paper-self-review
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChinesePaper Self-Review
论文自审
A systematic paper quality checking tool that helps researchers conduct comprehensive self-review before submission.
一款系统性的论文质量检查工具，帮助研究者在投稿前进行全面的自审。
Core Features
核心功能
1. Structure Review
1. 结构评审
Check whether all sections of the paper are complete and conform to academic standards:
- Does the Abstract include problem, method, results, and contributions?
- Does the Introduction clearly articulate research motivation and background?
- Is the Method detailed enough to be reproducible?
- Do the Results sufficiently support the conclusions?
- Does the Discussion address limitations and future work?
检查论文所有章节是否完整且符合学术规范：
- 摘要是否包含问题、方法、结果和贡献？
- 引言是否清晰阐述研究动机与背景？
- 研究方法的细节是否足够支持可复现性？
- 研究结果是否充分支撑结论？
- 讨论部分是否提及研究局限与未来工作方向？
2. Logic Consistency Check
2. 逻辑一致性检查
Verify the logical coherence of the paper:
- Do research questions match the methodology?
- Does the experimental design support the research hypotheses?
- Are result interpretations reasonable?
- Are conclusions supported by evidence?
验证论文的逻辑连贯性：
- 研究问题是否与研究方法匹配？
- 实验设计是否支持研究假设？
- 结果解读是否合理？
- 结论是否有证据支撑？
3. Citation Completeness
3. 引用完整性检查
Check the completeness and accuracy of citations:
- Are all citations present in the references?
- Is the reference format consistent?
- Are key related works cited?
- Do citations accurately reflect the original content?
检查引用的完整性与准确性：
- 所有引用内容是否都在参考文献中列出？
- 参考文献格式是否统一？
- 关键相关研究是否已被引用？
- 引用内容是否准确反映原文信息？
4. Figure/Table Quality
4. 图表质量评估
Evaluate the quality and effectiveness of figures and tables:
- Do all figures/tables have clear titles and captions?
- Do figures/tables support the text narrative?
- Are figures/tables clear and readable?
- Do formats comply with journal/conference requirements?
评估图表的质量与有效性：
- 所有图表是否都有清晰的标题和说明？
- 图表是否辅助文本叙述？
- 图表是否清晰易读？
- 格式是否符合期刊/会议要求？
5. Writing Clarity
5. 写作清晰度检查
Check writing clarity and readability:
- Is the language concise and clear?
- Is technical terminology used appropriately?
- Are sentence structures clear?
- Is paragraph organization logical?
检查写作的清晰度与可读性：
- 语言是否简洁明了？
- 专业术语使用是否恰当？
- 句子结构是否清晰？
- 段落组织是否符合逻辑？
Quality Checklist
质量检查清单
Use this checklist for systematic paper self-review:
Paper Quality Checklist:
- [ ] Abstract includes problem, method, results, contributions
- [ ] Introduction clearly states research motivation
- [ ] Method is reproducible
- [ ] Results support conclusions
- [ ] Discussion addresses limitations
- [ ] All figures/tables have captions
- [ ] Citations are complete and accurate使用以下清单进行系统性论文自审：
Paper Quality Checklist:
- [ ] Abstract includes problem, method, results, contributions
- [ ] Introduction clearly states research motivation
- [ ] Method is reproducible
- [ ] Results support conclusions
- [ ] Discussion addresses limitations
- [ ] All figures/tables have captions
- [ ] Citations are complete and accurateWhen to Use
使用场景
Use this skill in the following scenarios:
- Pre-submission check - Final review before submitting to a journal or conference
- After first draft - Systematic review after completing the first draft
- Before advisor review - Self-check before requesting advisor feedback to improve quality
- Post-revision verification - After revising based on reviewer comments, verify all issues are addressed
- Collaborator review - Quality check before sending to collaborators
在以下场景中使用本Skill：
- 投稿前检查 - 向期刊或会议投稿前的最终评审
- 初稿完成后 - 完成初稿后的系统性评审
- 导师评审前 - 请导师反馈前进行自审，提升论文质量
- 修改后验证 - 根据审稿意见修改后，验证所有问题是否已解决
- 合作者评审 - 发送给合作者前的质量检查
Review Process
评审流程
Follow these steps for systematic paper review:
遵循以下步骤进行系统性论文评审：
Step 1: Structure Review
步骤1：结构评审
Start with the overall structure, checking if all sections are complete and logically coherent.
从整体结构入手，检查所有章节是否完整且逻辑连贯。
Step 2: Content Review
步骤2：内容评审
Dive into each section, checking content accuracy and completeness.
深入每个章节，检查内容的准确性与完整性。
Step 3: Citation Check
步骤3：引用检查
Verify the completeness and accuracy of all citations.
验证所有引用的完整性与准确性。
Step 4: Figure/Table Review
步骤4：图表评审
Check the quality and captions of all figures and tables.
检查所有图表的质量与说明。
Step 5: Writing Quality
步骤5：写作质量评审
Review language expression and writing clarity.
评审语言表达与写作清晰度。
Step 6: Final Checklist
步骤6：最终清单检查
Use the quality checklist for final verification.
使用质量检查清单进行最终验证。
Best Practices
最佳实践
Review Timing
评审时机
- Spaced review - Wait 1-2 days after completing the draft before reviewing to maintain objectivity
- Multiple rounds - Conduct multiple review rounds, focusing on different aspects each time
- Print review - Print a hard copy for review; issues are easier to spot on paper
- 间隔评审 - 完成初稿后等待1-2天再进行评审，保持客观性
- 多轮评审 - 进行多轮评审，每轮聚焦不同的检查维度
- 纸质评审 - 打印纸质版进行评审，纸质版更容易发现问题
Review Techniques
评审技巧
- Reverse reading - Read from conclusion backwards to check logical coherence
- Read aloud - Reading the paper aloud helps identify language issues
- Reviewer perspective - Assume you are a reviewer and read critically
- 逆向阅读 - 从结论倒着读，检查逻辑连贯性
- 朗读检查 - 大声朗读论文，有助于发现语言问题
- 审稿人视角 - 假设自己是审稿人，以批判性视角阅读
Common Issues
常见问题
- Abstract too brief or too verbose
- Introduction lacks clear research question statement
- Method lacks sufficient detail for reproduction
- Results lack statistical significance tests
- Discussion doesn't address research limitations
- Figures/tables lack clear titles and captions
- Inconsistent citation formatting
- 摘要过于简短或冗长
- 引言缺乏清晰的研究问题陈述
- 研究方法缺乏足够的可复现细节
- 结果缺少统计显著性检验
- 讨论部分未提及研究局限
- 图表缺少清晰的标题和说明
- 引用格式不一致
Summary
总结
The Paper Self-Review skill provides a systematic paper quality checking process, helping researchers identify and resolve issues before submission, improving paper quality and acceptance rates.
论文自审Skill提供了一套系统性的论文质量检查流程，帮助研究者在投稿前发现并解决问题，提升论文质量与录用率。