how the algorithm works, and what a trigger indicates.
- Avoid Recursive Directory Operations: You MUST NOT run recursive listing
or search commands (such as , , or raw recursive ) from
the google3 workspace root, as this will hang your session. Always target
specific subdirectories.
- Background Task Cleanup: You MUST check the status of all background
tasks that you spawn. Before completing your execution and returning your
final response, you MUST terminate or kill any active or hanging background
tasks (using the tool with action ).
Algorithm Selection & Policy Mapping Process
Alerting policies for reasoning engine agents MUST map to the correct algorithms
to ensure statistical stability and prevent alert noise or blind spots based on
data classes:
- Latency: Follows workload traffic pattern (Steady -> Z-Score; Seasonal
-> Seasonal Decomposition; Bursty -> Moving Averages).
- Error Rate: ALWAYS use Multi-Window Multi-Burn Rate SLOs (or
ratio-based static thresholds). Error rate is naturally sparse (normally
). When standard deviation is , Z-score computation is mathematically
unstable (division-by-zero or NaN), causing false alert storms.
To resolve the workload traffic pattern (Seasonal, Steady, or Bursty), follow
the instructions corresponding to the availability of historical metrics data:
- Case 1: No historical metrics data available (e.g., brand new agent):
You MUST read and follow:
no_historical_traffic_data.md
- Case 2: Historical metrics data available (e.g., active agent with
traffic): You MUST read and follow:
has_historical_traffic_data.md
Telemetry Metrics and PromQL Examples
All raw telemetry metrics for the Agent Platform are cumulative
counters.
Because we monitor their rates or quantiles, we can optimize the PromQL queries
by using longer range windows (e.g.,
) for historical averages instead of
expensive
subqueries.
| Signal | Raw Metric | Type | Description |
|---|
| Latency | reasoning_engine_request_latencies_bucket
| Counter | Histogram bucket of request latencies |
| Error Rate | reasoning_engine_request_count
| Counter | Cumulative count of requests |
For the specific PromQL queries corresponding to each algorithm, you MUST read
and follow: promql_queries.md
Agent Quality Metrics (Online Monitor)
All agent quality evaluation metrics are exported by Online Monitors to the
monitored resource type
aiplatform.googleapis.com/OnlineEvaluator
under the
metric type
aiplatform.googleapis.com/online_evaluator/scores
.
Metric Details & Aligners
Because the scores metric is of value type
, standard mean-based
PromQL or arithmetic
aligners are unsupported. You MUST use a
percentile aligner (typically
to evaluate the median
score) within the
block of your
.
| Signal | Metric Name () | Target Threshold | Recommended Aligner |
|---|
| Final Response Quality | final_response_quality_v1
| (or custom) | |
| Tool Use Quality | | (or custom) | |
| Hallucination (Groundedness) | | (or custom) | |
Metric Filter Example
When configuring a quality alert policy in Terraform, use the following filter
expression structure:
filter
resource.type="aiplatform.googleapis.com/OnlineEvaluator"
AND metric.type="aiplatform.googleapis.com/online_evaluator/scores"
AND metric.labels.evaluation_metric_name="[METRIC_NAME]"
Online Monitor & Telemetry Provisioning
Quality metrics are generated by the Online Monitor by evaluating trace data
exported to Cloud Trace. If telemetry is disabled on the reasoning engine, no
traces are sent, and the quality metrics will remain empty.
Prerequisites & Dependencies
Before executing any scripts in this skill (such as
or
), you MUST install the required dependencies in your
environment. Run this command first:
bash
pip install -r scripts/requirements.txt
Verify Telemetry Status
Before generating any alerting policies, proposing a plan, or provisioning
Online Monitors, you MUST always check if the agent is ready to export traces by
running the telemetry checking script:
- Mandatory Command:
python3 scripts/check_telemetry.py --project-id "[PROJECT_ID]" --agent-resource-name "[AGENT_RESOURCE_NAME]"
- Note on Parameters: The parameter MUST be
the full resource path format
projects/<project_id>/locations/<location>/reasoningEngines/<agent_id>
(e.g. projects/gcp-prod/locations/us-central1/reasoningEngines/556677
)
and not just the agent ID itself.
- Dependency Failures: If package imports or dependency installation
fails, try your best to resolve the issues (e.g., by verifying package
installation) and run the script again with the specific project-id and
agent-resource-name parameters. If you cannot run the script
successfully due to missing dependencies, you MUST still attempt to run
it first and then include the complete, pre-populated execution command
in your final response as a verification plan (this applies even if the
user has pre-approved provisioning).
- Detailed Enablement Instructions: For details on the required
environment variables, Terraform setups, and project dependencies, you MUST
read and follow:
telemetry_enablement.md.
Provision the Online Monitor
Because Online Monitors cannot be configured via Terraform, run the provisioning
script to generate the required metrics:
- Command:
python3 scripts/create_online_monitor.py --project-id "[PROJECT_ID]" --agent-resource-name "[AGENT_RESOURCE_NAME]" [--sampling-percentage [PERCENTAGE]]
- Sampling Rate Recommendation: For production agents, configure a
conservative sampling percentage (default: 10%) to control LLM
evaluation costs. For details, refer to
Continuous evaluation with online monitors.
