financial-statement-analyzer
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseFinancial Statement Deep Dive
财务报表深度分析
Act as a forensic financial analyst. Perform comprehensive analysis of a single company's financial statements to evaluate earnings quality, financial health, fraud risk indicators, and operational efficiency.
担任司法财务分析师,对单一公司的财务报表进行全面分析,以评估盈利质量、财务健康状况、欺诈风险指标和运营效率。
Workflow
工作流程
Step 1: Identify the Target
步骤1:确定分析目标
Confirm with the user:
- Company — Ticker or name
- Time period — Default: most recent 5 years (20 quarters)
- Focus areas — Full analysis (default) or specific focus (earnings quality, fraud risk, working capital, etc.)
- Comparison — Key competitor(s) for benchmarking (optional)
- Data source — SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q) as primary source
与用户确认以下信息:
- 公司 — 股票代码或名称
- 时间范围 — 默认:最近5年(20个季度)
- 重点领域 — 全面分析(默认)或特定重点方向(盈利质量、欺诈风险、营运资金等)
- 对比对象 — 用于基准对比的主要竞争对手(可选)
- 数据来源 — 以SEC文件(10-K、10-Q)为主要来源
Step 2: Profitability Decomposition
步骤2:盈利能力分解
Perform 5-factor DuPont analysis. See references/analysis-methodology.md for formulas.
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × Operating Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier| Component | Formula | What It Reveals |
|---|---|---|
| Tax burden | Net income / Pre-tax income | Tax efficiency |
| Interest burden | Pre-tax income / EBIT | Debt cost impact |
| Operating margin | EBIT / Revenue | Operational efficiency |
| Asset turnover | Revenue / Total assets | Asset utilization |
| Equity multiplier | Total assets / Equity | Financial leverage |
Track each component over 5 years to identify what is driving ROE changes.
执行五因素DuPont分析。公式请参考references/analysis-methodology.md。
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × Operating Margin × Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier| 组成部分 | 计算公式 | 揭示内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 税负 | 净利润 / 税前利润 | 税务效率 |
| 利息负担 | 税前利润 / EBIT | 债务成本影响 |
| 营业利润率 | EBIT / 营业收入 | 运营效率 |
| 资产周转率 | 营业收入 / 总资产 | 资产利用率 |
| 权益乘数 | 总资产 / 股东权益 | 财务杠杆水平 |
跟踪各组成部分过去5年的变化,找出ROE变动的驱动因素。
Step 3: Earnings Quality Assessment
步骤3:盈利质量评估
Evaluate whether reported earnings reflect genuine economic value:
| Test | What It Measures | Red Flag Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Accruals ratio | Non-cash earnings proportion | > 10% of total assets |
| Cash conversion | Operating cash flow / Net income | < 0.8 persistently |
| Revenue recognition | Revenue growth vs receivables growth | Receivables growing faster |
| Deferred revenue | Trend in deferred revenue | Declining (front-loaded revenue) |
| Non-recurring items | One-time gains/charges frequency | "Non-recurring" items every year |
| Change in estimates | Depreciation, reserves, assumptions | Consistently income-boosting changes |
评估报告收益是否反映真实的经济价值:
| 测试项目 | 衡量内容 | 预警阈值 |
|---|---|---|
| 应计比率 | 非现金收益占比 | 超过总资产的10% |
| 现金转化率 | 经营活动现金流 / 净利润 | 持续低于0.8 |
| 收入确认 | 营收增长与应收账款增长对比 | 应收账款增长更快 |
| 递延收入 | 递延收入趋势 | 持续下降(营收提前确认) |
| 非经常性项目 | 一次性收益/支出的发生频率 | 每年都存在“非经常性”项目 |
| 估计变更 | 折旧、准备金、假设条件的变更 | 持续做出增加收益的变更 |
Step 4: Financial Health Scoring
步骤4:财务健康评分
Calculate composite financial health indicators:
| Model | Purpose | Components |
|---|---|---|
| Altman Z-Score | Bankruptcy prediction | Working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, market cap, sales — all relative to total assets |
| Piotroski F-Score | Financial strength | 9 binary signals across profitability, leverage, and efficiency |
| Beneish M-Score | Earnings manipulation detection | 8 variables measuring anomalies in financial data |
See references/analysis-methodology.md for detailed formulas and interpretation.
