Loading...
Loading...
Compare original and translation side by side
Protect the maker. Score the meetings. Reclaim the time.
保护创造者,为会议打分,夺回时间。
| Condition | Flow |
|---|---|
No | Onboarding Flow — instant audit from screenshot, then setup |
| Regular Flow — FAST approach, scores from configured calendar tool |
| 条件 | 流程 |
|---|---|
不存在 | 入门流程 — 通过截图快速生成审计报告,随后完成设置 |
存在 | 常规流程 — 快速模式,通过已配置的日历工具生成评分 |
.claude/calendar-audit.md.claude/calendar-audit.mdreferences/branding.mdLet's audit your calendar right now. No setup needed.
Take a screenshot of your calendar for this week (the week view works best)
and paste it here.
This is a fast first pass — we can set up automated calendar access afterwards
so future audits are hands-free.references/branding.md现在就开始审计你的日历吧,无需任何设置。
截取本周日历的截图(周视图效果最佳),并粘贴到此处。
这是快速初步审计——之后我们可以设置自动日历访问,让后续审计完全无需手动操作。How much focus time do you think you need each week?
Research says knowledge workers need 3-4 hours of uninterrupted focus daily.
I recommend at least 60% focus / 40% meetings — that's ~24h focus out of a
40h week, with at least one 4-hour contiguous block of deep work per day.
What feels right for you?
→ 60/40 (recommended — player-coach, technical leader)
→ 70/30 (IC-heavy, needs more building time)
→ 50/50 (manager-heavy, lots of direct reports)
→ Other你认为自己每周需要多少专注时间?
研究表明,知识工作者每天需要3-4小时不受干扰的专注时间。
我建议至少保持60%专注 / 40%会议的比例——即每周40小时工作时间中,约24小时用于专注工作,且每天至少要有一段4小时的连续深度工作时间。
你觉得哪种比例更合适?
→ 60/40(推荐——适合既要执行也要管理的角色、技术负责人)
→ 70/30(适合以独立贡献为主的角色,需要更多时间完成任务)
→ 50/50(适合管理为主的角色,有较多直接下属)
→ 其他references/frameworks.mdHere's your audit. Take a look at the scores.
Anything look wrong? Correct any scores and I'll regenerate suggestions.
For example: "Abdul 1:1 should be Green not Yellow" or "Sales standup
score is right but I need to keep it for political reasons"references/frameworks.md这是你的审计报告。请查看各项评分。
有没有看起来不准确的地方?可以修正任何评分,我会重新生成建议。
例如:“与Abdul的1对1会议应该是绿色而非黄色” 或 “销售站会的评分正确,但出于工作需要我必须参加”Great — that's your first audit done.
Let's set up so next time is automated. I'll ask a few quick questions
to save your preferences.1. What should I call you?
2. What's your role? (e.g. CTO, Engineering Manager, IC)
3. How many direct reports? (helps score 1:1s correctly)
4. Top 3 priorities that need deep work this quarter?
5. How should I access your calendar going forward?
Zero setup (you provide data each time):
a) Screenshot — paste an image each week
b) Copy-paste — paste your schedule as text
c) ICS file — export from any calendar app
Automated (one-time setup, then hands-free):
d) Google Calendar MCP [recommended for Google users]
e) Apple Calendar MCP [recommended for macOS]
f) icalBuddy [macOS CLI]
g) gcalcli [Google Calendar CLI]
See references/calendar-setup.md for setup instructions.
6. Which decision framework do you prefer?
a) 5-Dimension [default] — what we just used. Scores 5 factors. Most comprehensive.
b) Eisenhower — simple Urgent vs Important grid. Fastest.
c) RACI — classifies your role (Accountable/Responsible/Consulted/Informed). Best for cutting meetings where you're just "Informed".
d) Value vs Effort — scores value generated vs time invested.
e) Custom — define your own dimensions and scoring.
See references/frameworks.md for details on each.references/frameworks.md.claude/calendar-audit.mdreferences/config-guide.md.claude/modules/meeting-scores.mdYou're all set. Run /calendar-audit anytime — ideally Monday mornings.
Your config: .claude/calendar-audit.md
Meeting history: .claude/modules/meeting-scores.md很好——你的首次审计已完成。
接下来我们进行设置,让后续审计实现自动化。我会问几个简单问题来保存你的偏好设置。1. 我该如何称呼你?
2. 你的职位是什么?(例如:CTO、工程经理、独立贡献者)
3. 你有多少直接下属?(有助于准确为1对1会议打分)
4. 本季度需要深度工作支持的Top 3优先级任务是什么?
5. 后续我该如何访问你的日历?
