kata-verify-work

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese
<objective> Validate built features through conversational testing with persistent state.
Purpose: Confirm what Claude built actually works from user's perspective. One test at a time, plain text responses, no interrogation. When issues are found, automatically diagnose, plan fixes, and prepare for execution.
Output: {phase}-UAT.md tracking all test results. If issues found: diagnosed gaps, verified fix plans ready for /kata-execute-phase </objective>
<execution_context> @./references/verify-work.md @./references/UAT-template.md </execution_context>
<context> Phase: $ARGUMENTS (optional) - If provided: Test specific phase (e.g., "4") - If not provided: Check for active sessions or prompt for phase
@.planning/STATE.md @.planning/ROADMAP.md </context>
<process> 1. Check for active UAT sessions (resume or start new) 2. Find SUMMARY.md files for the phase 3. Extract testable deliverables (user-observable outcomes) 4. Create {phase}-UAT.md with test list 5. Present tests one at a time: - Show expected behavior - Wait for plain text response - "yes/y/next" = pass, anything else = issue (severity inferred) 6. Update UAT.md after each response 7. On completion: commit UAT.md 7.5. Finalize changes (pr_workflow only) — commit fixes, push, mark PR ready 7.6. Run PR review (pr_workflow only, optional) — offer automated review 7.7. Handle review findings — fix issues or add to backlog 8. If issues found: - Spawn parallel debug agents to diagnose root causes - Spawn kata-planner in --gaps mode to create fix plans - Spawn kata-plan-checker to verify fix plans - Iterate planner ↔ checker until plans pass (max 3) - Present ready status with `/clear` then `/kata-execute-phase` </process>
<step_7_5_pr_workflow>
<objective> 通过带持久化状态的对话式测试验证已开发完成的功能。
目的:从用户视角确认Claude开发的功能是否真正可用。每次进行一项测试,采用纯文本回复,无需质询。当发现问题时,自动诊断问题、制定修复计划并为执行做准备。
输出:{phase}-UAT.md 文件,用于跟踪所有测试结果。如果发现问题:会诊断出存在的差距,验证修复计划已就绪,可执行 /kata-execute-phase </objective>
<execution_context> @./references/verify-work.md @./references/UAT-template.md </execution_context>
<context> 阶段:$ARGUMENTS(可选) - 如果提供:测试指定阶段(例如:"4") - 如果未提供:检查是否有活跃会话或提示输入阶段
@.planning/STATE.md @.planning/ROADMAP.md </context>
<process> 1. 检查是否有活跃的UAT会话(恢复或启动新会话) 2. 查找对应阶段的SUMMARY.md文件 3. 提取可测试的交付成果(用户可观察的结果) 4. 创建包含测试列表的{phase}-UAT.md文件 5. 逐个展示测试: - 展示预期行为 - 等待纯文本回复 - "yes/y/next" = 通过,其他任何回复 = 问题(自动推断严重程度) 6. 每次回复后更新UAT.md 7. 完成测试后:提交UAT.md 7.5. 最终确定变更(仅适用于pr_workflow)—— 提交修复内容、推送代码、标记PR就绪 7.6. 执行PR评审(仅适用于pr_workflow,可选)—— 提供自动评审服务 7.7. 处理评审结果——修复问题或添加到待办事项 8. 如果发现问题: - 启动并行调试Agent诊断根本原因 - 启动kata-planner并使用--gaps模式创建修复计划 - 启动kata-plan-checker验证修复计划 - 重复规划器 ↔ 检查器的流程,直到计划通过(最多3次) - 先输出`/clear`,再显示准备就绪状态,提示执行`/kata-execute-phase` </process>
<step_7_5_pr_workflow>

7.5. Finalize Changes (pr_workflow only)

7.5. 最终确定变更(仅适用于pr_workflow)

