obsidian-literature-workflow
Original:🇺🇸 English
Translated
2 scripts
Use this skill when the user keeps paper notes inside an Obsidian project knowledge base and wants filesystem-first literature review, explicit agent-first Zotero ingestion, `Papers/` plus `Knowledge/` synthesis, collection-wide normalization, and a default literature canvas without Obsidian MCP.
6installs
Added on
NPX Install
npx skill4agent add galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar obsidian-literature-workflowTags
Translated version includes tags in frontmatterSKILL.md Content
View Translation Comparison →Obsidian Literature Workflow
Handle the literature sub-workflow inside the filesystem-first Obsidian project knowledge base.
Role in the workflow
This is a supporting skill under .
obsidian-project-memoryUse it when the user says things like:
- “My papers are in Obsidian”
- “Read papers from Zotero and create notes in the vault”
- “Review the notes under ”
Papers/ - “Generate literature knowledge notes from this project vault”
- “Connect paper notes to project knowledge”
- “Show me the literature structure as a map/graph”
- “Check whether all papers already have detailed notes”
Assumptions
- The project is already bound through , or can be imported with
.claude/project-memory/registry.yamlobsidian-project-bootstrap - Durable paper notes live under inside
Papers/Research/{project-slug}/ - Obsidian note writing is done through the filesystem; no Obsidian MCP is required
- Zotero may still be used as the source of metadata/full text; use when the source corpus is in Zotero
$zotero-obsidian-bridge
Default workflow
- Read bound project memory and locate the vault root.
- If the source papers are in Zotero, explicitly use to pull them into canonical
$zotero-obsidian-bridgenotes.Papers/*.md - Scan and adjacent synthesis notes using filesystem tools.
Papers/ - Normalize note metadata and structure using .
$obsidian-markdown- Prefer the standardized review schema:
ClaimMethodEvidenceLimitationDirect relevance to repoRelation to other papers
- Prefer the standardized review schema:
- Query narrowly first:
- read the relevant paper notes,
- then the linked notes,
Knowledge/ - and only then open if the user asked for a review or comparison deliverable.
Writing/
- Prefer updating existing paper notes and literature synthesis notes over creating sibling notes.
- Default literature synthesis should land in , not
Knowledge/orExperiments/:Results/- update
Knowledge/Literature-Overview.md - update
Knowledge/Method-Families.md - update when the synthesis is stable enough to deserve canonical notes.
Knowledge/Research-Gaps.md
- update
- If the source is a named collection and the user cares about completeness, maintain a collection inventory note with explicit coverage mapping.
- Refresh after major paper-note changes or batch note creation.
Maps/literature.canvas- Prefer argument-map structure over dense all-to-all links.
- Prefer semantic filtering and edge thinning.
- Create only when a lightweight presentation graph is needed.
Maps/literature-main.canvas
- Update the daily note and project memory with what changed.
Default outputs
- remains first-class: one durable paper note per paper whenever possible
Papers/ - holds durable literature synthesis notes
Knowledge/ - is the default visual graph surface
Maps/literature.canvas - literature work should usually produce at least one of:
- new or updated paper notes,
- new or updated knowledge notes,
- literature-canvas refresh,
- optional writing synthesis when requested
Default stance
Do not assume by default:
Concepts/Datasets/- views
.base
The literature workflow may create by default. Other artifacts still require explicit justification.
Maps/literature.canvasReferences
Load only what is needed:
- - detailed paper-note frontmatter and sections
references/PAPER-NOTE-SCHEMA.md - - how and when to refresh
references/CANVAS-WORKFLOW.mdMaps/literature.canvas