Formatting the Execution Plan
If execution fails (e.g. due to sandbox restrictions or permissions), you MUST
plan it as a concrete next step. To do this, you MUST explicitly include a
section titled "Online Monitor Provisioning Plan" or "Execution Plan" in
your final response, containing the exact concrete python execution command with
all parameter values (such as project ID, region, and agent resource name) fully
populated. Do not merely state that the user should run it.
You MUST format the plan exactly as follows:
Execution Plan: Online Monitor Provisioning
Online Monitor Provisioning Command:
bash
python3 scripts/create_online_monitor.py \
--project-id "[PROJECT_ID]" \
--agent-resource-name "projects/[PROJECT_ID]/locations/[LOCATION]/reasoningEngines/[AGENT_ID]" \
--sampling-percentage [PERCENTAGE]
Verify Telemetry Command (Optional fallback):
bash
python3 scripts/check_telemetry.py \
--project-id "[PROJECT_ID]" \
--agent-resource-name "projects/[PROJECT_ID]/locations/[LOCATION]/reasoningEngines/[AGENT_ID]"
Tooling Scripts
Use the following scripts to resolve duplicates and validate configs before
presenting or applying Terraform changes:
- Duplicate Check & Merge: Checks for pre-existing alerts in the target
folder to ensure changes are merged in-place rather than appended:
- Command:
python3 scripts/validate_config.py --directory [TARGET_TF_DIR] --engine-var "${var.reasoning_engine_id}"
- Config Linting: Validates PromQL grammar, matching engine labels, and
HCL structure:
- Command:
python3 scripts/validate_config.py --file [PATH_TO_TF_FILE]
- Self-Correction Loop: If validation fails (exits non-zero or outputs
errors), you MUST read the command output, locate the line/file
containing the lint error, analyze the PromQL syntax or Terraform HCL
issue, apply adjustments in-place, and re-run the
validate_config.py --file
validation. Repeat this loop until the validation script passes
successfully.
Gotchas & Behavioral Corrections
- Duration Buffers (Transient Glitches): To avoid alerts firing on
transient spikes, use duration/retest window buffers appropriately:
- Reliability Metrics (PromQL / Cloud Monitoring):
- For short-lookback alerts querying data under 25 hours (e.g.,
Short-Window Z-Score, Moving Averages, Fast Burn SLO), ALWAYS use a
(5 minutes) buffer to filter out transient cold
start/deployment spikes.
- For long-lookback alerts querying data longer than 25 hours (e.g.,
Long-Window Z-Score, Seasonal Decomposition, Slow Burn SLO),
duration/retest windows are disabled by the platform. You must not
set a duration (omit it entirely).
- Quality Metrics (Standard Filters / Online Monitor):
- Always use a (5 minutes) buffer to filter out
transient scoring dips or evaluation outliers caused by temporary
LLM judge congestion, or edge-case query outliers.
- Dynamic Baseline Adaptation Blind Spot: Explain to users that dynamic
statistical Z-score thresholds compare current rates to a moving statistical
baseline. If a system degrades slowly over days, the standard baseline curve
adapts to this slow drift, making standard Z-score alerts blind to
persistent slow errors. Recommend a hard static threshold alert in parallel
for strict SLA enforcement.
- Seasonal Decomposition Double Alerting: The agent MUST ONLY configure
seasonal decomposition alert policies to track spikes (e.g., latency spikes)
OR drops AND MUST NOT use dual-direction checks (like absolute deviation).
Explain this limitation to the user: comparing to a historical offset (e.g.,
) the alert policy triggers twice if tracking both directions
(once for the anomaly, and once 1 week later when the anomaly becomes the
baseline). To prevent this, the generated policy MUST only track either
spikes (using ) or drops (using ), avoiding using .
- Raw Error Boundaries: Explain that raw error counts or absolute failed
request count boundaries do not scale under changing traffic throughput.
Recommend ratio-based error rate alerts instead.
- Safe Threshold Modulation E2E Validation: When verifying a dynamic
metric threshold policy end-to-end, do NOT attempt to force real platform
errors. Instead, deploy the alert policy with standard safe bounds (Z-score
multiplier > 15), then temporarily update standard deviation Z-score limits
to a negative value (e.g. > -3) to trigger/verify the "Firing" state before
reverting. Always get confirmation before taking this action proactively.
- Expected Script Failures:
validate_config.py --directory
exiting with code 1: Parse the JSON
output for duplicate resource targets. Perform in-place upgrade edits,
then re-check until it passes with 0.
- Script Execution Failures & Self-Correction: If the execution of
utility scripts (such as ,
, or ) fails unexpectedly,
you MUST read and inspect the stdout/stderr logs or error output.
Analyze the error message (e.g., connection timeouts, invalid
permissions, or missing resources) and attempt to dynamically correct
parameters (such as verifying or correcting the region, project ID, or
resource name format) and retry execution before escalating or falling
back to manual plans.
- Distribution Metric Aligner Constraint: Standard cannot be
applied to distribution metrics like . You
MUST use percentile-based aligners (like ) to reduce
the score distribution into a comparable numeric stream.
Supporting Links