Read pr_workflow config:
bash
PR_WORKFLOW=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"pr_workflow"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "false")
If PR_WORKFLOW=false: Skip to offer_next.
If PR_WORKFLOW=true:
  1. Check for uncommitted changes:
    bash
    git status --porcelain
  2. If changes exist, stage and commit them:
    bash
    git add -u
    git commit -m "fix({phase}): UAT fixes"
  3. Push to branch:
    bash
    BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
    git push origin "$BRANCH"
  4. Check if PR exists:
    bash
    PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr list --head "$BRANCH" --json number --jq '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
  5. If PR exists, mark ready (if still draft):
    bash
    gh pr ready "$PR_NUMBER" 2>/dev/null || true
    PR_URL=$(gh pr view --json url --jq '.url')
Store PR_NUMBER and PR_URL for offer_next. </step_7_5_pr_workflow>
<step_7_6_pr_review>
读取pr_workflow配置:
bash
PR_WORKFLOW=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"pr_workflow"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "false")
如果PR_WORKFLOW=false: 跳转到offer_next步骤。
如果PR_WORKFLOW=true:
  1. 检查是否有未提交的变更:
    bash
    git status --porcelain
  2. 如果存在变更,暂存并提交:
    bash
    git add -u
    git commit -m "fix({phase}): UAT fixes"
  3. 推送到分支:
    bash
    BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current)
    git push origin "$BRANCH"
  4. 检查PR是否存在:
    bash
    PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr list --head "$BRANCH" --json number --jq '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
  5. 如果PR存在,标记为就绪(如果仍为草稿状态):
    bash
    gh pr ready "$PR_NUMBER" 2>/dev/null || true
    PR_URL=$(gh pr view --json url --jq '.url')
为offer_next步骤存储PR_NUMBER和PR_URL。 </step_7_5_pr_workflow>
<step_7_6_pr_review>

7.6. Run PR Review (pr_workflow only, optional)

7.6. 执行PR评审(仅适用于pr_workflow,可选)

After marking PR ready, offer to run automated review:
Use AskUserQuestion:
  • header: "PR Review"
  • question: "Run automated PR review before team review?"
  • options:
    • "Yes, run full review" — Run kata-review-pull-requests with all aspects
    • "Quick review (code only)" — Run kata-review-pull-requests with "code" aspect only
    • "Skip" — Proceed without review
If user chooses review:
  1. Invoke skill:
    Skill("kata:review-pull-requests", "<aspect>")
  2. Display review summary with counts: {N} critical, {M} important, {P} suggestions
  3. STOP and ask what to do with findings (see step 7.7)
If user chooses "Skip": Continue to offer_next without review. </step_7_6_pr_review>
<step_7_7_handle_findings>
标记PR就绪后,提供自动评审选项:
使用AskUserQuestion:
  • 标题:"PR Review"
  • 问题:"在团队评审前执行自动PR评审吗?"
  • 选项:
    • "Yes, run full review" — 调用kata-review-pull-requests并检查所有维度
    • "Quick review (code only)" — 调用kata-review-pull-requests仅检查代码维度
    • "Skip" — 不进行评审直接继续
如果用户选择评审:
  1. 调用Skill:
    Skill("kata:review-pull-requests", "<aspect>")
  2. 显示评审摘要及统计:{N}个严重问题,{M}个重要问题,{P}个建议
  3. 暂停并询问如何处理评审结果(见步骤7.7)
如果用户选择"Skip": 不进行评审直接跳转到offer_next步骤。 </step_7_6_pr_review>
<step_7_7_handle_findings>

7.7. Handle Review Findings (required after review completes)

7.7. 处理评审结果(评审完成后必须执行)

STOP here. Do not proceed to offer_next until user chooses an action.
Use AskUserQuestion with options based on what was found:
  • header: "Review Findings"
  • question: "How do you want to handle the review findings?"
  • options (show only applicable ones):
    • "Fix critical issues" — (if critical > 0) Fix critical, then offer to add remaining to backlog
    • "Fix critical & important" — (if critical + important > 0) Fix both, then offer to add suggestions to backlog
    • "Fix all issues" — (if any issues) Fix everything
    • "Add to backlog" — Create issues for all findings without fixing
    • "Ignore and continue" — Skip all issues
After user chooses:
Path A: "Fix critical issues"
  1. Fix each critical issue
  2. If important or suggestions remain, ask: "Add remaining {N} issues to backlog?"
    • "Yes" → Create issues, store TODOS_CREATED count
    • "No" → Continue
  3. Commit and push fixes
  4. Continue to offer_next
Path B: "Fix critical & important"
  1. Fix each critical and important issue
  2. If suggestions remain, ask: "Add {N} suggestions to backlog?"
    • "Yes" → Create issues, store TODOS_CREATED count
    • "No" → Continue
  3. Commit and push fixes
  4. Continue to offer_next
Path C: "Fix all issues"
  1. Fix all critical, important, and suggestion issues
  2. Commit and push fixes
  3. Continue to offer_next
Path D: "Add to backlog"
  1. Create issues for all findings using
    /kata-add-issue
  2. Store TODOS_CREATED count
  3. Continue to offer_next
Path E: "Ignore and continue"
  1. Continue to offer_next
Store REVIEW_SUMMARY and TODOS_CREATED for offer_next output. </step_7_7_handle_findings>
<anti_patterns>
  • Don't use AskUserQuestion for test responses — plain text conversation
  • Don't ask severity — infer from description
  • Don't present full checklist upfront — one test at a time
  • Don't run automated tests — this is manual user validation
  • Don't fix issues during testing — log as gaps, diagnose after all tests complete </anti_patterns>
<offer_next> Output this markdown directly (not as a code block). Route based on UAT results:
StatusRoute
All tests pass + more phasesRoute A (next phase)
All tests pass + last phaseRoute B (milestone complete)
Issues found + fix plans readyRoute C (execute fixes)
Issues found + planning blockedRoute D (manual intervention)

