Back to Details

solo-stream

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

/stream

/stream

Interactive wizard that walks any decision through the STREAM 6-layer framework. Designed for founders making high-stakes choices under uncertainty.
交互式向导，可通过STREAM六层框架引导你完成任何决策。专为在不确定环境下做高风险抉择的创始人设计。

Steps

步骤

  1. Parse the decision from 
    $ARGUMENTS
    . If empty, ask: "What decision or dilemma do you want to analyze?"
  2. Load framework context (optional enhancement):
    • If MCP 
      kb_search
      available: 
      kb_search(query="STREAM framework", n_results=3)
      for full framework details.
    • Otherwise, the framework is embedded below.
  3. Walk through 6 layers interactively. For each layer, explain the concept, ask a clarifying question via AskUserQuestion, then provide assessment.
  1. 解析决策：从
    $ARGUMENTS
    中提取决策内容。如果为空，询问：“你想要分析的决策或困境是什么？”
  2. 加载框架上下文（可选增强功能）：
    • 如果MCP 
      kb_search
      可用：调用
      kb_search(query="STREAM framework", n_results=3)
      获取完整框架细节。
    • 若不可用，则使用下方内置的框架内容。
  3. 交互式遍历六层框架：针对每一层，先解释概念，通过AskUserQuestion提出澄清问题，然后给出评估。

Layer 1 — Epistemological (Knowledge)

第一层 — 认识论层（认知）

  • Is this within your circle of competence?
  • What assumptions are unproven?
  • What would change your mind?
  • Ask: "What do you know for certain about this space? What are you assuming?"
  • 这是否在你的能力圈范围内？
  • 哪些假设尚未被证实？
  • 什么会改变你的想法？
  • 提问：“你对这个领域有哪些确定的了解？你做出了哪些假设？”

Layer 2 — Temporal (Time)

第二层 — 时间层

  • What's the time horizon for results?
  • Is this Lindy-compliant (will it matter in 10 years)?
  • Reversibility: can you undo this in 6 months?
  • Ask: "What's your timeline? Is this a 3-month experiment or a 3-year commitment?"
  • 结果的时间跨度是多久？
  • 它符合Lindy法则吗（10年后仍有意义吗）？
  • 可逆性：6个月内可以撤销这个决定吗？
  • 提问：“你的时间规划是什么？这是一个3个月的实验还是3年的承诺？”

Layer 3 — Action (Minimum Viable)

第三层 — 行动层（最小可行行动）

  • What's the smallest possible first step?
  • What are second-order effects?
  • Can you test this in a weekend?
  • Ask: "What's the minimum viable version you could ship in 1-2 weeks?"
  • 最小的第一步行动是什么？
  • 会产生哪些二阶效应？
  • 你能在周末完成测试吗？
  • 提问：“你能在1-2周内落地的最小可行版本是什么？”

Layer 4 — Stakes (Risk/Reward)

第四层 — 风险层（风险/收益）

  • Asymmetric upside? (small downside, large upside)
  • Survivable worst case?
  • Opportunity cost of NOT doing this?
  • Ask: "What's the worst realistic outcome? Can you survive it financially and emotionally?"
  • 是否存在不对称收益（下行风险小，上行收益大）？
  • 最坏情况是否在可承受范围内？
  • 不做这件事的机会成本是什么？
  • 提问：“最现实的最坏结果是什么？你能在经济和情感上承受吗？”

Layer 5 — Social (Network)

第五层 — 社交层（人脉网络）

  • Reputation impact on your network?
  • Network effects or viral potential?
  • Does this build social capital?
  • Ask: "Who benefits besides you? Who might be hurt?"
  • 这会对你的人脉网络产生怎样的声誉影响？
  • 是否存在网络效应或传播潜力？
  • 这能积累社交资本吗？
  • 提问：“除了你之外，还有谁会受益？谁可能受到损害？”

Layer 6 — Meta (Mortality Filter)