计算综合财务健康指标:
| 模型 | 用途 | 组成要素 |
|---|---|---|
| Altman Z-Score | 破产预测 | 营运资金、留存收益、EBIT、市值、销售额 — 均与总资产的比值 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 财务实力评估 | 涵盖盈利能力、杠杆水平和效率的9个二元信号 |
| Beneish M-Score | 收益操纵检测 | 衡量财务数据异常的8个变量 |
详细公式和解读请参考references/analysis-methodology.md。
Step 5: Working Capital Analysis
步骤5:营运资金分析
Examine operational efficiency through the cash conversion cycle:
| Metric | Formula | What It Reveals |
|---|---|---|
| DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) | (Receivables / Revenue) × 365 | Collection efficiency |
| DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) | (Inventory / COGS) × 365 | Inventory management |
| DPO (Days Payable Outstanding) | (Payables / COGS) × 365 | Payment practices |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | DSO + DIO − DPO | Working capital efficiency |
Track trends over 5 years and compare to peers.
通过现金转换周期分析运营效率:
| 指标 | 计算公式 | 揭示内容 |
|---|---|---|
| DSO(应收账款周转天数) | (应收账款 / 营业收入) × 365 | 收款效率 |
| DIO(存货周转天数) | (存货 / 营业成本) × 365 | 存货管理水平 |
| DPO(应付账款周转天数) | (应付账款 / 营业成本) × 365 | 付款策略 |
| 现金转换周期 | DSO + DIO − DPO | 营运资金使用效率 |
跟踪过去5年的趋势并与同行对比。
Step 6: Balance Sheet Risk Assessment
步骤6:资产负债表风险评估
Identify off-balance-sheet and hidden risks:
| Risk Area | What to Check |
|---|---|
| Goodwill / Intangibles | Size relative to equity; impairment risk |
| Operating leases | Off-balance-sheet obligations (pre-ASC 842) |
| Pension obligations | Funded status, discount rate assumptions |
| Contingent liabilities | Litigation, guarantees, commitments |
| Variable interest entities | Unconsolidated entities |
| Share-based compensation | Dilution impact |
| Debt maturity profile | Near-term maturities vs cash/refinancing capacity |
识别表外和隐藏风险:
| 风险领域 | 核查内容 |
|---|---|
| 商誉/无形资产 | 相对于股东权益的规模;减值风险 |
| 经营租赁 | 表外义务(ASC 842准则之前) |
| 养老金义务 | 资金到位情况、折现率假设 |
| 或有负债 | 诉讼、担保、承诺事项 |
| 可变利益实体 | 未合并实体 |
| 基于股份的薪酬 | 股权稀释影响 |
| 债务到期结构 | 短期到期债务与现金/再融资能力的对比 |
Step 7: Segment Analysis
步骤7:分部分析
Break down performance by business segment:
- Revenue and growth by segment
- Operating margin by segment
- Capital intensity by segment
- Identify which segments drive value and which destroy it
- Cross-subsidization between segments
按业务分部拆解业绩表现:
- 各分部的营收及增长情况
- 各分部的营业利润率
- 各分部的资本密集度
- 识别创造价值和毁损价值的分部
- 分部间的交叉补贴情况
Step 8: Peer Benchmarking
步骤8:同行基准对比
Compare key metrics against 2–3 direct competitors:
| Metric Category | Metrics |
|---|---|
| Profitability | Gross margin, operating margin, net margin, ROE, ROIC |
| Efficiency | Asset turnover, inventory turnover, receivables turnover |
| Leverage | Debt/equity, interest coverage, net debt/EBITDA |
| Valuation | P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/FCF, PEG |
| Growth | Revenue CAGR, EPS CAGR, FCF CAGR |
与2-3家直接竞争对手对比关键指标:
| 指标类别 | 具体指标 |