Route A: All tests pass, more phases remain
Step 1: If PR_WORKFLOW=true, STOP and ask about merge BEFORE showing completion output.
Use AskUserQuestion:
  • header: "PR Ready for Merge"
  • question: "PR #{pr_number} is ready. Merge before continuing to next phase?"
  • options:
    • "Yes, merge now" — merge PR, then show completion
    • "No, continue without merging" — show completion with PR status
Step 2: Handle merge response (if PR_WORKFLOW=true)
If user chose "Yes, merge now":
bash
gh pr merge "$PR_NUMBER" --merge --delete-branch
git checkout main && git pull
Set MERGED=true for output below.
Step 3: Show completion output
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► PHASE {Z} VERIFIED ✓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase {Z}: {Name}
{N}/{N} tests passed UAT complete ✓ {If PR_WORKFLOW and MERGED: PR: #{pr_number} — merged ✓} {If PR_WORKFLOW and not MERGED: PR: #{pr_number} ({pr_url}) — ready for review} {If REVIEW_SUMMARY: PR Review: {summary_stats}} {If TODOS_CREATED: Backlog: {N} issues created from review suggestions}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
在此暂停。在用户选择操作前,不要跳转到offer_next步骤。
根据发现的问题,使用AskUserQuestion提供选项:
  • 标题:"Review Findings"
  • 问题:"您希望如何处理评审结果?"
  • 选项(仅显示适用的选项):
    • "Fix critical issues" — (如果存在严重问题)修复严重问题,然后询问是否将剩余问题添加到待办事项
    • "Fix critical & important" — (如果存在严重或重要问题)修复这两类问题,然后询问是否将建议添加到待办事项
    • "Fix all issues" — (如果存在任何问题)修复所有问题
    • "Add to backlog" — 为所有评审结果创建问题,不进行修复
    • "Ignore and continue" — 忽略所有问题直接继续
用户选择后:
路径A:"Fix critical issues"
  1. 修复每个严重问题
  2. 如果仍有重要问题或建议,询问:"是否将剩余{N}个问题添加到待办事项?"
    • "Yes" → 创建问题,记录TODOS_CREATED数量
    • "No" → 继续
  3. 提交并推送修复内容
  4. 跳转到offer_next步骤
路径B:"Fix critical & important"
  1. 修复每个严重和重要问题
  2. 如果仍有建议,询问:"是否将{N}个建议添加到待办事项?"
    • "Yes" → 创建问题,记录TODOS_CREATED数量
    • "No" → 继续
  3. 提交并推送修复内容
  4. 跳转到offer_next步骤
路径C:"Fix all issues"
  1. 修复所有严重、重要问题及建议
  2. 提交并推送修复内容
  3. 跳转到offer_next步骤
路径D:"Add to backlog"
  1. 使用
    /kata-add-issue
    为所有评审结果创建问题
  2. 记录TODOS_CREATED数量
  3. 跳转到offer_next步骤
路径E:"Ignore and continue"
  1. 跳转到offer_next步骤
为offer_next步骤的输出存储REVIEW_SUMMARY和TODOS_CREATED。 </step_7_7_handle_findings>
<anti_patterns>
  • 不要对测试回复使用AskUserQuestion — 采用纯文本对话
  • 不要询问严重程度 — 从描述中推断
  • 不要提前展示完整的检查清单 — 每次只展示一项测试
  • 不要运行自动化测试 — 这是手动用户验证
  • 不要在测试过程中修复问题 — 记录为差距,所有测试完成后再诊断 </anti_patterns>
<offer_next> 直接输出此Markdown内容(不要放在代码块中)。根据UAT结果选择对应路径:
状态路径
所有测试通过 + 存在更多阶段路径A(进入下一阶段)
所有测试通过 + 当前是最后阶段路径B(里程碑完成)
发现问题 + 修复计划已就绪路径C(执行修复)
发现问题 + 规划被阻塞路径D(手动干预)

