Back to Details

talk-stage4-position

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Talk Stage 4: Position + CHECKPOINT

演讲筹备第4阶段：定位 + 检查点

Generates strategic angles, titles, descriptions, and a peer-feedback draft. Then stops and waits for your angle + title choice before Stage 5 can proceed.
生成策略角度、标题、描述以及同行反馈草稿，随后停止运行并等待你选定角度和标题，再继续进行第5阶段。

When to Use This Skill

何时使用此技能

  • After Stage 3 (Concepts) — needs the concept catalogue
  • When deciding how to frame the talk
  • Before sending the CFP (uses the generated descriptions directly)
  • 第3阶段（概念梳理）完成后——需要用到概念目录
  • 确定演讲内容框架时
  • 提交CFP（会议征稿）前——可直接使用生成的描述内容

What This Skill Does

此技能的功能

  1. Reads inputs — summary + concepts + event constraints
  2. Generates angles — 3-4 distinct angles with force/weakness analysis
  3. Recommends — one clear choice with structured justification
  4. Generates titles — 3-5 options per angle
  5. Generates descriptions — short abstract + long CFP description
  6. Generates feedback draft — ready-to-send message (3 formats)
  7. CHECKPOINT — displays choice request and waits for user response
  8. Saves 4 files
  1. 读取输入内容——摘要+概念+活动限制要求
  2. 生成演讲角度——3-4个不同的角度，附带优劣势分析
  3. 给出推荐——明确推荐最优选项，并附结构化的理由说明
  4. 生成标题——每个角度对应3-5个可选标题
  5. 生成描述内容——短篇摘要+长篇CFP描述
  6. 生成反馈草稿——可直接发送的消息（3种格式）
  7. 检查点——展示选择要求，等待用户反馈
  8. 保存4个文件

Input

输入内容

  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md
    (required)
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-concepts.md
    (required)
  • Event constraints: duration, audience, CFP format if applicable
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-summary.md
    （必填）
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-concepts.md
    （必填）
  • 活动限制要求：时长、受众、CFP格式（如有）

Output

输出内容

  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
  • talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md

angles.md Format

angles.md 文件格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Talk Angles — {provisional title}

Talk Angles — {provisional title}

Goal: Choose the angle that maximizes impact for {audience}. Audience: {audience description}
Goal: Choose the angle that maximizes impact for {audience}. Audience: {audience description}

Angle 1: {Angle name}

Angle 1: {Angle name}

Pitch: {2-3 sentences describing the talk from this angle}
Strengths:
  • {strength 1}
  • {strength 2}
Weaknesses:
  • {weakness 1}
  • {weakness 2}
Audience fit: Strong / Medium / Weak — {short justification}
Verdict: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (out of 5)
[Angle 2, Angle 3, (optional Angle 4) — same structure]
Pitch: {2-3 sentences describing the talk from this angle}
Strengths:
  • {strength 1}
  • {strength 2}
Weaknesses:
  • {weakness 1}
  • {weakness 2}
Audience fit: Strong / Medium / Weak — {short justification}
Verdict: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (out of 5)
[Angle 2, Angle 3, (optional Angle 4) — same structure]

Recommendation: Angle {X}, enriched by the others

Recommendation: Angle {X}, enriched by the others

Angle {X} is the right choice. Here's why:
Angle {X} is the right choice. Here's why:

1. It's the only angle that integrates the others

1. It's the only angle that integrates the others

[Structure showing how other angles feed into the main one]
[Structure showing how other angles feed into the main one]

2. The narrative arc is natural and compelling

2. The narrative arc is natural and compelling

[Why the story holds better with this angle]
[Why the story holds better with this angle]

3. The metrics lend credibility throughout

3. The metrics lend credibility throughout

[Which metrics support this angle most]
[Which metrics support this angle most]

4. The final message emerges naturally

4. The final message emerges naturally

[How the conclusion flows from this angle]
[How the conclusion flows from this angle]

Recommended structure with sub-angles

Recommended structure with sub-angles

ActDurationMain angleIntegrated sub-angle
1. {name}{n} min{main angle}{sub-angle}
...
undefined
ActDurationMain angleIntegrated sub-angle
1. {name}{n} min{main angle}{sub-angle}
...
undefined

titre.md Format

titre.md 文件格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Titles — Talk {slug}

Titles — Talk {slug}

Selected angle: Angle {X} — {name} Constraints: {duration} min | {audience}
Selected angle: Angle {X} — {name} Constraints: {duration} min | {audience}

Titles for the recommended angle

Titles for the recommended angle

Option 1 (recommended)

Option 1 (recommended)

{Main title} Optional subtitle: {subtitle}
Strengths: {why this title works} Audience appeal: {who it hooks}
{Main title} Optional subtitle: {subtitle}
Strengths: {why this title works} Audience appeal: {who it hooks}

Option 2

Option 2

{Title} Strengths: {strengths}
[Options 3-5]
{Title} Strengths: {strengths}
[Options 3-5]

Titles for alternative angles (backup)

Titles for alternative angles (backup)

If Angle 2 chosen

If Angle 2 chosen

  • {title}
  • {title}
[If Angle 3 chosen — same]
  • {title}
  • {title}
[If Angle 3 chosen — same]