零设置方案(每次需手动提供数据):
a) 截图——每周粘贴一张图片
b) 复制粘贴——将日程以文本形式粘贴
c) ICS文件——从任意日历应用导出
自动化方案(一次性设置,之后无需手动操作):
d) Google Calendar MCP [Google用户推荐]
e) Apple Calendar MCP [macOS用户推荐]
f) icalBuddy [macOS命令行工具]
g) gcalcli [Google Calendar命令行工具]
设置说明详见 references/calendar-setup.md。
6. 你偏好哪种决策框架?
a) 五维度模型 [默认]——我们刚刚使用的框架,从5个维度打分,最全面。
b) 艾森豪威尔矩阵——简单的紧急vs重要四象限模型,最快捷。
c) RACI模型——对你在会议中的角色进行分类(负责人/执行人/咨询人/知会人),最适合剔除那些你仅作为“知会人”的会议。
d) 价值vs投入——根据会议产生的价值与投入的时间进行评分。
e) 自定义——定义你自己的评分维度与规则。
各框架详情见 references/frameworks.md。references/frameworks.md.claude/calendar-audit.mdreferences/config-guide.md.claude/modules/meeting-scores.md设置已完成。随时运行 /calendar-audit 命令即可——建议在每周一上午使用。
你的配置文件:.claude/calendar-audit.md
会议历史记录:.claude/modules/meeting-scores.mdcalendar.tool| Tool | How |
|---|---|
| Call MCP |
| Call MCP tool for current week |
| Run: |
| Run: |
| Read file at |
| Ask user: "Paste a screenshot of your calendar for this week (week view works best)" — extract events via vision |
| Ask user: "Paste your schedule for this week as text" — parse events |
| Ask user: "List your meetings for this week (name, day, time, duration)" |
min_daily_focuscalendar.tool| 工具 | 获取方式 |
|---|---|
| 调用MCP的 |
| 调用MCP工具获取当前周的事件 |
| 运行命令: |
| 运行命令: |
| 读取 |
| 询问用户:“请粘贴本周日历的截图(周视图效果最佳)”——通过视觉识别提取事件 |
| 询问用户:“请粘贴本周日程的文本内容”——解析事件信息 |
| 询问用户:“请列出本周的所有会议(名称、日期、时间、时长)” |
min_daily_focus.claude/calendar-audit.md.claude/modules/meeting-scores.md.claude/calendar-audit.md.claude/modules/meeting-scores.mdDeep Work Budget
────────────────
Work week: [work_hours, default 40]h
Target focus ratio: [focus_ratio, default 60]%
Target focus hours: [work_hours * ratio]h
Target meeting hours: [work_hours * (1-ratio)]h
Min daily focus block: [min_daily_focus, default 4]h contiguous
Current meetings: Xh (raw) / Yh (with transitions)
Current focus: Zh
Current ratio: Z/work_hours = N%
Gap: [target - current]h to reclaimmin_daily_focus深度工作预算
────────────────
工作周时长: [work_hours, 默认40]小时
目标专注比例: [focus_ratio, 默认60]%
目标专注时长: [work_hours * ratio]小时
目标会议时长: [work_hours * (1-ratio)]小时
每日最小专注块: [min_daily_focus, 默认4]小时连续专注
当前会议时长: X小时(原始) / Y小时(含切换时间)
当前专注时长: Z小时
当前专注比例: Z/work_hours = N%
缺口: [目标值 - 当前值]小时,需夺回相应时间min_daily_focusundefinedundefined| # | Goal | Est. Time | Priority | Proposed Slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [goal from tasks/priorities] | [hours] | P1 | [day, time range] |
| 2 | [goal] | [hours] | P2 | [day, time range] |
If there's a gap, proceed to Step 3 to find meeting time to reclaim.
If no gap, still run the audit — meeting load creeps up over time.| 序号 | 目标 | 预估时长 | 优先级 | 建议时段 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [来自任务/优先级的目标] | [小时] | P1 | [日期,时间范围] |
| 2 | [目标] | [小时] | P2 | [日期,时间范围] |
若存在缺口,则进入步骤3寻找可优化的会议时间。
若无缺口,仍需运行审计——会议负荷会随时间逐渐增加。framework.namereferences/frameworks.mdframework.namereferences/frameworks.mdframework.customreferences/frameworks.mdframework.customreferences/frameworks.mdscoring.overridesscoring.overridesreferences/frameworks.mdundefinedreferences/frameworks.mdundefinedundefinedundefined.claude/modules/meeting-scores.mdundefined.claude/modules/meeting-scores.mdundefinedRunning log of meeting audit scores and decisions.
会议审计评分与决策的运行日志。
| Meeting | Last Scored | Framework | Score | Zone | User Decision | Notes |
|---|
| 会议 | 最后评分日期 | 使用框架 | 评分 | 分区 | 用户决策 | 备注 |
|---|
| Week | Framework | Meetings (h) | Focus (h) | Focus % | Meetings Optimised |
|---|
---| 周次 | 使用框架 | 会议时长(小时) | 专注时长(小时) | 专注占比 | 优化会议数量 |
|---|
---| Type | Path |
|---|---|
| Config | |
| Meeting Memory | |
| Calendar Setup Guide | |
| Decision Frameworks | |
| Config Reference | |
| Branding | |
| Weekly Notes | Varies by user's planning setup |
| Monthly Goals | Varies by user's planning setup |
| 类型 | 路径 |
|---|---|
| 配置文件 | |
| 会议历史记录 | |
| 日历设置指南 | |
| 决策框架 | |
| 配置参考 | |
| 品牌资料 | |
| 周度笔记 | 取决于用户的规划工具设置 |
| 月度目标 | 取决于用户的规划工具设置 |
| ", |