Back to Details

gate-info-coincompare

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

gate-info-coincompare

gate-info-coincompare

Side-by-side comparison Skill. The user inputs 2-5 coins, the system calls market snapshot + fundamentals tools for each coin in parallel, and the LLM aggregates multi-dimensional data into a comparison table with overall analysis.
Trigger Scenarios: User mentions two or more coins + keywords like compare, versus, vs, which is better, difference, head-to-head.
并列对比Skill。用户输入2-5个加密货币，系统并行调用每个币种的市场快照+基本面工具，LLM将多维度数据汇总为对比表格并附上整体分析。
触发场景：用户提到两个及以上加密货币，同时出现compare、versus、vs、哪一个更好、区别、正面交锋这类关键词。

Routing Rules

路由规则

User IntentKeywords/PatternAction
Multi-coin comparison"compare BTC and ETH" "SOL vs AVAX" "Layer2 coin comparison"Execute this Skill's full workflow
Single coin analysis"analyze SOL for me"Route to 
gate-info-coinanalysis
Price only"what's BTC price"Call 
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
directly
Sector overview"how is the DeFi sector doing"Route to 
gate-info-marketoverview
Ranking list"top 10 coins by market cap"
info_coin_get_coin_rankings
not yet available — prompt user to list specific coins to compare
用户意图关键词/匹配模式动作
多币种对比"compare BTC and ETH" "SOL vs AVAX" "Layer2币种对比"执行本Skill的完整工作流
单币种分析"帮我分析SOL"路由到
gate-info-coinanalysis
仅查询价格"BTC价格是多少"直接调用
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
板块概览"DeFi板块行情怎么样"路由到
gate-info-marketoverview
榜单查询"市值排名前10的币种"
info_coin_get_coin_rankings
暂未可用 —— 提示用户列出具体要对比的币种

Execution Workflow

执行工作流

Step 1: Intent Recognition & Parameter Extraction

步骤1：意图识别与参数提取

Extract from user input:
  • symbols[]
    : List of coins (2-5), e.g., [BTC, ETH, SOL]
  • If the user mentions project names (e.g., Solana, Avalanche), map to ticker symbols
  • If the user mentions a sector without specific coins (e.g., "which Layer2 coins are good"), prompt them to list 2-5 specific coins
Limits: Minimum 2, maximum 5. If more than 5, prompt user to narrow the scope. If only 1 coin, ask for at least one more or route to 
gate-info-coinanalysis
.
从用户输入中提取：
  • symbols[]
    ：币种列表（2-5个），例如[BTC, ETH, SOL]
  • 如果用户提到项目名（例如Solana、Avalanche），映射为对应的代币代码
  • 如果用户提到板块但未指定具体币种（例如“哪些Layer2币种比较好”），提示用户列出2-5个具体币种
限制：最少2个，最多5个。如果超过5个，提示用户缩小范围。如果只有1个币种，询问用户是否要补充至少一个其他币种，或者路由到
gate-info-coinanalysis
。

Step 2: Call 2 MCP Tools per Coin in Parallel

步骤2：为每个币种并行调用2个MCP工具

For each 
symbol
in the list, execute in parallel:
StepMCP ToolParametersRetrieved DataParallel
1a
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
symbol={symbol}, timeframe="1d", source="spot"
Market data: real-time price, K-line summary, market cap, FDV, Fear & Greed IndexYes
1b
info_coin_get_coin_info
query={symbol}
Fundamentals: project info, sector, funding, tokenomicsYes
For 3 coins, this results in 6 parallel Tool calls with no dependencies. When 
info_marketsnapshot_batch_market_snapshot
and 
info_coin_search_coins
are available, prefer them; otherwise use per-coin calls above.
针对列表中的每个
symbol
，并行执行：
步骤MCP工具参数获取的数据并行执行
1a
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
symbol={symbol}, timeframe="1d", source="spot"
市场数据：实时价格、K线概要、市值、FDV、恐惧贪婪指数是
1b
info_coin_get_coin_info
query={symbol}
基本面：项目信息、所属板块、融资情况、代币经济学是
针对3个币种的场景，会并行发起6个无依赖的工具调用。当
info_marketsnapshot_batch_market_snapshot
和
info_coin_search_coins
可用时优先使用，否则使用上述单币种调用方式。

Step 3 (Optional): Technical Comparison

步骤3（可选）：技术面对比

If the user explicitly requests technical comparison, or the number of coins is 3 or fewer, optionally call in parallel:
StepMCP ToolParametersRetrieved DataParallel
2
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
symbol={symbol}
Technical signals: RSI, MACD, MA alignment, support/resistanceYes
如果用户明确要求技术面对比，或者币种数量≤3，可选择并行调用：
步骤MCP工具参数获取的数据并行执行
2
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
symbol={symbol}
技术信号：RSI、MACD、MA排列、支撑位/阻力位是

Step 4: LLM Cross-Comparison Report Generation

步骤4：LLM生成交叉对比报告

Group all Tool responses by coin, and the LLM generates a side-by-side comparison report using the template below.
将所有工具返回的结果按币种分组，LLM使用以下模板生成并列对比报告。

Report Template

报告模板

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Coin Comparison: {symbol_1} vs {symbol_2} [vs {symbol_3} ...]