路径A:所有测试通过,仍有未完成的阶段
步骤1:如果PR_WORKFLOW=true,在显示完成输出前暂停并询问是否合并。
使用AskUserQuestion:
  • 标题:"PR Ready for Merge"
  • 问题:"PR #{pr_number}已就绪。进入下一阶段前是否合并?"
  • 选项:
    • "Yes, merge now" — 合并PR,然后显示完成内容
    • "No, continue without merging" — 显示完成内容并附带PR状态
步骤2:处理合并回复(如果PR_WORKFLOW=true)
如果用户选择"Yes, merge now":
bash
gh pr merge "$PR_NUMBER" --merge --delete-branch
git checkout main && git pull
为下方的输出设置MERGED=true。
步骤3:显示完成输出
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► 阶段 {Z} 已验证 ✓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
阶段 {Z}: {名称}
{N}/{N} 项测试通过 UAT已完成 ✓ {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为true: PR: #{pr_number} — 已合并 ✓} {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为false: PR: #{pr_number} ({pr_url}) — 待评审} {如果存在REVIEW_SUMMARY: PR评审: {summary_stats}} {如果存在TODOS_CREATED: 待办事项: 从评审建议中创建了{N}个问题}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

▶ Next Up

▶ 下一步

Phase {Z+1}: {Name} — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
/kata-discuss-phase {Z+1} — gather context and clarify approach
<sub>/clear first → fresh context window</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Also available:
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z+1} — skip discussion, plan directly
  • /kata-execute-phase {Z+1} — skip to execution (if already planned) {If PR_WORKFLOW and not MERGED: -
    gh pr view --web
    — review PR in browser before next phase}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Route B: All tests pass, milestone complete
Step 1: If PR_WORKFLOW=true, STOP and ask about merge BEFORE showing completion output.
Use AskUserQuestion:
  • header: "PR Ready for Merge"
  • question: "PR #{pr_number} is ready. Merge before completing milestone?"
  • options:
    • "Yes, merge now" — merge PR, then show completion
    • "No, continue without merging" — show completion with PR status
Step 2: Handle merge response (if PR_WORKFLOW=true)
If user chose "Yes, merge now":
bash
gh pr merge "$PR_NUMBER" --merge --delete-branch
git checkout main && git pull
Set MERGED=true for output below.
Step 3: Show completion output
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► PHASE {Z} VERIFIED ✓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase {Z}: {Name}
{N}/{N} tests passed Final phase verified ✓ {If PR_WORKFLOW and MERGED: PR: #{pr_number} — merged ✓} {If PR_WORKFLOW and not MERGED: PR: #{pr_number} ({pr_url}) — ready for review} {If REVIEW_SUMMARY: PR Review: {summary_stats}} {If TODOS_CREATED: Backlog: {N} issues created from review suggestions}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
阶段 {Z+1}: {名称} — {来自ROADMAP.md的目标}
/kata-discuss-phase {Z+1} — 收集上下文并明确实现方案
<sub>先执行/clear → 刷新上下文窗口</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
其他可用操作:
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z+1} — 跳过讨论,直接制定计划
  • /kata-execute-phase {Z+1} — 直接进入执行阶段(如果已完成规划) {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为false: -
    gh pr view --web
    — 进入下一阶段前在浏览器中评审PR}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

路径B:所有测试通过,里程碑完成
步骤1:如果PR_WORKFLOW=true,在显示完成输出前暂停并询问是否合并。
使用AskUserQuestion:
  • 标题:"PR Ready for Merge"
  • 问题:"PR #{pr_number}已就绪。完成里程碑前是否合并?"
  • 选项:
    • "Yes, merge now" — 合并PR,然后显示完成内容
    • "No, continue without merging" — 显示完成内容并附带PR状态
步骤2:处理合并回复(如果PR_WORKFLOW=true)
如果用户选择"Yes, merge now":
bash
gh pr merge "$PR_NUMBER" --merge --delete-branch
git checkout main && git pull
为下方的输出设置MERGED=true。
步骤3:显示完成输出
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► 阶段 {Z} 已验证 ✓ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
阶段 {Z}: {名称}
{N}/{N} 项测试通过 最终阶段已验证 ✓ {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为true: PR: #{pr_number} — 已合并 ✓} {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为false: PR: #{pr_number} ({pr_url}) — 待评审} {如果存在REVIEW_SUMMARY: PR评审: {summary_stats}} {如果存在TODOS_CREATED: 待办事项: 从评审建议中创建了{N}个问题}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