第六层 — 元层（生死过滤器）

  • Is this worth your finite time on earth?
  • Does this align with your values?
  • Will you regret NOT trying this?
  • Ask: "If you had only 5 years left, would you still do this?"
  1. Synthesize verdict:
    • Score each layer 1-10
    • Overall STREAM score (weighted average)
    • GO (score > 7) / PAUSE (5-7) / NO-GO (< 5)
    • Key risk to mitigate
    • Recommended first action
  2. Capture the decision (optional): Offer to save the decision record. If user wants to save:
    • Write to 
      3-inbox/
      (if in solopreneur KB) or 
      docs/decisions/
      (any project)
    • Format: date + decision summary + verdict
  3. Output structured decision journal:
    ## Decision: [topic]

**Date:** [today]
**Framework:** STREAM 6-layer

### Analysis Summary
| Layer | Score | Key Finding |
|-------|-------|-------------|
| Epistemological | X/10 | ... |
| Temporal | X/10 | ... |
| Action | X/10 | ... |
| Stakes | X/10 | ... |
| Social | X/10 | ... |
| Meta | X/10 | ... |

**Overall STREAM Score: X/10 — GO/PAUSE/NO-GO**

### Recommendation
[Clear recommendation with reasoning]

### Next Actions
1. [action]
2. [action]
3. [action]
  • 这件事值得你投入有限的人生时间吗？
  • 它是否符合你的价值观？
  • 如果不尝试，你会后悔吗？
  • 提问：“如果你只剩5年寿命，你仍然会这么做吗？”
  1. 综合结论：
    • 为每一层打分（1-10分）
    • 计算整体STREAM得分（加权平均值）
    • 给出结论：GO（得分>7）/ PAUSE（5-7）/ NO-GO（<5）
    • 指出需要规避的关键风险
    • 推荐第一步行动
  2. 记录决策（可选）：主动提出保存决策记录。如果用户需要保存：
    • 写入
      3-inbox/
      （若在个体创业者知识库中）或
      docs/decisions/
      （任何项目中）
    • 格式：日期 + 决策摘要 + 结论
  3. 输出结构化决策日志：
    ## Decision: [topic]

**Date:** [today]
**Framework:** STREAM 6-layer

### Analysis Summary
| Layer | Score | Key Finding |
|-------|-------|-------------|
| Epistemological | X/10 | ... |
| Temporal | X/10 | ... |
| Action | X/10 | ... |
| Stakes | X/10 | ... |
| Social | X/10 | ... |
| Meta | X/10 | ... |

**Overall STREAM Score: X/10 — GO/PAUSE/NO-GO**

### Recommendation
[Clear recommendation with reasoning]

### Next Actions
1. [action]
2. [action]
3. [action]

Common Issues

常见问题

Questions feel too abstract

问题过于抽象

Cause: Decision not specific enough. Fix: Start with a concrete decision statement: "Should I [action] given [context]?" not just "What should I do?"
原因： 决策不够具体。 解决方法： 从明确的决策陈述开始：“在[背景]下，我是否应该[采取行动]？”而不是只问“我该怎么办？”

Score seems wrong

得分似乎不合理

Cause: Layers weighted equally but some matter more for this decision. Fix: The overall score is a starting point. Pay more attention to the layers most relevant to your situation (e.g., Stakes for financial decisions, Meta for life choices).
原因： 各层权重相同，但某些层对当前决策更重要。 解决方法： 整体得分仅为参考。请更关注与你的情况最相关的层（例如，财务决策重点看风险层，人生选择重点看元层）。

Want to save but not in KB

想要保存但不在知识库中

Cause: Running outside solopreneur knowledge base. Fix: Skill saves to 
docs/decisions/
in any project, or 
3-inbox/
in solopreneur KB. Create the directory if needed.
原因： 在个体创业者知识库外运行。 解决方法： 本工具可在任何项目中保存至
docs/decisions/
，或在个体创业者知识库中保存至
3-inbox/
。若目录不存在，请先创建。