Coin Comparison: {symbol_1} vs {symbol_2} [vs {symbol_3} ...]

1. Key Metrics Comparison

1. Key Metrics Comparison

Metric{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Price${price_1}${price_2}${price_3}
24h Change{change_24h_1}%{change_24h_2}%{change_24h_3}%
7d Change{change_7d_1}%{change_7d_2}%{change_7d_3}%
Market Cap${mcap_1}${mcap_2}${mcap_3}
Market Cap Rank#{rank_1}#{rank_2}#{rank_3}
FDV${fdv_1}${fdv_2}${fdv_3}
24h Volume${vol_1}${vol_2}${vol_3}
Fear & Greed Index{fg_1}{fg_2}{fg_3}
Metric{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Price${price_1}${price_2}${price_3}
24h Change{change_24h_1}%{change_24h_2}%{change_24h_3}%
7d Change{change_7d_1}%{change_7d_2}%{change_7d_3}%
Market Cap${mcap_1}${mcap_2}${mcap_3}
Market Cap Rank#{rank_1}#{rank_2}#{rank_3}
FDV${fdv_1}${fdv_2}${fdv_3}
24h Volume${vol_1}${vol_2}${vol_3}
Fear & Greed Index{fg_1}{fg_2}{fg_3}

2. Fundamentals Comparison

2. Fundamentals Comparison

Dimension{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Sector{category_1}{category_2}{category_3}
Total Funding${funding_1}${funding_2}${funding_3}
Key Investors{investors_1}{investors_2}{investors_3}
Circulating Ratio{circ_ratio_1}%{circ_ratio_2}%{circ_ratio_3}%
Upcoming Unlocks{unlock_1}{unlock_2}{unlock_3}
Dimension{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Sector{category_1}{category_2}{category_3}
Total Funding${funding_1}${funding_2}${funding_3}
Key Investors{investors_1}{investors_2}{investors_3}
Circulating Ratio{circ_ratio_1}%{circ_ratio_2}%{circ_ratio_3}%
Upcoming Unlocks{unlock_1}{unlock_2}{unlock_3}

3. Technical Comparison (if available)

3. Technical Comparison (if available)

Dimension{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Overall Signal{signal_1}{signal_2}{signal_3}
RSI(14){rsi_1}{rsi_2}{rsi_3}
MACD{macd_1}{macd_2}{macd_3}
MA Alignment{ma_1}{ma_2}{ma_3}
Dimension{symbol_1}{symbol_2}{symbol_3}
Overall Signal{signal_1}{signal_2}{signal_3}
RSI(14){rsi_1}{rsi_2}{rsi_3}
MACD{macd_1}{macd_2}{macd_3}
MA Alignment{ma_1}{ma_2}{ma_3}

4. Comparative Summary

4. Comparative Summary

{LLM generates a 3-5 sentence cross-comparison analysis covering:}
  • Strengths and weaknesses of each coin across dimensions
  • Which coin has stronger recent performance and which is weakening
  • Whether fundamentals and market data align
  • Differentiated risks to watch
{LLM generates a 3-5 sentence cross-comparison analysis covering:}
  • Strengths and weaknesses of each coin across dimensions
  • Which coin has stronger recent performance and which is weakening
  • Whether fundamentals and market data align
  • Differentiated risks to watch

5. Dimension-by-Dimension Winners

5. Dimension-by-Dimension Winners

DimensionBest PerformerWeakest PerformerNotes
Short-term Gains{best_1}{worst_1}...
Market Cap / FDV Ratio{best_2}{worst_2}...
Funding Background{best_3}{worst_3}...
Technical Signals{best_4}{worst_4}...
DimensionBest PerformerWeakest PerformerNotes
Short-term Gains{best_1}{worst_1}...
Market Cap / FDV Ratio{best_2}{worst_2}...
Funding Background{best_3}{worst_3}...
Technical Signals{best_4}{worst_4}...

⚠️ Risk Warnings

⚠️ Risk Warnings

{Risk differentials identified in the comparison, e.g.:}
  • {symbol_x} has only {x}% circulating supply — significantly higher unlock pressure than peers
  • {symbol_y} RSI is in overbought territory — higher short-term pullback risk than {symbol_z}
  • {symbol_w} 24h volume is disproportionately low relative to market cap — liquidity disadvantage
The above analysis is a data-driven side-by-side comparison and does not constitute investment advice. Please make decisions based on your own risk tolerance.

---
{Risk differentials identified in the comparison, e.g.:}
  • {symbol_x} has only {x}% circulating supply — significantly higher unlock pressure than peers
  • {symbol_y} RSI is in overbought territory — higher short-term pullback risk than {symbol_z}
  • {symbol_w} 24h volume is disproportionately low relative to market cap — liquidity disadvantage
The above analysis is a data-driven side-by-side comparison and does not constitute investment advice. Please make decisions based on your own risk tolerance.