Verdict

Verdict

Recommendation: Option 1 — "{title}" Why: {short justification}
undefined
Recommendation: Option 1 — "{title}" Why: {short justification}
undefined

descriptions.md Format

descriptions.md 文件格式

markdown
undefined
markdown
undefined

Descriptions — Talk {slug}

Descriptions — Talk {slug}

Short description (abstract, ~100 words)

Short description (abstract, ~100 words)

{Full text — direct, engaging, starts with the impact or concrete promise. Not "In this talk, we will..."}
{Full text — direct, engaging, starts with the impact or concrete promise. Not "In this talk, we will..."}

Long description (CFP, ~250 words)

Long description (CFP, ~250 words)

{Full text — context, what the audience will learn, who it's for. Includes key metrics if available. Direct and factual tone.}
{Full text — context, what the audience will learn, who it's for. Includes key metrics if available. Direct and factual tone.}

Speaker pitch (bio-ready, ~50 words)

Speaker pitch (bio-ready, ~50 words)

{Speaker introduction in 1-2 sentences, their relationship to the topic}
{Speaker introduction in 1-2 sentences, their relationship to the topic}

Tags / Keywords

Tags / Keywords

{5-10 relevant tags for CFP or search}
undefined
{5-10 relevant tags for CFP or search}
undefined

CHECKPOINT (mandatory — Step 7)

检查点（强制要求——第7步）

After generating and saving the 4 files, display:
---
CHECKPOINT: Angle + Title choice

I've generated 4 files:
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md    → {n} angles analyzed
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md     → {n} title options
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md

Before starting the script (Stage 5), I need your choice:

1. Which angle do you choose? (recommended: Angle {X} — {name})
2. Which title do you prefer? (recommended: "{title}")

You can also modify, combine, or propose something different.
Reply to start the script.
---
Do not invoke Stage 5 without explicit user confirmation.
生成并保存4个文件后，展示如下内容：
---
CHECKPOINT: Angle + Title choice

I've generated 4 files:
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-angles.md    → {n} angles analyzed
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-titre.md     → {n} title options
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-descriptions.md
- talks/{YYYY}-{slug}-feedback-draft.md

Before starting the script (Stage 5), I need your choice:

1. Which angle do you choose? (recommended: Angle {X} — {name})
2. Which title do you prefer? (recommended: "{title}")

You can also modify, combine, or propose something different.
Reply to start the script.
---
未获得用户明确确认前，不得启动第5阶段。

Angle Generation Rules

角度生成规则

  • Minimum 3 angles, maximum 4 (beyond that it's noise)
  • Each angle must be genuinely distinct (not variations of the same)
  • The recommendation must be clear and argued — not "your choice"
  • Always test: "can this angle sustain the full duration without repeating?"
  • 最少3个角度，最多4个（超过会造成信息冗余）
  • 每个角度必须完全不同（不能是同一个角度的变体）
  • 推荐内容必须清晰且有论据支撑，不能仅给出“自行选择”的说明
  • 始终验证：“这个角度能否支撑整个演讲时长，不会出现内容重复？”

Anti-patterns

反面案例

  • Click-bait titles ("What nobody tells you about AI")
  • Recommending the last angle listed by default (recency bias)
  • Descriptions that read like slide summaries
  • Skipping the CHECKPOINT — it's the pipeline's most important control point
  • Marketing language in descriptions (revolutionary, game-changer)
  • 标题党式标题（"What nobody tells you about AI"）
  • 默认推荐最后列出的角度（近因偏差）
  • 描述内容读起来像幻灯片摘要
  • 跳过检查点——它是整个工作流最重要的控制点
  • 描述中使用营销话术（revolutionary、game-changer这类词汇）

Validation Checklist

验证清单

  • 3-4 angles with force/weakness/audience-fit analysis
  • Clear recommendation with structured justification
  • 3-5 titles for the recommended angle
  • Short description (~100 words) and long description (~250 words)
  • Feedback draft generated from template
  • CHECKPOINT displayed clearly
  • 4 files saved
  • 3-4个角度，附带优劣势/受众匹配度分析
  • 明确的推荐内容，附带结构化理由说明
  • 为推荐角度提供3-5个可选标题
  • 短篇描述（约100字）和长篇描述（约250字）
  • 基于模板生成的反馈草稿
  • 清晰展示检查点提示
  • 4个文件已保存

Tips

小贴士

  • Send 
    feedback-draft.md
    to a peer before the checkpoint — 10 minutes of external feedback can save hours of rework on the script
  • The recommendation is a starting point, not an order — your audience knowledge overrides any algorithmic suggestion
  • Weak titles are usually too abstract: test each title by asking "would someone in the hallway stop walking to read this?"
  • 在检查点之前将
    feedback-draft.md
    发送给同行——10分钟的外部反馈可以节省数小时的脚本返工时间
  • 推荐内容仅作为起点，不是硬性要求——你对受众的了解比任何算法建议都更有效
  • 不合格的标题通常过于抽象：可以通过提问“走廊里的人看到这个标题会不会停下来阅读？”来测试每个标题的吸引力

Templates

模板

  • Peer feedback formats: 
    templates/feedback-draft.md
  • 同行反馈格式：
    templates/feedback-draft.md

Related

相关内容

  • Stage 3: Concepts — prerequisite
  • Stage 5: Script — starts after this CHECKPOINT
  • Orchestrator
  • Stage 3: Concepts —— 前置要求
  • Stage 5: Script —— 在本次检查点完成后启动
  • Orchestrator