Back to Details

cw-voice-check

Compare original and translation side by side

🇺🇸

Original

English
🇨🇳

Translation

Chinese

Voice Check

语气风格核查

Evaluate the passage against the voice context that actually governs the assignment.
对照实际支配本次任务的语气风格语境评估段落内容。

Load Voice Context

加载语气风格语境

Read 
../../references/context-contract.md
, then load the relevant maintained voice and style sources it identifies.
Use this authority order for voice work:
  1. Explicit instructions for the current passage.
  2. The active writer and project 
    VOICE.md
    files.
  3. Project, publication, column, or platform 
    STYLE.md
    and more specific guides.
  4. Relevant curated examples from the active project's 
    examples/
    folder.
  5. Legacy 
    TASTE.md
    , only when the project still maintains it.
  6. Plugin defaults only for unresolved gaps.
Name the sources used in the assessment. Do not treat plugin defaults as the writer's identity.
读取 
../../references/context-contract.md
，然后加载该文件指明的、已维护的相关语气与风格来源。
语气风格工作遵循以下优先级顺序：
  1. 当前段落的明确指令
  2. 当前作者及项目的 
    VOICE.md
    文件
  3. 项目、出版物、专栏或平台的 
    STYLE.md
    及更具体的指南
  4. 当前项目 
    examples/
    文件夹中相关的精选示例
  5. 遗留的 
    TASTE.md
    （仅当项目仍维护该文件时参考）
  6. 仅针对未解决的空白项使用插件默认设置
需明确列出评估中使用的信息来源，不得将插件默认设置等同于作者的风格特征。

Diagnose

诊断

Check for:
  • sentence architecture and cadence;
  • diction and register;
  • specificity, scenes, examples, and stakes;
  • humor, vulnerability, priors, and distinctive asides;
  • publication or platform fit;
  • smoothing, generic symmetry, scaffolding, and other AI residue;
  • phrases copied too closely from illustrative voice-guide examples.
Preserve intentional rule-breaking when it carries the writer's point of view. Treat examples as evidence for voice rules, not a corpus to imitate.
检查以下维度：
  • 句子结构与节奏；
  • 措辞与语域；
  • 具体性、场景、示例与利害关系；
  • 幽默感、脆弱感、预设立场与独特题外话；
  • 出版物或平台适配度；
  • 平滑化、通用对称性、脚手架式表达及其他AI痕迹；
  • 与语气指南示例中措辞过于雷同的内容。
若有意打破规则是为了传递作者的观点，则应予以保留。 将示例视为语气风格规则的佐证，而非可供模仿的语料库。

Output

输出

Provide:
  1. Voice sources used — the live files or supplied instructions.
  2. Aligned — the strongest specific matches.
  3. Drift — the few highest-impact mismatches, quoted precisely.
  4. Closer revision — a usable rewrite that preserves meaning and authorship.
  5. Judgment call — any tension between writer voice and publication/platform constraints.
Do not turn the result into a generic style checklist. The test is whether this piece sounds like this writer in this context.
需提供以下内容：
  1. 使用的语气风格来源 — 实际参考的有效文件或提供的指令
  2. 符合项 — 最突出的具体匹配点
  3. 偏离项 — 影响最大的少数不匹配之处，需精确引用原文
  4. 更贴合的修订版 — 保留原意与作者特质的可用改写版本
  5. 判断说明 — 作者风格与出版物/平台约束之间的任何冲突
请勿将结果变成通用的风格清单，核查的核心是这篇内容在当前语境下是否符合该作者的表达风格。