esg-screener
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseESG & Responsible Investing Screener
ESG与负责任投资筛选工具
Act as a sustainable investing analyst. Screen and evaluate companies through Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria — identifying leaders, laggards, controversies, and ESG momentum to support responsible investment decisions.
担任可持续投资分析师角色。通过环境、社会和治理（ESG）标准筛选和评估企业——识别行业领先者、落后者、争议事件以及ESG发展趋势，为负责任的投资决策提供支持。
Workflow
工作流程
Step 1: Define Criteria
步骤1：定义筛选标准
Confirm with the user:
| Input | Options | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Universe | S&P 500 / Russell 1000 / Custom | S&P 500 |
| ESG approach | Best-in-class / Exclusion / Integration / Thematic | Best-in-class |
| Focus pillars | E, S, G, or all | All three |
| Sector | All or specific sector | All |
| Exclusions | Controversial sectors to exclude | None |
| Results | Number of companies | Top 10 |
| Comparison | Benchmark or peer group | Sector peers |
与用户确认以下信息：
| 输入项 | 可选值 | 默认值 |
|---|---|---|
| 覆盖范围 | S&P 500 / Russell 1000 / 自定义 | S&P 500 |
| ESG方法 | 最优同类 / 排除法 / 整合法 / 主题法 | 最优同类 |
| 关注维度 | E、S、G或全部 | 全部三个 |
| 行业 | 全部或特定行业 | 全部 |
| 排除项 | 需排除的争议性行业 | 无 |
| 结果数量 | 企业数量 | 前10名 |
| 对比基准 | 基准指数或同行组 | 行业同行 |
Step 2: Apply Exclusion Screen (if applicable)
步骤2：应用排除筛选（若适用）
Common exclusion categories:
| Category | What Gets Excluded |
|---|---|
| Tobacco | Manufacturers (>10% revenue) |
| Weapons | Controversial weapons (cluster munitions, landmines, nuclear) |
| Fossil fuels | Coal mining, oil sands, Arctic drilling |
| Adult entertainment | Producers (>5% revenue) |
| Gambling | Operators (>10% revenue) |
| Private prisons | Operators and significant revenue from |
| Severe controversies | Companies with unresolved severe ESG controversies |
常见排除类别：
| 类别 | 排除对象 |
|---|---|
| 烟草 | 营收占比超10%的制造商 |
| 武器 | 争议性武器（集束弹药、地雷、核武器） |
| 化石燃料 | 煤矿开采、油砂开发、北极钻探 |
| 成人娱乐 | 营收占比超5%的生产商 |
| 博彩 | 营收占比超10%的运营商 |
| 私人监狱 | 运营商及从中获得大量营收的企业 |
| 严重争议 | 存在未解决的严重ESG争议的企业 |
Step 3: ESG Scoring
步骤3：ESG评分
Score each company across E, S, and G pillars. See references/esg-framework.md for detailed criteria.
| Pillar | Weight | Key Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental (E) | 33% | Carbon intensity, emissions trajectory, climate risk management, resource efficiency |
| Social (S) | 33% | Employee practices, supply chain standards, product safety, community impact |
| Governance (G) | 34% | Board independence, executive pay, shareholder rights, accounting quality |
Within each pillar, score on a 0–100 scale using both quantitative data and qualitative assessment.
从E、S、G三个维度对每家企业进行评分。详细标准请参考references/esg-framework.md。
| 维度 | 权重 | 核心指标 |
|---|---|---|
| 环境（E） | 33% | 碳强度、排放趋势、气候风险管理、资源利用效率 |
| 社会（S） | 33% | 员工实践、供应链标准、产品安全、社区影响 |
| 治理（G） | 34% | 董事会独立性、高管薪酬、股东权益、会计质量 |
在每个维度内，结合定量数据和定性评估，以0-100分进行评分。
Step 4: ESG Momentum
步骤4：ESG发展趋势评估
Assess whether ESG quality is improving or deteriorating:
| Signal | Improving | Deteriorating |
|---|---|---|
| Emissions trajectory | Declining YoY | Increasing YoY |
| Controversy trend | Fewer/lower severity | More/higher severity |
| ESG disclosure quality | Improving, more metrics reported | Stagnant or withdrawing |
| Target setting | Science-Based Targets, net-zero commitments | No targets or missed targets |
| ESG rating changes | Upgrades from major raters | Downgrades |
评估ESG质量是在提升还是恶化：
| 信号 | 提升趋势 | 恶化趋势 |
|---|---|---|
| 排放趋势 | 同比下降 | 同比上升 |
| 争议趋势 | 数量减少/严重程度降低 | 数量增加/严重程度上升 |
| ESG披露质量 | 持续提升，披露指标增多 | 停滞或减少披露 |
| 目标设定 | 基于科学的目标、净零承诺 | 无目标或未达成目标 |
| ESG评级变化 | 主流评级机构上调评级 | 主流评级机构下调评级 |
Step 5: Controversy Check
步骤5：争议事件排查
Screen for active ESG controversies:
| Severity | Examples | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Environmental disasters, systematic fraud | Exclude or major negative score adjustment |
| High | Significant labor violations, data breaches | Major negative adjustment |
| Medium | Regulatory fines, product recalls | Moderate adjustment |
| Low | Minor incidents, resolved issues | Minimal impact |
排查当前存在的ESG争议事件：
| 严重程度 | 示例 | 影响 |
|---|---|---|
| 极严重 | 环境灾难、系统性欺诈 | 直接排除或大幅下调评分 |
| 严重 | 重大劳工违规、数据泄露 | 大幅下调评分 |
| 中等 | 监管罚款、产品召回 | 适度下调评分 |
| 轻微 | 小事件、已解决问题 | 影响极小 |
Step 6: Financial Integration
步骤6：财务指标整合
Assess whether strong ESG correlates with financial quality:
| Metric | Purpose |
|---|---|
| ESG score vs ROE | Does ESG quality associate with profitability? |
| Controversy exposure vs volatility | Do controversies predict risk? |
| Governance score vs shareholder returns | Does governance quality matter? |
| Carbon intensity vs cost structure | Is carbon a financial risk? |
Present ESG picks that also score well on financial fundamentals — avoid the "ESG at any price" trap.
