flock-agents - Run through a backlog autonomously

Implement a whole backlog of tickets overnight, unattended. Give it the spec (or parent issue) whose build tickets you want built; it pulls the linked tickets from the configured issue tracker, reads the spec and already-completed tickets for context, orders the open tickets by dependency, then runs one agent per ticket — each using the

/implement

skill in its own git worktree, on a model matched to the ticket's difficulty (see the model matrix below) at high reasoning effort — and leaves you your chosen deliverable in the morning: a stack of reviewed branches, one integration branch, or a ready-to-review PR.

Use when you have a pile of well-formed, session-sized build tickets and want them built AFK. These are the tracer-bullet tickets

/to-tickets

produced from a spec — not wayfinder's decision tickets. So on a wayfinder-originated effort, point flock at the spec

/to-spec

produced from the map, never the map itself: the map's children are HITL decisions, and any ticket that still needs a decision belongs in a grilling or prototype session first, not here.

Input

Ask for this first if it wasn't given:

SOURCE — the spec or parent issue whose build tickets you'll implement, as an issue number or URL. On a local-markdown tracker, SOURCE is instead the
```
.scratch/<feature>/issues/
```
backlog folder.

Also settle these three at launch — from the invocation if the user already said so, otherwise ask ONCE up front (never mid-run; nobody is awake then):

MODEL POLICY — automatic (matrix below) or user-specified per ticket or tier. Default: automatic.
DELIVERABLE — how finished work lands: (a) a stack of per-ticket branches (default), (b) one integration branch built by serialized cherry-picks in dependency order — the best format for a one-sitting morning review, or (c) pushed branch + one PR mapping commits → tickets.
EXTERNAL WRITES — exactly which outward-facing actions are authorized: close finished tickets? comment on SOURCE? push? open a PR? Default: none (tracker read-only). Bake the answers into every agent prompt.

How to turn SOURCE into its ticket set is tracker-specific: read

docs/agents/issue-tracker.md

for how this repo lists a spec's child / linked issues, reads their bodies, and exposes blocking edges. Run

/setup-matt-pocock-skills

if that file is missing.

Steps

Gather context. Read the SOURCE spec / parent issue and the already-completed (closed) tickets linked to it. Learn the established patterns and conventions, and note what is already done — so agents match existing work and never redo a closed ticket.
Enumerate the work. Pull the open tickets linked to SOURCE from the tracker — its child / sub-issues or issues referencing it, filtered to the
```
ready-for-agent
```
label (per
```
docs/agents/issue-tracker.md
```
); on a local tracker, the open ticket files in the backlog folder. Skip anything closed, merged, or still flagged as needing a decision. For each, capture its acceptance criteria and the files it is likely to touch. Gate on quality: a ticket without testable acceptance criteria, or one still hiding a design decision, is not agent-ready — set it aside for the morning report rather than letting an agent guess at it overnight.
Order into phases. Group tickets by dependency — use the tracker's native blocking edges as the primary signal (a ticket is takeable only once its blockers are closed), plus file overlap. Tickets that share files or depend on another's output must not run in the same parallel batch. Independent tickets run together; dependents run in later phases.
Preflight one worktree. Everything gitignored is missing in a fresh worktree — node_modules, generated files, env, symlink chains. Before launching anything: create one worktree, provision it, and prove the checks the tickets rely on actually pass there (typecheck at minimum). Keep the result as an idempotent setup script every lane reuses. Skipping this is the #1 way an overnight run dies: every agent stalls on the same broken toolchain — or worse, "fixes" the phantom errors it causes.

Decide how models are chosen — from the MODEL POLICY input (asking mid-flight blocks a fire-and-forget launch):

Automatic (recommended) — you, the orchestrator, pick a model tier per ticket from the matrix below, judging each by its acceptance criteria and likely blast radius (captured in step 2).
User-specified — the user names the model(s): one model for every ticket, or a per-tier / per-ticket mapping. Honour it exactly for the implementation agents and skip the matrix.

Matrix (automatic path). Match capability tiers, not specific model names — this works on whatever runtime you use (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, etc.); map each tier to the best-fitting model your runtime offers. Use the smartest, most capable model available for the hardest tickets, and drop to faster, cheaper tiers as the work gets more mechanical. When in doubt between two tiers, pick the stronger one; a failed overnight run costs more than the token difference.

