cw-thesis
Compare original and translation side by side
🇺🇸
Original
English🇨🇳
Translation
ChineseThesis
论点
Purpose
用途
Generate 3 thesis options that crystallize the core insight of the piece.
Read and resolve available audience context, including optional or a named shared guide. The explicit assignment audience takes precedence; missing audience context does not block the task.
../../references/context-contract.mdAUDIENCE.md生成3个能够提炼文章核心洞见的论点选项。
读取 并解析可用的受众上下文，包括可选的 或指定的共享指南。明确指定的任务受众优先级最高；缺少受众上下文不会阻碍任务执行。
../../references/context-contract.mdAUDIENCE.mdInvocation
调用方式
- — Generate theses for the specified topic/piece
/cw-thesis [context] - — System asks "What's the piece about?" then generates options
/cw-thesis
- — 为指定的主题/文章生成论点
/cw-thesis [上下文] - — 系统会询问“这篇文章是关于什么的？”然后生成选项
/cw-thesis
What Makes a Good Thesis
好论点的标准
A thesis should achieve several of these qualities:
一个好的论点应当具备以下多项特质：
Core Functions
核心功能
- Reframes the familiar — Shows us something we thought we knew from a fresh angle
- Bridges domains — Connects ideas that don't usually talk to each other
- Names the unnamed — Articulates something we've felt but couldn't express
- Reveals hidden physics — Exposes the actual forces driving a situation
- Flips the script — Challenges conventional wisdom without being contrarian for sport
- 重构熟悉事物 — 从全新角度展现我们自以为了解的事物
- 跨领域联结 — 串联通常互不相关的思想
- 命名未名之物 — 清晰表达我们有所感知却无法言说的内容
- 揭示底层逻辑 — 暴露驱动特定局面的真实力量
- 反转叙事 — 挑战传统认知，但并非为了标新立异而刻意唱反调
Forms It Might Take
可能的呈现形式
- A coined term that actually helps us think (not jargon for jargon's sake)
- A paradox that reveals deeper truth
- A question that reframes the entire conversation
- Pattern recognition across unexpected domains
- A "yes, and..." that builds on existing ideas
- A synthesis that creates something genuinely new
- A distinction that clarifies muddy thinking
- A prediction grounded in observable shifts
- 一个真正有助于思考的自创术语（而非为了术语而造的行话）
- 一个揭示更深层真相的悖论
- 一个重构整个讨论框架的问题
- 跨出人意料的领域识别模式
- 基于现有观点延伸的“没错，而且……”式表达
- 一种创造出全新事物的综合提炼
- 一个厘清混乱思路的区分界定
- 一个基于可观测变化的预测
Quality Checks
质量检验标准
- Could someone build on this idea?
- Does it help readers see their own experience differently?
- Is it memorable without being gimmicky?
- Does it feel discovered rather than constructed?
- Would it spark a good dinner conversation?
- 其他人能否基于这个观点继续延伸？
- 它能否帮助读者以不同视角看待自身经验？
- 它是否令人难忘且不流于花哨？
- 它是否像是被自然发现的，而非刻意构建的？
- 它能否引发一场精彩的晚宴讨论？
How to Generate
生成方法
-
Analyze the content — What's the core insight? What's the writer actually saying?
-
Select 3 approaches that fit. Consider:
- What's the strongest version of this argument?
- What framing would make this stickiest?
- What would make a reader stop and think?
-
Generate one thesis per approach — Each should be 1-2 sentences that crystallize the insight.
-
Present all three with a brief note on the approach.
-
分析内容 — 核心洞见是什么？作者真正想表达的是什么？
-
选择3种合适的思路。考虑以下问题：
- 这个论点最有力的版本是什么？
- 什么样的框架能让它最容易被记住？
- 什么能让读者停下来深入思考？
-
每种思路生成一个论点 — 每个论点应为1-2句话，提炼核心洞见。
-
呈现全部三个论点，并附上每种思路的简要说明。
Output Format
输出格式
undefinedundefinedThesis Options
Thesis Options
Option 1: [Brief description of approach]
Option 1: [Brief description of approach]
[1-2 sentence thesis]
[1-2 sentence thesis]
Option 2: [Brief description of approach]
Option 2: [Brief description of approach]
[1-2 sentence thesis]
[1-2 sentence thesis]
Option 3: [Brief description of approach]
Option 3: [Brief description of approach]
[1-2 sentence thesis]
Which feels closest? Or want me to try a different angle?
undefined[1-2 sentence thesis]
Which feels closest? Or want me to try a different angle?
undefinedPrinciples
原则
- Arguable — Someone could disagree; it takes a position
- Specific — Not so broad it could apply to anything
- Sharp — Cuts through; not mushy or hedged
- Generative — Opens up thinking rather than closing it down
- 可商榷性 — 有人可能会反对；它持有明确立场
- 具体明确 — 不会宽泛到能套用在任何事物上
- 犀利精准 — 直击要害；不含糊其辞或模棱两可
- 启发性 — 能拓展思路而非封闭思考
Lessons
经验总结
[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]
[相关技能经验将在收集后补充至此]