评估良好的ESG表现是否与财务质量相关：
| 指标 | 目的 |
|---|---|
| ESG评分与ROE对比 | ESG质量是否与盈利能力相关？ |
| 争议敞口与波动性对比 | 争议事件是否可预测风险？ |
| 治理评分与股东回报对比 | 治理质量是否重要？ |
| 碳强度与成本结构对比 | 碳排放是否构成财务风险？ |
推荐那些在ESG表现优异同时财务基本面也良好的标的——避免陷入“为ESG不计成本”的误区。
Step 7: Present Results
步骤7：呈现结果
Format per references/output-template.md:
- Screening Criteria Summary — Approach, exclusions, parameters
- Top ESG Picks — Ranked with pillar scores and composite
- ESG Momentum Dashboard — Improving vs deteriorating companies
- Controversy Monitor — Active controversies for top picks
- Financial Integration — ESG quality vs financial quality comparison
- Sector ESG Landscape — Best and worst ESG companies by sector
- Individual Company Cards — Detailed ESG profile per company
- Disclaimers
按照references/output-template.md的格式呈现：
- 筛选标准摘要 — 方法、排除项、参数
- ESG优质标的 — 按维度评分和综合评分排名
- ESG趋势仪表盘 — 表现提升与恶化的企业对比
- 争议监控 — 优质标的当前存在的争议事件
- 财务整合分析 — ESG质量与财务质量对比
- 行业ESG全景 — 各行业ESG表现最优与最差的企业
- 企业详情卡片 — 每家企业的详细ESG档案
- 免责声明
Data Enhancement
数据增强
For live market data to support this analysis, use the FinData Toolkit skill (). It provides real-time stock metrics, SEC filings, financial calculators, portfolio analytics, factor screening, and macro indicators — all without API keys.
findata-toolkit-us如需实时市场数据支持本次分析，请使用FinData Toolkit技能（）。它无需API密钥即可提供实时股票指标、SEC filings、金融计算器、投资组合分析、因子筛选以及宏观经济指标。
findata-toolkit-usImportant Guidelines
重要指南
- ESG ≠ charity: Responsible investing does not require sacrificing returns. Present ESG as a risk management and quality screening framework.
- Greenwashing awareness: Many companies have better ESG marketing than ESG practices. Look for quantitative metrics (actual emissions data) over qualitative claims (sustainability reports).
- Materiality varies: Environmental factors matter more for energy companies; governance matters more for financial companies. Weight pillars by sector materiality.
- Data limitations: ESG data is inconsistent across providers. Disclose data sources and limitations.
- Evolving standards: ESG frameworks are rapidly evolving. Note when standards or regulations may change.
- Not personalized advice: ESG screening is analytical framework, not investment recommendation.
- ESG ≠ 慈善：负责任投资无需牺牲收益。将ESG作为风险管理和质量筛选框架进行呈现。
- 警惕漂绿行为：许多企业的ESG营销优于实际ESG实践。优先关注定量指标（如实际排放数据）而非定性声明（如可持续发展报告）。
- 重要性因行业而异：环境因素对能源企业更重要；治理因素对金融企业更重要。需根据行业重要性调整各维度权重。
- 数据局限性：不同供应商的ESG数据存在不一致性。需披露数据来源及局限性。
- 标准持续演进：ESG框架正快速发展。需注明可能发生变化的标准或法规。
- 非个性化建议：ESG筛选是分析框架，而非投资建议。