Ticket profile	Model tier	Signals
Hardest: UI/UX work, cross-cutting or architectural changes, ambiguous specs, many files touched	Smartest / most capable model available	"redesign", "refactor across", visual/layout acceptance criteria, touches shared frameworks or 5+ files
Normal implementation ticket (the default)	Balanced mid-tier model	one feature or fix, clear acceptance criteria, a handful of files, established patterns to copy
Trivial: formatting, renames, config/doc tweaks, mechanical one-file changes	Fast / cheap model	no design decisions, diff is predictable from the ticket text alone

Verifier agents check a diff against acceptance criteria — catching a subtle miss is worth the strongest judgment, so run them on the smartest / most capable model available regardless of the implementation model, unless the user's specification says otherwise.

Launch the flock as a background dynamic workflow, so it survives overnight and resumes if interrupted. First check for leftovers of an interrupted earlier run (existing flock worktrees/branches, tickets with unverified commits): adopt that work — rebase, audit against the acceptance criteria, review, fix — instead of redoing it. For each ticket spawn one agent:
- in its own git worktree (isolated branch — no collisions),
- on the model chosen in step 5 at high reasoning effort,
- with the per-agent instructions below. Run phases in order; within a phase, run agents in parallel. Write every branch-prep step idempotently: a killed agent leaves a dirty worktree and a half-created branch, and a naive
```
checkout -b
```
  on re-run just dies — stash leftovers, reuse existing branches, reset only when safe.
Verify each result. After an agent commits, a separate verifier agent judges the diff against that ticket's acceptance criteria — adversarially, evidence over claims: it re-runs the checks itself rather than trusting the implementer's report, confirms the new tests actually pin the required behavior (a suite that passes without the change is vacuous), and checks commit hygiene. On failure, return the ticket to its agent ONCE with the failure notes; if it still fails, stop and flag it. Never loop unbounded overnight.
Land per the DELIVERABLE. Branch-stack mode: leave the verified branches. Integration-branch mode: one merge agent at a time — strictly serialized — cherry-picks each verified ticket in dependency order onto the integration branch; conflicted generated artifacts (declaration rollups, API reports, generated clients) are regenerated from source, never hand-merged. Then run a final cross-ticket integration gate (repo typecheck + full checks of every touched package/app): per-ticket green does not compose into collectively green. PR mode: after the gate, push and open one PR whose description maps commits → tickets → spec criteria. In every mode: no force-pushes, nothing merges to the default branch.
Report. Write a run log the user reads with coffee — a file next to the worktrees (on a local tracker, in the backlog folder): each ticket's status (done / failed / needs-decision), its branch or PR, commit shas, verifier evidence, and anything a human must resolve. Comment on SOURCE or close finished tickets only if EXTERNAL WRITES authorized it. Leave the rest for morning review — do not auto-merge.

Per-agent instructions

Give each implementation agent exactly this shape:

You own ONE ticket:
```
<ticket>
```
— fetch it from the tracker and read it fully.
Reference (read-only) the spec and these completed tickets for conventions:
```
<pointers>
```
. Match existing patterns; do not redo done work.
Invoke the
```
/implement
```
skill on this ticket only: use TDD where possible at pre-agreed seams, type-check and run single test files regularly, one full test sweep at the end.
Then run code review, and commit to your worktree branch.
If you hit a blocker or a real decision, STOP and write why — do not guess.

Before you run (unattended safety)

Pre-allowlist the shell commands the agents need (test runner, typecheck, git, package manager, and the tracker CLI — e.g.
```
gh
```
— for reading tickets and posting status). Unattended agents auto-approve file edits but will stall on a non-allowlisted command with no one to confirm.
Authorize external writes explicitly (the EXTERNAL WRITES input). Permission classifiers judge intent from what the user asked for: an unattended
```
gh issue close
```
or
```
git push
```
the user never requested gets denied mid-run, with nobody awake to approve it. Collect the authorization at launch and carry it verbatim into the prompts.
Dynamic workflows must be enabled (on by default for Max/Team/Enterprise; Pro users enable them in the Dynamic workflows row of
```
/config
```
).
Worktrees from non-interactive runs are not auto-cleaned; expect to
```
git worktree remove
```
after merging.
Fan-out multiplies token usage and draws down rate limits (workflow caps: 16 agents concurrent, 1000 per run). Size the batch to fit your plan.

flock-agents

NPX Install

Tags

SKILL.md Content

flock-agents - Run through a backlog autonomously

Input

Steps

Per-agent instructions

Before you run (unattended safety)