|---|---|
| 盈利能力 | 毛利率、营业利润率、净利润率、ROE、ROIC |
| 运营效率 | 资产周转率、存货周转率、应收账款周转率 |
| 杠杆水平 | 债务权益比、利息保障倍数、净债务/EBITDA |
| 估值水平 | P/E、EV/EBITDA、P/FCF、PEG |
| 增长能力 | 营收CAGR、EPS CAGR、FCF CAGR |
Step 9: Synthesize and Present
步骤9:整合与呈现
Compile findings per references/output-template.md:
- Company Overview — Business summary and key metrics
- DuPont Decomposition — 5-year ROE driver analysis
- Earnings Quality Report — Accruals, cash conversion, red flags
- Financial Health Scores — Z-Score, F-Score, M-Score with interpretation
- Working Capital Analysis — CCC trend and peer comparison
- Balance Sheet Risk Map — Hidden risks and off-balance-sheet items
- Segment Analysis — Value drivers and detractors
- Peer Comparison — Benchmarking table
- Overall Assessment — Synthesis of bull/bear case from financial perspective
- Disclaimers
按照references/output-template.md整合分析结果:
- 公司概况 — 业务摘要及关键指标
- 杜邦分解分析 — 5年ROE驱动因素分析
- 盈利质量报告 — 应计项目、现金转化率、预警信号
- 财务健康评分 — Z值、F值、M值及解读
- 营运资金分析 — 现金转换周期趋势及同行对比
- 资产负债表风险图谱 — 隐藏风险及表外项目
- 分部分析 — 价值驱动与毁损因素
- 同行对比 — 基准对比表
- 整体评估 — 从财务角度整合多空观点
- 免责声明
Data Enhancement
数据增强
For live market data to support this analysis, use the FinData Toolkit skill (). It provides real-time stock metrics, SEC filings, financial calculators, portfolio analytics, factor screening, and macro indicators — all without API keys.
findata-toolkit-us如需实时市场数据支持本次分析,请使用FinData Toolkit技能()。它提供实时股票指标、SEC文件、财务计算器、投资组合分析、因子筛选和宏观经济指标 — 无需API密钥即可使用。
findata-toolkit-usImportant Guidelines
重要指南
- Read the footnotes: The most important information in financial statements is often in the footnotes. Flag any unusual accounting policies, related-party transactions, or significant estimates.
- Trends matter more than levels: A declining operating margin is more concerning than a low-but-stable one. Always emphasize directional changes.
- Context is essential: A high debt/equity ratio means different things for a utility vs a tech company. Always interpret metrics within industry context.
- Complement, don't replace, valuation: This skill assesses financial quality, not whether the stock is a buy or sell. Direct valuation questions to the appropriate screening skills.
- GAAP vs non-GAAP: Many companies report "adjusted" earnings that exclude stock-based compensation, restructuring, and other real costs. Always anchor to GAAP, then discuss adjustments.
- Not an audit: This is analytical review, not a professional audit. It cannot detect sophisticated fraud or verify data accuracy.
- 阅读附注:财务报表中最重要的信息通常在附注里。标记任何异常的会计政策、关联方交易或重大估计。
- 趋势比绝对值更重要:营业利润率持续下降比低但稳定的情况更值得关注。始终强调变化方向。
- 语境至关重要:高债务权益比对公用事业公司和科技公司的意义完全不同。始终结合行业背景解读指标。
- 补充而非替代估值:本技能仅评估财务质量,不判断股票是否值得买卖。估值相关问题请使用对应的筛选技能。
- GAAP与non-GAAP:许多公司会报告“调整后”收益,剔除基于股份的薪酬、重组及其他实际成本。始终以GAAP数据为基础,再讨论调整项。
- 非审计服务:本分析属于分析性复核,而非专业审计。无法检测复杂欺诈行为或验证数据准确性。