---

Decision Logic

判定逻辑

ConditionAssessment
24h change difference > 10% between coinsFlag "Significant short-term performance divergence"
FDV/Market Cap ratio for one coin > 2x othersFlag "Relatively elevated FDV — higher unlock risk"
Circulating ratio < 30%Flag "Low circulating ratio — future sell pressure risk"
24h volume / market cap < 1%Flag "Low liquidity — slippage risk for large trades"
RSI difference > 30 (one overbought, another oversold)Flag "Technicals in opposite states — evaluate separately"
Any Tool returns empty/errorMark corresponding column as "Data unavailable"; display remaining coins normally
Two coins are from entirely different sectorsRemind user: "Cross-sector comparison is for reference only — core value drivers differ significantly"
条件评估结果
币种之间24小时涨跌幅差值大于10%标记“短期表现出现显著分化”
某个币种的FDV/市值比值是其他币种的2倍以上标记“FDV相对偏高，解锁风险更高”
流通率低于30%标记“流通率低，存在未来抛售压力风险”
24小时成交量/市值比值低于1%标记“流动性低，大额交易存在滑点风险”
RSI差值大于30（一个超买，另一个超卖）标记“技术面处于相反状态，需单独评估”
任意工具返回空/错误将对应列标记为“数据不可用”，其余币种正常展示
两个币种属于完全不同的板块提醒用户：“跨板块对比仅供参考，核心价值驱动因素差异较大”

Error Handling

错误处理

Error TypeHandling
A coin does not existNote the name may be incorrect; exclude it and continue comparing the rest
Only 1 coin providedRoute to 
gate-info-coinanalysis
(single coin analysis)
More than 5 coins providedPrompt user to narrow down to 5 or fewer, or suggest comparing in batches
A coin's Tool times outSkip that coin's dimension; mark as "Temporarily unavailable" in the table
All Tools failReturn error message; suggest the user try again later
User inputs an addressRoute to 
gate-info-addresstracker
错误类型处理方式
币种不存在提示名称可能有误，排除该币种后继续对比其余币种
仅提供1个币种路由到
gate-info-coinanalysis
（单币种分析）
提供的币种超过5个提示用户缩小范围到5个及以内，或者建议分批对比
某个币种的工具调用超时跳过该币种的对应维度，在表格中标记为“暂时不可用”
所有工具调用失败返回错误信息，建议用户稍后重试
用户输入地址路由到
gate-info-addresstracker

Cross-Skill Routing

跨Skill路由

User Follow-up IntentRoute To
"Give me a deep dive on SOL"
gate-info-coinanalysis
"Show me SOL technicals in detail"
gate-info-trendanalysis
"Any recent news for these coins?"
gate-news-briefing
"Is SOL's contract safe?"
gate-info-riskcheck
"Why did ETH pump but SOL didn't?"
gate-news-eventexplain
"How about on-chain data comparison?"
gate-info-tokenonchain
用户后续意图路由到
"给我深入分析下SOL"
gate-info-coinanalysis
"给我看SOL的详细技术面"
gate-info-trendanalysis
"这些币种有什么最新消息吗？"
gate-news-briefing
"SOL的合约安全吗？"
gate-info-riskcheck
"为什么ETH涨了SOL没涨？"
gate-news-eventexplain
"链上数据对比怎么样？"
gate-info-tokenonchain

Available Tools & Degradation Notes

可用工具与降级说明

PRD-Defined ToolActually Available ToolStatusDegradation Strategy
info_marketsnapshot_batch_market_snapshot
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
DegradedCall 
get_market_snapshot
per coin in parallel — no speed impact
info_coin_search_coins
info_coin_get_coin_info
DegradedUse 
get_coin_info
with symbol query as substitute
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
✅ Ready—
PRD定义工具实际可用工具状态降级策略
info_marketsnapshot_batch_market_snapshot
info_marketsnapshot_get_market_snapshot
已降级并行调用单币种
get_market_snapshot
接口，无速度影响
info_coin_search_coins
info_coin_get_coin_info
已降级使用
get_coin_info
传入代币代码查询作为替代
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
info_markettrend_get_technical_analysis
✅ 可用—

Safety Rules

安全规则

  1. No investment advice: Comparative analysis is data-driven and must include a "not investment advice" disclaimer
  2. No ranking recommendations: Do not output conclusions like "buy A instead of B" — only present data differences
  3. No price predictions: Do not output specific target prices or up/down predictions
  4. Data transparency: Label data source and update time for each dimension
  5. Flag missing data: When any dimension has no data, explicitly mark "Data unavailable" — never fabricate data
  6. Cross-sector reminder: When compared coins belong to different sectors, remind the user of fundamental logic differences
  1. 不提供投资建议：对比分析为数据驱动，必须包含“不构成投资建议”的免责声明
  2. 不提供排名推荐：不得输出“买A不要买B”这类结论，仅展示数据差异
  3. 不做价格预测：不得输出具体目标价或者涨跌预测
  4. 数据透明：每个维度都要标注数据来源和更新时间
  5. 缺失数据标记：任意维度无数据时，明确标记“数据不可用”，严禁编造数据
  6. 跨板块提醒：当对比的币种属于不同板块时，提醒用户底层逻辑存在差异