▶ Next Up

▶ 下一步

Audit milestone — verify requirements, cross-phase integration, E2E flows
/kata-audit-milestone
<sub>/clear first → fresh context window</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Also available:
  • /kata-complete-milestone — skip audit, archive directly {If PR_WORKFLOW and not MERGED: -
    gh pr view --web
    — review PR in browser before audit}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Route C: Issues found, fix plans ready
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► PHASE {Z} ISSUES FOUND ⚠ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase {Z}: {Name}
{N}/{M} tests passed {X} issues diagnosed Fix plans verified ✓
审计里程碑 — 验证需求、跨阶段集成、端到端流程
/kata-audit-milestone
<sub>先执行/clear → 刷新上下文窗口</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
其他可用操作:
  • /kata-complete-milestone — 跳过审计,直接归档 {如果PR_WORKFLOW为true且MERGED为false: -
    gh pr view --web
    — 审计前在浏览器中评审PR}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

路径C:发现问题,修复计划已就绪
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► 阶段 {Z} 发现问题 ⚠ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
阶段 {Z}: {名称}
{N}/{M} 项测试通过 {X} 个问题已诊断 修复计划已验证 ✓

Issues Found

发现的问题

{List issues with severity from UAT.md}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
{从UAT.md中列出带有严重程度的问题}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

▶ Next Up

▶ 下一步

Execute fix plans — run diagnosed fixes
/kata-execute-phase {Z} --gaps-only
<sub>/clear first → fresh context window</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Also available:
  • cat ${PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md — review fix plans
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z} --gaps — regenerate fix plans
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Route D: Issues found, planning blocked
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► PHASE {Z} BLOCKED ✗ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Phase {Z}: {Name}
{N}/{M} tests passed Fix planning blocked after {X} iterations
执行修复计划 — 运行已诊断的修复内容
/kata-execute-phase {Z} --gaps-only
<sub>先执行/clear → 刷新上下文窗口</sub>
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
其他可用操作:
  • cat ${PHASE_DIR}/*-PLAN.md — 查看修复计划
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z} --gaps — 重新生成修复计划
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

路径D:发现问题,规划被阻塞
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Kata ► 阶段 {Z} 已阻塞 ✗ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
阶段 {Z}: {名称}
{N}/{M} 项测试通过 经过{X}次迭代后,修复规划仍被阻塞

Unresolved Issues

未解决的问题

{List blocking issues from planner/checker output}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
{从规划器/检查器输出中列出阻塞性问题}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

▶ Next Up

▶ 下一步

Manual intervention required
Review the issues above and either:
  1. Provide guidance for fix planning
  2. Manually address blockers
  3. Accept current state and continue
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Options:
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z} --gaps — retry fix planning with guidance
  • /kata-discuss-phase {Z} — gather more context before replanning
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── </offer_next>
<success_criteria>
  • UAT.md created with tests from SUMMARY.md
  • Tests presented one at a time with expected behavior
  • Plain text responses (no structured forms)
  • Severity inferred, never asked
  • Batched writes: on issue, every 5 passes, or completion
  • Committed on completion
  • If issues: parallel debug agents diagnose root causes
  • If issues: kata-planner creates fix plans from diagnosed gaps
  • If issues: kata-plan-checker verifies fix plans (max 3 iterations)
  • Ready for
    /kata-execute-phase
    when complete </success_criteria>
需要手动干预
查看上述问题并选择以下操作之一:
  1. 为修复规划提供指导
  2. 手动解决阻塞问题
  3. 接受当前状态并继续
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
选项:
  • /kata-plan-phase {Z} --gaps — 提供指导后重试修复规划
  • /kata-discuss-phase {Z} — 收集更多上下文后重新规划
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── </offer_next>
<success_criteria>
  • 已从SUMMARY.md中提取测试项并创建UAT.md
  • 每次展示一项测试及预期行为
  • 采用纯文本回复(无结构化表单)
  • 自动推断严重程度,不询问用户
  • 批量写入:发现问题时、每5次通过后或完成时
  • 完成后已提交UAT.md
  • 如果发现问题:并行调试Agent已诊断根本原因
  • 如果发现问题:kata-planner已根据诊断的差距创建修复计划
  • 如果发现问题:kata-plan-checker已验证修复计划(最多3次迭代)
  • 完成后已准备好执行
    /kata-execute-phase
    </success_criteria>